Study Objective: Learn about the significance and role of money in macroeconomic analysis. Skills: Define money as a means of payment. Skills: Show the logic why money must be an intermediated MOP. Keywords: MOP, intermediation, necessary and sufficient conditions Theoretical issues: What is the significance of money in macroeconomic analysis? Questions for discussion: What is money if it is not a means of payment? Can money arise spontaneously? Can money arise without intermediation? M Gani (2016): Principles of Macroeconomics 1 202 PrinceMacro 6 The puzzle and the paradox of money Money is the most puzzling phenomenon in economics. It occupies the oldest and the largest segment of the economic literature, but it remains a big mystery. Fiat money is intrinsically worthless, and yet nearly all people are eager to get it. It is extremely hard to find somebody who will take a real good in payment for some real good. But it is easy to find one who will take money. Again though everybody wants to get it, nobody wants to keep it, but wants to spend it sooner or later. The absence of money aborts production of real good. The perfect money such as e-money has no physical existence at all, M Gani (2016): Principles of Macroeconomics 2 202 PrinceMacro 6
The Significance of Money
The practical significance of money is that it is the only possible vehicle to transmit the effect of one agents action on the other agents through a transmission process that spreads the effect of money across the entire economy. Macroeconomic events are impossible without money, as there is nothing else to propagate the events. The theoretical significance of money as a MOP is that it recognizes the agent to agent relation of reciprocal claims and obligations. Old ideas about money did not recognize this relation and hence missed out on the complete specification of the equilibrium of the market. In macro theory, if there is no money, there is no meaning. The analysis of the necessary function of money as a MOP changes economic theory completely. M Gani (2016): Principles of Macroeconomics 3 202 PrinceMacro 6 A Proper Definition of Money A logically proper definition must have two parts: the genus and the differentium. The genus identifies the class to which the entity belongs, because anything must be something. The differentium identifies the unique properties of the object or entity to show how it differs from other members of the same class. Following this logical dictum, consistent economics defines money as an intermediated means of payment. First, the genus is MOP. A MOP is anything that satisfies the buyers obligation and the sellers claim. There are three genuine types of MOP: 1. barter as a real good paying for another real good; 2. money as a device allowing transfer of claims and obligations of specified value, 3. a bond as a promise to pay in the future. M Gani (2016): Principles of Macroeconomics 4 202 PrinceMacro 6 Definition of Money Contd.. No matter whatever else money may be, nobody will call it money if it fails to serve as a MOP. Something that nobody accepts in payment for a real good is something, but not money. The differentium is the qualifier intermediated. Money is the only MOP that is intermediated. It is passed by an intermediary from one agent to another. Thus an ordinary agent becomes an intermediary between two strangers. The intermediary takes the money from his customer, and then gives it over to his supplier, even as the customer is usually totally unknown to the supplier.
M Gani (2016): Principles of Macroeconomics 5
202 PrinceMacro6 Definition of Money Contd.. The mystery of money is that it is a device to transfer claims and obligations. An intermediary as seigneur must bear the risk that the device will serve its function. Money cannot be created without an intermediary taking up the responsibility of managing the claims and obligations of agents who do not trust each other, and most often who never even meet each other. Previous economics could not define money because it never learned about the reciprocity relation of payment between agents. Without a theory of payment, there was just no way of seeing money as a MOP. Indeed, the most difficult part was to see the intermediation in the circulation of money. M Gani (2016): Principles of Macroeconomics 6 202 PrinceMacro 6 Showing how money acts as a MOP The relation between a real good and money is one of reciprocity. Let a first subscript denote the seller and a second denote the buyer. A minimal case of indirect trade needs at least three goods and three agents. Suppose that agent A sells food qAB to agent B, who then pays back with money mBA. Next, agent A buys real good qCA from agent C, and pays with money mAC. Then between two real goods (qAB|qCA) money enters in the interim as the MOP. IT may be shown as B C {(qAB| mBA): : (mAC | qCA)}
Agent A takes money from agent B and gives money to agent C.
M Gani (2016): Principles of Macroeconomics 7 202 PrinceMacro 6 Money implements reciprocity A social rule of exchange is the rule of reciprocity. If agent A gives some good (say food, qAB) to agent B, then A earns a claim on B while B incurs an obligation to A. That is, B and nobody but B must pay A. Hence there must be a payment from B to A. B may pay with a real good (qBA) or money (mBA) or bond (fBA). Reciprocity is seen in the juxtaposition of the subscript order (AB|BA). Under indirect trade with money, there is no reciprocity between real goods (qAB, qCA) with (AB|CA), but there is two-step reciprocation. First, between A and B, (qAB |mBA) has reciprocity (AB|BA). Secondly, between A and C, there is reciprocity (mAC | qCA) with juxtaposition (AC|CA). Note that the same money is denoted by (mBA = mAC) to show the concerned agents who give and who take the money. The inner agent A in (BA|AC) is the intermediary between the outer agents B and C.
M Gani (2016): Principles of Macroeconomics
8 202 PrinceMacro 6 No Intermediation, No Money It is clear that money cannot arise without an intermediary. Even the ordinary agent who does not intend to act as an intermediary must act as one between his customer from whom he takes money and the supplier to whom he gives money. At a greater depth, nobody would take money if they did not expect others to take it from them in exchange for the desired kind of real good. For money to be generally acceptable, there must be a deliberate act of intermediation by the original issuer of money, who must lend the money and then take it back in repayment of the loan. M Gani (2016): Principles of Macroeconomics 9 202 PrinceMacro 6 Money cannot arise spontaneously Carl Menger, the founder of the Austrian School, argued that money and other social institutions arose spontaneously. Consistency analysis disproves this. It claims that money must be created deliberately by a seigneur who must bear the risk of managing the claims and obligations of people who on their won do not trust each other. The key problem is that issuer of money must assume the risk of recovering the loan. It is a common mistake to suppose that if people trust the banker, he can issue money. It is just the opposite. If the banker trusts the people, he can issue money as loan, because a banker cannot issue money excp0et as a loan. M Gani (2016): Principles of Macroeconomics 10 202 PrinceMacro 6 The Meaning of Money