My 360 Degree

Assessment Results
R A N DA LL S JOBS K I
S I E NA HE I G HTS UN I V ERSITY
8 / 7 /2017
Agenda
Scores Review: The Leadership Profile (TLP)
Most Comparable Scores: Self-Assessment vs. Observers
Lowest Observer Scores
Area Identified as Strength
Area to Focus on for Improvement
Overall Reaction to Observer Scores
Possible Reasons for Differences

Rosenbach & Sashkin (2014)

Scores Review
Randall Jobskis Self-Assessment vs. Observers TLP Scores
Category Self Observers Delta
Enabling Leadership 64.65 34.26 30.39
Visionary Leadership 58.38 28.93 29.45
Leadership Communication 52.79 27.94 24.85
Culture Building Leadership 60.96 36.31 24.65
Follower Centered Leadership 57.56 38.30 19.26
Credible Leadership 63.79 47.20 16.59
Confident Leadership 64.86 48.32 16.54
Caring Leadership 57.30 42.33 14.97
Capable Management 53.28 43.97 9.31
Reward Equity 44.46 42.15 2.31
Rosenbach & Sashkin (2014)
 Observers Results

Underdeveloped
Manager

Rosenbach & Sashkin (2014)

 Most Comparable Scores
Randall Jobskis Self-Assessment vs. Observers TLP Scores: Most Comparable
Observers Group

Category Self Observers Average Lowest Highest

Reward Equity 44.46 42.15 50.17 41.13 61.67

Capable
53.28 43.97 50.76 43.97 60.51
Management

Rosenbach & Sashkin (2014)

 Lowest Observer Scores
Randall Jobskis Self-Assessment vs. Observers TLP Scores: Lowest Observer Scores
Observers Group

Category Self Observers Average Lowest Highest

Leadership
52.79 27.94 43.72 27.94 51.71
Communication

Visionary
58.38 28.93 45.19 28.93 63.08
Leadership

Rosenbach & Sashkin (2014)

 Identified Strength
Randall Jobskis Self-Assessment vs. Observers TLP Scores: Strength
Observers Group

Category Self Observers Average Lowest Highest

Confident
64.86 48.32 60.49 48.32 73.46
Leadership

Rosenbach & Sashkin (2014)

 Focus for Improvement
Randall Jobskis Self-Assessment vs. Observers TLP Scores: Improvement
Observers Group

Category Self Observers Average Lowest Highest

Leadership
52.79 27.94 43.72 27.94 51.71
Communication

Learn to Tell Stories

Rosenbach & Sashkin (2014)
Reaction to Observer Scores
Extremely Surprised
Hope Scores are Skewed
Focus Improvement on Lowest Observer Score
Leadership Communication

Want to be Recognized as Transformational Leader

Reasons for Differences?
New to MSU (1 Yr)
2 Different Leaders
2 Different Organizations
2 Different Teams to Lead
MSU Tier 1 Research University
High Expectations
Central Tendency Bias1

1Gross (n.d.)
Conclusion
The Leadership Profile (TLP)
360 Degree Assessment
Great Insight into Current Leadership Skills
Self & Observers
Work on Leadership Communication
Tell Stories
Recent Job Change Likely Affected Outcome
References
Gross, E. (n.d.). The Likert scale explained (with examples). Fieldboom.com. Retrieved from
https://www.fieldboom.com/blog/likert-scale/
Rosenbach, W.E. & Sashkin, M. (2014). The leadership profile: On becoming a better leader
through leadership that matters. Retreived from
http://www.leadingandfollowing.com/documents/TLPParticipantManual.pdf