Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
MOVING TOWARDS
DEREGULATION
Dr. YOG RAJ SOOD
Professor & Dean (R & D)
Department Of Electrical Engineering
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
HAMIRPUR 177 005 (H.P.)
1
Wheeling
It
istheuseoftransmissionfacilitiesofasystemtotransmit
powerforothersellersandbuyers.
Definitions;
Intraditionalpowersystem,governmentsmostlyown
the integrated electricity utilities, having complete
controlovergeneration,transmissionanddistribution.
Historically, wheeling has not been a very important
issue. Intervening utilities have been involved
formally as part of a contract path between a buyer
andasellerutility.
GENERATION
Tieline
TRANSMISSION
Tieline
DISTRIBUTION
Fig1.1:Traditionalintegratedpowersystem
GENERATION
Tieline
TRANSMISSION
Tieline
DISTRIBUTION
Fig1.1:Traditionalintegratedpowersystem
Genco
Genco
Genco
Transco
Tielines
Disco
IPP
Tielines
Disco
Genco
Genco
Bulkconsumers
Deregulatedpowersystem
10
Genco-2
Genco-1
Genco-3
Transco
Tielines
Disco-1
IPP
Tielines
Disco-2
Genco-5
Genco-4
Bulkconsumers
Deregulatedpowersystem
11
T2
13
12
11
L18
L17
10
L16
L15
L14
L11
L8
3
G!
L5
T1
L3
L4
T3
T1
G2
G3
5
400KV
T 28
15
16
T 29
G4
L24
T2
L1
765KV
L2
2
17
18
L26
L27
T 30
14
L19
L22
L25
L20
T 31
L12
L9
L21
L23
T3
L10
L13
13
Wheeling transactions
14
Types of transactions
Feasible Transactions
Feasible
transactions
can
be
accommodated without violating the
transmission network constraints.
Non-Feasible Transactions
Unfeasible
transactions
violate
transmission network constraints and
hence cannot be accommodated
fully.
15
Firm Transactions
These are the transactions that are
not
subject
to
discretionary
interruptions. These are also known
as reserved transactions.
Non-firm Transactions
These transactions may be curtailed
at the utilitys discretion. These are
also called as-available transactions.
16
Bilateral Transactions
It is a bilateral exchange of power between a
buying and a selling entity. The exchange can
be proposed, scheduled or actual.
Multilateral Transactions
In a multilateral transaction power is injected
(generations) at different buses and taken out
(loads) at some another different buses
simultaneously. Such that sum of all
generations is equal to all loads in the
transaction, excluding losses. Losses may be
supplied by generators of the transactions or
by the pool/utility as per pre defined contract.
17
Steps towards
deregulation
Privatization
Transmission Open Access
(TOA)
Re-structuring
De-regulation
18
Privatization:
Sale by a government of its state-owned
electric utility assets, and operating
company, to private companies.
Transmission Open Access (TOA):
Because of transmission open access,
entities that did not own transmission
lines were granted the right to use the
transmission system. The aim of TOA is
to introduce competition into the
traditional regulated utilities without
giving up the existing regulating19
Re-structuring
Re-structuring of regulated power sector is
to separate the functions of power
generation, transmission and distribution.
De-regulation
It is changing the monopoly franchise rule
or other regulations of regulated industry,
that affect how electric companies do
business, and how customers may buy
electric power and services.
20
COMPONENTS OF DEREGULATED
SYSTEM
21
Generation
Companies
(Gencos)
Gencos
are
responsible
for
operating
and
maintaining
generating plants in the generation
sector and in most of cases, are the
owners of the plants. In some cases
individual generators do not market
their output, but only Genco market
the output of all its generators.
22
23
Distribution
Companies
(Discos) and Retailers
Discos assume the same responsibility
on the distribution side as in a
traditional regulatory supply utility.
However, a trend in deregulation is
that Discos may now be restricted to
maintain the distribution network and
provide
facilities
for
electricity
delivery while retailers are separated
from Discos and sales electric energy
to end consumers.
25
Independent
System
Operator (ISO)
The ISO is the supreme entity in
the
control
of
transmission
system. The basic requirements
of an ISO is disassociation from
all market participants and
absence from any financial
interest in the generation and
distribution business.
26
27
28
Pool Model
Pool and Bilateral Model
Multilateral Trades Model
29
Pool Model
GENCOS
ISO
PX
TRANSMISSION
POOL
TRANSCOS
RETAILERS
DISCOS
CONSUMERS
Energy sales
Energy Flow
Coordination
Figure1.3:PowerPoolModel
30
The California
model is of
this category.
The
Nordic
model and the
New Zeeland
model almost
fall into this
category with
some
modifications.
