Sei sulla pagina 1di 98

AUDITING

A RISK-BASED APPROACH
TO CONDUCTING A
QUALITY
AUDIT
9th Edition
Karla M. Johnstone | Audrey A. Gramling | Larry E.
Rittenberg

Chapter 5
Professional Auditing Standards and
the Audit Opinion Formulation Process

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

Learning Objectives
1.

2.

3.

4.

Identify and compare the various auditing


standards that provide guidance on the audit
opinion formulation process
List and discuss the foundational principles
underlying the auditing standards
List the phases and related activities in the
audit opinion formulation process
Explain the concept of accounting cycles and
discuss their importance to the audit opinion
formulation process
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-2

Learning Objectives
5.

6.

7.

8.

Describe the assertions that are inherent to


financial statements and explain their
importance to the audit opinion formulation
process
Define audit evidence and describe the purpose
and types of audit procedures used to obtain
audit evidence
Discuss the importance of audit documentation
and provide examples
Discuss audit activities in Phase I of the audit
opinion formulation process
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-3

Learning Objectives
9.

10.

11.

12.

Discuss audit activities in Phase II of the


audit opinion formulation process
Discuss audit activities in Phase III of the
audit opinion formulation process
Discuss audit activities in Phase IV of the
audit opinion formulation process
Discuss audit activities in Phase V of the
audit opinion formulation process

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-4

Learning Objectives
13.

14.

Apply the concepts related to the


auditors assessment of internal control
design effectiveness, implementation,
and operating effectiveness
Apply the frameworks for professional
decision making and ethical decision
making to issues involving conducting an
audit

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-5

THE AUDIT OPINION


FORMULATION PROCESS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-6

PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT IN CONTEXT Importance of Adhering to Professional


Auditing Standards
Adhering to the professional auditing
standards is viewed as conducting a quality
audit
Lack of adherence heightens the risk of
issuing an unqualified audit opinion on
financial statements that are materially
misstated
Highlighted in the 2004-2006 audits of
Thornton Precision Components, Limited (TPC)
performed by Ernst & Young, LLP UK (E&Y UK)
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-7

PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT IN CONTEXT Importance of Adhering to Professional


Auditing Standards
What is the role of auditing standards and
their underlying principles in promoting a
quality audit? (LO 1, 2)
How does the fundamental concept of
professional skepticism relate to audit
quality? (LO 2)
What audit evidence is necessary for opining
on a clients financial statements? (LO 6)
How does audit documentation provide
evidence related to audit quality? (LO 7)
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-8

PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT IN CONTEXT Importance of Adhering to Professional


Auditing Standards

What audit activities are conducted during


the audit opinion formulation process to
provide reasonable assurance about a
clients financial statements? (LO 8, 9, 10,
11, 12)
How does professional judgment and
ethical decision making contribute to audit
quality? (LO 14)

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-9

Learning Objective 1

Identify and Compare the Various Auditing


Standards that Provide Guidance on the Audit
Opinion Formulation Process

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

Professional Auditing Standards


Auditors in the United States follow auditing
guidance issued by:
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA)
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(PCAOB)
International Auditing and Assurance Standards
Board (IAASB)

Common objective - Provide assurance to public


that audits are conducted in a quality manner
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-11

Professional Auditing Standards


Require auditors to develop and
communicate:
Opinion on financial statements
Clients internal control over financial reporting

Vary according to the nature of organization


audited
Audit compliance depends on:
Domicile of the organization
Where its stock is publicly traded
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-12

AICPAS AUDITING STANDARDS


BOARD - CLARITY PROJECT
Made standards easier to read, understand,
and apply
Converged its standards with the
International Standards on Auditing (ISAs),
issued by the IAASB
Standards were written using drafting
convention called the clarity format
Issued the clarified standards in a single
Statement on Auditing Standard (SAS No.
122) in 2012
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-13

