Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
the College of Arts, Cairo University. He was the editor of Sutoor (Lines)
and Almasrah (Theatre) periodicals. His literary career includes about 100
works ranging from writing to translating. His contributions to translation
from and into Arabic represent a great impact on promoting the level of
translation process and to provide the Arabic as well as foreign libraries with
a number of distinguished works especially in the field of literary creativity,
which promotes to mutually introduce the cultural and scientific components
of the European and Arabic civilizations.
Introduction
The study is a new historicist reading of Michael Pearces The Mamur Zapt and
the Return of the Carpet (1988), and The Mamur Zapt and the Night of the Dog
(1989).
The reason behind this choice is the fact that New Historicism, as a critical
perspective, is primarily concerned with examining systems of power such as the
European colonial discourse, while, Mamur Zapt is a series which is concerned
with the subject of British colonization and imperialism; especially the dizzying
political situation in Egypt before World War I.
It primarily aims to examine the ideological approaches to imperialism and
colonialism in the twentieth-century-British culture after the end of the British
Empire.
Introduction
In particular, it seeks to examine to what extent Pearces texts are products of
these ideological approaches; how these novels display, react to, and get
influenced by these ideological approaches.
To fulfill this aim, the study adopts the new historicist perspective to read the
two selected novels of Mamur Zapt series that represent proper material for the
study in relation to the travel writing of Joseph McPhersons The Man Who
Loved Egypt: Bimbashi McPherson (1983).
In dealing with this topic, essential key terms such as historicist assumptions,
textuality, intertextuality, historicity, and contextuality are highlighted.
New Historicism
The Emergence of New Historicism is always cited by 1980.
It is a method based on the parallel reading of literary and non-literary texts,
usually of the same historical period (Barry 172).
It refuses to isolate literary criticism from the study of any source, paving the
way for exploring how cultural factors (social, economic, political,
biographical, or psychological phenomena) interact with the literary texts.
For New Historicism, history and literature are mutually imbricated
(Greenblatt, Greenblatt Reader 3)
It considers history as initially a kind of discourse, which is not a denial that
there are real events (3).
New Historicism
New Historicism has greatly been influenced by the cultural anthropology of
Clifford Geertz.
It focus on the literary text as a cultural artifacts that can inform the reader
about the cultural discourses that circulate in any particular society.
Inspired by Foucault, new historicists frequently seek to study how power
works as the lower common denominator of all behaviors of the man.
The most typical procedures of New Historicism is to begin its analysis by
recounting an anecdote, which contains a microcosmic image of the power
relations, which the critic seeks to elaborate in relation to the main texts of
discussion (Brannigan 133).
the
honor
of
being
their
examinee.