GENCOS
ISO
PX
SCs
RETAILERS
Transco
DISCOS
CONSUMERS
Energy sales
Energy Flow
Figure1.4:Poolandbilateralmodel
Coordination
31
SCs
ISO
TRANSCOS
RETAILERS
DISCOS
CONSUMERS
Energy sales
Energy Flow
Coordination
Figure1..5:MultilateralTradeModel
32
Cn
BidPrice
C3
LoadForecast
C2
Generation
Offer
Prices
C1
B1B2B3..BN
Fig1.6
EnergyBid
33
BidPrice
EnergyCleared
Generation
Offer
Prices
Fig.1.7
P P2P3
PN
EnergyBid
PD1PD2PDM
1
34
35
Quadraticatbus1
C ( Pg 1 ) 26.0 * Pg i 0.00375 * Pg 12
Valvepointloadingatbus2
C ( Pg 2 ) 20.0 * Pg 2 0.001 * Pg 22
abs (150 * sin(0.098 * ( Pg 2 ))
Piecewisequadraticwithdoublebidatbus5
C ( Pg 5 ) 20.0 * Pg 5 0.001 * Pg 52
for0 Pg 5 20
C ( Pg 5 ) 400.4 25.0 * ( Pg 5 20) 0.001 * ( Pg 5 - 20) 2
for20 Pg 5 33
36
Quadraticatbus8and11.
C ( Pg 8 ) 24.5 * Pg 8 0.000275 * Pg 82
2
C ( Pg11 ) 26.5 * Pg11 0.000375 * Pg 11
37
38
39
40
41
Subjecttothefollowingconstraintsafteraddingallfirmtransactions.
Thepowerflowequationofthepowernetwork g (V , ) 0
Pi (V, ) Pinet
Where
ForeachPQbusi
net
g(V, ) Qi (V, ) Qi
P (V, ) P net
m
m
ForeachPVbusm,not
includingtheref.bus.
where:
PandarerespectivelycalculatedrealandreactivepowerforPQbusi.
Qi
i
andarerespectivelyspecifiedrealandreactivepowerforPQbusi.
Pinet
Qinet
PmandarerespectivelycalculatedandspecifiedrealpowerforPVbusm.
Qmnet
V andarevoltagemagnitudeandphaseanglesofdifferentbuses.
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
ALLOCATION OF
EMBEDED COST
51
MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION
Pw
C
Ppeak 8760
(5.1)
where:
C=Totaltransmissionannualrevenuerequirement
C C f
f
53
CbT
Pw
Pmin, path
Cf
path
8760
(5.2)
where
Pmin, path istheminimumlongtermratingofall
transmissionlinesonthecontractpath
C f isthesumofannualcostofalltransmission
path
facilityalongthespecifiedpath
54
MW Mile Method:
According to MW Mile (MWM) method, embedded costs of
transmissionsystemareallocatedproportionallytothechangeinthe
lineMWflowscausedbytransactionandlengthofthelineinmiles.
The transaction cost CcT is $/h for a transaction T is given by the
followingequations.
CcT
C ( MW f )T L f
f
8760 ( ( MW f )T L f )
T
(5.3)
where
MW f MW f ( with transaction T ) MW f ( without transaction T)
Lf=LengthoftransmissionLinef
(MWf)T=MWflowinfacilityfduetotransactionT.
55
MWM-net
Negative MW line flow changes whose line loading
decreases due to the wheel are subtracted from the positive
MW line flow changes and the wheeling costs are
correspondingly lowered or even reversed in sign. This may
lead to negative charges. This method is considered in this
work.
MWM-pos
Only positive MW line flow changes are used in computing
thesumofthechangesinequation(6.3)andnegative MW line
flow changes are ignored. In this way, transactions relieving
loadedtransmissionlinesarenotconsidered.
MWM-gross
Positiveandnegative MW lineflowchangesareindividually
converted to absolute values and added and thus equally
contributetopositivewheelingcosts.Thiscausesapricetobe
paidbythewheelingpartyevenifthetransmissionnetworkis
56
relieved.
C ( 12 MWi )
i
8760( Pmax
loading
(5.4)
where:
includingwheelingtransaction.
i =boundarylines
57
58
C ( MVA f )T L f
f
8760 ( ( MVA f )T L f )
T
(5.5)
where:
Lf=Lengthoftransmissionfacilityf
(MVAf)T=MVAflowinfacilityfduetotransactionT.
Dependingonthedirection of power flow, three sub-methods
canalsobedistinguishedinthisproposedmethod.The MVA net
change (MVAM-net), MVA positive change (MVAM-pos) and
MVA gross change (MVAM-gross). The same sign conventions
holdasfortheMW-Milemethod.
A transaction causing more reactive power loading will be
allocatedmorecostthanothertransactions,bythismethodonly.So
this method is most realistic and fair among all existing methods,
59
includingMW-milemethod.
60
C ( MW f )T C f
f
8760 ( ( MW f )T C f )
T
(5.6)
where
MVA f MW f ( with T ) MW f ( without T)
Cf=Costoftransmissionfacilityf
(MWf)T=MWflowinfacilityf duetotransaction
T.
61
CnnT
C ( MVA f )T C f
f
8760 ( ( MVA f )T C f )
T
(5.7)
where
Cf=Costoftransmissionfacilityf
(MVAf)T=MVAflowinfacilityfduetotransactionT.
