Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Attitudes
CONSUMER
BEHAVIOR, 8e
Michael Solomon
Chapter Objectives
When you finish this chapter you should understand
why:
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-2
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-3
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-4
VALUE-EXPRESSIVE
FUNCTION:
EGO-DEFENSIVE
FUNCTION:
Protect ourselves from
external threats or internal
feelings
KNOWLEDGE
FUNCTION:
Need for order, structure, or
meaning
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-5
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-6
Discussion
Imagine that you work for the marketing department
of your college or university and have segmented
students into four different clusters, each
representing one of the four functions identified by
Katz.
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-7
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-8
Hierarchies of Effects
Impact/importance of attitude components depends
on consumers motivation toward attitude object
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
Figure 7.1
7-9
Hierarchy of Effects
Standard Learning Hierarchy
Results in strong brand loyalty
Assumes high consumer involvement
Low-Involvement Hierarchy
Consumer does not have strong brand preference
Consumers swayed by simple stimulus-response
connections
Experiential Hierarchy
Consumers hedonic motivations and moods
Emotional contagion
Cognitive-affective model versus independence
hypothesis
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-10
Discussion
One persons contextual marketing is another
persons spyware
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-11
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-12
Warm feelings:
affectionate,
contemplative, hopeful
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-13
Attitude Commitment
Degree of commitment is related to level of
involvement with attitude object
INTERNALIZATION
Highest level: deep-seeded attitudes become part
of consumers value system
IDENTIFICATION
Mid-level: attitudes formed in order to conform to
another person or group
COMPLIANCE
Lowest level: consumer forms attitude because it
gains rewards or avoids punishments
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-14
Consistency Principle
Principle of cognitive consistency:
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-15
7-16
Discussion
Interview a student next to you regarding a behavior
that he or she has that is inconsistent with his or her
attitudes (e.g., attitudes toward healthy eating or
active lifestyle, attitudes toward materialism, etc.).
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-17
Self-Perception Theory
Self-perception theory: we use observations of our
own behavior to determine what our attitudes are.
FOOT-IN-THE-DOOR TECHNIQUE
Consumer is more likely to comply with a request if he has
first agreed to comply with a smaller request
LOW-BALL TECHNIQUE
Person is asked for a small favor and is informed after
agreeing to it that it will be very costly.
DOOR-IN-THE-FACE TECHNIQUE
Person is first asked to do something extreme (which he
refuses), then asked to do something smaller.
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-18
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-19
Balance Theory
Balance theory: considers relations among elements
a consumer might perceive as belonging together
7-20
Figure 7.2
7-21
Example:
Consumers: college
football fans
Attitude object: winning
college football team
endorsers of products to
create positive associations
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-22
Discussion
Students often bask in
reflected glory of their
colleges winning sports
teams by showing team
spirit or buying
merchandise
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-23
Three elements
Attributes of AO (e.g., college)
Example: scholarly reputation
Beliefs about AO
Example: University of North Carolina is strong
academically
Importance weights
Example: stresses research over athletics
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-24
Fishbein Model
Measures three components of
attitudes:
Aijk = ijkIik
Overall Attitude Score =
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-25
Import (I)
Smith
Princeton
Rutgers
Northland
Academic reputation
All women
Cost
Proximity to home
Athletics
Party atmosphere
Library facilities
163
142
153
131
Attitude Score
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
Table 7.1
7-26
7-27
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-28
7-29
Theory of Trying
Theory of trying: measures the reasoned action
consumers take to reach a goal
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
Figure 7.3
7-30
7-31
7-32
Tracking Attitudes
Percentage of 16- to 24-year-olds who agree
We must take radical action to cut down on how we use our
cars.
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
Figure 7.4
7-33
Prentice-Hall, cr 2009
7-34