Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Introduction
Introduction
Introduction
Purpose
Participants
Instruments and
procedure
patients
were
interviewed
by
psychiatrist
or a
psychologist
with
extensive
In this
clinical 2-h
approximately
experience
face-to-face
interview, subjects
were asked about
their premorbid
history of
complaints,
psychotic
symptoms, OCS
and general
Diagnosis
of
characteristics.
psychotic
disorders was
established using
the
Comprehensive
Assessment of
Symptoms and
History (CASH)
schedule
In referrals to the
diagnostic facility
of our clinic with
no evident
psychosis, the
Structured
Interview for
Prodromal
Syndromes (SIPS)
was
Diffi administered
culties in
assessing
symptom status or
diagnostic criteria
were discussed
and resolved by
reaching
agreement
between all
professionals
involved
Statistical analyses
Results
Results
Results
Discussion
Limitations
Conclusion
CRITICAL APPRAISAL
Identitas Jurnal
PICO
Critical Appraisal
Title :
consists more than 12 words
content :
describe enough the content of the
study, interesting enough, without
abbreviation
Author :
Bouke Sterk , Kay Lankreijer , Don H
Linszen , Lieuwe de Haan
Publisher :
Australian and New Zealand Journal
of Psychiatry
the publisher is one of well-known
publisher among Netherlands and
Europe.
Abstract :
(+):
Di dalamnya terdapat Tujuan, Bahan dan
(-):
jumlah kata>321
Result :
dijelaskan dengan lengkap
methods:
Metode tidak dijelaskan secara ekplisit tetapi dapat
diketahui bahwa study ini merupakan observational study.
Sampling:
subjects that qualified with Comprehensive Assessment
of Symptoms and History (CASH) schedule, Structured
Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS), The Scale of
Prodromal Symptoms (SOPS), and Structured Clinical
Interview for DSM-III-R
Sampling technique : consecutive sampling
Conclusion :
Kesimpulan menjawab tujuan dari
penelitian
Reference :
Referensi yang digunakan sesuai tetapi
beberapa diantaranya diterbitkan tahun
1990an.
ValidITY
Question
Were subjects chosen
randomly?
No
No
No
Unknown
Application
Question
are there any differences in
our patients compared with
this study so that the findings
cannot be applied to our
patients?
Unknown
No
Conclusion
Clinical evidence :
not valid
cannot be applied