Sei sulla pagina 1di 76

Chapter 4: Stability!

OVERALL STABILITY
External Forces Acting on a Vessel (4.1)
In Chapter 4 we will study five areas:
1. The concept of a ships Righting Moment (RM),
the chief measure of stability.
2. KG and TCG changes and their effects on
RM.
3. How Stability is effected by Damage to the
Hull using the Added Weight method.
4. Effects of a Free Surface.
5. Effects of Negative GM on ship stability.

OVERALL STABILITY
Why?

OVERALL STABILITY
Internal Righting Moment (4.2)
The Big Picture in Understanding the Overall
Stability of a Vessel:
The horizontal distance between the positions
of the ships displacement vector and the
buoyant force vector help determine stability.
The relationship changes when a ship is
heeled by an external moment.

OVERALL STABILITY

Internal Righting Moment (4.2)

OVERALL STABILITY
Internal Righting Moment (4.2)
EXTERNAL FORCES cause a vessel to heel.
Recall Force x Dist = Moment
External Moment can be caused by wind
pushing on one side of the vessel and water
resisting the motion on the other side.
Each distributed force can be resolved into a
resultant force vector. The wind acts above
the waterline and the water resistance acts
below the waterline.

OVERALL STABILITY
Internal Righting Moment (4.2)
The two forces create a couple because they are
equal in magnitude, opposite in direction, and
not aligned.
The couple causes rotation or heeling.
The vessel will continue to rotate until it returns to
Static Equilibrium (i.e. an Internal Moment is
created which is equal in magnitude and
opposite in direction). Giving M=0!

OVERALL STABILITY

Internal Righting Moment (4.2)


Internal Forces create a Righting Moment to
counter the Upsetting Moment of the External
Forces.
The two internal forces are the weight of the
vessel ( s) and the resultant buoyant force (FB).
Recall the directions they act.

OVERALL STABILITY

Internal Righting Moment (4.2)

OVERALL STABILITY
Internal Righting Moment (4.2)
The perpendicular distance between the Weight
and the Buoyancy Force vectors is defined as
the RIGHTING ARM (GZ).
The moment created by the resultant Weight and
the resultant Force of Buoyancy is defined as
the RIGHTING MOMENT (RM). It may be
calculated by:

RM GZ

OVERALL STABILITY

Internal Righting Moment (4.2)


Where:
RM is the internal righting moment of the ship in
ft-LT.
s

is displacement of the ship in LT.

Fb is the magnitude of the resultant buoyant


force in LT.
GZ is the righting arm in feet.

GZ changes with heel angle

OVERALL STABILITY
Curve of Intact Statical Stability (4.3)
Curve of Intact Statical Stability or the Righting
Arm Curve
Shows the Heeling Angle () versus the
righting arm (GZ).
Assumes the vessel is heeled over quasistatically in calm water (i.e. external moments
are applied in infinitely small steps).

OVERALL STABILITY
Measure of Overall Stability (4.3)
Curve of Statical Stability

OVERALL STABILITY
Curve of Intact Statical Stability (4.3)
Caveats!
Predictions made by the Curves of Intact Statical
Stability are not accurate for dynamic seaways
because additional external forces and
momentum are not included in the analysis.
(Added Mass)
However, it is a simple, useful tool for comparison
and has been used to develop both intact and
damaged stability criterion for the US Navy.

OVERALL STABILITY
Curve of Intact Statical Stability (4.3)
Typical Curve of Intact Statical Stability
Vessel is upright when no external forces are
applied and the Center of Gravity is assumed
on the centerline. (Hydrostatics)
As an external force is applied, the vessel
heels over causing the Center of Buoyancy to
move off the centerline. The Righting Arm (GZ)
is no longer zero.

OVERALL STABILITY
Curve of Intact Statical Stability (4.3)
Typical Curve of Intact Statical Stability (cont.)

As the angle of heel increases, the Center of Buoyancy


moves farther and farther outboard (increasing the
Righting Arm).

The max Righting Arm will happen when the Center of


Buoyancy is the furthest from the CG. This is max
stability.

If the vessel continues to heel, the Center of Buoyancy


will move back towards the CG and the Righting Arm
will decrease.

OVERALL STABILITY
Curve of Intact Statical Stability (4.3)
Typical Curve of Intact Statical Stability (cont.)
Since stability is a function of displacement,
there is a different curve for each displacement
and KG! These are called the Cross Curves.
Cross Curves of Stability (different presentation,
more data)
X-Axis: Displacement of the Vessel in LT.
Y-Axis: Righting Arm in Feet.

