Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Pragmatics
Tth Sra
Danyis Nikolet
Context
1. Background to the notion of authorship and
ownership
a) Premodern understanding
b) Modern understanding
c) Postmodern understanding
2. Development of textual ownership
3. Relationship between different approaches to texts
4. Discussion of some general implication for
understanding text, ownership and learning
1. Background
An example raised questions about:
a. ownership, practices of memory and writing
b. Textual borrowing (acceptable or unacceptable)
c. Boundaries drawn
d. Different relationships to text and memorization in
different cultural context
Cultural and historical specificity of notions of
ownership and authorship international norms
Plagiarism: in terms of particular cultural and
educational context
Premoden = mimetic era
Biblical, classical, medieval era
Image as a representation of reality, as a means
through which nature and God could be worshiped
Monotheistic religions are still tied to a position that it
is divine, not human, inspiration that produced their
texts
Modern = productive era
Great shift of thinking in Europe = Enlightenment
Imagination viewed as a productive force
Earlier onto-theological view of meaning the
humanist subject is the center of creativity
Great store on the authority and authenticity
Modern = productive era
Development of print created a new sense of private
ownership of words
History of literary plagiarism started to emerge
Textual borrowing has always been common (Romans)
Studies of literary plagiarism (Mallon, Shaw)
Spurious quotations and misquotations
1) Nothing to say?
2) Hard to pin down the real originator of a quotation
Postmodern = parodic era