Depending on the direction of power flow, three submethods can also be distinguished. The MVA net
change (MVAC-net), MVA positive change (MVACpos)andMVA gross change (MVAC-gross). The same
signconventionsholdasfortheMW-costmethod.
62
SIMULATION RESULTS
63
13
12
T2
T4
L18
11
L17
L16
10
L1 5
L14
L11
L8
3
G !
L5
T1
L3
L4
T1
G 2
T3
G 3
5
400K V
T28
15
16
L24
T2
T29
G 4
L1
765KV
L2
2
17
18
L26
L27
T30
14
L19
L22
L25
L20
T31
L12
L9
L21
L23
T3
L10
L13
T4
Fig5.1:SouthAfricaPowerSystem
64
Table5.1:(Transactions)
Transa From To
Valueof
ction
Bus Bus
Transaction
No.
No.
(MW) MVAR
T1
4
13
10.0
0.0
T2
11
5
12.0
0.0
T3
3
14
15.0
7.2645
(pf=0.9)
T4
6
12
25.0 12.1075(
pf=0.9)
65
Table5.2:(PostageStampMethod)
Transa
Cost
Cost($/M
ction ($/hour)
Wh)
T1
18.17
1.817
T2
21.80
1.817
T3
27.25
1.817
T4
45.42
1.817
So PS method is easy to implement and does not require a
powerflowinthecalculationprocess.Neitherthedistancewheeled,
norreverseflowsaretakenintoaccount.
66
67
TestProblemandResults
13
T2
T4
12
L18
11
L17
10
L16
L1 5
L14
L11
L8
3
G!
L5
T1
L3
L4
T1
T3
G2
G3
5
400K V
T28
15
16
L24
T2
T29
G4
L1
765K V
L2
2
17
18
L26
L19
14
L27
T30
L22
L25
L20
T31
L12
L9
L21
L23
T3
L10
L13
T4
SouthAfricaPowerSystem
68
Table:5.4(BoundaryFlowMethod)
Trans Costallocationofarea
action
B
($/hour) ($/MWh)
2.663603
T1
0.26636
-4.67021 -0.38918
T2
2.678539 0.178569
T3
2.685305 0.107412
T4
The boundary lines are 12,13,22 and
23.Resultofthis method is difficult tocompare
with other methods, because this method has
been used for calculating the cost allocation
acrosstheborderofthegridBonly.
69
13
12
T2
T4
L18
11
L17
10
L16
L1 5
L14
L11
L8
3
G!
L5
T1
L3
L4
T1
T3
G2
G3
5
400K V
T28
15
16
T29
G4
L24
T2
L1
765K V
L2
2
17
18
L26
L19
14
L27
T30
L22
L25
L20
T31
L12
L9
L21
L23
L10
L13
T3
T4
B
SouthAfricaPowerSystem
70
Flow-mile Method
71
MW-Mile Method
Table5.5:(MW-MileMethod)
ran
Case1
Case2
acti
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
n
($/hour) ($/MWh) ($/hour)
($/MWh)
T1
67.93
6.79
67.84
6.78
T2 -106.97
-8.91
-107.32
-8.94
T3
88.37
5.89
88.34
5.89
T4
57.17
2.29
55.88
2.24
Pool 9009.28
1.82
9011.03
1.82
72
MVA-Mile method:
Trans
T1
T2
T3
T4
Pool
Table5.6:(MVA-MileMethod)
Case1
Case2
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
($/hour)
($/MWh)
($/hour) ($/MWh)
80.94
8.09
81.30
8.13
-110.75
-9.23
-111.33
-9.28
108.78
7.25
109.27
7.28
95.70
3.83
82.05
3.28
8941.10
1.80
8834.96
1.81
73
Table5.7:(proposedMW-CostMethod)
Transac
Case1
Case2
tion
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
($/hour) ($/MWh) ($/hour) ($/MWh)
T1
70.97
7.10
70.91
7.09
T2
-103.35
-8.61 -103.59
-8.63
T3
87.03
5.80
87.01
5.80
T4
33.91
1.36
33.32
1.33
Pool
9027.22
1.82 9028.12
1.82
74
Table5.8:(ProposedMVA-CostMethod)
Transac
Case1
Case2
tion
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
($/hour)
($/MWh) ($/hour) ($/MWh)
T1
80.33
8.03
80.74
8.07
T2
-106.90
-8.91 -107.50
-8.96
T3
102.26
6.82 102.83
6.86
T4
63.39
2.54
50.42
2.02
Pool
8976.70
1.81 8989.30
1.81
75
24-hours
of
schedule
Receives ahead
supply curves from each
77
In real time
78
79
Hedging Arrangement
Customer
Bulk
x
HEDGING
Power
Markets
ORGANISATION
x+y
(y)
Price
Customer
2
Fig1.8
80
Ancillary Services
Ancillary services are needed to fine tune
system energy needs Rely firmly on them
for Reliability
Market competition
Spinning reserve
Non-spinning reserve
Replacement reserves
Bilateral contracts
Voltage support (Regulation up and down
Reactive power support
81
82
86
87
NationalConference