Asokoro Cluster 5 June 2017 Pre by Chika

Cluster drive report
ABUJA Asokoro CLUSTER 5
30th JUNE, 2017
MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 1 (5)

summary
Region Abuja.
Cluster Name Asokoro Cluster 5.
Drive test done 30th JUNE, 2017.
Number of 2G/3G cells served 95/103
DT Tool version - TEMs investigation13.1
DT model
MS1 on 2G (Dedicated mode) -Medium Call
MS2 on 3G (Dedicated mode) Medium Call
MS3 on IRAT (Dedicated mode) Medium Call

KPIs Summary
Observations & Recommendations
Site distribution & Drive route
Rx level & Rx quality plot
Gsm
SQI & SQI MOS plot
performance
Cell ID plot
SHORT CALL
Event failure plot & analysis
Performance analysis

KPIs summary
2G DEDICATED MODE
Drive Test KPI 30/06/2017 KPIs Unit MTN

Call Initiation - 58
2G Call Setup Success Rate (Speech) 94.83
Call Attempts - 58
2G Block Call Rate (Speech) 5.17
Call Setup Success - 55
2G Drop Call Rate (Speech)
18.18
Call Setup Success rate % 94.83
2G Handover Success Rate (Speech)
97.70 Blocked Calls - 3
2G Coverage Reliability (RxLev > -95dBm) Blocked Call rate % 5.17
76.60
2G Voice Quality (RxQual < 5) Dropped Calls - 10
85.48
Dropped Call rate % 18.18
2G Speech Quality (SQI) 95.76
2G Speech Quality (MOS) 71.22 Total Handover Attempts - 174
2G Call Setup Time in Sec Total Handover Success - 170

4.05
Handover Success rate % 97.70
Total Location Update

- 14
Requests
Total Location Update
- 14
Success
Location Update Success
% 100.00
rate

OBSERVATIONS:
P1 Poor Quality due to overshooting of T1376DA and short height of T1227.
P2 Poor Quality/Handover failure due to short height of T1227 and overshooting of T1336DC. .
P3 Drop call due to overshooting of T1335C
P4 Dropped call due to overshooting of FC2390D.
P5 Poor quality/Handover Failure due to network outage on FC2027D and overshooting of FC1323F.
P6 Poor quality due to interference from FC2256D.
P7 Drop call due to interference from FC2042B.
P8 Poor Quality/Drop Call / Handover Failure due to feeders swap on T1115A, T1115B and T1115C
RECOMMNEDATIONS:
P1 Increase the antenna height at T1227 and down tilt T1376DA.
P2. Increase the antenna height at T1227 and down tilt T1336DC.
P3. Down tilt T1335C.
P4 Down tilt FC2390D.
P5 Check and Resolve hardware issue on FC2027D and down tilt FC1323F. .
P6 Consider frequency retune for FC2256D and T1115DA
P7 Consider frequency retune for FC2042B and T1335B
P8 Check and correct feeders swap on T1115A, T1115B and T1115C.

2G DEDICATED MODE: Site distribution & Drive route

2G DEDICATED MODE: RX level PLOT

RX level status
RX LEVEL STATUS 30/06/2017
Rx Level Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[-70, Max] 836 22.49% 22.49%
[-81, -70] 1440 38.73% 61.22% 76.60% GOOD
[-85, -81] 572 15.38% 76.60%
[-95, -85] 716 19.26% 95.86%
22.16% Acceptable
[-100,-95] 108 2.90% 98.76%
[Min, -100] 46 1.24% 100.00% 1.24% BAD

2G DEDICATED MODE: RX QUALITY PLOT

quality status
RX QUALITY STATUS 30/06/2017
Rx Quality Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
Min,2 1944 60.04% 60.04%
2,4 587 18.13% 78.17% 85.48% GOOD
4,5 237 7.32% 85.48%
5,6 160 4.94% 90.43%
9.64% Acceptable
6,7 152 4.69% 95.12%
7,Max 158 4.88% 100.00% 4.88% BAD

2G sqi DBQ plot

2G sqI DBQ status
SQI STATUS 30/06/2017
CPICH EcNo Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[30, Max] 890 28.84% 28.84%
[20, 30] 1560 50.55% 79.39%

95.76% GOOD
[10, 20] 394 12.77% 92.16%
[0, 10] 111 3.60% 95.76%
[-10, 0] 52 1.69% 97.44%

4.24% Acceptable
[-20, -10] 79 2.56% 100.00%
[Min, -20] 0 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% BAD