Each standard of Clarity format


presented in following sections
Introduction
Purpose and scope of the standard

Objective
Context in which the requirements are set

Definitions
Relevant meanings of terms in standards

Requirements
Actions required to achieve objective of the
Application
and other explanatory
standard

material

Cross-references to the requirements


Guidance for applying requirements of
standard Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-14

Auditing Standards Issued by


the IAASB
Objectives
Set auditing, assurance, and other related
standards
Facilitate convergence of international and
national auditing and assurance standards
Enhance quality and consistency of practice
throughout the world
Strengthen public confidence in the global
auditing and assurance profession

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-15

Auditing Standards Issued by


the IAASB
Standards should to be understandable, clear,
and consistent
Launched a program in 2004 to enhance
clarity of its ISAs
Clarity Project was completed in 2009
As of 2013, a set of its clarified standards
comprises of:
36 ISAs
1 International Standard on Quality Control
(ISQC)
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-16

Each standard of Clarity format


presented in following sections
Introduction
Purpose and scope of subject matter of ISA

Objective
Clear statement of the objective of the
auditor

Definitions

For applicable terms included

Requirements
For each objective are provided

Application and other explanatory


material

Explains what a requirement means or


intends to cover

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-17

Auditing Standards Issued by


the PCAOB
Apply to auditors of U.S. public companies
Issued sixteen Auditing Standards (ASs) as
of 2013
PCAOB interim standards - Standards
adopted from AICPA
Requirement for public company auditors,
unless superseded by a PCAOB standard
Standards issued by AICPA after April 16,
2003, not included
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-18

Exhibit 5.1 - Comparison of U.S.


and International Auditing
Standards

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-19

Learning Objective 2

List and Discuss the Foundational Principles


Underlying the Auditing Standards

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

PCAOB Guidance - General


standards
Require
Audit to be performed by individuals having
adequate technical training and proficiency as
an auditor
Auditors to be independent:
In fact, i.e., in reality in terms of mental attitude
and
In appearance, i.e., in how the auditor is perceived
by users

Audit to be conducted with professional care


expected of a prudent auditor
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-21

PCAOB Guidance - Fieldwork


standards
Applicable to conduct of the audit
Require auditors to:
Properly plan and supervise the audit
Develop an understanding of clients
controls
Prerequisite for developing audit tests

Obtain audit evidence by performing audit


procedures

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-22

PCAOB Guidance - Reporting


standards
Applicable to communicating auditors opinion
Require auditors to:
State whether financial statements are presented in
accordance with the applicable financial reporting
framework (i.e., GAAP or IFRS)
Identify conditions where accounting principles are
not consistently observed
Review disclosures for adequacy and state in the
report if disclosures are not reasonably adequate
Express an opinion on financial statements as a
whole or state that an opinion cannot be expressed
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-23

AICPA Guidance - Purpose and


premise of audit
Purpose - Enhance degree of confidence
that users can place in financial statement
Premise - Management has responsibility
to:
Prepare financial statements
Maintain internal control over financial
reporting
Provide auditor with relevant information
and access to personnel
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-24

AICPA Guidance Responsibilities


The auditors responsibilities include
Having appropriate competence and
capabilities to perform audit
Complying with ethical requirements
Maintaining professional skepticism
throughout the audit

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-25

AICPA Guidance - Performance


Obtain assurance that financial statements are
free from material misstatement
Limitations - Lack of absolute assurance about
financial statements being free from misstatement

Requires an auditor to:

Plan and supervise work


Determine materiality levels
Identify risks of material misstatement
Design and implement audit responses to assessed
risks

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-26

AICPA Guidance - Reporting


Expressing either of the following
Financial statements are free of material
misstatement
Stating that an opinion cannot be expressed

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-27

Integrated audit
Combines audits of an organizations
financial statements and its internal
control over financial reporting
In this audit:
Opinion provided on effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting
Additional audit work done to be able to
issue that opinion

