Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Department
dr M arman Nasution SpPD
Waiting
room
Triage
Team leader
Definition of Triage
Triage
Non
Triage Categories
Definition:
Disaster
not
Disaster
Type
Type
Type
Two-tiered
1- Resuscitation
2- Emergent
3- urgent
4- less urgent
5- Non urgent
The Canadian E.D. Triage and Acuity Scale
Triage levels
Class 1
acuity
Emergent
Recommended
reassessment
continuous
Cardiopulmonary
arrest, severe
respiratory distress,
major burns, major
trauma, massive
uncontrolled bleeding
Coma, status epil..
Every 30
minutes
Every 1-2
hrs
Class 2
Urgent
Requires prompt care, but
will not cause loss of life or
limb if left untreated for
several hours.
Class 3
Non urgent
And treatment but time is
not a critical factor
Examples
TRIAGE LEVELS
1- Resuscitation -- threat to life
Time to nurse assessment
IMMEDIATE
Time to physician assessment
IMMEDIATE
Cardiac and respiratory arrest
Major trauma
Active seizure
Shock
Status Asthmatics
Triage levels
2- Emergent
Potential threat to life,limb or function
Nurse Immediate , Physician <15 minutes
Triage levels
3- Urgent
Condition with significant distress
Time Nurse < 20 min, physician < 30
min
Head injury without decrease of LOC but
with vomiting
Mild to moderate respiratory distress
G.I. Bleed not actively bleed
Acute psychosis
Triage levels
4- Less urgent
Conditions with mild to moderate
discomfort
Time for Nurse assessment <1h
Time for physician assessment < 1h
Head injury, alert, no vomiting
Chest pain, no distress, no cardiac susp.
Depression with no suicidal attempt
Triage levels
5- Non urgent
Conditions can be delayed, no distress
Time for nurse and Physician assessment
more than 2h
Minor trauma
Sore throat with temp. < 39
An
Disability
(neurogenic)
Air way
Circulation
Breathing
The
Air
way
Abnormal airway sounds, strider, wheezing
grunting
Unusual posture e.g.. Sniffing position, inability
to speak, drooling or inability to handle
secretion
Breathing
Altered skin signs, cyanosis, dusky skin,
tachypnic
bradypnea,
or apnea
periods,
retractions, use
Across
the
room
assessment
accessory muscles, nasal flaring, grunting, or
audible wheezes
knowledge to emergency
medical treatment
Adequate training and competent
skills,language, terminology
Ability to use the critical thinker process
Good decision maker
interviewing others.
Maintain good communication between
triage and treatment area
maintain excellent communication with
waiting area.
Use all resources to maintain high
standard of care.
Importance of re triage
Reassess
Triage
Triage:
To
aim
Non
Multi
types
Definition:
The
Disaster:
1.
2.
3.
Objectives -1:
Objectives -2:
Immediately
accessible
Sign
posted
Allow for patients examination
Privacy
Staff security
Fully equipped with Emergency equipment
Communication services
Triage area
for
additional nurse.
Accurate triage is key to the efficient
operation
Effective triage is based on knowledge,
skills and attitude of the triage nurse.
Pediatric cases record vital signs every 30
mts and others 60 mts during
reassessment.
Triage time
Triage
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Goals of triage
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Advantages of triage
The
triage team
Triage
of Victims
- first victims to arrive are frequently not
the most seriously injured. They are
1. Critical patients
2. Fatally Injured Patients
3. Non critical patients
4. Contaminated patients
Are
1.Chief complaint
2.Brief triage history
3.Injury/ illness
4.General appearance
5.Vital signs
Level 1- Resuscitation
Level 2- Emergent
Level 3- urgent
Level 4- less urgent
Level 5- Non urgent
arrest
Level I Immediate :
Level II - emergent
centigrade
Chronic medical illnesses.
Alcoholics
An
The
triage history
The
The
triage decision
Disability
(neurogenic)
Air way
Circulation
Breathing
Air
way
Abnormal airway sounds, strider, wheezing
grunting
Unusual posture e.g.. Sniffing position, inability
to speak, drooling or inability to handle
secretion
Breathing
Altered skin signs, cyanosis, dusky skin,
tachypnea
bradypnea, or apnea periods, retractions, use
accessory muscles, nasal flaring, grunting, or
audible wheezes
Circulation
(neuro.)
LOC
Interaction with environment
Inability to recognize family members
Unusual irritability
Response to pain or stimuli
Flaccid or hyper active muscle tone
Extensive
treatment
Adequate
Ability
Good
decision maker
interviewing
others.
