Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Historians regard the year 1757 as the starting point of the British Empire in
India, even though large parts of the country remained under the rule of Indian
princes. It took nearly another hundred years for the East India Company and
the British government to extend British rule to northern and western India.
The British ruled over the Indians for nearly two centuries, when finally in
1947, India gained independence and became a sovereign state.
During these years, the British introduced innumerous reforms in India. They
developed roads, introduced better means of communication, built great cities
and buildings to facilitate their smooth governance over the large Indian sub-
continent. Renowned architects of the likes of Lutyens, Edward Frere, Le
Corbusier, etc. laid layout plans for some modern Indian cities and designed
exquisite buildings during this period. These buildings and monuments still
stand high glorifying the excellence of these icons of modern architecture.
When the British government had consolidated its position in India, it decided
to redefine its administration. A whole new Government architecture was
developed. During the initial phase, the East India Company's main interest in
India was to generate internal revenue for promoting its trade but under the
British government, India developed as a colony and British dominion.
The government developed a transport network to help its economic, military,
and administrative operations. Railway building in India was done for both
military and economic reasons. Government buildings were erected and new
cities developed. The foundation stone for British architecture was laid down.
The Madras Government House:The vestiges of the British
architecture can be traced to the times when the East India Company had
a firm hold over a large part of the Indian mainland. The Madras
Government House represents the architecture trends of the period. Unlike
its French equivalent at Pondicherry, Government House Triplicane, Madras
(now Chennai) is typical except for its later Banqueting Hall.
The Madras Government House was adapted for Lord Clive in the 1790s
from an earlier one, after the pattern set at Pondicherry by the residence
built for Duplex some fifty years earlier. There superimposed arcaded
loggias before clerestory-lit major spaces were articulated with Doric and
Ionic Orders in the Academic Classical manner of early 18th-century
France.
At Triplicane, however, much lighter colonnaded verandahs, elegant but
quite uncanonical in their intercolumniations, were erected around much of
the side as well as the front. The whole complex is dominated by the Doric
Banqueting Hall, which, even in its original form without the lower
arcading -but not least in the application of column to wall - was as remote
from its ostensible model, the Parthenon, as the main house is from
Academic Classical principle.
The Bombay Town Hall:Quite different in its exceptional Neo-Classical
gravitas is the Bombay Town Hall of Colonel Thomas Cowper, Bombay
Engineers. It is hardly inferior to many of the works of the masters of
French Neo-Classicism. The Greek Doric Order of its powerful temple-
fronts doubtless came from the principal source of the English Greek
Revival, the work of Stuart and Revett, and the dramatically lit staircase
leads to a splendid Corinthian Hall.
CHURCHES
Despite their airy porticos and slender steeples, the walled and pillared
later colonial churches, 'Palladian' in the English sense, ultimately Roman,
usually avoid the insubstantiality if not always the coarseness, of detail
characteristic of many secular works. St Martin in the Fields was to be an
enduringly popular model.
The most accomplished homage paid to it was certainly in St George's
Cathedral and St Andrew's Kirk, Madras. To the Gibbs's formula, Colonel
James Caldwell and Major Thomas de Havilland added side porches for St
George's and sturdy aedicules below the distinguished steeple. St
Andrew's, with an elegant, fluted Ionic order and a more purely classical
steeple, is adventurous in following Gibbs's alternative scheme with
circular nave
A revelation in Architecture:In the prevailing eclecticism of the age,
English design reformers, disgusted with the regurgitation of the
classical and mediaeval styles of Europe's past as the individual
architect thought fit for his particular purpose, had turned back to the
native vernacular traditions and produced the so-called 'Free-Style',
hybrid but non-historicist and of little interest to Anglo-Indians.
On the other hand, the hybrid aspect of the style Scott devised for
Bombay, though still essentially foreign and historicist was a crucial
pointer for Anglo-Indian public builders away from a narrow cultural
chauvinism towards Indian traditions. To that extent, it was reformative.
However, the synthesis that the Anglo-Indians were to evolve, far from
rejecting overt allusion to the monumental styles of the past, added a
resounding new dimension to historicist eclecticism in a truly imperial
style, which reached its apotheosis in New Delhi.
Reformative architecture in Bombay:The energetic Governor, Sir
Bartle Frere - of which Scotts buildings were so significant a product,
launched a public building campaign in Bombay in the second half of
the 1860s. The campaign opened with the Decorated Gothic scheme for
the rebuilding of St Thomas's Cathedral by the Government Architect,
James Trubshawe. This was only partially realized, but Trubshawe made
a weighty contribution, in collaboration with W. Paris,
Of other landmarks produced by the campaign, William Emerson's
Crawford Markets - in an elementary northern Gothic delineated in the
various coloured stones, which contributed so much to the success of the
Gothic Revival in Bombay - reflected the ideals of the early design
reformers at home more nearly than any other prominent Anglo-Indian
building of the period.
