Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
India
Changing Agricultural
Traditions
DEFINITIONS
International relief
organizations invested in
research to breed more
productive rice and wheat
crops.
History
Countries all over the world in turn benefited from the Green Revolution
work conducted by Borlaug and this research institution.
Green Revolution
In
India
INTRODUCTION
In the 1960s, rice yields in India were about two tons per hectare; by the mid1990s, they had risen to six tons per hectare. In the 1970s, rice cost about
$550 a ton; in 2001, it cost under $200 a ton.India became one of the world's
most successful rice producers, and is now a major rice exporter, shipping
nearly 4.5million tons in 2006.
The core of his investigation focused on a collection of wheat plants at the IARI.
He experimented with cross-breeding native Indian varieties with Japanese
strains and with a dwarf wheat plant developed in Mexico by Norman Borlaug.
DOUBLE-CROPPING AND
CONTINUING EXPANSION OF
FARMING AREAS
IRRIGATION
FERTILIZERS
During the Green Revolution era, the
use of synthetic nitrogen-based
fertilizers became very popular and
commonly used in new agricultural
methods. This helped to adjust the soil
pH balance and achieve the right
levels of all the important chemical
compounds needed for the plant to
grow.
It was concluded that Nitrogen is the
most important mineral nutrient for
cereal production, and an adequate
supply is essential for high yields,
especially with modern cultivars
Worldwide fertilizer use increased
rapidly from 14 million tons in 1950 to
140 million tons in 1990.
PESTICIDES
Pesticides became commonly used in
order to prevent the high levels of pest
and disease damage that occur during
vast crop production on farming lands.
FARM MECHANIZATION
Green revolution allowed a drastic
reduction in the input of human labor to
agriculture by extending the use of
machinery to automate every possible
agricultural process like tractors,
mechanized harvesters , threshers etc.
This helped in :
Increasing the farmers productivity
Having a shorter growing season
Making double or treble cropping.
GOVERNMENT SUPPORT
Government provides :
Subsidies: pesticides, seeds
Commercial banks
Finance houses
RESULTS
OF
GREEN
REVOLUTION
STATISTICAL RESULTS
The Green Revolution resulted in a record grain output of 131
million tons in 1978-79. This established India as an exporter
and one of the world's biggest agricultural producers.
Yield per unit of farmland improved by more than 30 per cent
between 1947 (when India gained political independence) and
1979 when the Green Revolution was considered to have
delivered its goods.
The crop area under HYV varieties grew from seven per cent to
22 per cent of the total cultivated area during the 10 years of
the Green Revolution.
More than 70 per cent of the wheat crop area, 35 per cent of
the rice crop area and 20 per cent of the millet and corn crop
area, used the HYV seeds.
No other country in the world which attempted the Green
Revolution recorded such level of success.
ECONOMIC RESULTS
Crop areas under HYVs needed more water, fertilizer, pesticides,
fungicides and certain other chemicals. This spurred the growth of
the local manufacturing sector which created new jobs and
contributed to the country's GDP.
The increase in irrigation created need for new dams to harness
monsoon water. The water stored was used to create hydroelectric power. This in turn boosted industrial growth, created jobs
and improved the quality of life of the people in villages.
India paid back all loans it had taken from the World Bank for the
purpose of the Green Revolution. This improved India's
creditworthiness in the eyes of the lending agencies.
Some developed countries, especially Canada, which were facing
a shortage in agricultural labour, were so impressed by the results
of India's Green Revolution that they asked the Indian government
to supply them with farmers experienced in the methods of the
POLITICAL RESULTS
India transformed itself from a starving nation to an exporter
of food. This earned admiration for India in the comity of
nations, especially in the Third World.
The Green Revolution was one factor that madeMrs. Indira
Gandhi (1917-84)and her party, theIndian National
Congress, a very powerful political force in India.
The Green Revolution package has reduced genetic diversity at two levels.
First, it replaced mixtures and rotations of crops like wheat, maize, millets,
pulses and oil seeds with monocultures of wheat and rice.
3. SOIL EROSION
Marginal land or forests have been cleared to make way for the expansion of agriculture;
rotations have been abandoned; and cropland is now used to grow soil depleting crops yearin, year-out.
The removal of legumes from cropping patterns, for example, has removed a major source of
free nitrogen from the soil. In addition, the new HYVs reduce the supply of fodder and
organic fertilizer available to farmers.
High-yielding varieties rapidly deplete micronutrients from soils and chemical fertilizers
cannot compensate for the loss. Micronutrient deficiencies of zinc, iron, copper, manganese,
magnesium and boron are thus common.
4. WATER SHORTAGES
One result of the Green Revolution has therefore been to create conflicts
over diminishing water resources. Where crops are dependent on
groundwater for irrigation, the water table is declining at an estimated
rate of one-third to half a metre per year.
Intensive irrigation has led to the need for large-scale storage systems,
centralizing control over water supplies and leading to both local and
inter-state water conflicts.
5. SOCIAL IMPACT
CRISIS IN PUNJAB
SECOND GREEN
REVOLUTION
Dr MS Swaminathan is the present chairman of National Commission on
Farmers. He gives a new call for Evergreen Revolution for doubling the
present production of the food grains by adopting some best techniques and
promotion of organic farming .
The 11th five year plan has targeted 4% growth in agriculture sector. However,
the growth has not been achieved.
The approach paper to the 11th five year plan had highlighted a framework
which envisaged improvements such as doubling the rate of growth of
irrigated area, improvement of water management, rainwater harvesting,
reclamation of degraded land, focusing on soil quality, bridging the knowledge
gap, diversification into high value outputs etc
CONCLUSION
GREEN REVOLUTION has done a lot of positive things, saving
the lives of millions people and exponentially increasing the
yield of food crops.
But environmental degradation makes the Green Revolution an
overall inefficient, short-term solution to the problem of food
insecurity.
So, more sustainable and environmental friendly system of
cultivation needs to be practice call as Organic Farming. The
world is on the brink of a Green Revolution 2.0 which promises
to both feed a growing population to do so sustainably-without
compromising the needs of the future generation to feed
themselves.