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-28

Auditing in Practice - Benefits


of Integrating the Audits
Integrating audits of internal controls and of
financial statements makes sense
Both the tests of controls and direct tests of
account balances provide evidence related to
each other
Example:
Tests of controls provide indirect evidence that
financial statements are free from misstatement
Further, if material misstatements found in account
balances or disclosures, it implies that there were
material weaknesses in internal controls
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-29

Learning Objective 3

List the Phases and Related Activities in the


Audit Opinion Formulation Process

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

EXHIBIT 5.2 - OVERVIEW OF CLIENTS PREPARATION


OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND MANAGEMENT
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-31

Exhibit 5.3 - Activities of each Phase of


the Audit Opinion Formulation Process

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-32

Important Concepts Affecting Audit


Opinion Formulation Process
Accounting cycles
Management assertions
Audit evidence and audit procedures
Documentation

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-33

Learning Objective 4

Explain the Concept of Accounting Cycles and


Discuss Their Importance to the Audit Opinion
Formulation Process

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

Accounting Cycles
Recording and processing transactions
that affect a group of related accounts
Begin when a transaction occurs and ends
when it is recorded in financial statements
Break the audit into manageable sections
of related accounts

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-35

Accounting Cycles
Auditor focuses on:
Flow of transactions within a particular cycle
Identifying:
Points where material misstatement can occur
Controls that have been designed and
implemented to mitigate those risks

Understanding risks and controls within each


cycle
Helps determine specific audit procedures to be
used and specific audit evidence to be obtained
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-36

Exhibit 5.4 - Illustrations of Cycles


and Related Accounts

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-37

Learning Objective 5

Describe the Assertions that Are Inherent to Financial


Statements and Explain Their Importance to the
Audit Opinion Formulation Process

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

Financial Statement Assertions


Assertions made by management

Existence
Completeness
Rights and obligations
Valuation
Presentation and disclosure

Related evidence is obtained for accounts


and disclosure in financial statements

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-39

MANAGEMENTS FINANCIAL
STATEMENT ASSERTIONS IN PCAOB
STANDARDS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-40

Learning Objective 6

Define Audit Evidence and Describe the Purpose


and Types of Audit Procedures Used to Obtain
Audit Evidence

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

Audit Evidence and Procedures


Audit evidence: Information used by auditor in
arriving at conclusions on which the opinion is
based
Audit procedures: Procedures designed to
obtain audit evidence to support audit opinion(s)
Risk assessment procedures
Provide information for assessing the risks of
material misstatement in the financial statements
Do not provide sufficient evidence upon which to
base an audit opinion
Used for purposes of planning the audit
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-42

Audit Evidence and Procedures


Tests of controls: Designed for evaluating
operating effectiveness of controls in
preventing, or detecting and correcting,
material misstatements, typically at
assertion level
Substantive procedures
Designed for detecting material
misstatements at assertion level
Comprising of tests of details and substantive
analytical procedures
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-43

Audit Procedures
Sufficient appropriate audit evidence:
Measure of the quantity of audit evidence
about following factors of audit procedures
Nature
Timing
Extent

Audit program
Lists audit procedures to be followed in
gathering evidence
Helps monitor progress and supervising work
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-44

Exhibit 5.6 - Types of Audit


Procedures

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-45

Learning Objective 7

Discuss the Importance of Audit Documentation


and Provide Examples

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

Audit Documentation
Record of audit procedures performed,
relevant audit evidence obtained, and
conclusions the auditor reached
Known as working papers or workpapers

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-47

Purposes of Audit
Documentation
Assisting engagement team in:
Planning and performing audit
Supervising and reviewing audit work

Retaining a record of matters of continuing


significance to future audits
Enabling internal or external inspections of
completed audits
Assisting auditors in understanding work
performed in prior year
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-48

Examples of Audit
Documentation
Audit programs
Analyses prepared by client or auditor
Memorandums
Summaries of significant findings or issues
Letters of confirmation and representation
Checklists
Correspondence concerning significant
findings or issues
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-49

