Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Up Consideration
Vadhel Iqbal
1406574314
Teknik Industri
Development of
recommendation
Most hazard evaluation result in recommendations
or action items to improve the safety of a process
Recommendation must be assoiated with
improving the safety of an operation and must be
tied directly to the hazard evaluation
Prioritization of Hazard Evaluation
Results
Describe the strategies for prioritizing hazard
evaluation recommendation and discusses
specific hazard evaluation techniques that make
prioritization easier
Item Description
Study Objectives Primary purposes and ancillary
needs
Physical and analytical scope Specific process areas, systems,
and equipment covered
Analysis team composition Participants in the review
Meeting dates and duration When, where, and how long the
team met
Hazard evaluation technique Rationale for selection of the
description hazard evaluation techniques
Process/activity description Description of the system
analyzed
Drawing, specification, and Documents used as the basis of
procedural list analysis
Action items/suggestions Recommendations made to
management for risk reduction
Detailed documentation of any Minutes of meetings, summaries
review meeting ; technique- of topic covered, attendance list
specific list, forms, or graphical
The questions that should always be asked by
every hazard evaluation reports :
1. Who did the study?
2. On what process area or operation was the study
performed?
3. Which technique was used?
4. What are the important results and conlusions?
Another detailed that can be included for a more
detailde reports :
1. A section describing the specific details of the
hazard evaluation technique used in the study
2. A description of the process
3. Justification for each of the action items
4. Typed versions of the hazard evaluation team
meeting notes that have been thoroughly
reviewed for consistency and accuracy
5. Copies of any techniques-specific models or
worksheets that may have been used to explain
why the hazard analysts concluded particular
events were significant
Developments of a Management
Response to a Hazard Evaluation
Example of risk management considerations
1. How serious is the safety problems
2. How beneficial is the potential safety solution?
3. Does the proposed solution create adverse
effects elsewhere?
4. How expensive is the proposed solution?
5. Does the solution require capital resource
allocation or adding more personnel, or can it be
done under the current operating budget?
Typical reasons why rejecting a hazard evaluation
team recommendation might be justified
1. A detailed engineering analysis following the
hazard evaluation indicates the suggestion was
not a good idea for the following specific reasons
2. Other information, which was not available to the
hazard evaluation team, indicates that the
hazard is not as significant a problem as the
team thought
3. A review of the data upon which the team based
its finding revealed error in the data, which when
corrected indicates the finding is no longer
warranted
Resolution of Action Items
Organizations should establish a management
system to track progress on action items form the
time the items are recommended until they are
resolved
After managers reach a decision about which
hazard evaluation recommendations are to be
implemented, the tracking system should focus
on the status of the implementation of each item
Communication of Special
Findings/Sharing of Information
Sometimes a hazard evaluation may discover
findings or information that should be
communicated beyond the plant or process
evaluated by the study. Because hazard evaluation
can require significant resources and their results
can prevent major incidents, the results of all hazard
evaluation should be communicated to those who
can benefit from the knowledge
Use of Hazard evaluation Results
over the Plant Lifetime
The following plant lifetime stages delienated by
CCPS
1. Process development
2. Detailed design
3. Construction and start-up
4. Operating lifetime
5. Extended shutdowns
6. Decommisioning