Maintain good communication between triage and
treatment area
maintain excellent communication with waiting area.
Use all resources to maintain high standard of care.
Crowd control.
Telephone.
Communicate with team leader and seek feed back on
decisions.
Reassess
retriage
The
Patient
If
Key points
With
Any
Pregnant
Assaults
Motor vehicle crashes
Shootings
Domestic abuse
Pregnant
Pregnant
When
Cardiac
arrest
Follow
Some
The
Rapid
High-priority
High-priority
patients (contd):
High-priority
patients (contd):
Transport
Transport
decision
Primary Assessment
Circulation
decision
Primary Assessment at
accident area
originated
in WW I by French
doctors treating the battlefield wounded at
the aid stations behind the front
3 categories
Those who are likely to live, regardless of what
care they receive
Those who are likely to die, regardless of what
care they receive
Those for whom immediate care might make a
positive difference in outcome
simplest
of items
Concepts
1) Utility
2) Relevance
3) Validity
1
"usual
presentation"
Assigning Triage
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Goals of Triage
The
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Accurate:
based on
dynamic
process
Triage
1.
2.
3.
4.
Chief complaint
Subjective
Objective
Additional Information:
Allergies
Medications
Objectives
Reassessment
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Documentation Standards
Conditions
Level I Resuscitation
Conditions
Level II Emergent
Level II Emergent
Conditions
Conditions
Conditions
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
in
group
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
1
Normal Delivery
14.91%
Complications of Pregnancy
12.39%
Accident
9.11%
7.30%
7.26%
Perinatal Conditions
6.57%
5.20%
3.74%
3.43%
10
Malignant Neoplasms
3.13%
INTRODUCTION
Principal Causes of Deaths In Government Hospitals Malaysia in 2007
1
Septicemia
16.87%
15.70%
Malignant Neoplasm
10.59%
Cerebrovascular Diseases
8.49%
Pneumonia
5.81%
Accident
5.59%
4.47%
Perinatal Conditions
4.20%
Kidney Diseases
3.83%
10
Ill-Defined Conditions
3.03%
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Jan-Jun
Death
5,378
5,634
5,678
5,623
5719
5672
3,018
Serious Injuries
6,696
7,163
7,444
7,600
7373
7384
3,632
Mild Injuries
30,259
31,357
33,147
25,905
15596
13979
6,690
Mechanical
Damage
237,378
254,499
280,546
289,136
312564
336284
170,357
Total Case
279,711
298,653
326,815
328,264
341,252
363,319
183,357
INTRODUCTION
10 year statistic on Road Traffic Accident
Year
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Total Injuries
55,693
53,063
50,20
0
50,50
6
47,82
3
50,864
47,080
39,71
6
29,258
27,64
5
Minor injuries
37,885
36,886
34,37
5
35,97
3
35,23
6
37,415
33,413
25,92
8
15,596
13,97
9
Major injuries
12,068
10,383
9,790
8,684
6,696
7,163
7,444
7,600
7,375
7,384
Total Death
5,740
5,794
6,035
5,849
5,891
6,286
6,223
6,188
6,287
6,282
Death Index
(10,000 registered
vehicles)
6.28
5.83
5.69
5.17
4.9
4.9
4.52
4.18
3.98
3.7
Accident Index
(10,000 registered
vehicles)
230.9
224.7
236.3
234.6
232.7
233
237.4
220.6
216.1
216.1
Historically
Historically EMS in Malaysia was very
underdeveloped prior to 1998
At Present.
Subspecialty areas
New ambulances
New Guidelines/protocol
Empowerment for EM physicians
Recognition (14th specialty)
Training:
More universities for EM
postgraduate program
- Conjoint program/exam board
Now total EPs are 55 (Min 1 EP per state)
Paramedic training increased
Public training/education life support
STANDARDS
i.
ii.
Manpower (training/certification)
iii.
iv.
Call center
v.
Medical Control
vi.
