Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Pain Management:
It workswhy isnt it
used?
David A. Williams, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Medicine / Rheumatology
Associate Director, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research
Center
Associate Director, Center for the Advancement of
Clinical Research
Ethel E. Thompson
Early Practitioners of Pain
Medicine Cross-trained
Babylonian Physicians
Priest-Physician-Pharmacist combination
Used ritual and incantations to make treatments more
effective
Arabian Physician
Astrologer or Magician
Importance gauged by turban height or sleeve length
Leveraged social authority to make treatments more
effective
Indian Physician Illness Classifications (6
B.C.)
Curable by magic
Not curable by magic
Curable
Incurable Ethel E. Thompson
With time: More science
less magic
Cures were king
A cure is rendered at all costs (even
dubious ones)
Pain was a secondary consideration
When pain was the primary
problem, the curative
model was followed
Revolutionary Approach
to Pain
Anesthesiology Neurology
Psychology Pharmacy
Nursing
Recommendation
Multidisciplinary
Clinics
Comprised of 2 or more disciplines
Goal is to provide coordinated and more
comprehensive care to patients for more
complex chronic pain problems
3 general subtypes
Psychoeducational clinic (mild and
motivating)
Problem-based clinic (e.g. headache, LBP, FM)
Multidisciplinary
Pain Management
Practice
Perception of High Costs
Multidisciplinary Pain Management
Surgery
P.T.
Psych
Meds
Curative Model
S IN G L E D IS C IP L IN E P A IN C L IN IC S
R e fe r r a l S o u r c e :
A m b u la t o r y C a r e
A n e s t h e s io lo g y N e u r o lo g y P s y c h o lo g y
P a in C lin ic P a in C L in ic P a in C lin ic
How are pain interventions
doing today?
Pain Medications
Second most commonly prescribed
drug class
Does not eliminate pain
Long term Opiates
(32% reduction)
Anti-Convulsive / Depressants
(1:3 will have 50% reduction)
Rarely below 4 (0-10 rating)
Mixed Pain
(25% reduction)
Neuropathic Pain
(39% pain reduction)
Comparably effective
at pain relief
Better at functional
restoration
Lower Cost
So why are multi-
disciplinary treatments
not used more?
Demand is for Quick
Relief
Much profit possible in pain relief
interventions
Pain interventions have industry backing
Patient expectations are for quick relief
Curative approaches often involve
procedures
Standardized
Short time horizon for outcome
Quantifiable in cost
Widely available
Finite patient burden
Multi-disciplinary Pain
Rehabilitation
Less profitable business venture
Smaller advocacy voice
Less consistent with patient
expectations
Greater patient burden
Outcomes depend on patient participation
Longer time horizon
Less standardized across centers
Less widely available
More difficult to quantify costs
Conclusions
We do have single modality interventions
for pain
Modestly effective
Costly
Considerable adverse event profile
We also have multidisciplinary treatments
for pain
Modestly effective
Often less costly and fewer side-effects
Improves both pain and functional status
Patients prefer interventions despite
costs and modest effects
Dislike outcomes depending upon participation
How far have we come?
Content Content Now
Then Opioids
Poppy Plant Aspirin Enhanced
Willow bark Cannabinoid Technology
Hemp s
Automation
Beer Beer
Efficiency
Eels TNS
Acupuncture Acupuncture
Oils Creams/oils
Less
Blood letting Surgery
Human contac
Exercise Exercise Follow-up
Heiliotherap Light
y therapy