Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
BMW
VNIT, Nagpur
For ZS Associates Campus
Embrace Program
We started with a
challenge!
The reputed
pharmaceutic
al company
Triex has
been
preparing to
launch a
product in US
market in
diabetes
treatment
Expanding
Optimizing
the city
the calls for
based model
maximizing
to national
ROI along
level;
with
Identifying
sustaining of
the factors
growth over
playing an
the initial
important
launch period
role in this
of
expansion
approximatel
and proper
y two years
measures
Constraint
s
Target
s
Maximizing trial
and uptake post
launch
launch
Increase the
efficiency of the
sales team for
greater output
Emerging
Emerging as
as an
an
established top
player among
the branded
drugs in a span
of
of 2
2 years
years
Optimizing the
number of visits
for increasing
the business
potential
potential
Initial
Action
Segmentation of the
groups
groups in
in the
the following
following
way
Group A: - ENDO
Group B: - PCP (LH,
LL,LM, MH, MM)
Group C: -Internal
Medicine
Group D: Others+PA+NP+CARD
Group E: - PCP (HH,
HM,
HM, HL,
HL, ML)
ML)
1st L,M,H stands for
avg. cost to phiksitall
patients being Low,
Medium, High
respectively, while
second stands for
avg. cost to Dermitol
patients
Number of HCP's
Sales Volume
E; $4,952.22
D; $4,176.83
16%
21%
A; $17,632.50
24%
17%
B; $9,051.95
C; $6,692.33
20%
B
PCP&MM; 25%
PCP≪ 38%
PCP&MH; 17% PCP&LH; 8%
PCP&LM; 13%
Endo; 100%
Endo
PCP&LL
PCP&LH
PCP&MH
PCP&MM
PCP&LM
pcp&hh; 10%
pcp&ml; 30%
OTHER; 29%
CARD; 29%
pcp&hm; 40%
pcp&hl; 20%
NP; 24%
PA; 19%
IM; 100%
IM
pcp&hh
pcp&hm
pcp&hl
pcp&ml
CARD
NP
PA
OTHER
adopter
s
(assigne
d
KOL/Influ Major
importa encers(7 Hospital LM,LH,M LL.MM, ML,HL,H
nce=9)
)
(3)
H (10)
HH (4)
M (1)
Segment summary:
Segment
Description
# of Doctors
% total
sales
Priority
Objective
Endo
16
41.48%
1, 2, 4
PCP(LM,LH,MH,L
L,MM)
24
(9+2+3+4+6)
21.30%
2, 4
IM
17
9.83%
2, 3
CARD+NP+PA+
OTHER
21
(6+5+4+6)
11.65%
3, 4
PCP(HL,HM,ML,
HH)
20
15.74%
2, 4
Objective
1. Quick penetration of market sales
2. Increase in market sales volume
3. Advertisement of the drug
4. Major Hospital tie-ups
Weight
Weight loss
loss along
along with
with
metformin
metformin
Superior
Superior results
results
Avg.
Avg. cost
cost to
to patient
patient is
is low
low
Weight
Weight loss
loss along
along with
with
metformin
metformin
Superior
Superior results
results
Messagi
ng
etiquette
A
B
C
1
0
Accepted
the
product
Positive
response
Yet to be
contacted
2. KOL
3. Early
adopters
4. Avg.
cost to
patients
force
Patient profiles
Treatment pathways to understand
Prescription makers profiles to determine
marketing KPIs
KOLs among the prescription makers and the payer
decision makers
Geographical demographics or data of location,
of payer decision makers
Data
Data source
source file
file 4
4
Data
Data source
source file
file 2
2
Data
Data source
source file
file 5
5
Data
Data source
source file
file 1,
1,
4
4
Data
Data source
source file
file 3
3
Data
Data source
source file
file 4
4
THANK YOU!