Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
PILE FOUNDATION
REKHASREE K S
NITC
PILE CAPACITY
Ultimate bearing capacity of pile
STATIC ANALYSIS
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
Static analysis
With driven piles the term involving the size of the pile is
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Mayerhofs method
21
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
22
23
24
25
26
27
For wood piles driven with drop hammers and for lightly
28
Hileys Formula
This formula takes into account various losses.
Wh = weight of hammer
Wp=weight of pile
H = height of fall of hammer
= Efficiency of hammer blow
Cr =coefficient of restitution
The allowable load Qap may be obtained by dividing Qup by
29
30
31
32
33
34
where
35
2.5 cm thick
36
37
Wp.
The value . H is also referred to as the effective fall of
hammer.
38
39
40
41
the pile.
42
43
44
pile
and c = Unit cohesion of soil layer which is setting
45
46
PILE GROUPS
47
48
49
50
For a wall:
piles for walls are commonly installed in a staggered
51
For column:
For a column, at least three piles are used in a triangular
52
53
Spacing of piles
Factors :
Overlapping of stresses of adjacent piles
cost of foundation
The desired efficiency of the pile group
54
55
of soil.
If piles are driven in loose sand compaction takes place and
take place but the piles may experience uplift, To avoid this,
greater spacing.
Cast-in-situ piles less disturbance, Smaller spacings may be
used.
Point-bearing piles may be more closely spaced than friction piles.
56
Spacing
Straight
piles
uniform
Friction piles
cylindrical 2d to 6d
3d
compaction piles
2d
57
Group capacity
58
59
60
61
and sensitive.
62
63
64
they rest
Method of installation
spacing of piles
Vesic (1967) has shown that end-bearing resistance is
65
66
Converse-Labarre formula
67
Felds rule
According to Felds rule, the value of each pile is
68
69
Seiler-Keeney formula
70
Thank You