2G sqi mos status

2G sqI MOS status
SQI MOS STATUS 30/06/2017
SQI MOS Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[3.9 , Max] 1339 43.50% 43.50%
71.22% Good
[3.5 ,3.9] 853 27.71% 71.22%
[2 , 3.5] 659 21.41% 92.63%
23.52% Acceptable
[1.5 , 2] 65 2.11% 94.74%
[Min , 1.5] 162 5.26% 100% 5.26% Bad

2G cell id plot

2G speech codec plot

2G ACTIVE codec plot

2G EVENT FAILURE plot

2G DEDICATED MODE FREQUENCY BAND

KPIs Summary
RSCP & Ecno plot
Wcdma
CQI & SQI MOS plot
performance
UE TX power
SHORT CALL
PSC plot

KPIs summary
3G DEDICATED MODE
3G Call Setup Success Rate (Speech) 98.31 Call Initiation - 62
3G Block Call Rate (Speech) 1.69 Call Attempts - 59
3G Drop Call Rate (Speech) 18.97
Call Setup Success - 58
3G Soft Handover Success Rate (Speech) 54.70
Call Setup Success rate % 98.31
3G Coverage Reliability (RSCP > -95dBm) 99.31
3G Voice Quality (Ec/No > -14) Blocked Calls - 1
47.44
3G Speech Quality (SQI) 94.15 Blocked Call rate % 1.69
3G Speech Quality (MOS) 46.12 Dropped Calls - 11

3G Call Setup Time in Sec 3.75 Dropped Call rate % 18.97
Total SHO Attempts - 1181
Total SHO Success - 646
SHO Success rate % 54.70
Radio link addition - 538
Radio link addition failure - 0
Success rate 100.00

OBSERVATIONS:
P1. Poor Ec/No due to pilot pollution from FC0035X and FC2135Y
P2. Poor Ec/No due to short height of T1227
P3. Poor Ec/No due to pilot pollution from FC2361W and T0136GC
P4. Poor Ec/No due to pilot pollution from FC0012P and FC3112V.
P5. Poor Ec/No due to pilot pollution from FC0012U and FC2442W
P6. Poor Ec/No due to pilot pollution from FC2361U, FC3112V and T0316GC.
P7. Poor Ec/No due to pilot pollution from FC2442Z and FC2211X.
P8. Poor Ec/No / Drop Call due to over shooting of FC0047W, FC0210U and FC1056GA.
P9. Poor Ec/No due to over shooting of FC0097V.
P10. Poor Ec/No due to pilot pollution from FC0097Y and T1056GD.
P11. Poor Ec/No due to over shooting of FC0210U.
P12. Poor Ec/No due to over shooting of T1056GD.
P13. Poor Ec/No due to pilot pollution from FC2027Y and FC0090Z.
P14. Poor Ec/No due to pilot pollution from FC2027W and T1056GA
P15. Poor Ec/No due to over shooting of FC2224Y.
P16. Poor Ec/No/Drop Call due to missing neighbor between FC2224Y and T6066GA.
P17. Poor Ec/No due to over shooting of T1335GC.
P18. Poor Ec/No due to network outage on FC2042 and overshooting of T1115GF.
P19. Poor Ec/No due to network outage on FC2042 and over shooting of FC2361Y and T1335GE.
P20. Poor Ec/No due to pilot pollution from FC0033P and T1056GA.
P21. Poor Ec/No due to over shooting of FC2027Y .
P22. Poor Ec/No due to pilot pollution from T1115GD, T1056GD and FC0210X.

RECOMMNEDATIONS:
P1. Down tilt FC0035X and FC2135Y
P2. Increase the antenna height at T1227 .
P3. Down tilt FC2361W and T0136GC.
P4. Down tilt FC0012P and FC3112V. .
P5. Down tilt FC0012U and FC2442W.
P6. Down tilt FC2361U, FC3112V and T0316GC
P7. Down tilt FC2442Z and FC2211X .
P8. Down tilt FC0047W, FC0210U and FC1056GA.
P9. Down tilt FC0097V.
P10. Down tilt FC0097Y and T1056GD
P11. Down tilt FC0210U
P12. Down tilt T1056GD. .
P13. Down tilt FC2027Y and FC0090Z.
P14. Down tilt FC2027W and T1056GA.
P15. Down tilt FC2224Y.
P16. Add FC2224Y to the neighbor list of T6066GA.
P17. Down tilt T1335GC
P18. Verify and bring up FC2042 and down tilt T1115GF
P19. Verify and bring up FC2042 and down tilt FC2361Y and T1335GE .
P20. Down tilt FC0033P and T1056GA.
P21. Down tilt FC2027Y .
P22. Down tilt T1115GD, T1056GD and FC0210X.

