Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CRITIQUE
OF
BRAIN
DEATH
The Critique of Brain Death
CRITIQUE OF BRAIN DEATH
- One compelling criterion of death is brain
death, since it captured two dimensions:
a. Ceasing to exist
. Brain is the seat of consciousness
. Once brain is no longer possible,
consciousness is no longer possible
b. Biological Death
. There can no longer be integrated functions
once brain as a whole is dead
PERSISTENT
VEGETATIVE
STATE
WHAT KIND OF ENTITY ARE WE?
PERSISTENT
VEGETATIVE
STATE
The Human entity
Jeff McMahan believes:
- An person is a human with one brain
and one mind. A human that is capable
of experiencing and thinking with the
state of consciousness present.
- An human organism is a human being
with one of each part.
- A person, just like how religion describes
it, couldnt possibly be an organism.
PERSISTENT
VEGETATIVE
STATE
The Human Entity
Jeff McMahan explained that the
vegetative state is when a person has
died before its biological death. This
results to being in a vegetative state
or, as some would call it, the state of
being brain dead. It was described and
related to how religious groups would
say that a body has a soul and that the
soul may depart (leaving the person to
cease to exist) even if the body is still
PERSISTENT
VEGETATIVE
STATE
The Human Entity
For McMahan, to exist is to have
consciousness and to have a subject of
experiences. If these 2 are present in
an organism, then there is still a
person inside of it. We are alive
because we are at the state of
consciousness and awareness and if
we lose it, then we cease to exist.
PERSISTENT
VEGETATIVE
STATE
The Human Entity
Jeff clearly stated that Despite being
declared Brain dead, at the present
age, it could not be a full declaration
due to the lack of technology to
examine patience diagnosed with such
case. This means that it can still be
ruled as lawfully and morally wrong to
end a life in a vegetative state. This
could still be ruled as murder.