Performance analysis of

Wireless Multimedia
Communication

Performance Analysis of Bit Error Rate in DS-CDMA Communication Network

for SDC, MRC & Combined MRC-SDC Diversity Scheme
Table 1.1 Variation in Pe with SNR for SDC
S.No

SNR

0dB

2
3
4
5
6

Pefor L=1

Pefor L=2

Pe for L=3

0.1463261

0.0815682

0.0553652

0.0435231

0.0097064

0.0033141

0.0232752

0.0029733

0.0005835

0.0153260

0.0004225

0.0000293

0.0120235

0.0000831

0.0000034

0.0023221

0.000002

0.0000005

5dB
10dB
15dB
20dB
25dB

Performance Analysis of Bit Error Rate in DS-CDMA Communication Network

for SDC, MRC & Combined MRC-SDC Diversity Scheme (cont)
Table 1.2 Variation in Pe with SNR for MRC
S.No

SNR

0dB

2
3
4
5
6

Pefor L=1

Pefor L=2

Pe for L=3

0.1965314

0.0875121

0.0662500

0.0498132

0.0075231

0.0012501

0.0256432

0.0018751

0.0001563

0.0166667

0.0008333

0.0000014

0.0082311

0.0000468

0.0000001

0.0010010

0.0000033

0.000000008

5dB
10dB
15dB
20dB
25dB

Performance Analysis of Bit Error Rate in DS-CDMA Communication Network

for SDC, MRC & Combined MRC-SDC Diversity Scheme (cont)
Table 1.3 Variation in Pe with SNR for MRC-SDC
S.No

SNR

0dB

2
3
4
5
6

Pefor L=2,N=1

Pefor L=2,N=2

Pe for L=2,N=3

0.0732641

0.0482652

0.0156620

0.0125643

0.0032571

0.0005125

0.0023121

0.0052451

0.0000015

0.0002871

0.0000043

0.0000001

0.0000291

0.0000012

0.000000021

0.0000012

0.0000003

0.00000000038

5dB
10dB
15dB
20dB
25dB

Performance Analysis of Bit Error Rate in DS-CDMA Communication Network

for SDC, MRC & Combined MRC-SDC Diversity Scheme (cont)

Fig. 4.1 Variation in Pe with SNR for SDC (L=1)

Fig. 4.2 Variation in Pe with SNR for SDC (L=2)

Performance Analysis of Bit Error Rate in DS-CDMA Communication Network

for SDC, MRC & Combined MRC-SDC Diversity Scheme (cont)

Fig. 4.3 Variation in Pe with SNR for SDC (L=3)

Fig. 4.4 Comparison in BER performance of SDC

for several paths

Performance Analysis of Bit Error Rate in DS-CDMA Communication Network

for SDC, MRC & Combined MRC-SDC Diversity Scheme (cont)

Fig. 4.5 Variation in Pe with SNR for MRC (L=1)

Fig. 4.6 Variation in Pe with SNR for MRC (L=2)

Performance Analysis of Bit Error Rate in DS-CDMA Communication Network

for SDC, MRC & Combined MRC-SDC Diversity Scheme (cont)

Fig. 4.7 Variation in Pe with SNR for MRC (L=3)

Fig. 4.8 Comparison in BER performance of MRC

for several paths

Performance Analysis of Bit Error Rate in DS-CDMA Communication Network

for SDC, MRC & Combined MRC-SDC Diversity Scheme (cont)

Fig. 4.9 Variation in Pe with SNR for Combined MRCSDC (L=2,N=1)

Fig. 4.10 Variation in Pe with SNR for Combined

MRC-SDC (L=2, N=2)

Performance Analysis of Bit Error Rate in DS-CDMA Communication Network

for SDC, MRC & Combined MRC-SDC Diversity Scheme (cont)

Fig. 4.11 Variation in Pe with SNR for Combined MRCSDC (L=2,N=3)

Fig. 4.12 Comparison in BER performance for

Combined MRC-SDC for several Base stations

Performance Analysis of Code Division Multiple Access System in Terms of

Capacity Calculation for WMC:
Table 2.1 Number of user per cell with variation in information bit rate
without VAF. (When w=1.25MHz,Eb/No=7)
SNo

W/R

1.

