Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Djanggan Sargowo
Batu, 2004
HYPERTENSION
HYPERTENSION
In INDONESIA complex problems:
Etiology
Prevention
Early detection
Management
Monitoring
Socio economic
Education
Income
Etc.
3
ETIOLOGY OF HYPERTENSION
: 92,1 95,3 %
: 3,4 6,3 %
: 0 0,2 %
: 0 0,3 %
: 0,1 0,2 %
: 0 0,2 %
: 0,2 1 %
4
HEREDITY - ENVIRONMENT
Normotension
PRE - HYPERTENSION
0 - 30
EARLY HYPERTENSION
20 40
ESTABLISHED HYPERTENSION
30 50
UNCOMPLICATED
Accelerated
CARDIAC
Malignant Hypertrophy
course
Failure
Infarction
COMPLICATED
LARGE
VESSEL
Aneurysm
Dissection
CEREBRAL
Ischemia
Thrombosis
Hemorrhage
40
RENAL
Nephrosclerosis
Failure
5
WHO-ISH (1999)
Klasifikasi Derajat Tekanan Darah menurut WHO-ISH 1999
yang diadaptasi dari JNC VI 1997
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Kategori
Sistolik
(mmHg)
Diastolik
(mmHg)
Optimal
Normal
Normal Tinggi
Hipertensi derajat 1 (ringan)
Subgrup : perbatasan
Hipertensi derajat 2 (sedang)
Hipertensi derajat 3 (berat)
Hipertensi Sistolik
(Isolated Systolic Hypertension)
120
130
130 - 139
140 - 159
140 - 149
160 - 179
180
140
80
85
85 - 89
90 - 99
90 - 94
100 - 109
110
90
7
Coronary
Coronaryartery
artery
disease
disease
Myocardial
Myocardial infarction
infarction
LV
LVhypertrophy
hypertrophy
LV dilation
Remodelling
Diastolic
LV dysfunction
LV damage
Systolic
Heart
Heart failure
failure
Symptoms
Decreased tissue
perfusion
Increased
hospitalisations
Death
Hemodynamic overload
Hypertension
Myocardial Infarction
Hemodynamic Overload
Myocardial Remodeling
Myocardial Failure
9
Myocardial Remodeling
Systolic Overload
Hypertension
Aortic Stenosis
Diastolic Overload
Myocardial Infarction
Valvular Regurgitation
Concentric
Hypertrophy
Eccentric
Hypertrophy
10
AGE
EXERCISE
GENDER
COEXISTENT
CARDIAC
DISORDERS
ADRENERGI
C
SYSTEM
LVH
WEIGHT
INSULIN, GROWTH,
THYROID HORMON
RENINANGIOTENSIN
SYSTEM
11
Impaired
LV filling
Myocardial
Ischemia
Infarction
Sudden
death
Arrhythmia
Heart
failure
LVH
Impaired
contractility
12
CAD
Endothelial dysfunction
Microvascular Disease
Atherosclerosis
&
LVH
Risk factors
Hyperlipidemia
HTN
Diabetes
Smoking
Insulin resistance
Neurohormonal
activation
LV
Remodeling
Ventricular dilation
HF
End-stage Microvascular
& Heart Disease
Death
13
HYPERTENSION
THE LATEST GUIDELINES:
The
TheSeventh
SeventhReport
Reportof
ofthe
the
JOINT
JOINTNATIONAL
NATIONALCOMMITTEE
COMMITTEE
on
onPrevention,
Prevention,Detection,
Detection, Evaluation,
Evaluation,and
andTreatment
Treatment
of
of High
High Blood
Blood Pressure
Pressure(JNC
(JNCVII)
VII)(May,
(May,2003)
2003)
2003
2003Guidelines
Guidelinesfor
forthe
themanagement
management of
of hypertension
hypertension
from
fromEuropean
EuropeanSociety
Societyof
of Hypertension
Hypertension
European
EuropeanSociety
Societyof
of Cardiology
Cardiology(ESH
(ESHESC
ESC2003)
2003)
(June,
(June,2003)
2003)
14
JNC VII
NEW GUIDELINES IN JNC VII:
1. Classification and Management of
Blood Pressure for Aduls
2. Patient Evaluation
3. Treatment
15
1. Classification and
Management of
Blood Pressure for
Adults
16
Classification of Hypertension
JNC V (1988)
Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Presure (JNC)
BP Range, mmHg
Category
BDP
< 85
Normal BP
85 89
High normal BP
90 104
Mild Hypertension
105 114
Moderate hypertension
> 115
Severe Hypertension
SBP, when
DBP < 90 mmHg
< 140
Normal BP
140 159
> 160
17
JNC VI (1997)
Blood Presure
Normal
Normal high
Stafe 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
Systolic
( mmHg )
< 130
Diastolic
( mmHg )
< 85
130 139
140 159
160 179
> 180
85 89
90 99
100 109
> 110
18
JNC VII
Blood Presure
(mmHg)
Normal
SBP
DBP
< 120
and
< 80
Prehypertension
120 139
or
80 89
Stage 1 H.