Learning Objective 8

Discuss Audit Activities in Phase I of the Audit


Opinion Formulation Process

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

Phase I - Making Client


Acceptance and Continuance
Decisions

Preconditions for accepting auditing


engagements

Use of an acceptable financial reporting


framework
Agreement of management to acknowledge
and understand its responsibilities

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-51

Auditing in Practice - Accepting


a New Audit Engagement
Communicate with predecessor auditor
Following issues should be addressed
Information regarding integrity of management
Disagreements with management about
accounting policies, auditing procedures
Communications to management and those in
charge with governance regarding:
Fraud and noncompliance with laws
Deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal
control
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-52

Audit Engagement Letter


Document specifying responsibilities of client
and auditor that includes the following:
Objective and scope of audit of financial statements
Responsibilities of auditor and management
Statement that some material misstatements may
not be detected due to inherent limitations of audit
and internal control
Identification of applicable financial reporting
framework for preparation of financial statements
Reference to expected form and content of any
reports to be issued
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-53

Learning Objective 9

Discuss Audit Activities in Phase II of the Audit


Opinion Formulation Process

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

Phase II - Performing Risk


Assessment
Identifying relevant risks and determining
audit procedures required to address them
Continuing clients - Update information
from previous years audit
New clients - the risk assessment process
is more time consuming

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-55

Identifying and Assessing Risks


of Material Misstatement
Essential to audit planning
Requires identification of significant:
Accounts
Disclosures
Relevant assertions

Auditor establishes a materiality level


overall and for specific accounts and
disclosures

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-56

EXHIBIT 5.7 - Examples of


Sources of Risk of Material
Misstatement

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-57

Risks at assertion level


Inherent risk
The susceptibility of an assertion to a misstatement,
due to error or fraud, that could be material,
individually or in combination with other
misstatements, before consideration of any related
controls

Control risk
The risk that a misstatement due to error or fraud
that could occur in an assertion and that could be
material, individually or in combination with other
misstatements, will not be prevented or detected on
a timely basis by the organization's internal control
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-58

Risk assessment procedures


Inquiries for information to assist in
identifying risks of material misstatement
due to fraud or error
Preliminary analytical procedures
Observation and inspection of
documentation

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-59

Types of controls
Entity-wide controls
Transaction controls
Fraud-related controls

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-60

Auditing in Practice - Controls


to Address Fraud Risk
PCAOB has identified the following
Controls over significant, unusual transactions,
particularly those resulting in unusual journal entries
Controls over journal entries and adjustments made
in the period-end financial reporting process
Controls over related-party transactions
Controls related to significant management estimates
Controls mitigating incentives for, and pressures on,
management to falsify financial results

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-61

types of procedures to
assess design effectiveness
Inquiry of appropriate personnel
Observation of the organizations operations
Inspection of relevant documentation
Performance of walkthroughs
Documentation of preliminary assessment of
control design and basis for that assessment
Understand the approach used by
management for conclusions on
effectiveness of internal control
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-62

AUDITING IN PRACTICE - DOCUMENTING


AUDITORS UNDERSTANDING OF AN
ORGANIZATIONS INTERNAL CONTROLS

Process of documentation uses:


Narratives
Flowcharts
Questionnaires

Once documented, in subsequent years


audit firms focus on:
Changes in the system
Effectiveness of monitoring controls

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-63

Assessing range of control risk


High control risk
Weak internal controls
Auditor cannot rely on controls to reduce
substantive procedures for account balances

Assessing control risk as low


Strong internal controls
Auditor will test operating effectiveness of
controls to reduce substantive procedures for
account balances
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-64

AUDITING IN PRACTICE EXAMPLE FOR WEAK


INTERNAL CONTROL DESIGN AND LINKS TO
SUBSTANTIVE AUDIT PROCEDURES

Scenario - Clients internal control design


assessed as ineffective that makes a
preliminary assessment of control risk as
high
Requires expanding substantive tests for
sales returns by:
Arranging to be on hand at year end to
observe the taking of physical inventory
Determining if receipts for items returned by
customers are issued in the correct time period
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-65

