Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Management
Project Management
Chapter 3 - Heizer
3-1
Examples of Projects
Building construction
Software development
Staging a play
3-3
Characteristics of Projects
Single unit
Relatively low frequency
Defined starting points and ending points
Defined outcomes / goals
Complex interrelated tasks, often transcending
functional boundaries
Require special management tools
3-4
Scheduling
Objectives
Resources
Work breakdown structure
Organization
Project
activities
Start & end
times
Network
Controlling
Monitor, compare,
revise, action
3-5
3-6
3-7
Project Scheduling
3-8
v ity
Acti ign
nth
es ild
MoMF J DB
u t
MA
Tes
JJ
3-9
Gantt Chart
Activity
Time Period
J
Design
Build
Test
3-10
PERT / CPM
Network planning methods that generate:
Relationship between activities
Project duration
Critical path
Slack for non critical activities
Crashing (cost / time trade-offs)
Resource usage
3-11
Immediate
Predecessor(s)
Description
A
B
B
A
C
D
A
E,G,H
F,I,J
Immediate
Predecessor(s)
AON Network
Description
I
A
B
B
A
C
D
A
E,G,H
F,I,J
Completion Time
I
Activity
Description
15
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
A
B
B
A
C
D
A
E,G,H
F,I,J
Path
36
A-F-K
31 Critical
Immediate
Completion Time
A-C-G-J-K
70 Path
I
Activity
Description
Predecessor(s)
B-D-H-J-K
72
15
B-E-J-K
46
A
Select administrative and medical
staff.
B
Select site
Critical Path
The longest path in the network
Defines the shortest time project can be completed
Critical path activity delay
project delay
3-16
ES
Activity
Name
EF
EF is earliest finish
EF = ES + Activity time
LS
3-17
Activity
Duration
LF
12
10
10
35
10
40
Start
Finish
E
24
3-18
Start
15
0 A 12
12 F 22
63 K 72
12
10
12 C 22
22 G 57
10
35
0 B 9
9 D 19
19 H 59
59 J 63
10
40
Critical
path
Finish
9 E 33
24
3-19
LS is latest start
ES
LS
LS = LF Activity time
3-20
Activity
Name
Activity
Duration
EF
LF
Start
A 12
12
14
Critical
path
0
0
B 9
9 9
12
48
I 27
15 63
12 F 22
53
63
63 K 72
63
72
10
12 C 22
14
24
22 G 57
24
59
9 D 19
9
19
19 H 59
19
59
10
40
10
9 E 33
35
24
Finish
35
59
3-21
59 J 63
59
63
What do you
notice about
ES/LS & EF/LF?
2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J. 07458
12
14
Slack = LF12 EF
12
48
I 27
15 63
12 F 22
53
63
63 K 72
63
72
10
12 C 22
14
24
22 G 57
24
59
9 D 19
9
19
19 H 59
19
59
Start
Slack
63 = 0 10
K = 63Critical
Finish
35
path
or
0
0
B 9
SlackK = 72
9 972 = 0 10
40
59 J 63
59
63
9 E 33
35
59
24
3-22
12 I 27
48Slack
63
0
2
A012 0
12 14 14
129
9
9 35
12 53
22 24
Critical
19 19
path
12 48
B 9 59
59
63 9 63
2
0
12 F 22
53 2 63
10
0
26
C 22
12 41
14 2 24
10
0
36
0 19
9 D
9 0 19
Node Duration ES
Latest
start time
A
B
C
D
E
F
Start
G
H
I
J
K
12
9
10
10
24
10
35
40
15
4
6
0
2
0
0
15
63 K 72
63
72
22 G 57
24
59
Finish
35
19 H 59
19
59
40
10
59 J 63
59
63
Critical
24 path activities have zero slack
3-23
Activity Slack
How much would we like to reduce
the time for activity B?
5
Start
B 25
5 20 25
25
35
25 10 35
0
5
0 5 5
Finish
5
20
10 15 25
3-24
3-26
3-27
8000
Crash cost
7000
6000
Activity B
5000
Normal cost
4000
3000
0
|
5
Crash
time
|
6
|
7
3-28
|
9
|
10
|
11
Normal
time
3-29
Summary
Project management requires special tools
PERT / CPM Network planning methods that generate
relationship between activities, project duration,
critical path, slack for non-critical activities, crashing
(cost / time trade-offs), and resource usage