Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Open Fractures
INTRODUCTION
Fractures
that are
exposed to
the
environment
through
breaks in the
skin
Occur in wide
spectrum of
conditions with
specific
consequences
Bacteria may
contaminate area of
injury
Force magnitude
required to produce
the fracture is
variable
Mechanism of Injury
-result from the application of a
violent force
-applied kinetic energy(KE)=0.5 mV2
History
Hippocrates (460-370 BC) - War as
most appropriate training ground for
surgeons. They can facilitate healing
and cannot impose it. Advocated I&D
for wounds that did not progress.
Galen (2nd) - also recognized
purulence, considered essential to
the repair process
History
Brunschwig and Botello (15th and 16th) removal of necrotic tissue from wounds
that did not progress
Ambroise Pare (17th) - Hot oil as cautery.
Used turpentine over wound, enlarged
wounds; largely unrecognized during his
day
Desault (18th) reestablished exploration
of wound, adopted the term debridement
History
Larrey Desaults pupil added timing
- sooner the better
Mathysen POP, occlusive dressings
were reintroduced, only to lapse
again because of untoward effects
from misapplication, time when
debridement was abandoned
Lister - Carbolic acid dressings
History
Sir Robert Jones (WWI 13-18)
Debridement in missile injuries
Trueta (Spanish Civil War 36-39) Combination of debridement and an
occlusive dressing that also served
as a splint. Only 6 deaths in 1,073
patients
WWII 39-45 - Sulfa agents replaced
antiseptic solutions
History
Korean War 50-53 Antibiotic use.
Policy of rapid evacuation, wound
debridement, and delayed closure.
Still the standard today
Advances shifted the focus
Preservation of life and limb
preservation of function and prevention
of complications
History
Operation Enduring Freedom/OTA
CPG mirror the military model: ABCs,
splint and dress wound, IV
antibiotics, urgent operative
debridement and irrigation, leave the
wound open, and stabilize unstable
skeletal injuries, repeated
debridements prn
DIAGNOSIS
Straightforward in most
History
PE wound dimension, visible bone,
NV, compare to normal side
The real
injury
Patient Variables
Age
Gender
Diabetes
Infection
Smoking
Medications
Underlying
physiology
Injury Variables
Severity
Energy of Injury
Morphology of the
fracture
Bone loss
Blood supply
Location
Other injuries
CLASSIFICATION
Gustilo and Anderson
Most quoted and widely accepted
Degree of soft-tissue injury and
contamination predict outcome
Wide variation, too much emphasis on
wound size
Devastating crush injury of the leg
necessitating amputation may be associated
with only a small skin wound; very large
wound caused by a sharp object, such as a
knife, may have minimal associated softtissue crush
Requires a flap
for bone
coverage and
soft tissue
closure
Periosteal
stripping
3A
3B
3C
Infection
Rates
0-2%
2-7%
10-25%
1050%
25-50%
Fracture
Healing
(weeks)
21-28
28-28
30-35
30-35
Amputati
on Rate
50%
AO classification (adapted
from Tscherne)
The
AO classification of fracture wound severity
provides a grading system for injuries of
each of the skin (I), muscles and tendons
(MT), and neurovascular (NV), each of which
is divided into five degrees of severity.
It is designed to provide a unique,
unequivocal definition of any injury and,
thereby, allows accurate comparison of
cases.
Treatment
Current Treatment at the ER:
Obvious debris that can be easily
removed should be taken with sterile
forceps.
If the patient will be at OR in 1-2 hours
from injury, cover wound with a sterile
bandage
If not, irrigate the wound with 1-2L
PNSS before placing the sterile dressing
Antibiotics
Therapeutic, not
prophylactic
Kill residual
organisms and at
least inhibit their
growth to the point
where host
protective
mechanisms can
eradicate them
Operative Treatment
Primary surgery
Objectives of initial
surgical management
Irrigation and
Debridement
adequate
irrigation and
debridement are the
most important steps
in open fracture
treatment
Objectives of Debridement
and Irrigation
Extension of the traumatized wound to allow
identification of the zone of injury
Detection and removal of foreign material,
especially organic foreign material
Detection and removal of nonviable tissues
Reduction of bacterial contamination
Creation of a wound that can tolerate the
residual bacterial contamination and heal
without infection.
I&D in the OR
Trauma scrub
Zone of injury
Excise margins
Resect muscle and skin to healthy
tissue
The Irrigation
Amount
No good data, copious is
better
Anglen recommends:*
3L for type 1
6L for type 2
9L for type 3
SKELETAL STABILIZATION
If unstable following debridement
Restore length and alignment of long bones
Reduce articular surfaces displaced by
fracture
Allow access to the traumatic wound
Facilitate further reconstruction procedures
Allow early use of the limb
Facilitate fracture union and return of function
POSTOPERATIVE ANTIBIOTIC
USE
Oswold: Antibiotics are given for 48 hours
after the initial and any subsequent
debridements, as well as after wound
closure.
This often translates into a patient being
on antibiotics for 2 to 4 days following
initial presentation and debridement. If
signs of infection or drainage occur at any
time, the wound is cultured and treatment
is based on those cultures
LOCAL NEGATIVE-PRESSURE
DRESSINGS
1997, Argenta and Morykwas
STSG
Thank you!