Cross Curves Example


Righting
Arm
(feet)
5

30 degrees heel

For KG=0
10 degrees heel

2.5

At 2000 LT, the ship


Has a RA of 2.5 @10o
Heel and 5 @30o

0
1000

2000
Displacement (LT)

3000

OVERALL STABILITY
Cross Curves (4.3)
Cross Curves of Stability (Cont.)
Each curve is for one angle of heel.
Plot assumes KG = 0ft. (Does this make
sense?)

A Curve of Intact Statical Stability can be


determined by extracting the values at a given
draft, plotting and then applying the sine
correction for the correct KG.

Lab 5 Full Size!

OVERALL STABILITY
Measure of Overall Stability (4.4)
From the Curves of Intact Stability the following
Measures of Overall Stability can be made:
Range of Stability
Dynamical Stability
Maximum Righting Moment
Angle of Maximum Righting Moment
Measure of Tenderness or Stiffness

OVERALL STABILITY
Measure of Overall Stability (4.4)
Range, Max, Angle of Max, AVS, Initial Slope, Dynamic

OVERALL STABILITY
Measure of Overall Stability (4.4)
Range of Stability
The range of angles for which there exists a
positive righting moment.
The greater the range of stability, the less
likely the ship will capsize.
If the ship is heeled to any angle in the range
of stability, the ship will exhibit an internal
righting moment that will right the ship if the
external moment ceases.

OVERALL STABILITY
Measure of Overall Stability (4.4)
Dynamical Stability:
The work done by quasi-statically rolling the ship
through its range of stability to the capsizing angle.

Can be calculated by the equation: s GZ d . This is


equal to the product of the ships displacement with
the area under the Curve of Intact Statical Stability.

Not shown directly by the Curve of Intact Statical


Stability.

Does not account for the actual dynamics, because it


neglects the impact of waves and momentum.

OVERALL STABILITY
Measure of Overall Stability (4.4)
Maximum Righting Moment
The largest Static Moment the ship can
produce.
Calculated by multiplying the displacement of
the vessel times the maximum Righting Arm.
The larger the Maximum Righting Moment, the
less likely the vessel is to capsize.

OVERALL STABILITY
Measure of Overall Stability (4.4)
Angle of Maximum Righting Arm
The angle of inclination where the maximum
Righting Arm occurs. Beyond this angle, the
Righting Arm decreases.
It is desirable to have a larger angle. Why?
Waves!

OVERALL STABILITY
Measure of Overall Stability (4.4)
Measure of Tenderness or Stiffness
The initial slope of the intact statical stability curve
indicates the rate at which a righting arm is developed as
the ship is heeled over. This slope is GM!
A steep initial slope indicates the rapid development of a
righting arm and the vessel is said to be stiff. Stiff vessels
have short roll periods and react strongly to external
heeling moments.

A small initial slope indicates the slower development of a


righting arm and the vessel is said to be tender. Tender
vessel have longer roll periods and react sluggishly to
external heeling moments.

OVERALL STABILITY
Effect of a Vertical Shift in the Center of
Gravity on the Righting Arm (4.5)
A rise in KG decreases the righting arm (GZ).
This change in GZ can be found from:

Gv Z v G0 Z 0 G0Gv sin
Where:
Gv is the final vertical location of the center of gravity.
G0 is the initial location of KG. (Could be from Cross
Curves or from an earlier calculation)

OVERALL STABILITY
Effect of a Vertical Shift in the Center of
Gravity on the Righting Arm (4.5)
Sine Correction:

Gv Z v G0 Z 0 G0Gv sin
Go, Zo=initial locations
Gv, Zv=final positions

So GoGv is the
shift in KG!

OVERALL STABILITY
Effect of a Vertical Shift in the Center of
Gravity on the Righting Arm (4.5)
EXAMPLE DDG-51

Gv Z v G0 Z 0 G0Gv sin
From the Cross Curves at 20 degrees heel
And disp = 8000 LT GoZo is 10 ft. If KG is
22 ft, then the actual Righting Arm is:

Gv Z v 10 ft 22 ft sin 20
So, GZ actually equals 2.5 feet!

DDG-51 Cross Curves

OVERALL STABILITY

Effect of a Vertical Shift in the Center of


Gravity on the Righting Arm (4.5)

What are the


practical
implications of
KG=48 ft?

OVERALL STABILITY
Effect of Increased Displacement on the
Righting Arm (4.5)
A higher displacement should increase the
Righting Moment as RM= Displacement * RA
But, if the added weight is high, then the KG
increase could cause a reduction in GZ
Weight added low down usually increases
stability

OVERALL STABILITY
Stability Change for Transverse Shift in the
CG (4.6)
So far (in Ch. 4) we have only considered the case
where the Center of Gravity is on the centerline
(TCG=0).
The center of gravity may be moved off the
centerline by weight additions, removals, or
shifts such as cargo loading, ordnance firing,
and movement of crew.

OVERALL STABILITY
Stability Change for Transverse Shift in the CG (4.6)

Notice the improvement crew weight provides!