AUDITING IN PRACTICE EXAMPLE FOR WEAK


INTERNAL CONTROL DESIGN AND LINKS TO
SUBSTANTIVE AUDIT PROCEDURES

Reviewing credit memos issued shortly after


year end
Increasing number of accounts receivable
confirmations sent to the clients customers

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-66

Additional Considerations for


an Integrated Audit
Risk assessment procedures apply to:
Audit of internal control over financial reporting
Audit of financial statements

Top-down approach - Used for audit of internal


control over financial reporting to select
controls to test
Begins at financial statement level
Focuses on entity-wide controls
Works down to significant accounts and
disclosures and their relevant assertions
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-67

Responding to Identified Risks


of Material Misstatement
Purpose of risk assessment procedures
Identify risks of material misstatement
Determine where misstatements in financial
statements may occur
Design appropriate audit strategy

Controls reliance audit: Includes tests of


controls and substantive procedures
Substantive audit: Includes substantive
procedures and does not include tests of
controls
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-68

Responding to Identified Risks


of Material Misstatement
Selecting specific audit procedures to respond to
identified risks
Assembling an audit team having knowledge,
skill, and ability needed to address assessed
risks
Emphasizing the need for professional skepticism
Providing an appropriate level of supervision for
assessed risks
Incorporating elements of unpredictability in
selection of audit procedures
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-69

EXHIBIT 5.8 - Responding to Identified


Risks through Evidence Decisions

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-70

Additional Considerations for


an Integrated Audit
Audit strategy that includes tests of controls
to accomplish objectives of both audits
Sufficient evidence related to operating
effectiveness of controls to support
auditors:
Control risk assessments for purposes of the
audit of financial statements
Opinion on internal control over financial
reporting as of year-end

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-71

Fraud Considerations
Performing tests of controls and
substantive procedures susceptible to
fraud risks
Performing procedures related to risk of
management override of controls
Examining journal entries
Reviewing accounting estimates for biases
Evaluating business rationale for significant
unusual transactions
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-72

Learning Objective 10

Discuss audit activities in Phase III of the audit


opinion formulation process

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

PHASE III - Obtaining Evidence about


Internal Control Operating
Effectiveness
Auditor tests controls
Determine whether controls are operating
effectively at year-end or throughout the
year

Auditor obtains more persuasive audit


evidence
As the reliance auditor places on
effectiveness of a control increases

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-74

Auditing in Practice - Risk Assessment


Procedures and Tests of Operating Effectiveness
of Controls

Auditors risk assessment procedures


include
Inquiring about managements use of
budgets
Inspecting documentation of managements
comparison of monthly budgeted and actual
expenses
Inspecting reports pertaining to the
investigation of variances between
budgeted and actual amounts
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-75

Selecting Controls to Test


Involves choosing controls that effectively
indicate capability to address the assessed
risk of material misstatement for relevant
assertions
Auditor selects:
Entity-wide controls
Reduce number of control activities selected
for testing

Transaction controls
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-76

EXHIBIT 5.9 - Linking Financial


Statement Assertions and Selecting
Controls to Test

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-77

Types of Controls and Examples of


Concepts Affecting Control Testing

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-78

Types of Controls and Examples of


Concepts Affecting Control Testing

Authorizatio
ns

Reconciliatio
ns

Reviews for unusual


transactions

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-79

Types of Controls and Examples of


Concepts Affecting Control Testing

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-80

Types of Controls and Examples of


Concepts Affecting Control Testing

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-81

First Approach to Testing


Controls
Take sample of customer orders and trace it
through the system to determine whether:
There was proper review of credit and
Credit authorization or denial was proper