3G DEDICATED MODE: Site distribution & Drive route

3G DEDICATED MODE: RSCP PLOT

RSCP status
CPICH RSCP STATUS 30/06/2017
CPICH RSCP Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[-75, Max] 2041 54.48% 54.48%
[-85, -75] 1193 31.85% 86.33% 99.31% GOOD
[-95, -85] 486 12.97% 99.31%
[-105, -95] 26 0.69% 100.00%
0.69% Acceptable
[-115,-105] 0 0.00% 100.00%
[Min, -115] 0 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% BAD

3G DEDICATED MODE: ECNO PLOT

ECNO status
CPICH EcNo STATUS 30/06/2017
[-8, Max] 634 16.92% 16.92%
[-10, -8] 527 14.07% 30.99% 47.44% GOOD
[-12, -10] 616 16.44% 47.44%
[-14, -12] 1049 28.00% 75.44%
45.25% Acceptable
[-16,-14] 646 17.25% 92.69%
[Min, -16] 274 7.31% 100.00% 7.31% BAD

3G sqi DBQ plot

3G sqI dbq status
[30, Max] 438 15.08% 15.08%
[20, 30] 1736 59.76% 74.84% 94.15% GOOD
[10, 20] 494 17.01% 91.84%
[0, 10] 67 2.31% 94.15%
[-10, 0] 37 1.27% 95.42%

5.85% Acceptable
[-20, -10] 133 4.58% 100.00%
[Min, -20] 0 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% BAD

3G sqi mos plot

3G sqI & sqi mos status
[3.9 , Max] 430 14.88% 14.88%
46.12% Good
[3.5 ,3.9] 903 31.25% 46.12%
[2 , 3.5] 1270 43.94% 90.07%
46.89% Acceptable
[1.5 , 2] 85 2.94% 93.01%
[Min , 1.5] 202 6.99% 100% 6.99% Bad

3G UE TX POWER

3G UE TX POWER status
TXPOWER STATUS 30/06/2017
[Min, -30] 179 5.58% 5.58%
[-30, -20] 583 18.18% 23.76%

86.40% GOOD
[-20, -10] 1072 33.43% 57.19%
[-10, 0] 937 29.22% 86.40%
[0, 10] 404 12.60% 99.00%
13.60% Acceptable
[10, 20] 32 1.00% 100.00%
[20, Max] 0 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% BAD

Pilot pollution plot

Pilot pollution status
PILOT POLLUTION STATUS 30/06/2017
Pilot Pollution Status Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
Sole Server - Strong 1002 26.75% 26.75%
71.70% Good
Sole Server - Marginal 1684 44.95% 71.70%
Dominant Server 540 14.42% 86.12% 14.42% Acceptable
Weak Pilot 520 13.88% 100% 13.88% Bad

3G PSC

3G EVENT FAILURE plot

KPIs Summary
Rx level, Rx Quality, RSCP & Ecno plot
irat
SQI, CQI, SQI MOS plot
performance
Cell ID & PSC plot
SHORT CALL

KPIs summary
IRAT DEDICATED MODE
IRAT Call Setup Success Rate (Speech) 91.23 Call Initiation - 59
IRAT Block Call Rate (Speech) 8.77
Call Attempts - 57
IRAT Drop Call Rate (Speech) 26.92
IRAT Handover Success Rate (Speech) 2G Call Setup Success - 52
99.32
IRAT Soft Handover Success Rate (Speech) 3G 67.39 Call Setup Success rate % 91.23
IRAT Coverage Reliability (RX LEV/RSCP > -
77.43/98.04 Blocked Calls - 5
95dBm)
IRAT Voice Quality (RxQual/ECNO < 5/-14) 87.56/43.61 Blocked Call rate % 8.77
IRAT Speech Quality (SQI) 97.18
Dropped Calls - 14
IRAT Speech Quality (MOS) 73.68
Dropped Call rate % 26.92
IRAT Call Setup Time in Sec 3.76
Total Handover Attempts - 146
Total Handover Success - 145
Handover Success rate % 99.32
Total SHO Attempts - 92
Total SHO Success - 62
SHO Success rate % 67.39

IRAT SHORT CALL: COMPARISON RX LEV & RSCP PLOT

RSCP & RX LEV status
RX LEVEL STATUS 30/06/2017
Rx Level Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[-70, Max] 746 23.03% 23.03%
[-81, -70] 1312 40.51% 63.54% 77.43% GOOD
[-85, -81] 450 13.89% 77.43%
[-95, -85] 614 18.96% 96.39%

21.55% Acceptable
[-100,-95] 84 2.59% 98.98%
[Min, -100] 33 1.02% 100.00% 1.02% BAD
CPICH RSCP STATUS 30/06/2017
CPICH RSCP Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
[-75, Max] 252 49.51% 49.51%
[-85, -75] 148 29.08% 78.59% 98.04% GOOD
[-85, -85] 99 19.45% 98.04%
[-105, -95] 10 1.96% 100.00%

