0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
31 visualizzazioni15 pagine
The document summarizes data from the Dropped Objects Register of Incidents & Statistics (DORIS) database. It finds that the number of reported dropped object incidents and potentials continues to grow. Environmental factors like wind seem to influence the first and fourth quarters. Most actual dropped objects weigh 2kg or less and fall from heights of 5m or more, exposing personnel. The top five reported causes are inadequate securing, failed fixtures and fittings, poor housekeeping, corrosion, and operator errors. While awareness of dropped objects seems higher, performance at preventing them does not seem to have improved according to the data. More complete reporting of incidents is needed to better understand and address the risks.
The document summarizes data from the Dropped Objects Register of Incidents & Statistics (DORIS) database. It finds that the number of reported dropped object incidents and potentials continues to grow. Environmental factors like wind seem to influence the first and fourth quarters. Most actual dropped objects weigh 2kg or less and fall from heights of 5m or more, exposing personnel. The top five reported causes are inadequate securing, failed fixtures and fittings, poor housekeeping, corrosion, and operator errors. While awareness of dropped objects seems higher, performance at preventing them does not seem to have improved according to the data. More complete reporting of incidents is needed to better understand and address the risks.
The document summarizes data from the Dropped Objects Register of Incidents & Statistics (DORIS) database. It finds that the number of reported dropped object incidents and potentials continues to grow. Environmental factors like wind seem to influence the first and fourth quarters. Most actual dropped objects weigh 2kg or less and fall from heights of 5m or more, exposing personnel. The top five reported causes are inadequate securing, failed fixtures and fittings, poor housekeeping, corrosion, and operator errors. While awareness of dropped objects seems higher, performance at preventing them does not seem to have improved according to the data. More complete reporting of incidents is needed to better understand and address the risks.
New patterns emerging in past year, increase in Lifting
Dropped Objects Activity
Previous analysis showed similar trends for Actual incidents
Potentials being identified throughout the day
Dropped Objects Time (April 2012 to date)
Q1 and Q4 feature in Wind/ High Wind categories
Data not always available to provide
Dropped Objects Environmental Factors
Category data previously suggested greater awareness of
potential drops from equipment and unsecured items
Dropped Objects Categories (Actual and Potential)
Actual incident categories follow similar pattern, increase in
structural related incidents Potentials improved awareness in all areas?
Dropped Objects Categories (April 2012 to date)
Similar trending as previous (actual and potential)
May benefit from more details on object category
Dropped Objects Weights (Actual since April 2012)
Again, similar trend
52% of objects fall from 5m or more
Dropped Objects Heights (Actual)
According to the data as-read, personnel have been exposed to
over 80% of incidents in 2012 More than one person may be exposed in any single incident
Dropped Objects Consequences
Based on data from only 5 operators
ACTUAL INCIDENTS since April 2012
No real change in trend here, Inadequate Securing continues
to show an increase closely followed by failed fixtures and fittings. Corrosion is also in increase
Dropped Objects The Causes
Actual incidents trend mirrors overall trending
Potential reporting is more interesting. Since 2012, increase in HazID + Corrosion.
Dropped Objects The Causes (Actual)
Data shows 183 actual dropped objects (42 potential).
April 2012 to date DORIS users only (9 key users, 5OP 4Cont)
57% of all Dropped Objects are 2kg or less.
16% were greater than 10kg slight improvement (was 18%)
24% Dropped objects fall 1m or less (was 30%).
52% fell from 5m or above increased again (was 45%)
Personnel exposure (difficult to analyse but no improvement).
5 actual injuries (1 LTI) 19 Potential LTI, 40 Potential Fatalities (of 181 Actual Incidents)
Top 5 Causes (according to reporting process
(2012 position))
Inadequate Securing (1)
Failed Fixtures & Fittings (2) Poor Housekeeping (NEW) Corrosion (NEW) Operator Error / Procedures not followed (NEW)
Dropped Objects - Messages
By filtering current data by year, DORIS clearly shows that
we have not improved our dropped object prevention performance but perhaps we have raised awareness of the problem and the causes? To realise the true value of DORIS, we need data. Please help us out! DROPS Admin can help with anonymous input of data please just ask. Thats exactly the same statement as this time last year. Time for a DORIS Focus Group gathering