Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1
Microsoft
What is the central issue in the Microsoft case?
2
Microsoft
3
Microsoft
How is it that Microsoft could have such a large market cap and such a
low book value of equity?
4
Is this how you would expect the balance sheet to look for
the largest company in the world?
1997 1998 1999
Current Assets
Cash 8,966 13,927 17,236
Accts Receivable 980 1,460 2,245
Other 427 502 752
Total Curr. Assets 10,373 15,889 20,223
PP&E 1,465 1,505 1,611
Equity Investments 2,346 4,703 14,372
Other 203 260 940
Total Assets 14,387 22,357 37,156
5
Is this how you would expect the balance sheet to look for
the largest company in the world?
1997 1998 1999
Current Liabilities
Accts Pay 721 759 874
Accrued Comp 336 359 396
Income tax pay 466 915 1,607
Unearned Rev 1,418 2,888 4,239
Other 669 809 1,602
Total Liabilities 3,610 5,730 8,718
Equity
Convertible Preferred 980 980 980
Common Stock 4,509 8.025 13,844
Retained earnings 5,288 7,622 13,614
Total S/E 10,777 16,627 28,438
(see earlier slide)
6
Total liab & Equity 14,387 22,357 37,156
Session 8
Microsoft
How is it that Microsoft could have such a large market cap and such a
low book value of equity?
- Intangible Assets
- Intellectual Property
- Brand Value
- Human Capital
- Customer loyalty
- Growth opportunities
- Conservative Accounting Choices
Focus of this class 7
Market value = Book value ++
8
Back to Microsoft
10
Capitalizing Software Development
What are the accounting rules for capitalizing
software development costs?
Costs are charged to R&D (i.e., expensed) until the
firm achieves technological feasibility.
Once technological feasibility has occurred, costs
are capitalized and expensed over the useful life of
the software.
Technological feasibility depends on the
completion of a detailed model, and/or a working
model.
11
Capitalizing Software Development
13
Capitalizing Software Development: Materiality
Suppose that:
60% of R&D represents software development costs that should be
capitalized, and
the product has a 2 year useful life.
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
R&D 860 1,326 1,863 2,601 2,970
60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60%
Capitalizable costs 516 796 1,118 1,561 1,782
R&D to be expensed 344 530 745 1,040 1,188
14
Capitalizing Software Development:
Balance Sheet effects
15
Capitalizing Software Development:
Balance Sheet effects
258 = 516/2
16
Capitalizing Software Development:
Balance Sheet effects
17
Capitalizing Software Development:
Income Statement Effects
18
Capitalizing Software Development:
Income Statement Effects
19
Capitalizing Software Development:
Income Statement Effects
Is this material?
How do these numbers compare to net income in 1999? 1998?
Is this the only conservative accounting choice?
20
Unearned Revenue
- Income is understated.
- Equity is understated.
21
Unearned Revenue
How would you estimate the impact of the decision to defer revenue,
assuming all revenue was earned?
22
Unearned Revenue
How would you estimate the impact of the decision to defer revenue,
assuming all revenue was earned?
23
Fool.com Article (July 1, 1999)
24
Session 8
Fool.com Article (continued)
Microsoft will now recognize 75% to 90% of revenue from new products
up front, instead of 65% to 80%, and spread the rest over the life cycle of
the product
The company will extend the life cycle of Windows operating systems to
three years from two
25
Session 8
What happened?
Changes in Unearned Revenue
In 1999 Microsoft changed its policies it decreased the amount of
revenue it deferred (from 20-35% to 15-25%), but increased useful life
from 2 to 3 years.
2,000
1,800
1,600
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
additions
600
usage
400
200
-
Dec-97 Mar-98 Jun-98 Sep-98 Dec-98 Mar-99 Jun-99 Sep-99 Dec-99
Why would Microsoft choose to be conservative?
Incentives to hide profits?
Antitrust regulation concerns that Microsoft is a monopoly
Other regulators SEC, congress, regulators from other countries are
all interested in Microsofts performance
Competitors Profitable companies encourage entrance into the
market.
Other Incentives?
Financial reporting conservatism as competitive strategy
Avoid complacency, maintain pressure on employees
Force competitors to choose conservative strategies
How does Microsofts Gloom and Doom approach towards financial
analysts fit in?
Incentives to smooth income?
27
Microsoft: Take-Aways
Microsoft provides a nice counter-example to income increasing
earnings management.
28