1.96% Acceptable
[-115,-105] 0 0.00% 100.00%
[Min, -115] 0 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% BAD

IRAT SHORT CALL: COMPARISON RX QUAL & EcNo PLOT

ECNO & quality status
RX QUALITY STATUS 30/06/2017
Rx Quality Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks
Min,2 1623 62.52% 62.52%
2,4 464 17.87% 80.39% 87.56% GOOD
4,5 186 7.16% 87.56%
5,6 126 4.85% 92.41%

8.36% Acceptable
6,7 91 3.51% 95.92%
7,Max 106 4.08% 100.00% 4.08% BAD
CPICH EcNo STATUS 30/06/2017
[-8, Max] 57 11.20% 11.20%
[-10, -8] 65 12.77% 23.97% 43.61% GOOD
[-12, -10] 100 19.65% 43.61%
[-14, -12] 183 35.95% 79.57%

51.47% Acceptable
[-16,-14] 79 15.52% 95.09%
[Min, -16] 25 4.91% 100.00% 4.91% BAD

IRAT sqi dbq & sqi mos PLOT

IRAT sqi & sqi mos status
[30, Max] 828 30.70% 30.70%
[20, 30] 1447 53.65% 84.35%
97.18% GOOD
[10, 20] 272 10.09% 94.44%
[0, 10] 74 2.74% 97.18%
[-10, 0] 30 1.11% 98.29%
2.82% Acceptable
[-20, -10] 46 1.71% 100.00%
[Min, -20] 0 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% BAD
[3.9 , Max] 1218 45.41% 45.41%

73.68% Good
[3.5 ,3.9] 758 28.26% 73.68%
[2 , 3.5] 574 21.40% 95.08%

22.93% Acceptable
[1.5 , 2] 41 1.53% 96.61%
[Min , 1.5] 91 3.39% 100% 3.39% Bad

IRAT CELL ID & PSC PLOT

IRAT EVENT FAILURE plot

EVENT FAILURE ANALYSIS
The analyses are in files embedded below

Thank you!!!

Asokoro Cluster 5 June 2017 Pre by Chika

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Asokoro Cluster 5 June 2017 Pre by Chika

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Cluster drive report

ABUJA Asokoro CLUSTER 5

30th JUNE, 2017

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 1 (5)

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 2 (5)

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 3 (5)

Drive Test KPI 30/06/2017 KPIs Unit MTN

2G Call Setup Time in Sec Total Handover Success - 170

Handover Success rate % 97.70

Total Location Update

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 4 (5)

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 5 (5)

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 6 (5)

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 7 (5)

Rx Level Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks

[-70, Max] 836 22.49% 22.49%

[-81, -70] 1440 38.73% 61.22% 76.60% GOOD

[-85, -81] 572 15.38% 76.60%

[-95, -85] 716 19.26% 95.86%

[-100,-95] 108 2.90% 98.76%

[Min, -100] 46 1.24% 100.00% 1.24% BAD

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 8 (5)

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 9 (5)

Rx Quality Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks

Min,2 1944 60.04% 60.04%

2,4 587 18.13% 78.17% 85.48% GOOD

4,5 237 7.32% 85.48%

5,6 160 4.94% 90.43%

6,7 152 4.69% 95.12%

7,Max 158 4.88% 100.00% 4.88% BAD

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 10 (5)

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 11 (5)

CPICH EcNo Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks

[30, Max] 890 28.84% 28.84%

[20, 30] 1560 50.55% 79.39%

[0, 10] 111 3.60% 95.76%

[-10, 0] 52 1.69% 97.44%

[Min, -20] 0 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% BAD

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 12 (5)

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 13 (5)

SQI MOS Range Samples % Contribution Cumulative % % Remarks

[3.9 , Max] 1339 43.50% 43.50%

[3.5 ,3.9] 853 27.71% 71.22%

[2 , 3.5] 659 21.41% 92.63%

[1.5 , 2] 65 2.11% 94.74%

[Min , 1.5] 162 5.26% 100% 5.26% Bad

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 14 (5)

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 15 (5)

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 16 (5)

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 17 (5)

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 18 (5)

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 19 (5)

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 20 (5)

3G Speech Quality (MOS) 46.12 Dropped Calls - 11

Total SHO Attempts - 1181

Total SHO Success - 646

SHO Success rate % 54.70

Radio link addition - 538

Radio link addition failure - 0

Success rate 100.00

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 21 (5)

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 22 (5)

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 23 (5)

MTN - Ericsson MS Performance | Ericsson NG 2015 | 2015-11-03 | Page 24 (5)