Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Bryan Youree
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Objectives
Definition and pathophysiology of
fever
FUO: classifications and etiology
Diagnostic workup of FUO
Prognosis
37.5 C
98.6 F
340.15 K
Each human being is a unique individual,
and therefore, normal temperature
cannot be defined.
37.6 C
98.6 F
340.15 K
Each human being is a unique individual,
and therefore, normal temperature
cannot be defined.
Wunderlichs Maxim
After analyzing >1 million axillary
temperatures from ~25,000 patients,
Wunderlich identified 37.0 C (36.2-37.5)
as the mean temperature in healthy
adults.
Temperature readings >38.0 C were
deemed as suspicious/probably febrile.
Wunderlich C. Das Verhalten der Eiaenwarme in Krankenheiten.
Leipzig, Germany: Otto Wigard;1868.
2
Mackowiak, et al., JAMA 1992;268:1578
1
Bacterial Pyrogens
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) endotoxin
Endotoxin binds to LPS-binding protein and is transferred to CD14
on macrophages, which stimulates the release of TNF.
Categories of FUO
Feature
Nosocomial
Neutropenic
HIV-associated
Classic
Patients
situation
Hospitalized,
acute care, no
infection when
admitted
Neutrophil count
Confirmed HIVeither <500/L or positive
expected to reach
that level in 1-2
days
Duration of
illness while
investigated
3 daysb
3 daysb
3 daysb (or 4
weeks as
outpatient)
3 daysb or 3+
outpatient
visits
Examples
Septic
thrombophlebitis,
sinusitis, C.
difficile colitis,
drug fever
Perianal infection,
aspergillosis,
candidemia
MAIc infection,
TB, nonHodgkins
lymphoma, drug
fever
Infections,
malignancy,
inflammatory
diseases, drug
fever
Malignancies
Lymphoma
Lymphoma
Lymphoma
Drug Fever
No characteristic fever pattern
was observed.
Maximum temperatures
ranged from 38C to 43C
The mean lag time between
initiation of a drug and the
onset of fever was 21 days, but
lag times varied considerably.
Alpha methyldopa and
quinidine were the two drugs
most commonly implicated, but
antimicrobials (as a group)
were responsible for the
largest number of episodes.
Episodes
in Dallas
(n=51)
n
27/18
0
4
Episodes
in Lit.
(n=97)
n
53/44
3
12
Total
Episodes
(n=148)
%
56/44
2
11
51
0
19
6
26
41
9
7
13
12
62
10
28
21
41
Rigors
Relative bradycardia
Hypotension
Rash
Pruritus
Leukocytosis (>10K)
Eosinophilia (>300/mm3)
Hematologic
Deaths
26
5
6
20
11
11
21
1
2
52
4
21
6
0
0
12
12
4
53
11
18
18
7
7
22
9
4
Gender (male/female)
Hx of atopic disease
Previous hx of drug allergy
Marik, P. E. Chest
2000;117:855-869
Prognosis
Prognosis is determined primarily by the
underlying disease.
Outcome is worst for neoplasms.
FUO patients who remain undiagnosed
after extensive evaluation generally have
a favorable outcome and the fever usually
resolves after 4-5 weeks.
Summary
FUO is often a diagnostic dilemma
Infections comprise ~30% of cases
Bone marrow biopsies are of low
diagnostic yield
Diagnostic approach should occur in a
step-wise fashion based on the H&P
Patients that remain undiagnosed
generally have a good prognosis