Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
NRG ENGINEERING
training@nrgengineering.com
Scope of Presentation
Introduction
Design Codes
Aspects Used for Comparison
Method of Comparison
Input Data
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
Introduction
Design Codes
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) B31.8
American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice 1111 (API
RP 1111)
Det Norske Veritas 1981 (DNV 81)
Det Norske Veritas 2000 (DNV 2000)
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
Introduction (contd)
Aspects used for Comparison
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
Introduction (contd)
Method of Comparison
The equations for the 4 aspects (e.g Internal Pressure Containment) are
presented
The Wall Thickness for Internal Pressure Containment across the 4
design codes are determined
After all the 4 aspects are done a conclusion will be drawn as to which
is the most and the least conservative of the 4 codes
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
Introduction (contd)
Input Data
Pipe Outer Diameter
Line Pipe Specification / Type
Specified Minimum Yield Strength
Specified Minimum Tensile Strength
Youngs Modulus (Steel)
Design Pressure
Hoop Stress Design Factor
Temperature Derating Factor
Longitudinal Joint Factor
Density of Seawater
Collapse Factor
Poisson Ratio
Propagation Buckling Design Factor
27 May 2015
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
355.6 mm
API 5L X 60 / Seamless
414 MPa
517 MPa
207000 MPa
9.93 MPa
0.72
1
1
1030 kg/m3
0.7
0.3
0.8
0N
72 %
12.41 MPa
The Power to Deliver #6
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
ASME B31.8
2St
P
FET
D
Where,
D = Outside Diameter of Pipe
E = Longitudinal Joint Factor
F = Design Factor
P = Design Pressure
S = Specified Min. Yield Strength (SMYS)
T = Temperature Derating Factor
t = Nominal Wall Thickness
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
API RP 1111
The following equations must be satisfied:
a)
Pt f d f t f e Pb
b)
Pd 0.80 Pt
c)
NRG ENGINEERING
Pa 0.90 Pt
27 May 2015
D
Pb 0.45( S U ) ln
Di
(1)
(2)
Pb 0.90( S U )
Where
t
D t
Di
D
= outside diameter of pipe
= D 2t = inside diameter of pipe
S
t
U
For low D/t pipe (D/t < 15), formula (2) is recommended
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
API RP 1111
Where,
fd = Internal Pressure Design Factor
fe = Weld Joint Factor Factor
ft = Internal Pressure Design Factor
Pa = Incidental Overpressure
Pb = Specified Minimum Burst Pressure
Pd = Pipeline Design Pressure
Pt = Hydrostatic Test Pressure
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
DNV 1981
Where
D
y pi pe
2t
pi = Internal Pressure
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
DNV 2000
pb t
pli pe
SC m
Where
2t
2
Pb, s (t )
SMYS.
D t
3
2t
2
Pb ,u (t )
SMTS
D t
3
pb t Min ( pb , s t ; pb ,u t
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
DNV 2000
Where,
NRG ENGINEERING
pb,s(t)
pb,u(t)
pli
SC
27 May 2015
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
ASME B31.8
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
API RP 1111
Po Pi
Where
Pc
f o Pc
Py Pe
2
Py Pe
t
Py 2S
D
3
NRG ENGINEERING
Pe 2 E
1 v 2
27 May 2015
API RP 1111
Where,
fo = Collapse Factor
Pc = Collapse Pressure of Pipe
Pe = Elastic Collapse Pressure of Pipe
P0 = External Hydrostatic Pressure
Py = Yield Pressure at Collapse
v = Poissons Ratio (0.3 for steel)
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
DNV 2000
pc pe1 pc
Where
NRG ENGINEERING
t
2E
D
pe1
1 v2
pp
D
pc pe1 p p f o
t
t
p p 2 S fab
D
Dmax Dmin
fo
D
27 May 2015
DNV 2000
Where,
pc
pe
1.1 m SC
pc = Characteristic Collapse Pressure
pe1 = Elastic Collapse Pressure
pp = Plastic Collapse Pressure
fo = Ovality
fab = Fabrication Factor
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
LOCAL BUCKLING
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
DNV 1981
a)
b)
c)
NRG ENGINEERING
x x x
FA
N
x
A
M
x 0.72S
N
27 May 2015
DNV 1981
NRG ENGINEERING
x
x
N
M
xcr
xcr
x
x
N
d)
xcr
e)
xcr
f)
xcr
D
S 1 0.001
20
t
S 1.35 0.0045
t
27 May 2015
DNV 1981
g)
300 y
1
D / t ycr
h)
D
y pe pi
2t
ycr
i)
j)
NRG ENGINEERING
t
E
D t
xp xcr
y
1
yp ycr
27 May 2015
DNV 1981
Where,
x = Longitudinal Stress
xN = Longitudinal Stress (Axial)
xM = Longitudinal Stress (Bending)
xcr = Critical Longitudinal Stress
xcrN = Critical Longitudinal Stress (Axial)
xcrM = Critical Longitudinal Stress (Bending)
ycr = Critical Hoop Stress (Pressure)
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
BUCKLE PROPAGATION
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
API RP 1111
Po Pi f p Pp
Where,
t
Pp 24 S
D
2.4
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
DNV 1981
t
p pr 1.15
D t
Where
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
DNV 2000
a)
b)
NRG ENGINEERING
t
p pr 35S fab
D
p pr
pe
m SC
27 May 2015
2.5
COMPARISON TABLE
For the design codes
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
Comparison Table
OD = 914.4 mm; P = 15 MPa; WD = 50 100m;
Content density = 200 kg/m3 ; Wave Ht = 3.8 m
ASME
B31.8
API RP 1111
DNV 1981
DNV 2000
20.6 mm
20.46 mm
21.93 mm
19.90 mm
External
Pressure
Collapse
13.80 mm
13.61 mm
14.25 mm
Local
Buckling
22.0 mm
21.68 mm
21.35 mm
23.42 mm
21.15 mm
Internal
Pressure
Containment
Buckle
Propagation
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
CONCLUSION
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
Conclusion
From the Comparison Table, it can be seen that, each aspect for
each check, may result in different value for the Wall Thickness.
The highest value gotten for one particular check is taken (in
bold).
From this it can be seen that the most conservative code is DNV
1981.
The least conservative is DNV 2000.
NRG ENGINEERING
27 May 2015
Any questions?
NRG ENGINEERING
training@nrgengineering.com