Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
& control
BCI: logical scheme
Increase of appropriate feature extraction
performance
Modification of
Signal Features
Brain Signals
computer training
gni ni art r es u
Psychological
Classification
Effort
Of Intent
(Intention)
2. Clinical researchers,
Neuroscientists
3. Technical operators,
Therapists
4. Gamers, entertainers
Cost/benefit of requirements
vary over User Level
4
Technical Requirements
5
Disability Level and Application
Communication
Environmental control
Robotics / Mobility
devices
Neuroprosthetics
6
Effectiveness-application-
satisfaction chart
Multiple points of view
Target users: Disciplines involved in
Researchers (e.g., clinical research
researchers, neuroscientists, Engineering
signal processing experts, Clinical ...
etc.);
Psychological
Technical operators (e.g.,
caregivers, therapists who Neuroscience
are in charge of training
someone on BCI operation);
End-users (e.g., people with
disabilities who rely on the
system for communication)
Casual end-users (e.g., those
who use a BCI as an
alternative input for
entertainment devices)
Clinical applications of BCI are not…
… just application of potentially working
technologies to a new group of
experimental subjects.
Working with patients requires taking into
account new issues
Human computer interaction
Ease of use
Reliability
Sensible applications
…
Invasive vs. noninvasive
techniques
Multi-electrode grids implanted in
cortex
Epi- or sub-dural implantation
Surface EEG
Non electrical signal (MEG, fMRI,
NIRS, …)
Integration with assistive
technologies
need for "BCI device“
integration of the BCI device as a
control into standard
domotic and robotic systems
optimization of the BCI interface (to
user and to caregiver: generalization
and simplification )
BCI-operated robot
BCI-operated Environmental
control
Standardization
Non-invasive cortical
Scalp EEG
estimation of brain activity
Linear inverse estimates
within a RoI are collapsed
(mean)
M1
Hand
area
RoI
“Virtual”
Role of technical standards in the
development of BCI systems
helpful to foster involvement of companies
into the field
important to promote cooperation among
research groups
Topics for standardization:
system architecture
relationship with existing human-computer
devices
training procedures
signal processing techniques
indices of performance
communication protocols with external devices
Advantage of Standards
Improved interoperability of components
Lowers need for expertise
Facilitates technology diffusion
Facilitates performance comparison
FDA/CE certification is cheaper
Helps to solve legal disputes
Standardization of software
Decision making
tool for operators
Documentation and
reference for “good
practice”
Pseudo-BCI applications
Monitoring
Biofeedback
Detection of psychological states
EEG-EMG-EOG integration
Conclusions
BCI field is out of the demonstrations phase and is
ready for clinical applications – need for more intense
multidisciplinary cooperation
Any new BCI technology should be focused on
improving the quality of life of the end user
Many technologies still do not meet the requirements
of particular BCI applications
The BCI community needs
a technology standardization committee
BCI systems that can improve people’s lives are
within reach