Scribd Logo
Carica

Benvenuto in Scribd!

  • Grading Criteria Version 7 Revised

    Caricato da

    znyingwa
    22 visualizzazioni1 pagina
    The document outlines 4 pillars of effective teaching at the university: teaching portfolio, peer review, principal review, and development plan. Lecturers are required to submit a teaching portfolio within their first year or by a specified date. The portfolio will be peer reviewed and rated by the principal. Lecturers must also create a development plan to improve effectiveness and commit to continuous learning.

    Descrizione originale:

    Grading Criteria

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formati disponibili

    PPTX, PDF, TXT o leggi online da Scribd

    Hai trovato utile questo documento?

    Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

    Segnala questo documento
    The document outlines 4 pillars of effective teaching at the university: teaching portfolio, peer review, principal review, and development plan. Lecturers are required to submit a teaching portfolio within their first year or by a specified date. The portfolio will be peer reviewed and rated by the principal. Lecturers must also create a development plan to improve effectiveness and commit to continuous learning.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Scarica in formato PPTX, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    22 visualizzazioni1 pagina

    Grading Criteria Version 7 Revised

    Caricato da

    znyingwa
    The document outlines 4 pillars of effective teaching at the university: teaching portfolio, peer review, principal review, and development plan. Lecturers are required to submit a teaching portfolio within their first year or by a specified date. The portfolio will be peer reviewed and rated by the principal. Lecturers must also create a development plan to improve effectiveness and commit to continuous learning.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Scarica in formato PPTX, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    di 1

    4 PILLARS OF TEACHING AND

    LEARNING

    EFFECTIVE LECTURER IN THE CLASSROOM

    TEACHING ADC/PEE
    DEVELOPME
    PORTFOLI R SET
    NT PLAN
    O REVIEW
    Contribute to
    improving
    New lecturer: LEVELS: lecturer
    submission within 5 = EXCELLENT 4 = VERY GOOD/GOOD effectiveness
    first year of Lecturers
    lecturing
    3 = AVERAGE/SATISFACTORY commitment
    2 = UNSATISFACTORY/POOR 1 = to
    Existing lecturer Development
    EXTREMELY WEAK Plan
    who has never
    submitted: Sustainability
    Organisation, of
    submission by 31
    planning, structure Development
    October 2013
    Teacher-student Plan
    Existing lecturer PRINCIPALs Interaction Critical
    (rapport)
    with already- DISCRETION Clarity,
    development
    areas
    graded portfolio: no
    communication
    new submission
    skill
    required
    Workload, course
    RATE difficulty
    Subsequent
    submission at ADJUSTMEN Marking of exams,
    tests, assignments
    lecturers discretion
    T Student lecturing
    experience

    Potrebbero piacerti anche