Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
SHEKHAR RAJDERKAR
PRO VICE-CHANCELLOR.
MAHARASHTRA UNIVERSITY OF
HEALTH SCIENCES,
NASHIK.
WHAT IS M.S. ?
WHAT IS M.D. ?
WHAT IS Ph. D. ?
DOCTOR THE
FOLLOWS THE
ONE WHO
DOCTRINE.
DOCTRINE IS A SET OF
INDIVIDUAL PRINCIPLES
AND
SOCIALLY USEFUL MORAL VALUES,
LEARNT
THROUGH THE
EXPERIENCES, TESTED BY
INTELLECT, MIND AND EMOTIONS,
AND PRACTISED
BY AN
INDIVIDUAL WITH THE
RECOGNITION FROM
THE
SOCIETY / COMMUNITY
DOCTOR OF MEDICINE
MASTER OF SURGERY
PHILOSOPHY.
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
WHAT IS RESEARCH ?
SEARCHING
THE THINGS
AGAIN AND
AGAIN i.e.
RE SEARCH.
RESEARCH DEFINITION
R
E
S
E
A
R
C
H
G
L
A
M
O
U
R
O
U
S
BIO-MEDICO-SOCIAL RESEARCH.
BASIC
APPLIED
COMBINED
ENVIRONMENTAL
ANIMAL
ECOLOGICAL
HUMAN
PROCEDURES
LABORATORY
TESTS
DRUGS / VACCINES
OPERATIONAL
HEALTH SYSTEMS
RESEARCH
OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH
CAUSE EFFECT
RESEARCH
PHRMACO EPODEMIOLOGIC
RESEARCH
GENETIC RESEARCH
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
NUTRITIONAL RESEARCH
RESEARCH METHODS ..
OBSERVATIONAL
(NONINTERVENTIONAL)
DESCRIPTIVE
ANALYTICAL
EXPERIMENTAL
(INTERVENTIONAL)
ANIMAL
HUMAN
DISCRIPTIVE METHODS..
CROSS SECTIONAL
LONGITUDINAL
BIO-MEDICO-SOCIAL
RESEARCH
HOSPITAL
STUDIES
FIELD / COMMUNITY
STUDIES
GRADE A
(Evidence levels quality Ia, Ib)
REQUIRES
AT LEAST ONE
RANDOMISED CONTROL TRIAL AS
PART OF THE BODY
OF
LITERATURE
OF
OVERALL GOOD CONSISTANCY
AND ADDRESSING
SPECIFIC
RECOMMENDATION
GRADE B
(Evidence levels IIa, IIb, III)
REQUIRES
AVAILABILITY OF
CONDUCTED
STUDIES
WELL
CLINICAL
BUT
NO
RANDOMIZED CLINICAL
TRIALS
ON THE TOPIC OF
RECOMMENDATION
GRADE C
(Evidence levels IV)
REQUIRES
EVIDENCE FROM
EXPERT
COMMITTEE REPORTS OR
OPINIONS
AND / OR
CLINICAL EXPERIENCE OF
RESPECTED AUTHORITIES.
INDICATES ABSENCE OF
DIRECTLY APPLICABLE STUDIES
OF GOOD QUALITY.
INJURY
PERSON
PLACE
IMPACT
AGENT
STANDERDISATIONENVIRONMENT
AUTHENTICATIO
AUTHENTICATI
DISSERTATION
AT THE END
OF SUCH STUDY,
IT IS ESSENTIAL
TO FORMULATE
AN HYPOTHESIS
A HYPOTHESIS IS
MANDATORY
REQUIREMENT
FOR A THESIS ..
HYPOTHESIS
A SUPPOSITION
ARRIEVED AT, FROM
OBSERVATION OR
REFLECTION
HYPOTHESIS
A SUPPOSITION
THAT APPEARS
TO EXPLAIN
A GROUP OF
PHENOMENA
AND IS
ADVANCED AS
BASIS FOR
FURTHER
INVESTIGATION
HYPOTHESIS
A TENTATIVE
ASSUMPTION
MADE IN
ORDER TO
DRAW OUT AND
TEST ITS
LOGICAL OR
IMPIRICAL
CONSEQUENCES
WORKING HYPOTHESIS
A PROPOSITION OR
SET OF PROPOSITIONS
SET FORTH AS AN EXPLANATION
FOR THE OCCURRENCE OF
CERTAIN
SPECIFIED GROUP OF PHENOMENA,
EITHER ASSERTED MERELY
AS A PROVISIONAL CONJECTURE
TO GUIDE INVESTIGATION OR
ACCEPTED AS HIGHLY PROBABLE
IN THE LIGHT OF
ESTABLISHED FACTS.
COMPONENTS OF HYPOTHESIS 1
PERSON CHARACTERISTICS OR
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
GENETIC FACTORS
AGE,
GENDER,
SOCIOECONOMY,
MARITAL STATUS,
HABITS,
BEHAVIOUR ,
STRESS ETC.
