Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Methodology
Bauyon, HK
Parts of Methodology
Research Design
Sampling Technique (Population &
Sample)
Research Locale
Research Instruments
Data Gathering procedures
Statistical Treatment of Data
Bioethical considerations
Research Design
Research Design
This describes the research mode
whether it is true experimental or
quasi-experimental design,
descriptive or survey research,
historical research, qualitative
research, ethnographic and etc.
Research Design is
The
arrangement of
conditions for
collection and
analysis of data
in a manner that
aims to
combine
relevance to
the research
purpose with
economy in
procedure.
Blueprint of
the study. It
guides the
collection,
measurement
and analysis of
data.
A plan or
structure of
the
investigation
in order to
obtain answers
to research
questions.
Observatio
nal Design
Which
relates to
the
condition
under
which the
observation
are to be
created
Statistica
l Design
Which
concern the
question of
how the
information
and the data
gathered are
to be
analyzed
Operatio
nal
Design
Which
deals with
techniques
by which
the
procedures
satisfied in
sampling.
Research Design
Approaches
Type
Purpose
Experimen
tal
Time
frame
Degree of
Control
Examples
Test for
Current
cause/effect
relationships
High
Comparing
two types of
treatment
Quasiexperimen
tal
Test for
Current or
cause/effect past
relationships
without full
control
Moderate to
high
Gender
differences
in
visual/spatia
l abilities
Ex post
facto
Low to
medium
Relationship
between
history of
child abuse
and
depression
Type
Purpose
Examples
Cohortsequential
Examine
change in
varying time
Future
Low to
moderate
How motherchild
negativity
changed
over
adolescence
Survey
Assess
opinions or
characteristi
cs that exist
at a given
time
Current
None or low
Voting
preferences
before an
election
Qualitative
Discover
Past or
potential
current
relationships
; descriptive
None or low
Peoples
experiences
of quit
smoking
Sampling
Techniques
Sampling Techniques
The proportion of the population to
be used must have been determined
already and the computation of the
sample must have been finished.
Researcher must write about the
complete procedure he used in
determining his sample.
Types of Sampling
Techniques
1. Probability sampling
2. Non-probability sampling
1. Probability sampling
Simple random
sampling
Systemic
sampling
Stratified
sampling
each individual is
chosen randomly
and entirely by
chance, such that
each individual
has the same
probability of
being chosen at
any stage during
the sampling
process
a statistical
method involving
the selection of
elements from an
ordered sampling
frame (criteria or
reference/sequen
ce of selection)
the population
embraces a
number of distinct
categories, the
frame can be
organized by
these categories
into separate
strata. Each
stratum is then
sampled as an
independent subpopulation, out of
which individual
elements can be
randomly
selected.
2. Non-probability
sampling
Quota sampling
the population
is first
segmented into
mutually
exclusive subgroups, just as
in stratified
sampling. Then
judgment is
used to select
the subjects or
units from each
segment based
on specified
proportion
Accidental
sampling
involves the
sample being
drawn from
that part of the
population
which is close
to hand
Panel sampling
method of first
selecting a
group of
participants
through a
random
sampling
method and
then asking
that group for
(potentially the
same)
information
several times
over a period of
time
Add samples
from all the
final
sampling
strata to find
the total
sample.
Decide on the
margin of error; it
should not be
higher than 5%.
Probably, 3% is
ideal
Multiply the
number of
sampling units in
each final
sampling stratum
by the rate (%) to
find the sample
from each final
sampling stratum
In which:
n= size of sample
N= size of population
e= margin of error
If the sampling is
multistage or if the
population is
stratefied, compute
the sample
proportion by
dividing the result in
step no. 3 by the
population
Example
Example. Suppose an investigation of the teaching of science in the
high schools of a religion is to be conducted, in which the science
teachers are to be respondents. There are 2243 teachers handling
biological sciences, 1406 handling chemical sciences, and 992
teachers handling physical sciences, a total of 4641 teachers.
The sampling procedure follows:
Step 1. the population is 4,641
Step 2. the margin of error to be used is 3%
Step 3. using the formula
n=
4641
1+ 4641 (.03)
4641
1 + 4641 (.0009)
= 4641
1+4.1769
= 4641
5.1769
= 896.4825 ( this may not be rounded to 900 for
convenience) this is the sample.
Step 4. the teachers are group into three categories
according to the branch of science they are handling, so
we use stratefied sampling.
Sample proportion (%) = n
N
= 900
4641
=.1939
Step 5 and 6
Teachers
handling
Number
sample
Biological
sciences
2243
20
449
Chemical
sciences
1406
20
281
Physical
sciences
992
20
198
Total:
4641
928
Research Locale
Research Locale
This discusses the place or setting of
the study. It describes in brief the
place where the study is conducted.
Only important features which have
the bearing on the present study are
included.
It shows the target population.
Research
Instruments
Research Instruments
A survey, questionnaire, test, scale,
rating, or tool designed to measure the
variable(s), characteristic(s), or
information of interest, often a
behavioral or psychological
characteristic.
They are used to gauge some quality or
ability of your subjects.
Purpose: to elicit the data for your study.