Advantage - Most effective because it helps in


determining that the control worked
effectively
Requires documentation of all credit
applications and purchase orders required
Based on audit sampling
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-82

Second Approach to Testing


Controls
Taking a sample of recorded items and
tracing back to credit approval process
Provides evidence on proper credit
approval for all items presently recorded
Does not provide evidence as to whether
other items should have been approved
for credit, but had not been approved

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-83

Third Approach to Testing


Controls
Uses a computer audit program and
develops a print-out of account balances
exceeding their credit authorization
Cost-effective
Requires an inference about the control
Covers only the operation of the controls
related to the current account balances
100% evaluation of each item currently
recorded
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-84

Testing the Operating


Effectiveness
Auditor tests relevant principles of
components of:

Control environment
Risk assessment
Information and communication
Monitoring

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-85

Results of Tests of Controls For


financial statement audit
If control deficiencies are identified
Assess them to determine whether preliminary
control risk assessment should be modified
Record the implications for substantive procedures

If no control deficiencies are identified


Assess whether preliminary control risk
assessment is still appropriate
Determine extent that controls can provide
evidence on accuracy of account balances
Determine planned substantive audit procedures

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-86

Results of Tests of Controls For


financial statement audit
Determine how much assurance about
reliability of account balances can be
obtained from the effective operation of
controls
Within any audit, level of assurance will
vary across:
Accounts
Disclosures
Assertions
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-87

Learning Objective 11

Discuss audit activities in Phase IV of the audit


opinion formulation process

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

Phase IV - Obtaining Substantive Evidence


about Accounts, Disclosures, and Assertions
Substantive procedures include:
Substantive analytical procedures
Tests of details of account balances

Considerations in determining appropriate


substantive procedures:
Source of potential misstatement
Extent and type of potential misstatement

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-89

EXHIBIT 5.12 - Factors Affecting


Substantive Procedures to be
Performed

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-90

Learning Objective 12

Discuss audit activities in Phase V of the audit


opinion formulation process

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

Phase V - Completing the Audit


and Making Reporting
Decisions
Completing various review and
communication activities
Making a decision about what types of
opinions should be issued
Deciding on the appropriate opinion to be
issued

It can be based on financial statements and


internal control
It can be issued in one report or in two
separate reports
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-92

Learning Objective 13
APPLY THE CONCEPTS RELATED TO THE AUDITORS
ASSESSMENT OF INTERNAL CONTROL DESIGN
EFFECTIVENESS, IMPLEMENTATION, AND OPERATING
EFFECTIVENESS

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

Management Assessment of
Controls
Factors considered in deciding whether to
categorize a deficiency as significant or not
Risk that is being mitigated and whether other
controls operate effectively
Materiality of related account balances
Nature of deficiency
Volume of transactions affected
Subjectivity of account balance that is subject
to control
Rate at which control fails to operate
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-94

Management Assessment of
Controls
Deficiency of segregation of duties
Did not rise to a significant deficiency or a
material weakness
Management decides to use this deficiency
as a motivation to centralize purchases

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-95

Management Assessment of
Controls
Deficiency of lack of approval considered
as a significant deficiency based on the
following rationale:
Major departure from an approved process
Could lead to purchase of unauthorized
goods
Could be shipped elsewhere and lead to
material misstatement in financial
statements
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-96

Auditor Assessment of Controls


Auditor reviews:
Managements documentation of its internal
control
Managements evaluation and findings
related to internal control effectiveness

Auditor then gathers evidence on operating


effectiveness of these controls
By taking a random sample auditor needs to
independently determine that the controls
are working or not
Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage
Learning

5-97

Auditor Assessment of Controls


Implications for substantive procedures in
financial statement audit:
Auditor will do limited testing of inventory
quantities at year end
Auditor will assess year-end inventory for
potential obsolescence
Auditor will continue to examine all
adjusting entries at the end of the year

Copyright 2014 South-Western/Cengage


Learning

5-98

Potrebbero piacerti anche