COMPONENTS OF
HYPOTHESIS 2
POSTULATED CAUSE / S
- SPECIFIC OR
OTHERWISE
AETIOLOGICAL
FACTORS
RISK FACTORS
MODIFIABLE
NON-MODIFIABLE
COMPONENTS OF
HYPOTHESIS 3
THE
EXPECTED
OUTCOME
i.e. THE
DISEASE
ITS
FEATURES
COMPONENTS OF
HYPOTHESIS 4
DOSE
RESPONSE
RELATIONSHIP
EFFECT
EFFICACY
SIDE-EFFECTS
TOXICITY
LETHAL DOSE
COMPONENTS OF
HYPOTHESIS 5
TIME
RESPONSE
RELATIONSHIP
HYPOTHESIS
SUPPORTIVE
COMPONENTS
VULNERABLE
SUCCEPTIBLE
PRONE NESS
HYPOTHESIS
ACCESSORY
COMPONENTS
LET US LEARN
BETWEEN THE
TO READ
LINES.
TITLE (TOPIC)
SELF EXPLANATORY
CONCISE
COHERENT WITH
AIM,
OBJECTIVES,
TYPE OF STUDY,
METHODOLOGY
ETC ..
CONTENTS
1.
INTRODUCTION
2.
PURPOSE OF STUDY
3.
4.
5.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
CONTENTS
6.
METHODOLOGY
7.
8.
RESULTS,
OBSERVATIONS
& DISCUSSION
CONTENTS
CONTINUED
9.
10.
RECOMMENDATIONS
11.
12.
REFERENCES / BIBLIOGRAPHY
13.
ANNEXURES
14.
INTRODUCTION
EMPHASIZE THE
IMPORTANCE OF THE
AND SUBJECT.
TOPIC
PURPOSE OF STUDY.
PURPOSE OF STUDY.
QUOTE THE
RESEARCH QUESTION / S
RESEARCH QUESTION / S
DESCRIPTIVE QUESTIONS
RESEARCH QUESTION / S
OBSERVATIONAL / CO-RELATIONAL
QUESTIONS
Designed to look at the relationships between
two or more variables.
Which stage of MITOSIS is longest?
If two sounds have the same pitch, do they
have the same FREQUENCY?
What COMPLIMENTARY COLOURS do
color blind individuals see?
RESEARCH QUESTION / S
CAUSAL:
RESEARCH QUESTION / S
AIM
QUALITATIVE, IDEAL,
USUALLY SINGLE
OBJECTIVES
: QUANTITATIVE, MULTIPLE
OBJECTIVES
METHODOLOGY
STUDY AREA
STUDY SAMPLE & SIZE
STUDY PERIOD
PILOT TESTING
INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION
CRITERIA
PROFORMA / QUESTIONNAIRE
METHODOLOGY
CONTINUED
TIME UTILIZATION
CALENDER
MATERIALS USED
STANDARDIZATION OF
EQUIPMENTS / INSTRUMENTS /
PROCEDURES
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
QUALITATIVELY AND
QUANTITATIVELY ADEQUATE.
UP TO DATE, WITH
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
AYURVEDIC REVIEW
maUL saMihtomaQaIla
Xlaaok Aqavaa Xlaaok
samauccaya
%yaatIla
raogasamaudayaaMcao va
raogalaxaNaaMcao ivavarNa
AaiNa ivavaocana
AYURVEDIC REVIEW
maUL saMihtomaQyao
idlaolyaa ivakaraMSaI
jauLNaara va AaQauinak
vaOVkat namaUd
ivakar AaiNa yaa
daonhI caI tulanaa.
AYURVEDIC REVIEW ..
SPECIFY :
WHAT COMPONENTS ARE
TO BE INCLUDED UNDER
THE STUDY.
JUSTIFY..
REVIEW OF
CONTEMPORARY
AYURVEDA
TEXT
TABLES
DISCUSSION
GRAPHS, CHARTS,
ILLUSTRATIONS
COMPARATIVE ACCOUNT OF
VARIOUS OTHER SIMILAR
STUDIES INLAND AND ABROAD
PERTINENT UNIVARIATE /
MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL
APPLICATIONS
STATISTICS
W
H
Y
?
RESEARCH - PHOBIA ?
STATISTICALLY
YOURS
STATISTICS
CONSULT
THE
STATISTICIAN
BEFORE
PLANNING
THE STUDY.
QUALITATIVE STATISTICS
PILOT TESTING
OF
PROFORMA
SAMPLE
PARAMETERS
ERRORS
STATISTICS
PROCEDURE
AUTHENTICATION
STANDARDISATION
STATISTICS
SAMPLE SIZE
CALCULATIONS
RANDOMISATION
SAMPLE SIZE ..
SAMPLING
PLEASE TRY TO
UNDERSTAND THE
METHODS OF SAMPLING
SAMPLE SIZE
CALCULATIONS
CONTROL CONFOUNDING
RESULTS
SUMMARY
&
CONCLUSIONS
LIMITATIONS OF STUDY
HOSPITAL BASED
INSTITUTIONAL
NON REPRESENTATIVE
SAMPLE SIZE
ETC ETC ETC ..
FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
FOR THIS, USE ..
LOGIC
COMMON SENSE
INTELLIGENCE
TAKE HELP OF GUIDE
REFERENCES /
BIBLIOGRAPHY
VANCOUR STYLE
HARWARD STYLE
ANNEXURES
PROFORMA
QUESTIONNAIRE
METHODOLOFY OF ANY
PROCEDURE OR
TEST
ETC.
Ph. D. MEANS ..
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
LET US TRY TO
UNDERSTAND THE
MEANING OF THIS.