OVERALL STABILITY
Stability Change for Transverse Shift in the CG (4.6)

Another way to shift TCG!


Notice the keel position!

OVERALL STABILITY
Stability Change for Transverse Shift in the CG (4.6)
The new righting arm created by a shift in TCG
may be computed at each angle from the
Cosine Correction:

Gt Z t G0 Z 0 G0Gt cos

Ex. DDG51, disp = 8000 LT, from Cross


Curves at 20 degrees heel and KG=22 ft,
then GZ is 2.5 ft. If weight is moved
such that TCG is now 1 ft, then

Gt Z t 2.5 1cos 20 1.56 ft

OVERALL STABILITY
Stability Change for Transverse Shift in the CG (4.6)

OVERALL STABILITY
Stability Change for Transverse Shift in the CG (4.6)
The new righting arm (GtZt) created due to the
shift in the transverse center of gravity is either
shorter or longer than the righting arm created
if TCG=0. It depends on which side...
The range of stability has decreased on the side
that the transverse center of gravity has shifted
to (starboard) but has increased on the side it
shifted from (port).
Recall P-100! What happened when you hiked out
on the leeward side?!

OVERALL STABILITY
Stability Change for Transverse Shift in the CG (4.6)
EXAMPLE 4-2.
DDG51, Disp=8600 LT, KG=23.84 ft, TCG=0.4
At 10 degrees heel...

Gt Z t G0 Z 0 G0Gt cos
GoZo = 5.08 ft (from Cross Curve)
GvZv = 0.94 ft (after applying Sine Correction)
GvGt = 0.4 ft (=TCG)
GtZt = 0.94 - 0.4 cos(10o) = 0.55 ft
RM@10star = 4730 ft LT
RM@10port = 11470 ft LT

OVERALL STABILITY
Stability Change for Transverse Shift in the CG (4.6)

STABILITY
Damage Stability (4.7)

Flooding - Water ingression such that the


vessel has sinkage and trim but no list. May be
intentional.
Damage - Water ingression such that the vessel
has sinkage, trim and list.

STABILITY
Damage Stability (4.7)

Flooding or Damage?

STABILITY
Damage Stability (4.7)
Analyze Stability after Damage using:
Lost Buoyancy Method
OR

Added Weight Method (we use this one in


EN400)

STABILITY
Lost Buoyancy Method (4.7.1)
(not the one we use in EN400, but common)
Analyzes damage by changes in buoyancy versus
changes in the Center of Gravity.
Premise is that the ships CG does not move.
Since weight does not change, total buoyant
volume must also be constant.
Therefore, the ship makes up any lost buoyant
volume from damage by listing, trimming, and
draft changes. Need to calculate new volumes,
which require special programs to be efficient.

STABILITY
Added Weight Method (4.7.2)
(the one we use in EN400 !)
Damaged Ship Modeled as Undamaged But with
Water-Filled Spaces (Compartments) that add
weight.
Average Distances of Space from Keel, Midships,
and Centerline Known & Water Density Known.
Therefore We Can Solve for Shifts in G as a
Weight Addition Problem (which we know how to
do!)

STABILITY
Added Weight Method (4.7.2)
Independently Solve for Damaged Condition
KGnew
TCGnew
Draft and Trim (new)
Must know compartment contents to find Total of
(Water Weight) Added (unless it is a storage
tank). This involves a Permeability factor.

STABILITY
Permeability (4.7.2.1)
Compartments are rarely 100% flooded during
damage, due to trapped air, equipment, etc.
Ratio of volume occupied by water to the total
gross volume is defined as permeability.
Permeability = Volume Available for Flooding
Total Volume
Permeability is always < or = to 100%! Usually
it is 65-95%.

STABILITY
Damage Stability Design Criteria (4.7.3)
Guiding Rules for vessel design.
Note that the criteria used in static
analysis will neglect the impact of dynamic
forces such as wind and waves, so the
criteria are simply relative.

STABILITY
Damage Stability Design Criteria (4.7.3)

Three Main Criteria


MARGIN LINE
LIST
EXTENT OF DAMAGE TO HULL

STABILITY
Damage Stability Design Criteria (4.7.3)
MARGIN LINE LIMIT
Highest permissible location of any
damaged waterplane.
Must be at least 3 inches (0.075 m) below
top of the bulkhead deck at the side.

STABILITY

Damage Stability Design Criteria (4.7.3)


LIST LIMIT
Heel by damage 20 degrees.
Naval machinery to operate indefinitely at a
permanent list 15 degrees (most will function
up to ~25 degrees for a few hours).
Assumes personnel can continue damage control
efforts effectively at a permanent list of 20
degrees.
Ship must possess adequate stability against
weather to be towed when at 20 degree list.