13600

91.9117647

14.1302521

2.

12600

99.2063492

15.1722356

3.

11600

107.758621

16.3940887

4.

10600

117.924528

17.8463611

5.

9600

130.208333

19.6011904

6.

8600

145.348837

21.7641196

7.

7600

164.473684

24.4962406

8.

6600

189.393939

28.056277

9.

5600

223.214286

32.056277

10.

4600

271.73913

39.8198757

Performance Analysis of Code Division Multiple Access System in Terms of

Capacity Calculation for WMC:(cont)
Table2.2. Number of user per cell with variation in
Bandwidth without VAF (When R=9600bps &Eb/No=7)

SN0

W/R

19.60119

130.20833

19.750

131.2500

19.898

132.2900

20.047

133.3300

20.1964

134.3750

20.345

135.416

20.4940

136.458

20.6428

137.50

20.7916

138.54

10

20.9404

139.5833

Performance Analysis of Code Division Multiple Access System in Terms of

Capacity Calculation for WMC:(cont)

Table 2.3 Number of user per cell with variation in

Eb/Nowithout VAF (When R=9600bps, W=1.25MHz)
SNo

Eb/No

1.

19.60119

2.

17.27604

3.

15.46759

4.

10

14.02083

5.

11

12.83712

6.

12

11.85069

Performance Analysis of Code Division Multiple Access System in Terms of

Capacity Calculation for WMC:(cont)

Table 2.4 Number of user per cell with voice activity factor
(When W=1.25MHz&Eb/No=7)
SNo
Ns

1.

0.500

38.2024

2.

0.475

40.1604

3.

0.450

42.3359

4.

0.425

44.7675

5.

0.400

47.5029

6.

0.375

50.6031

Performance Analysis of Code Division Multiple Access System in Terms of

Capacity Calculation for WMC:(cont)
Table 2.5 Number of user per cell with variation in information bit rate with VAF
(= 3/8=0. 375) When R=9600bps &Eb/No=7.
R

W/R

Ns

N=3Ns

13600

91.9117647

35.0140056

105.042017

12600

99.2063492

38.7926283

116.377885

11600

107.758621

42.0509032

126.15271

10600

117.924528

45.9236296

137.770889

9600

130.20833

50.6031744

151.809523

8600

145.348837

56.3709856

169.112957

7600

164.473684

63.6566416

190.969925

6600

189.393939

73.150072

219.450216

5600

223.214286

83.8167387

251.450216

4600

271.73913

104.519669

313.559007

Performance Analysis of Code Division Multiple Access System in Terms of

Capacity Calculation for WMC:(cont)
Table 2.6 Number of user per cell with variation in Bandwidth with VAF
=3/8=0.375 (When R=9600bps &Eb/No=7)
SNo

W/R

Ns

N=3Ns

1.

130.20833

50.60317

151.80951

2.

131.25000

51.00000

153.00000

3.

132.29000

51.39619

154.18856

4.

133.33000

51.79238

155.37713

5.

134.37500

52.19047

156.57142

6.

135.41600

52.58705

157.76113

7.

136.45800

52.98400

158.95200

8.

137.50000

53.38095

160.14285

9.

138.54000

53.77714

161.33142

10.

139.58330

54.17459

162.52376

11.

140.62500

54.57143

163.71427

Performance Analysis of Code Division Multiple Access System in Terms of

Capacity Calculation for WMC:(cont)

Table 2.7 Number of user per cell with variation in Eb/No with VAF = 3/8=0.
375 (When R=9600bps, W=1.25MHz)
SNo

Eb/No

Ns

N=3Ns

1.

50.603173

151.80952

2.

44.402777

133.20833

3.

