Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
approaches to IR are:
1. Unitary Approach
2. Pluralistic Approach
3. Marxist Approach
These are discussed one by one
1. Unitary Approach:
The Unitary approach to IR is based on the
assumption that every one-be it employee, employer
or government-benefits when emphasis is on common
interest. Alternatively speaking, under unitary
approach, IR is founded on mutual co-operation, team
work, shared goal, and so.
Conflict at work place, if any, is seen as a temporary
aberration resulting from poor management or
mismanagement of employees. Otherwise, employees
usually accept and cooperate with management.
Conflict in the form of strikes is disregarded as
destructive.
Alwar plant of Eitcher Tractors represents one such
example of unitary approach. Nonetheless, unitary
approach is criticised mainly on two grounds. First, it is
used as a tool for keeping employees at bay from
unionism. Second, it is also seen as exploitative and
manipulative.
2. Pluralistic Approach:
British scholars in particular by A. Fox the
approach perceives that organization is a
coalition of competing interest groups
mediated by the management. At times, it
may so happen that management in its
mediating role may pay insufficient
attention to the needs and claims of
employees.
In such a situation, employees may unite in the
form of trade unions to protect their needs and
claims. As a result, trade unions become the
legitimate representatives of employees in the
organisation. Thus, the system of IR gets
grounded on the product of concessions and
compromises between management and trade
unions.
Conflict between employees and management
understood as competing interest groups, is
considered as inevitable and, in fact, necessary
also. Normally, employees are not that much
forceful in negotiation process as much
management is. Hence, employees join trade
unions to negotiate with management on equal
terms to protect their interests.
Like unitary approach, pluralistic approach
also suffers from certain limitations.
The basic assumption of this approach
that, employees and management do not
arrive at, an acceptable agreement do not
hold good in a free society.
This is because a society may be free, but
power distribution is not necessarily equal
among the competing forces.
3. Marxist Approach
Like pluralists, marxists also view conflict
between labour and management as
inevitable. But marxists unlike pluralists,
regard conflict as a product of the capitalist
society based on classes. According to
marxists conflict arises because of division
within society in terms of haves i.e., capitalists
and have nots i.e., labour. The main objective
of capitalists has been to improve productivity
by paying minimum wages to labour. Labour
views this as their exploitation by the
capitalists.
The marxists do not welcome state intervention as, in their view, it
usually supports managements interest. They view the pluralistic
approach is supportive of capitalism and the unitary approach as an
anathema. Therefore, the labour-capital conflict, according to
marxist approach, cannot be solved by bargaining, participation and
cooperation.
Election Disputes
Strike Fund
Trade Union Journals
1) Strikes
A cessation of work by a body of persons
employed in an industry acting in
combination, or a concerted refusal or a
refusal under a common understanding of any
number of persons who are or have been so
employed to continue to work or to accept
employment .
Item 2012 (January & June) 2013 (January & June) (P) 2014 (January & June)
(P) (P)
Centr State Total Central State Total Central State Total
al Sphere Sphere Sphere Sphere Sphere
Spher
e
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A: Industrial Units
affected by:
(I) Strikes 104 53 157 69 40 109 20 39 59
(II) Lockouts - 151 151 - 11 11 - 14 14
(III) Mandays Lost 640,3 3,543,8 4,184, 1,035,63 885,440 1,921,0 640,62 481,49 1,122,
95 83 278 2 72 5 2 119
B: Workers Affected as a
result of:
(I) Strikes 653,0 33,405 686,4 543,462 123,246 666,70 336,81 9,003 345,8
34 39 8 1 14
(II) Lockouts - 54,970 54,97 - 3,312 3,312 - 4,599 4,599
0
P = Provisional and based on the returns/ clarifications received in the Bureau till
1st May, 2014.- = Nil
2012(P) 2013(P) 2014(P)
January to March January to March January to March
Central State Total Central State Total Central State Total
Sphere Sphere Sphere Sphere Sphere Sphere
A.
Industrial
Units Affected
by:
- 6 6 14 2 16 1 5 6
(iv) Retrenchm - 32 32 - 10 10 - 11 11
ents
(v) Closures
B. Workers
affected as a
result of:
- 201 201 1167 117 1284 373 35 408
(iii) - 892 892 - 265 265 - 416 416
Retrenchments
(iv) Closures
While Tata Motors has decided to move its Nano factory out of Singur after violent
protests by farmers, this isn't the first time that there has been a standoff between
industry and farmers unwilling to surrender land.
Here are four other large industrial projects in India that have recently been wracked
by protests
1 In August, the Supreme Court gave South Korean steel firm POSCO the use of large
swathes of forestland in Orissa for a $12-billion plant that protesting farmers said
would displace thousands of people. The protests delayed the start of construction on
the plant, which could be India's single biggest foreign investment to date.
2 In the same month, the Supreme Court allowed Vedanta Resources to mine bauxite
in hills considered sacred by tribal people in Orissa. The mining would feed an alumina
refinery, part of an $800-million project that has been widely opposed.
Environmentalists say the open-cast mine will wreck the rich biodiversity of the remote
hills and disrupt key water sources vital for farming.
3 Goa, famous for its beaches and tourist industry, in January dropped plans to build
special economic zones for industry after protests from political and environmental
groups.
4 West Bengal last year aborted a plan for a special economic zone for a chemicals
complex in Nandigram after fierce protests. At least 35 villagers were killed in clashes
between locals and communist party workers and the state government put all SEZs on
hold in the state.