Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Indoor Localization
Zhang Zhang
zhangzhang@uottawa.ca
Outline
Introduction
Definition
Important parameters
Indoor Localization Methods
Proximity Detection
Triangulation
Scene Analysis
Indoor Localization Systems
Proximity Based
RF Based
Cameras Based
Comparison of Common Indoor Localization
Systems
Introduction - Defination
Def. Wirelessly locate objects or people inside a building in
real time.
Indoor Positioning Systems (IPS)
Real-time Locating Systems (RTLS)
Proximity / CoO
Direction based
Angle based
Triangulation
Scene Analysis
Distance based
Time based
Signal Property
based
Advantages
No complicated algorithms
Easy to implement
Low cost
Disadvantages
Low accuracy - room level
Identification problem
Advantages
No synchronization requirement
Works well in situations with direct line of sight
Disadvantages
Susceptibility to multipath interference
S1
S2
S3
...
S72
Advantages
High accuracy
NLoS
Disadvantages
Complicated algorithms
Not easy to implement
High cost
50-100m
Accuracy
1m
Method
RSSI Fingerprinting
, TDoA
NLOS/LOS
NLOS
Application
Office Space,
Person, Objects
Active
Passive
Range
10-100m
1-5m
Accuracy
1m
0.2m
Method
RSSI
Fingerprinting,
TDoA
AoA, TDoA
NLOS/LOS
NLOS
LOS
Application
Moving Objects
Assembly Industry
20-30m
Accuracy
2m
Method
RSSI
NLOS/LOS
NLOS
Application
Warehouse
management
Images
Cameras
Cameras
Database
Database Virtual
Map
Power
NLoS/Lo
Consum
s
e
Systems
Accura
cy
Covera
ge
Methods
GPS
10-50m
Poor
Indoor
ToA
NLoS
Proximity
3-5m
Room
level
Proximity
Cameras
Networks
0.5m
Building
level
1m
RFID
(Active)
RFID
(Passive)
WIFI
Bluetooth
ZigBee
Cost
Remark
s
High
High
Unstable
LoS
Low
Low
ID?
Scene
Analysis
LoS
Low
High
ID?
Building
level
RSSI
Fingerprintin
g
/TDoA
NLoS
High
High
WIFI
Covered
1m
Building
level
RSSI
Fingerprintin
g
NLoS
Med
Med
Long
Distance
0.2m
Room
level
TDoA/ AoA
LoS
Low
Low
No Data
Exchange
1-2m
Building
level
RSSI
Fingerprintin
g
NLoS
Low
Med
High
Data
Rate
2m
Building
level
RSSI
Fingerprintin
g
NLoS
Low
Low
Low Data
Rate
References
[1] Z. Farid, R. Nordin, and M. Ismail, "Recent Advances in Wireless Indoor
Localization Techniques and Systems," Journal of Computer Networks and
Communications, vol. 2013, 2013.
[2] R. Mautz, "Indoor positioning technologies," Habilitation Thesis, Department of
Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, Institute of Geodesy and
Photogrammetry, Habil. ETH Zrich, Zurich, 2012.
[3] H. Koyuncu and S. H. Yang, "A survey of indoor positioning and object locating
systems," IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security,
vol. 10, pp. 121-128, 2010.
[4] A. Aboodi andW. Tat-Chee, Evaluation ofWiFi-based indoor (WBI) positioning
algorithm, in Proceedings of the 3rd FTRA International Conference on Mobile,
Ubiquitous, and Intelligent Computing (MUSIC 12), pp. 260264, June 2012.
[5] S. Chan and G. Sohn, Indoor localization using Wi-Fi based fingerprinting and
trilateration techiques for LBS applications, in Proceedings of the 7th International
Conference on 3D Geoinformation, Quebec, Canada, May 2012.
Question 1
The RSSI pattern is shown below.
3 Wifi routers
9 refernces points
Q: Where is M(1.2, 2.6, 4.5) in this pattern?
5
2
5
1
2
4
1
2
3
4
3
5
Question 1
Q: Where is M(1.2, 2.6, 4.5) in this pattern?
A: Measured RSSI of Wifi one is 1.2.
Red zone (referenced RSSI of Wifi one is 1) are possible locations.
1
5
2
5
1
2
4
1
2
3
4
3
5
Question 1
Q: Where is M(1.2, 2.6, 4.5) in this pattern?
A: Measured RSSI of Wifi two is 2.6.
Green zone (referenced RSSI of Wifi two is 3) are possible locations.
1
5
2
5
1
2
4
1
2
3
4
3
5
Question 1
Q: Where is M(1.2, 2.6, 4.5) in this pattern?
A: Measured RSSI of Wifi three is 4.5.
Blue zone (referenced RSSI of Wifi two is 5) are possible locations.
The intersection of three zones is the location of M.
1
5
2
5
1
2
4
1
2
3
4
3
5
Question 2
The RSSI pattern is shown above.
3 Wifi routers
9 refernces points
Q: Where is M(5, 2, 1) in this pattern?
Is there any methods to increase the acceracy by optimizeing the
system?
1
5
2
5
1
2
4
1
2
2
1
3
4
3
5
Question 2
Q: Is there any methods to increase the acceracy of this system?
A: More Wifi routers, more reference points.
1
1
2
3
4
2
4
Question 3
A company with 3 buildings.
Question 3
A company with 3 buildings.
Building A: Working Office (Wifi coverd)
Building B: Assembly lines
Building C: Warehouse
Q: Building A: Locating persons + high rate data transmission
Building B: Accurate positioning products + no data transmission
Building C: Locating forklifts + low rate data transmission
Which indoor localization system will you choose for Building A,
Building B,
Building C, respectively? why?
Answers:
A: WIFI. Wife covered, high data rate, mobile phone.
B: RFID(Passive). Small tag size, high acceracy, low cost.
C: ZigBee. Low power consumption, low cost, low data rate
Thank you!