For the Public Works Secretariat, Colonel Henry St Clair Wilkins, Royal
Engineers, followed Scott's lead with a Venetian Gothic design in 1877
and his colleague Colonel John Fuller mixed Venetian and early English for
the stupendous High Court of 1879. The culminating masterpieces of the
series, increasingly hybrid in style, are Frederick Stevens' works,
especially Victoria 51 Terminus (1878-87), the headquarters of the Great
Indian Peninsular Railway.
This certainly rivals London's St Pancras in lan, but is more specifically
indebted to Scott's symmetrical scheme for the Government Offices in
Whitehall (1856), with its open forecourt flanked by three-storey turreted
wings and the German Houses of Parliament, Berlin (1872) with its
innovative dome. Like Scott's University buildings, the Venetian Gothic of
Stevens' splendid terminus is infused with Indian decorative elements.
Stevens was also responsible for the municipal buildings built in 1893
opposite Victoria Terminus and for the slightly later Bombay, Baroda, and
Central Indian Railway terminus at Churchgate. In these works, he took a
still more significant step towards the synthesis of Indian and European
forms with the incorporation of cusped arches and Deccani Muslim
domes.
Following the example, George Wittet achieved a thoroughgoing Anglo-
Indian synthesis for the Prince of Wales Museum in 1905 and the
Gateway of India some twenty-two years later. The Museum, Classical in
plan and purpose, prefers a full-blooded Adil Shahi revival, with its central
pavilion modelled on the Gol Gumbad at Bijapur. The Gateway is Neo-
Ahmad Shah, but recalls the Roman form of triumphal arch as much as
Ahmadabad's
ReformativeTin Darwaza, and
architecture at substitutes a Bijapuriand
Calcutta, Madras central
otherspace for
the trabeated the
cities:While one attention
provided of
byScott
the Guja
and his Bombay followers was
focused on Venice, the Government Architect Walter Granville ruptured
the Classical decorum of Calcutta with an excursion into the arena
favoured by Street at home and based his High Court (1872) on the
Cloth Hall at Ypres. Before the decade was out he showed his versatility
- not only at turning a corner - in the splendid General Post Office which,
if Classical in the purity of its forms, is certainly Baroque in scale and
movement. For the Victoria Memorial at the other end of the Maidan,
William Emerson embarked upon a quixotic attempt to rival the Taj
Mahal. It was built of a similar luscious material but the alien forms,
The potential of so-called 'Indo-Saracenic' hybridization, at best for
generating tension, at least for spinning mesmerizing fantasy, was
exploited all over the Subcontinent. Outstanding examples are W.
Brunton's bold reconciliation of Saracen castle and mosque for the
fortified railway station at Lahore, Samuel Swinton Jacob's cross-
fertilization of the English quadrangle with the Mughal court of audience
for St John's College, Agra, Robert Chisholm's Bizantino-Qutb Shahi
University Senate House, Madras, and the stupefying mlange of Gothic
and various permutations of the styles perpetrated by the late Deccani
Muslims with which Henry Irwin followed it for the Madras High Court.
Chisholm may lay claim to primacy in the late-19th century hybrid school
for his work on the conversion of the already 'Indo-Saracenic' mid-18th
Like the Government Houses of British territories, the early seats of British
century Chepauk Palace, former residence of the Nawab of the Carnatic,
power at the courts of indigenous rulers - such as the Residencies of
for the Madras Public Works Department.
Lucknow, Hyderabad and Bangalore - were modelled on the 'stately home'
to which the gentleman Resident would have been accustomed in Britain.
Many European merchants aped such works, often on a lavish scale quite
out of proportion with their status at home.
In Calcutta and Madras such are the mansions and club houses of
Chowringhi and Adyar, respectively, with their high ceilings and
verandahs. Native merchants went even further with their houses. Most
spectacular by far, is the Zimindari Mullick's 'Marble Palace' in Calcutta,
with its astonishing classical interpretation of diwan and court
Architecture of Princely homes and palaces:On a still larger and
often even coarser scale native rulers adopted western palace types in
whole or in part, with state rooms incorporating antechambers, salons,
banqueting halls and vast saloon-like durbar halls, designed to cater for
Westernized manners and European guests.
It was certainly not lost upon the 'Model Prince' that European building
types could be interpreted in a wide diversity of western, eastern and
hybrid styles and at their service the fecundity of the Anglo-Indian
imagination was to know no bounds.
Notable examples of princely residences in styles derived from the
repertory of Italianate Classicism range from the 'Palladian' Faluknama of
Hyderabad, taken over from a nobleman and expanded by the Nizam in
the last decades of the century - which belongs to the type represented
by Government House Triplicane - to the Neo-High Renaissance palace of
Cooch Behar and the Neo-Baroque one at Panna.
