Sei sulla pagina 1di 45

RISK AND RATES OF RETURN

Erlane K Ghani

What is investment risk?

Investment risk pertains to the


probability of earning less than
the expected return.
The greater the chance of low or
negative returns, the riskier the
investment.

Probability distribution
Firm X

Firm Y

-70

15

100

Expected Rate of Return

Rate of
return (%)

Annual Total Returns,1926-1996


Average
Return
Large-company
stocks
12.7%
Small-company
stocks
17.7
Long-term
corporate bonds 6.0
Long-term
government
5.4
Intermediate-term
government
5.4

Standard
Deviation

Distribution

20.3%
34.1
8.7
9.2
5.8

U.S. Treasury
bills

3.8

3.3

Inflation

3.2

4.5
-90%

0%

90%

Asset Returns, 1802 - 1998

Why is the T-bill return independent


of the economy?

Will return the promised 8%


regardless of the economy.

Do T-bills promise a completely


risk-free return?

No, T-bills are still exposed to the


risk of inflation.
However, not much unexpected
inflation is likely to occur over a
relatively short period.

How to Measure Stand-Alone Risk

S tan dard deviation.


Variance
n

(ki k )
i 1

Prob.

T-bill

Stock A
HT

13.8

17.4

Rate of Return (%)

Standard deviation (i) measures total, or

stand-alone, risk.
The larger the i , the lower the probability
that actual returns will be close to the
expected return.

Coefficient of Variation (CV)


Standardized measure of dispersion
about the expected value:
Std dev

CV = Mean = ^ .
k
Shows risk per unit of return.

A = B , but A is riskier because larger


probability of losses.

=
CV
>
CV
.
A
B
^
k

Portfolio Risk and Return


Assume a two-stock portfolio with
$50,000 in HT and $50,000 in
Collections.
^
Calculate kp and p.

General statements about risk

Most stocks are positively correlated. rk,m

0.65.
35% for an average stock.
Combining stocks generally lowers risk.

Returns Distribution for Two Perfectly


Negatively Correlated Stocks (r = -1.0) and for
Portfolio WM
25 .

Stock W

.
.

25

15

-10

Stock M

25

15

15
0

-10

Portfolio WM

.
-10

. . . . .

Returns Distributions for Two Perfectly


Positively Correlated Stocks (r = +1.0) and for
Portfolio MM
Stock M

Stock M

Portfolio MM

25

25

25

15

15

15

-10

-10

-10

What would happen to the


riskiness of an average 1-stock
portfolio as more randomly
selected stocks were added?
p would decrease because the added stocks
would not be perfectly correlated but kp would
^
remain relatively constant.

Prob.
Large
2

15

Even with large N, p 20%

p (%)
35

Company Specific Risk


Stand-Alone Risk, p

20

Market Risk
0

10

20

30

40

2,000+

# Stocks in Portfolio

As more stocks are added, each new stock has

a smaller risk-reducing impact.

p falls very slowly after about 40 stocks are

included. The lower limit for p is about 20%


= M .

Stand-alone Market Firm-specific


= risk +
risk
risk

Market risk is that part of a securitys


stand-alone risk that cannot be
eliminated by diversification.
Firm-specific risk is that part of a
securitys stand-alone risk which can
be eliminated by proper diversification.

By forming portfolios, we can eliminate about

half the riskiness of individual stocks (35% vs.


20%).

If you chose to hold a one-stock


portfolio and thus are exposed to
more risk than diversified investors,
would you be compensated for all
the risk you bear?

NO!
Stand-alone risk as measured by a stocks or

CV is not important to a well-diversified


investor.
Rational, risk averse investors are concerned
with p , which is based on market risk.

There can only be one price, hence market

return, for a given security. Therefore, no


compensation can be earned for the additional
risk of a one-stock portfolio.

Beta measures a stocks market risk. It


shows a stocks volatility relative to the
market.
Beta shows how risky a stock is if the stock is

held in a well-diversified portfolio.

How are betas calculated?