STABILITY

Damage Stability Design Criteria (4.7.3)


EXTENT OF DAMAGE TO THE HULL LIMIT
100 ft LOA: must withstand flooding in one space.

100 - 300 ft LOA: flooding in two adjacent


compartments.
Warships, troop transports and hospital ships over 300
ft LOA: hull opening up to 15 % of Lpp.
Others 300 ft: hull opening up to 12.5% of Lpp.

STABILITY
Foundering and Plunging (4.7.4)
A vessel as result of damage or other events
can be lost several ways:
Insufficient transverse stability. It rolls over.
(Could be static or dynamic.)

Insufficient longitudinal stability. Plunging


If insufficient buoyancy. It sinks. Foundering

STABILITY
Free Surface Correction (4.8)
Free Surface - A fluid that moves freely.
Example: water, fuel and oil
Question: sand, wheat, fish?
Fluid Shift is a weight and causes the CG to shift
in both the vertical and horizontal directions.
Vertical shift is small for small angles and is
usually ignored.
Horizontal shift always causes a reduction is
the righting arm (GZ), as water flows downhill!

STABILITY
Free Surface Correction (4.8)
Free Surface Correction (FSC) - The distance the
center of gravity would have to rise to cause a
reduction in the righting arm equivalent to that
caused by the actual transverse shift.
"Virtual" center of gravity (Gv) - The effective
position of this new VCG.
Effective Metacentric Height (GMeff) - The
distance from the virtual center of gravity (Gv)
to the metacenter.

STABILITY

Free Surface Correction (4.8)


The Big Picture

STABILITY
Free Surface Correction (4.8)
The free surface correction to GM for small angle
hydrostatics is:

t it
FSC g
s s
where:
t
is the density of the fluid in the tank in lb s2/ft4
s is the density of the water the ship is floating in lb s2/ft4
it
s

is the transverse moment of area of the tank's free


surface area in ft4 .
is the underwater volume of the ship in ft3.

STABILITY
Free Surface Correction (4.8)
It is calculated for a rectangular tank as:

breadth

length

lb
it
12

fwd

Length is in the ships x-axis


Breadth is in the y-axis
The dimensions are for the free surface, not the tank!

STABILITY
Free Surface Effect (4.8.5)
The new, effective VCG is Gv, so a sine correction
is applied to get the statical stability curve

STABILITY
Minimizing Free Surface Effects (4.8.4)
Practical Solutions
More, smaller compartments
Pocketing = Topping off tanks
Keeping tanks either full or empty
by transfering (30% Rule).
Avoid damage or flooding!

STABILITY
Metacentric Height (4.9)
Recall the Metacenter?!! (Hint, GM and KM)
The metacentric height is NEGATIVE if the center
of gravity (G) is above the metacenter (M).
A negative metacentric height will result in an
upsetting moment at small angles, but does
not necessarily indicate the overall stability.
Although we often say that a boat will capsize if it
has negative GM, technically we can only say that it
is unstable at that point. It may become stable later!

Stability
One of the least and most stable boats for its size!

STABILITY
Metacentric Height (4.9)
Recall that Overall Stability is measured by:
Range of Stability
Dynamical Stability
Maximum righting moment
The angle at which the maximum righting
moment occurs.
And the initial slope can tell us GM

STABILITY
Metacentric Height (4.9)

STABILITY
Initial Slope of the Curve of Intact Stability (4.9)
At small angles, a right triangle is formed between
G, Z, and M. The righting arm may be
computed:

GZ GM sin
As 0, if the angle is given in radians the
equation becomes:

GZ GM

STABILITY
Initial Slope of the Curve of Intact Stability (4.9)
Metacentric height can then be found from the
initial slope of the Curve of Intact Statical
Stability:
GM (for angles <10 degrees) = GZ at one radian
(57.3 degrees)!

STABILITY
Initial Slope of the Curve of Intact Stability (4.9)
To find the slope either:

Find the change in the y-axis over a given


change in the x-axis.

Draw a straight line with the initial slope and


read the value of GZ at an angle of 57.3
degrees (i.e. one radian).

STABILITY
Initial Slope of the Curve of Intact Stability (4.9)

STABILITY
Metacentric Height (4.9)
LET US EXAMINE EACH GM CONDITION
GM Positive
GM Zero
GM Negative

STABILITY

Metacentric Height (4.9)

STABILITY

Metacentric Height (4.9)

STABILITY

Metacentric Height (4.9)

STABILITY
Metacentric Height (4.9)
SUMMARIZING GM CONDITIONS
GM Positive = Positive Stability
GM Zero = Neutral Stability
GM Negative = Negative Stability
Metacentric Height is only a good indicator of
stability over small angles.
GM is initial slope of Curve Intact Stability

The End of Stability (Ch. 4)!

Coming up nextmaterials!

Potrebbero piacerti anche