Research Instrument
This explains the specific type of research
instrument used such as questionnaire,
checklist, questionnaire-checklists, structured
interview, teachermade test, standardized
instrument which are adopted or borrowed with
permission from the author or from other
sources.
The parts of the instruments should be
explained and what bits of information are
derived.
The establishment of validity and reliability
should be explained and only experts should be
chosen to validate such instrument. Specific
Data Gathering
Procedure
2. Indirect or Questionnaire
Method
The researcher makes use of written questionnaire. The
researcher gives or distributes the questionnaire to the
respondents either by personal delivery or by mail.
Example: Sudoku Sadako would send out questionnaires through
e-mails regarding peoples view and familiariztion on the game
of sudoku.
Pros: The researcher can save on time and money in gathering
the information needed because questionnaires can be given to
a large number of respondents at the same time.
Cons: The researcher cannot expect that all distributed
questionnaire will be retrieved because some respondents
simply ignore the questionnaires.
Clarifications cannot be made if the respondent does not
understand the question.
3. Registration Method
This method is governed by laws.
Example: The number of register professionals
can be found at the Professional Regulation
Commission (PRC). The number of births and
death rates are registered in the National
Statistics Office (NSO).
Pros: This method is the most reliable since it
is enforced by laws.
Cons: Data are limited to what are listed in
the document.
4. Experimental Method
This method is utilized to find out cause and
effect relationships.
Examples: Medical technologists would like to know
the effect of new brand of vitamins on the growth
of toddlers. The new brand will be taken by a set of
toddlers, while another set will be give the already
existing brand. The growth of toddlers will then be
compared to determine which vitamins is better.
Pros: This method goes to beyond plain description
data.
Cons: Care should be taken on making conclusions
to the result of the experiment.
Margin of Error
When we use a sample, we do not get the actual
value but just an estimate of the parameter.
Hence, there is an error associated when using
the sample. We call that the margin of error
represented by e
Example:
Suppose we want to find the average height of the third
year students of GSDMSFI. However, due to insufficient
time, only the students in the third floor were used to
estimate the average height. Obviously, the result is not
the actual average height but just an estimate and thus,
there is really an error when we use the sample instead
of the population.
Statistical treatment of
Data
Bioethical
Considerations
Objectivity
Integrity
Carefulness
Openness
Respect for
Intellectual
property
Confidentia
lity
Responsible
publication
Responsible
mentoring
Social
responsibili
ty
Competenc
e
Legality
Human
subjects
protection
Animal care
General
Principal
Ethics
The following is a rough and general summary of some ethical
principals that various codes address*:
Honesty
- Strive for honesty in all scientific communications. Honestly
report data, results, methods and procedures, and publication
status. Do not fabricate, falsify, or misrepresent data. Do not
deceive colleagues, granting agencies, or the public.
Objectivity
- Strive to avoid bias in experimental design, data analysis, data
interpretation, peer review, personnel decisions, grant writing,
expert testimony, and other aspects of research where objectivity
is expected or required. Avoid or minimize bias or self-deception.
Disclose personal or financial interests that may affect research.
Integrity
- Keep your promises and agreements; act with sincerity; strive
for consistency of thought and action.
Carefulness
- Avoid careless errors and negligence; carefully and critically examine your own
work and the work of your peers. Keep good records of research activities, such as
data collection, research design, and correspondence with agencies or journals.
Openness
- Share data, results, ideas, tools, resources. Be open to criticism and new ideas.
Respect for Intellectual Property
- Honor patents, copyrights, and other forms of intellectual property. Do not use
unpublished data, methods, or results without permission. Give credit where credit
is due. Give proper acknowledgement or credit for all contributions to research.
Never plagiarize.
Confidentiality
- Protect confidential communications, such as papers or grants submitted for
publication, personnel records, trade or military secrets, and patient records.
Responsible Publication
- Publish in order to advance research and scholarship, not to advance just your
own career. Avoid wasteful and duplicative publication.
Responsible Mentoring
Help to educate, mentor, and advise students. Promote
their welfare and allow them to make their own decisions.
Social Responsibility
Strive to promote social good and prevent or mitigate
social harms through research, public education, and
advocacy.
Non-Discrimination
Avoid discrimination against colleagues or students on the
basis of sex, race, ethnicity, or other factors that are not
related to their scientific competence and integrity.
Competence
- Maintain and improve your own professional competence and expertise
through lifelong education and learning; take steps to promote
competence in science as a whole.
Legality
- Know and obey relevant laws and institutional and governmental
policies.
Animal Care
- Show proper respect and care for animals when using them in research.
Do not conduct unnecessary or poorly designed animal experiments.
Human Subjects Protection
- When conducting research on human subjects, minimize harms and
risks and maximize benefits; respect human dignity, privacy, and
autonomy; take special precautions with vulnerable populations; and
strive to distribute the benefits and burdens of research fairly.
Example: CHAPTER 3
QUIZ
1. A plan or structure of the investigation in
order to obtain answers to research
questions.
2-6. Parts of Methodology
7-9. 3 examples of research design approaches
10-11 Types of sampling
12-15 Data gathering techniques
16. Slovins formula
17-20. Ethics