Run a regression of past returns on Stock i

versus returns on the market. Returns =


D/P + g.
The slope of the regression line is defined as
the beta coefficient.

Illustration of beta calculation:


_
ki

20

15

Year kM
1
2
3

10
5

-5

0
-5
-10

Regression line:
^
ki = -2.59 + 1.44 k^M

10

15

20

15%
-5
12

ki
18%
-10
16

_
kM

Find beta
Calculator. Enter data points, and calculator

does least squares regression: ki = a + bkM =


-2.59 + 1.44kM. r = corr. coefficient = 0.997.
In the real world, we would use weekly or
monthly returns, with at least a year of data,
and would always use a computer or
calculator.

If beta = 1.0, average stock.


If beta > 1.0, stock riskier than average.
If beta < 1.0, stock less risky than average.
Most stocks have betas in the range of 0.5 to

1.5.

List of Beta Coefficients


Stock
America Online
Mirage Resorts
General Electric
Coca-Cola
IBM
Microsoft Corp.
Procter & Gamble
Heinz
Energen Corp.
Empire District Electric

Beta
1.80
1.40
1.20
1.15
1.10
1.10
1.05
0.90
0.75
0.60

Can a beta be negative?

Answer: Yes, if ri,m is negative. Then


in a beta graph the regression line
will slope downward.

_
ki

HT

b = 1.29

40

b=0
20

-20

-20

T-Bills
20

_
kM

40

b = -0.86

Coll.

Expected
Risk
Security Return (Beta)
HT
17.4%
Market 15.0
USR
13.8
T-bills 8.0
Coll.
1.7

1.29
1.00
0.68
0.00
-0.86

Riskier securities have higher


returns, so the rank order is OK.

Use the SML to calculate the


required returns.
SML: ki = kRF + (kM - kRF)bi .
Assume kRF = 8%.
Note that kM = kM is
^ 15%. (Equil.)
RPM = kM - kRF = 15% - 8% = 7%.

Required Rates of Return

kHT

= 8.0% + (15.0% - 8.0%)(1.29)


= 8.0% + (7%)(1.29)
= 8.0% + 9.0%
= 17.0%.

kM

= 8.0% + (7%)(1.00)

= 15.0%.

kUSR = 8.0% + (7%)(0.68)

= 12.8%.

kT-bill = 8.0% + (7%)(0.00)

8.0%.

kColl = 8.0% + (7%)(-0.86) =

2.0%.

Expected vs. Required Returns


^

HT

k
17.4%

k
17.0%

Market
USR

15.0
13.8

15.0
12.8

T-bills
Coll.

8.0
1.7

8.0
2.0

Undervalued:
^
k>k
Fairly valued
Undervalued:
^
k>k
Fairly valued
Overvalued:
^
k<k

SML: ki = 8% + (15% - 8%) bi .


ki (%)

SML

HT

kM = 15
kRF = 8

Coll.
-1

. .

. T-bills

USR

Risk, bi

Calculate beta for a portfolio with 50%


HT and 50% Collections
bp= Weighted average
= 0.5(bHT) + 0.5(bColl)
= 0.5(1.29) + 0.5(-0.86)
= 0.22.

The required return on the HT/Coll.


portfolio is:
kp = Weighted average k
= 0.5(17%) + 0.5(2%) = 9.5%.
Or use SML:
kp= kRF + (kM - kRF) bp
= 8.0% + (15.0% - 8.0%)(0.22)
= 8.0% + 7%(0.22) = 9.5%.

If investors raise inflation expectations


by 3%, what would happen to the SML?

Required Rate
of Return k (%)
I = 3%

New SML

SML2
SML1

18
15

Original situation

11
8

0.5

1.0

1.5

Risk, bi

If inflation did not change


but risk aversion increased
enough to cause the market
risk premium to increase by
3 percentage points, what
would happen to the SML?

Required
Rate of
Return (%)

After increase
in risk aversion
SML2

kM = 18%
kM = 15%

SML1

18
15

RPM = 3%

Original situation
1.0

Risk, bi

Homework
Chapter 9, problems 17 & 18

Potrebbero piacerti anche