39.580246

118.74074

4.

10

35.722213

107.16666

5.

11

32.565657

97.696967

6.

12

29.935184

89.805553

Performance Analysis of Code Division Multiple Access System in Terms of

Capacity Calculation for WMC:(cont)

Fig.5.1 Number of user versus processing gain without

VAF (When processing gain R varies at W = 1.25MHz
&Eb/No=7)

Fig.5.2 Number of user versus processing gain without

VAF (When processing gain R varies at PG = 130.5 and
Nu = 19.6)

Performance Analysis of Code Division Multiple Access System in Terms of

Capacity Calculation for WMC:(cont)

Fig.5.2 Number of user versus processing gain without

VAF (When processing gain R varies at PG = 130.5 and
Nu = 19.6)

Fig. 5.4 Number of user versus processing gain with

VAF (When processing gain R varies at W = 1.25MHz
&Eb/No=7)

Performance Analysis of Code Division Multiple Access System in Terms of

Capacity Calculation for WMC:(cont)

Fig. 5.5 Number of user versus processing gain with VAF

(=0. 375), (when Bandwidth W varies and R=9600
&Eb/No=7 )

Fig. 5.6 Number of user versus Eb/No when

W/R=130.20833 (W=1.25MHz and R= 9600). &VAF
(=0. 375),

Performance Analysis of Code Division Multiple Access System in Terms of

Capacity Calculation for WMC:(cont)

Fig.5.7 Number of user versus voice activity factor,

(When W=1.25MHz and R= 9600).

Fig. 5.8 Number of user versus processing gain with

and without VAF(When R varies& W=1.25MHz)

Performance Analysis of Code Division Multiple Access System in Terms of

Capacity Calculation for WMC:(cont)

Fig. 5.9 Number of user versus processing gain, with and

without VAF [Taking R= 9600]

Fig. 5.10 Number of user versus Eb/No, with and

without voice activity factor (When R=9600 &
W=1.25MHz)

Analysis of the Performance of OFDMA (MC - CDMA) system VoIP application

at different speed for Packet End to End Delay and Packet Loss:
Table 3.1 Packet End to End Delay at static and
different speeds for VoIP users.
Selected

Static or 0 m/s

25 m/s

Caller 1

0.4572

0.2551

Receiver 1

0.8027

0.1287

Caller 3

0.9225

0.1287

Receiver 3

1.0508

0.1282

Nodes

Figurer 6.1: Packet E2E Delay at 0 m/s and 25 m/s

Analysis of the Performance of OFDMA (MC - CDMA) system VoIP application

at different speed for Packet End to End Delay and Packet Loss: (cont)
Table 3.2 Packet Loss at static and different
speeds of nodes
Static or 0

25 m/s

m/s

Caller 1

35.30

0.12

Receiver 1

32.10

0.30

Caller 3

59.00

0.08

Receiver 3

54.10

0.11

Figure 6.2: Packet Loss at 0 m/s and 25 m/s

Analyses of the Performance of OFDMA (MC - CDMA) system Video

Conferencing at different speed for Packet End to End Delay Variation and
Packet Delay Variation:
Table 4.1: End to End Delay Performance for
Video Conferencing
Nodes

Static or 0

25 m/s

m/s

Sender 1

40

20.1

Receiver 1

42

22.3

Sender 3

56

21.9

Receiver 3

38

21.2

Figure 7.1 Packet End to End Delay Performance for Video

Conferencing

Analyses of the Performance of OFDMA (MC - CDMA) system Video

Conferencing at different speed for Packet End to End Delay Variation and
Packet Delay Variation: (cont)
Table 4.2: Packet Delay Variation of Video
Conferencing at different Speed
Nodes

Static or 0

25 m/s

m/s

Sender 1

1.90

0.012

Receiver 1

0.69

0.020

Sender 3

2.3

0.030

Receiver 3

1.0

0.015

Figure 7.2 Graph of Packet Delay Variation at different Speed