140 159
or
90 99
Stage 2 H.
> 160
or
> 100
19
20
21
Cardioprotective Effect of
Antihypertension Drugs
Prevents atherosclerosis
progression Prevents hearth
attacks
Prevent and regression of LVH
Does not increase risk factors
22
23
Risk Group C
(TOD/CCD and/or
Diabetes, With or
Without Other Risk
Factors)
High-normal
(130-139/89-89)
Lifestyle
modification
Drug therapy
Stage 1
(140-159/90-99)
Lifestyle
Lifestyle
modification
modification
(up to 12 months) (up to 6 months)
Drug therapy
Stages 2 and 3
(> 160/> 100)
Drug therapy
Drug therapy
Lifestyle
modification
Drug therapy
For example, a patient with diabetes and a blood pressure of 142/94 mmHg plus left ventricular
hypertrophy should be classified as having stage 1 hypertension with target organ disease (left
ventricular hypertrophy) and with another major risk factor (diabetes). This patient would be categorized
as Stage 1, Risk Group C, and recommended for immediate initiation of pharmacologic treatment. 24
2. PATIENT
EVALUATION
25
2. PATIENT EVALUATION:
2.1. To asses lifestyle and identify
other cardiovascular risk
factors or concomitant
disorders that may effect
prognosis and guide treatment
26
2. PATIENT EVALUATION
2.2. To reveal identifiable causes
of high Blood Pressure
2.3. To assess the presence or
absence of target organ
damage and CVD
27
3. TREATMENT
28
Diuretics
Beta-blockers
ACE Inhibitors
Calcium antagonists
Alpha-blockers
Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
30
JNC
JNCVII
VII
2003
2003
Lifestyle
BP
SBP* DBP*
classification mmHg mmHg modification
JAMA.2003;289
Normal
<120
and
<80
Encourage
Prehypertens
ion
120
139
or 80
89
Yes
No antihypertensive
drug indicated.
Stage 1
Hypertension
140
159
or 90
99
Yes
Thiazide-type diuretics
for most. May consider
ACEI, ARB, BB, CCB,
or combination.
Stage 2
Hypertension
>160
or >100
Yes
With compelling
indications
Drug(s) for
compelling
indications.
JNC
JNCVII
VII
2003
2003
2003
Compelling indications
Heart Failure
Post Myocardial Infarction
High Coronary Art. Disease Risk
Diabetes
Chronic Kidney Disease
Recurrent Stroke Prevention
JAMA.2003;289
32
Lifestyle Modifications to
Prevent and Manage Hypertension
Reduce weight
Increase
physical
activity
alcohol
sodium
saturated fat
cholesterol
potassium
calcium
magnesium
Avoid tobacco
33
1950
HCT (1958)
1960
Diuretics
Verapamil (1963)
Furosemide (1964)
Propanolol (1965)
Beta blockers
1970
CCBs
1-blockers
ACE-inhibitors
Nifedipin (1975)
Prazosin (1977)
1980
Captopril (1981)
1990
Losartan (1995)
Valsartan
AT1-antagonists
2000
34
Diuretic -blocker
Post-MI
High coronary
disease risk
Diabetes
Chronic
kidney disease
Stroke
prevention
ACE
inhibitor
ARB
CCB
35
JNC
JNCVII
VII
2003
2003
Hypertension
Hypertension
Without
Without
Compelling
Compellingindication
indication
Stage 1 Hypertension
Syst. 140 159 OR
Diast. 80 90 mmHg
Stage 2 Hypertension
Syst. > 160 mmHg OR
Diast > 100 mmHg
2 Drug Combination
for most
JAMA.2003;289
36
Lifestyle modification
therapy
Thiazide
ACE-I
ARB
Long-acting
DHP-CCB
Betablocker
Alpha-blocker
as initial
monotherapy
37
JNC
JNCVII
VII
2003
2003
JAMA. 2003;289
Hypertension
With
Compelling Indication
Drugs for the compelling indications.