Funding
Manned by non
paramedics
Ambulance driver
with nursing staff
Minimally trained &
equipped
Scoop & Run Concept
Better equipped
Trained nursing staff
Accompanied by doc
Manpower (training/certification)
Level of care:
Manpower (training/certification)
Examples of effort by certain organization:
i. Hospital Universiti sains Malaysia
EMD program
Involve ambulance drivers and other support staff (BLS, BTLS, Fir
ii. Civil Defense
iii. St Johns Ambulance
iv. UKM Medical Center
v. Ministry of Health
GROUP
Call Processing
Time (CPT)
Time Taken to
Prepare Team
(TTP)
Ambulance
Response Time
(ART)
Without EMD
Mean
Number of Calls
Std Deviation
117.00
1000
54.93
203.91
1000
115.24
1325.29
1000
1572.30
1646.21
1000
1609.39
With EMD
Mean
Number of Calls
Std Deviation
117.67
1000
55.20
117.00
1000
54.93
676.83
1000
1451.08
911.50
1000
399.34
Mean Call
Processing
Time (CPT)
Mean Time
Taken to
Prepare
Team
(TTP)
Mean Time
Taken To
Arrive At
Scene
(TTTS)
Mean
Ambulance
Response
Time (ART)
Kota Bharu
117.67
117.00
676.83
911.50
Penang
154.07
218.56
896.33
1268.96
Kuala
Lumpur
135.48
196.22
1208.08
1539.78
P<0.05
Police
Fire & Rescue
Civil defence
Mobile phone
Major step
June 2007
i.
One number Client focus (response to 999 calls within 10 sec or 4 rings)
Total Cases
Percentage
1
2
3
4
1
915
9
36.1
9
2
16
10 12
0.63
0.4
7
5
6
7
8
3
30
1.1
9
4
1,153
Total
45.61
78
58
258
0.24
0.08
3.0
9
2.2
9
10.2
1
Medical/surgical causes
Trapped
Submersion injury/drowning
Wild reptile (snakes)
8
2,477
9 Bee/Hornet
10 - Others
Mass
Casualty
Incidence
J
A
N
U
A
R
Y
F
E
B
R
U
A
R
Y
M
A
R
C
H
A
P
J J
R M U U
I A N L
L Y E Y
S
E
A P
U T
E
G M
U B
S E
T R
O
C
T T
O
O TA
B L
E
R
Flooding
23
Collapsestructure
Fire
MaritimeIncidence
SAR
Industrialaccident
Landslide
Aircrash
Typhoon
11
35
Jumlah
No doctors
Health Centers
District hospital
Small ED
Limited no of
doctors
Time ?
OUTCOME
POOR
Tertiary
Equipped
Hospital ED
Emergency
Physicians
Health Center
District hospital
Transportation Time
Communication Time
REDUCED
Tertiary Hospitals
Medical Control
Funding
More focus on
RESEARCH
Very limited
Few research conducted by Trainee in Emergency Medicine
A study on the ambulance call received at the call center Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia
Zainalabidin I, Nik Hisamuddin NAR, Rashidi A, Mohd Shaharuddin S. May 2007
High percentage of misuse (mostly prank calls) of the emergency hotline. Half of the ambulance
Calls were associated woth communication difficulties
Pattern of injury & preventability of prehospital death among motorcyclist
Noor Azleen A, Wan Aasim WA, Rashidi A, Nik Hisamuddin NAR. May 2006
Based on ISS, 67% had ISS > 50, 31% had ISS of 75. 36% of them died before reaching
Hospitals. 39% died in the Emerg dept.
RESEARCH
Interhospital ambulance transportation of critically patients to Kuala Lumpur Hospital
Ridzuan MI, Abu Hassan A, Wan Aasim WA, Kamaruddin J, Rashidi A,
Nik Hisamuddin NAR. May 2003
58% were trauma cases, 68% referral from district hospitals & health centers. 51% seriouslyill patient
were accompanied by junior doctors only trained at the level of BLS. 47% of ambulance equipped
with two way radio communications
Ambulance call response interval in Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
Khairi K, Abu Hassan A, Kamaruddin J, Wan Aasim WA. May 2003
The ambulance call response interval was 15.1 + 8.4 minutes. The causes of delay include traffic jam,
wrong address, wrong route taken, tall building.
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
i. Ambulance response time
ii. Call processing time
iii. Crew mobilizing time
iv. Client feedback/satisfaction
Poor
Excellent
Vehicle appearance
1. General appearance of the ambulance
2. Cleanliness of ambulance
3. Comfort of ride in the ambulance
4. Feeling of security in the ambulance
5. Adequacy of ambulance equipments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Staff attitude
6. Helpfulness of staff
7. Attentiveness of staff
8. Empathy nature of staff
9. Friendliness of staff
10. Gentleness of staff
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Staff performance
11. Ensuring of patients comfort
12. Calmness of staffs
13. Adequacy of explanation by staff of their actions
14. Efficiency of staff
15. Feeling of safety when staff arrive
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Professionalism
16. Perceived level of training of staff
17. Professional look of staff
18. Level of trust in staff
19. Level of competency of staff
20. Confidence of staff to keep me alive until reaching hospital
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Image
24. What do you think is the public perception of our ambulance service?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Terima kasih
Ass Wr Wb