Most notorious is the Jal Vilas commissioned by the Maharaja of Gwalior
from Lieutenant Colonel Sir Michael Filose, Indian Army, to provide for the
visit of the Prince of Wales. With the fantastic 'La Martiniere' not far off at
Lucknow to emulate, Filose's achievement was prodigious.
The style might be called 'Venetian High Renaissance', though it hardly
recalls the sage deployment of the Venetian motif by Palladio or
Sansovino. Rather it suggests the infinite expansion of a Bibiena stage set
and to illuminate the prince's visit the durbar hall required the largest pair
of chandeliers ever made
Equally popular with their highnesses, predictably, was 'Rajput Revival'. The
palaces of Alwa or Varanasi, where major building campaigns originated
early in the 19th century, provide two of the many links between the two
great periods of princely building. The main compound of the Udai Vilas at
Dungapur falls into the same category but late in the century, the court
was paved and a tower pavilion constructed which, as at Datia, provides a
perfectly formal re-statement of the prasada (a large palace) prototype.
A similar model prasada provides the main tower of the accomplished new
palace, built early in the 20th century by Jaisalmer's Maharawal Salivahan:
the 'Rajput Revival' presides over a 'Saracenic' arcade with attached
debased Corinthian columns. Far purer - 'academic' if that word were
admissible in the context - are the great symmetrical piles produced for
Bikaner and Kotah by the master of the style, Sir Samuel Swinton Jacob.
Many other princes preferred the more daring Eurasian hybrid styles being
developed in the public buildings of the last decades of the 19th century. At
the turn of the century, the Maharaja of Mysore called upon Henry Irwin for
an extravaganza that ceded nothing in scale or prolixity to that master's
masterpiece in Madras.
Irwin's mentor, Robert Chisholm, was employed by the Gaekwad of Baroda
to complete his Lakshmi Vilas. This had been begun in the late 1870s by
Major Charles Mant, Royal Engineers, fresh from his triumph in the service
of another Maratha prince at Kolhapur. The latter work was a dazzling
asymmetrical composition combining late Mughal and Deccani Muslim
arcades and domes with Gujarati trabeation. In the confection at Baroda,
An essential ingredient in all these stupendous works of architecture was
the Classical portico, extended to form the sun-shielding verandah in
more elevated permutations, asserting the dignity of the ruler without
ostentation.
This modesty is equally well illustrated by the Viceroy's seat - for half the
year - at Shimla. Here the informal clutter of a minor English seaside
resort sprawls between the quaint little reproduction of a rural parish
church and the pseudo-Elizabethan great house - like that of some
newly-rich northern industrialist at home. How very different was to be
the last capital of British India laid out from 1913 by Sir Edwin Lutyens in
collaboration with Sir Herbert Baker, who was fresh from his imperious
triumph at Pretoria.
The Control of P.W.D. was removed from under the Military Board and placed
under the Chief Engineers.
P.W.D. came under the control of respective provincial Government.
The Chief Engineers to be assisted by the Superintending Engineer &
Executive Engineer.
The Governor General of India issued an order21st April, 1854by which
The
the responsibility officers
independent of the Chief
for management andEngineers
control ofwere dissolved.
the Public Works
Department was entrusted upon the Bengal Presidency with effect from1st
May, 1854:
In 1866, P.W.D. was divided into three branches namely, Civil (Roads,
Building & Irrigation), Military and Railway. This very year the then Governor
General, Lord Lawrence (1864-68) introduced the system of investing in
public works by borrowing from the public. The New policy saw
implementation of some important projects like Midnapore Canal (1872),
Orissa Coast Canal (1882), Rajapur Drainage Canal (1882) etc. During 1870,
local government system was introduced by the government. As per a
government decision taken inMay, 1882during the tenure of Lord Ripon
(1880-84), the local government body in India were recognized following the
British Rules. In1893, provincial services were created in each of the
provinces of India. The technical branch staffs were divided into three
categories: (i) Engineers (ii) Upper Subordinates (iii) Lower Subordinates.
And the engineers were divided into separate services, viz., Imperial
With the complete separation of the Military branch in1895, the P.W.D.
became an exclusive civil department. The P.W.D. became responsible for
public works relating to roads, buildings, irrigations and railways from this
time. Beside, with the integration and development of local government
system, Special types of public works were entrusted upon District Boards
and Municipalities.
In1905, the railways branch was segregated from the P.W.D. and was
converted into a separate department under the management and control
of Railway Board. The first railway line in India was commissioned in 1853
from Bombay to Thane and train services were introduced. Till 1905 about
3600 miles of railway track was constructed by the P.W.D.
Increased initiative by the British Government for more development
increased the work load of P.W.D. considerably. In1920, P.W.D. was
divided into two separate departments, viz., Public Works and Irrigation.
Surface Roads of pre-independence period were maintained by Works and
Building Directorate, which subsequently nomenclatured as P.W.
Directorate under the administrative set up of P.W. Department.