PRICE
HEART
FAILURE /
LV DYSFUNCTION
Diuretic
Betablocker
Ec : Maintate
( Tanabe )
CCB* Ec :
Herbesser CD
( Tanabe )
METABOLIC ( ec : DM )/ COPD
C.H.D /
ANGINA
CCB* : Calcium
Channel Blocker
38
Local
Circulating
Tissue
Liver
Angiotensinogen
Renin inhibitors
Renin
Angiotensin I
ACE inhibitor
Converting enzyme
Non-ACE pathways
- Chymase
- CAGE
- Cathepsin G
Angiotensin II
AII receptor blockers
Angiotensin
receptors
39
41
12
P < 0.05
10
8
6
4
2
0
Control
Captopril
(5 mg/kg/day)
Enalapril
Imidapril
(5 mg/kg/day) (5 mg/kg/day)
42
43
44
Change
Changein
inExercise
ExerciseDuration
Duration
after
after12
12weeks
weekstreatment
treatmentwith
withIMIDAPRIL
IMIDAPRIL
Change
Changein
inPhysical
PhysicalWorking
WorkingCapacity
Capacity(PWC)
(PWC)
after
after12
12weeks
weekstreatment
treatmentwith
withIMIDAPRIL
IMIDAPRIL
45
46
47
AT1-receptor blockers:
improving heart function
48
Role of ARBs in
The Cardiovascular Continuum
MI
CAD
Endothelial dysfunction
Microvascular Disease
Atherosclerosis
&
LVH
OPTIMAAL
VALIANT
ONTARGET
TRANSCEND
LIFE
VALUE
Risk factors
SCOPE
Hyperlipidemia
Hipertensi
NAVIGATOR
Diabetes
Smoking
Insulin resistance
Loss of
muscle
LV
Remodeling
Elite II
Val-HeFT
CHARM
RENAAL
IDNT
IRMA-2
MARVAL
Ventricular dilation
HF
End-stage Microvascular
& Heart Disease
Death
49
Heart failure
Postmyocardial
infarction
ACC/AHA Post-MI
Guideline, BHAT,
SAVE, Capricorn,
EPHESUS
ALLHAT, HOPE,
ANBP2, LIFE,
CONVINCE
50
Risk factors
smoking,hypertension
cholesterol, diabetes
Arrhythmia &
loss of muscle
Adrenergic
blockade
Remodelling
Ventricular
dilatation
Congestive
heart failure
Death
51
SNS System
Angiotensin II
Noradrenalin
ACE-I
-Blocker
Hypertension
Hypertension
Coronary
Coronary
artery
artery
disease
disease
Diabetes
Diabetes
Hyperlipidemia
Hyperlipidemia
Hypertrophic
Hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy
cardiomyopathy
Myocardial
Myocardial
infarction
infarction
Cardiac
Cardiac
rupture
rupture
LV
LV
dysfunction
dysfunction
Atrial
Atrial
fibrillation
fibrillation
Mechanical
Mechanical
death
death
Heart
Heart
failure
failure
Pump
Pump
failure
failure
53
Antihypertensive
Anti-ischemic
-blocking
-blocking
agents
agents
Antiarrythmic
NON
SELECTIVE
ISA Nadolol
ISA +
Pindolol
Propanolol
Penbutolol
Timolol
Alprenolol
Sotalol Oxprenolol
SELECTIVE
ISA Atenolol
ISA +
Acebutolol
Non-selective wit
alfa-blocking activ
Labetolol
Bucindolol
Carvedilol
Esmolol Celiporlol
Metoprolol
Bisoprolol
Bisoprolol
Betaxolol
55
34%
p < 0.0001
Sudden Death
44%
p < 0.0011
36%
p < 0.0001
20%
p < 0.0006
CIBIS II
Diabetic (%)
Renal impairment(%)
NYHA IV (%)
Elderly (mean age-year)
Antiarrhytmic drug (%)
*no data
12
33
17
61
15
MERIT-HF
25
*
3
64
0
COPERNICUS
*
*
100
63
18
56
Lifestyle modification
therapy
Thiazide
ACE-I
ARB
Long-acting
DHP-CCB
Betablocker
Alpha-blocker
as initial
monotherapy
57
50
Atenolol Bisoprol
ol
Betaxolol Metoprolol
Balanced clearance
Metabolites
Unchanged
substance
58
Bisoprolol
p 0,0001
placebo
200
400
600
800
59
Mmol/l
6
5
4
3
2
1
Start
1 Year
Total cholestrol
2 Years
Triglycerides
3 Years
4 Years
HDL-cholesterol
5 Years
LDL-cholesterol
60
BISOPROLOL :
Neutral Effect on Glucose Metabolism
Glucose (mg/dl)
170
HbA1 (%)
10
160
150
140
130
120
110
A
61
180
160
140
120
SBP
100
80
DBP
60
3 5
7
9 11
Last day of placebo
13
