0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
66 visualizzazioni13 pagine
This document discusses two contrasting paradigms for understanding the role of caste in Indian society - the culturological position and the Marxist position. The culturological position, exemplified by Louis Dumont, views caste as an irreducible and immutable system that conditions material reality. In contrast, early Marxists viewed caste as part of the superstructure that concealed class contradictions. However, some Marxists like Maurice Godelier argue caste exists at the base structural level. Dumont's theory of caste centers on the opposition of pure and impure defined by caste hierarchy. Production relations in India are always mediated by caste duty according to Godelier.
This document discusses two contrasting paradigms for understanding the role of caste in Indian society - the culturological position and the Marxist position. The culturological position, exemplified by Louis Dumont, views caste as an irreducible and immutable system that conditions material reality. In contrast, early Marxists viewed caste as part of the superstructure that concealed class contradictions. However, some Marxists like Maurice Godelier argue caste exists at the base structural level. Dumont's theory of caste centers on the opposition of pure and impure defined by caste hierarchy. Production relations in India are always mediated by caste duty according to Godelier.
This document discusses two contrasting paradigms for understanding the role of caste in Indian society - the culturological position and the Marxist position. The culturological position, exemplified by Louis Dumont, views caste as an irreducible and immutable system that conditions material reality. In contrast, early Marxists viewed caste as part of the superstructure that concealed class contradictions. However, some Marxists like Maurice Godelier argue caste exists at the base structural level. Dumont's theory of caste centers on the opposition of pure and impure defined by caste hierarchy. Production relations in India are always mediated by caste duty according to Godelier.
Yes and No Two contending paradigms: Culturological and Marxist
Culturological Position of Dumont
Louis Dumont relies primarily on a
textual or Brahmanical tradition to explain the caste system. He argues that the caste system conditions material reality in its own image and is, therefore an irreducible and immutable given.
The suggestion therefore is that the
caste system is independent of material conditions and political power.
Marxist Position
On the contrary it seeks to unearth
the material and historical roots of the caste system. The early Marxists in India had placed quite unambiguously caste at the level of the superstructure and had not considered it to be a primordial reality of the Indian society.
As an element of superstructure, the
caste system is said to conceal the contradictions between classes in society and provide a rationale for exploitation. But this perspective has of late been questioned from within the Marxists school.
Maurice Godelier
He believes that the caste system
exists at the level of the base structure and not of the superstructure.
Dumonts Theory of Caste
The two central theses of Dumont: 1. Caste system is based on the opposition of the Pure and Impure. The caste hierarchy is defined as the superiority of the pure over the impure.
2. The fundamental characteristic of the
caste system is that the oppositional principle of pure and impure is itself depends on the disjunction between status and power.
Disjunction between Status and
Power
According to Dumont, the opposition
between pure and impure is sustained by the disjunction between ritual status and the secular power. Within the Hindu society there are two competing sources of authority- the religious authority of Brahmans and the temporal or political authority of the kings. In the ideology of caste, temporal authority is subordinated or encompassed by religious authority.
Maurice Godelier s Interpretation
of Caste system
For him, the caste is part of base
structure. From his study of kinship in primitive societies he came to the conclusion that the kinship relations could serve as relations of production. In a similar way, he argued that caste relations could constitute the production relations in India.
Caste refers to the crucial materials
aspect in defining the processes of exploitation and appropriation of surplus labour. Production relations in India are always mediated by the idea of dutybound caste morality