Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Cranberry
Cooperative, 1981
Executive Summary
Industry Analysis
A. Threat of Substitutes
In the fast Cranberry industrthe threat of substitute products is high. The availability of
the substitute product facades an enormous threat for fast fruit-selling sellers. The
worst thing is that when the switching costs in a certain industry are low since the
buyer can facilely determine substitutes, substitutes that have the same levels of price
and quality.
B. Threat of New Entrants
In the fast Cranberry industry, the threat of new entrants is low and the reasons for this
threat are double. External forces such as globalization and information technology
developments are two main factors driving the need to reassess industry structure on
an ongoing basis to determine how to maintain a competitive advantage. Limited
connections of competitive forces to microeconomic principles that drive them are
made.
C. Rivalry among Competitors
In the fast Cranberry industry,the rivalry among competitors are more intense among
competitors. The main rivals are BKC, YUM, etc.)
D. Threat of Buyer Power
In the fast Cranberry industry, the bargaining power of buyers is moderate.
Consolidation in the food industry and supply drives much of the market for
cranberries. As company acquire the other companies, their buying power increases.
Market such as Walmart and Costco buy in huge quantities, giving them the bargaining
power to depress prices to undercut the smaller competition.
E. Threat of Supplier Power
In the National Cranberry Cooperative industry its supplier power is low because there
lots of market such as Walmart, Costco that are offered in some developing countries.
Problem
Statement
National
Objectives
of the Study
Strategic Alternatives
Recommendation to Management
Efficiency does not mean to produce as much as you can and build up inventory its about operating at capacity level of
the machines. Here I have a recommended a plan of action for the different constraints however the recommendations
might change the system and improve it but it could be only for a short period of time. Its important to keep in mind
that new-implemented actions might carry their own problems afterwards.
Grading berries
Sampling each load of berries takes some time, as there is only one chief berry in place to grade the arriving trucks.
Sampling is done poorly therefore in order to improve these two problems. I suggest farmers to assigned one of their
employees to grade the berries (wet or dry) while barrels are being load into trucks. Of course it is impossible to grade
each barrel accurately but it will enable to grade more fairly as each barrel is inspected rather than one small sample from
the truck. I would introduce a new scheme of colors and add a new category 2C for example, between 2B and 3, that will
help grade the berries more accurately. Adding a 10 000 $ light meter which requires another killed operator will increase
costs, something that NCC is trying to reduce.
To accommodate more wet berries at the holding bin level I would suggest converting the temporary bins (17-24) into wet
berries only. Then to take 1000 bbls, an equivalent of 4 bins from the temporary bins (1-16) as dry berries only need 1800
bbls of space, and allocate it to the wet berries temporary bins. That will increase capacity to receive more wet berries
therefore reducing waiting time of trucks.
When berries are placed in the held in the bins, I suggest you keep wet berries temporarily in the bins designed for dry and
start processing them first. Like that trucks do not have to wait anymore.
One Kiwanee dumper could be allocated to dry berries only as dry berries only represent 30 % of the total quantity
delivered. If you dont assign one to dry berries, then the wet berries will take them all since their quantity is larger. Trucks
delivering dry will then have to sit idle.
As mentioned in the case wet berries do not have a long shelf life therefore they need to be processed quicker
and it is preferable to be shipped in bulk in frozen bags. As the peak season increases the volumes of wet
berries then berries should be dried only partially as they are going to be frozen anyways. Therefore wet
berries can continue flowing to the drying process at its maximum of 600 bbls.
Removing the wet berries bottleneck will then enable to reduce the separating capacity of wet berries from
840 bbls 600 bbls. The difference of 240 bbls is then, given to the dry berries and increase their capacity of
separating.
Working hours
To beginning processing the berries quicker rather than waiting 4 hours form 7 am to 11 pm, as receivers are
busy unloading, RP1 should schedule the deston, dechaft and dry workers to come in an hour after 7 am. As
we can see on exhibit 8, no wet berries were received at the plant until 459 time which is approximately 7 30
am. Therefore an appropriate time to come in would be 8: 00 am in order to have a good accumulated amount
of berries to begin the process, and workers should remain until shut down. That will reduce idleness of trucks.
The case gives no reason for why there is a lot of absenteeism, there from a management point of view its
important for the manager who schedule the workers to have a meeting with all workers both full time and
temporary to see what the issues are, why are workers missing so much? Is it overtime? Is it lunch break? As
manager you need to find out what will motivate the employees to increase efficiency at the plant.
For example lunch break could take place while keeping wet berries processing at full capacity. By looking at
Exhibit 1 we can assume that at time 671, which is approximately at noon trucks, will slow down for lunch. If
trucks do not arrive anymore there is no need for receivers and they can take the time to replace the ones in
processing berries who need to take their lunch break.
Introducing two shifts instead of having overtime will relieve number of overtime workers work per day during
peak season. That could motivate but if overtime is kept I would suggest paying the employees to the price of
a full shift for the overtime.