15
17
19
21
23
62
28
56
84
mmHg
Days
28
0
-10
-10
-20
-20
-30
-30
-40
SBP
-40
5 mg
10 mg
56
84
Days
DBP
20 mg Bisoprolol
63
Cumulative Event/
Procedure Rate (%)
Any Revascularization
30.0
30.0
25.0
25.0
Placebo (n=408)
20.0
35%
15.0
Placebo
20.0
43%
15.0
P=.01 10.0
10.0
5.0
P=.001
5.0
Amlodipine besylate
0.0
0.0
0
12
18 24
30 36
Months of Follow-up
12
18 24
30 36
Months of Follow-up
65
66
Placebo (n=294)
50
Amlodipine (n=291)
40
30
20
10
0
67
Articel
Diltiazem in the management of acute myocardial
infarction treated with trombolythic agents ;
a randomized controlled trial
William E Boden et al for the INTERCEPT study group
May 20
68
INTERCEPT : Purpose
THE INCOMPLETE
INFARCTION
TRIAL OF
EUROPEAN
RESEARCH
COLLABORATORS
EVALUATING
PROGNOSIS
POST-THROMBOLYSIS
BACKGROUND
Diltiazem reduces
Non-fatal reinfarction,
Refractory ischaemia after nonQ-wave myocardial infarction
(acute coronary syndrome).
PURPOSE
Hazard
Placebo Ratio
95% CI
P
Value
All CV events
97
131
0.79
0.61-1.02
0.07
Non fatal CV
events
90
125
0.76
0.58-1.00
0.05
Refractory
ischaemia
74
103
0.76
0.56-1.02
0.07
All recurrent
ischaemia
116
153
0.80
0.63-1.02
0.07
Need PTCA /
CABG
46
75
0.67
0.46-0.96
0.03
PTCA / CABG
30
53
0.61
0.39-0.96
0.03
alone
Cardiac death
+ Non-fatal
reinfarction +
All recurrent
ischemia
21%
P= 0.07
19%
P= 0.07
Cardiac death
+ Non-fatal
reinfarction +
PTCA/CABG
Non-fatal
reinfarction
+
Refractory
ischemia
Non-fatal
reinfarction
+ All
recurrent
ischemia
Non-fatal
reinfarction
+
PTCA/CAB
G
PTCA/CAB
G
24%
P= 0.05
20%
P= 0.05
33%
P= 0.03
39%
P= 0.03
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
29%
P= 0.05
INTERCEPT : CONCLUSION
The INTERCEPT showed that diltiazem reduce all
composite endpoints of non-fatal cardiac events:
reinfarction (21%),
refractory ischemia (24%),
recurrent ischemia (20%),
the need for PTCA/CABG (39%).
The implications of the INTERCEPT findings are
important to cardiovacular therapeutics of Heart rate
lowering Calcium Antagonists - Diltiazem
in the
management of ACS.
BODEN WE et al . LANCET 2000 ; 355 : 1751-1756 72
N O R D IL
73
Primary endpoint
1.00
(0.87-1.15)
0.97
Stroke
(fatal and non-fatal)
0.80
(0.65-0.99)
0.04
Myocardial infarction
(fatal and non-fatal)
1.16
(0.94-1.14)
0.17
Diltiazem
0.5
/D
1.0
2.0
2000 359-365
74
Stroke
%
5
Conventional
Diltiazem
Patients with
event
4
3
2
1
0
5 Years
75
Myocardial infarction
Patients with event
%
5
Conventional
Diltiazem
4
3
2
1
0
3
Years
76
DBP 105
%6
Percentage
5
of patients
4
with stroke
3
(above) and
2
MI (below)
1
p = 0.030
n.s.
0
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
0 1 2 3 4 5
2493
2427
1545
-bl/diur
2974
2868 2002
1516
2501
2450
2905
2823 1978
Diltiazem
%6
5
4
3
2
n.s. 1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
0 1 2 3
2493
2433
2974
2889
1543
1509
2501
2905
2445
2820
%6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Patients at risk
-blockers/diuretics
Diltiazem
n.s.
4 5
2022
1971
77
Conclusion
NORDIL study showed:
( 10.881 patients 50 74 years old , follow up 4.5 years )
Combination Drugs of
Hypertension
Diuretics
- blocker
C.C. Blocker
79
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
% OF PATIENTS
80
90
100
80
BETHA
BLOCKERS
AT1- RECEPTOR
BLOCKERS
ALFA
BLOCKERS
CALCIUM
ANTAGONISTS
ACE
INHIBITORS
81
82
Thank
You
83