Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Background &Motivation
Why Malawi?
Malawi relies heavily on tobacco exports (80% of
total exports, 40% of GDP and 60% of FX earnings)
and foreign aid (40% of government budget).
Imports more than it exports (negative TB always)
Fixed and overvalued exchange rate for a long time
led to low FX reserves.
High prices of FX at the parallel market (100%
premium).
A year after 49% devaluation, FX problems still
exists.
No studies on how FX constraints and Tobacco
price shock affect the macro-economy of Malawi.
Studies on LIEs are done on panel level.
Literature Review
1. Theoretical Literature
. DSGE models are the NK version of analysing macroeconomic issues and
are the main workhorse in RBC estimations (Senbeta, 2011). However,
not many studies have included features for LICs
. Inclusion of features specific to LICs such as aid, high government debts
and FX constraints into the RBC models with micro-foundations tend to
be necessary in the analysis of LICs.
. Exchange rate models with tradable and non-tradable sectors of the
economy and the analysis of commodity price shocks from oil price shocks
literature have been developed to suit LICs and this gives the theoretical
literature for this work.
2. Empirical Literature
. Moran (1989), Lensink (1995); Senbeta (2011) FX DSGE; Adam et al
(2009) Aid shocks on LDCs
. Sichei & Eita (2006), MacDonald & Ricci (2004) ERER on Nam and RSA
. Kwalingana, Simwaka & Chiumia (2012), Kamoto (2006), Newark (2004),
Musila (2003) effects of FX on TB and Inflation, Mathisen (2003), ERER
. Deaton & Miller (1995), Raddatz (2007), Conforti, Ferrari and Sarris
(2010) Price shocks
Data Sources
Study uses quarterly data (1980Q1-2012Q4) from
RBM, World Bank, IFS and NSO
Variables of interest are international tobacco prices,
(TP), TOT, AID, GovtEXP, taxes, EXR and REM
The period is dictated by important macroeconomic
decisions that the country has undertaken
(commercialisation of tobacco growing), structural
breaks (policy regimes, exchange rate regimes and
political
regimes) devaluations,
pegging and
floatation of the kwacha
Why DSGE?
Standard DSGE models assume capital and intermediate
inputs are produced domestically and remain silent on
challenges in LICs e.g FX, mono-crop, aid dependence,
imports of inputs.
DSGE models are structural, micro-founded, general
equilibrium and are not vulnerable to the Lucas Critique.
Due to a decline in demand for commodity prices due to the
financial crisis which decreased exports of LIEs, the
suitable models to analyse these shocks are structural.
Compared to their consequences in HICs, standard models
produce results contrary to outcomes when applied to LICs.
A few studies have incorporated some features of LICs in
DSGE models (see for example Senbeta, 2011 (FX), Adam,
OConnell and Buffie, 2008(Aid), Peiris and Saxegaard,
2007(MP)). However, not much has been done on FX and
Aid.
Methodology
A. An Estimated New Keynesian DSGE for a Foreign Exchange
Constrained Small Open Economy: (4-sector model)
The model is as in Senbeta (2011) and tork (2011) but builds
extensively on Gali and Monacelli (2005) to account for incomplete
pass-through and habit formation.
1.Household maximize instantaneous utility
2. Firms produce tradable and non-tradable good. We explicitly model
FX constraints in the non-tradable production as additional cost faced
by firms in importing inputs
s.t s.t and
Contribution to Literature
THANK
YOU