Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Guided by:
Dr. J.A.Amin
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
Faculty of Technology
DHARMSINH DESAI UNIVERSITY
NADIAD 387001
CONTENT
Introduction
Parametric Study
References
INTRODUCTION
Shear wall is a structural element used to resist
as
DRIFT LIMITATIONAS
Country
Year
Max. interstorey
drift
Lateral deflection
India
2002
0.004h
0.002H
Euro code
1988
0.002h
Yugoslavia
1982
0.0029h
0.0017H
By M.Fintel
0.0015h
0.0007H
Canada
1995
0.004h
0.004H
Colombia
1981
0.015h
0.015H
Egypt
1988
0.0017h
0.0017H
Turky
1995
0.0035h
0.0035H
7
LITERATURE REVIEW
Zeynep SindelRagip Akba
10
Quanfeng Wang (2007) had described the effect of the shear wall
11
STUDY PARAMETERS
The parametric study has been carried out on 3 different
12
BUILDING PLAN
13
Particulars
Details
1.
Number of storeys
20
2.
3.
5.0 m
4.
3.5 m
5.
300 mm x 600 mm
6.
600mm x 600 mm
7.
500 mm x 500 mm
8.
Grade of concrete
30 MPa
9.
Grade of steel
415 MPa
10.
Slab thickness
150 mm
11.
Live load
5 kN/m
14
Material Property
Nature of diaphragms
15
RESULTS
Comparison of results for D.L. & L.L. case
Load case
By Manually
By ETAB
Dead load
86204.16 kN
87733.97 kN
Live load
62500 kN
62500 kN
DIMENSION OF COLUMNS
Designing the column as Axially loaded
Pu = 0.4 x fck x Ac + 0.67 x fy x Asc (From IS 456 :2000)
17
DIMENSION OF COLUMNS
From SP-16 (Chart 25)
Assuming p=1%
Ac = 5500 cm
B=D=741.6 mm
For column at eleven storey
Pu =3907.62 kN
B=D=526.71 mm
B=D=529.1 mm
(From IS 456:2000)
(From SP-16)
18
19
20
21
22
23
displacement in mm
60
50
without S.W.
40
30
With Diag.S.W.
20
10
0
0
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
No. of storey
24
SR.NO.
DESCRIPTION
MAX.
DISPLACEMENT
% REDUCTION
IN
DISPLACEMENT
1.
57.70mm
2.
51.60mm
10.7%
3.
27.80mm
51.8%
4.
27.7mm
52.0%
Diagonal and Zig-zag shear wall patterns may reduce more than 50%
of lateral displacements.
25
26
Drift in mm
0.8
Without S.W.
0.6
0.4
0
0
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
No. of storey
27
SR.NO.
DESCRIPTION
MAX.
INTERSTOREY
DRIFT
% REDUCTION
IN INTERSTOREY
DRIFT
1.
1.12mm
2.
0.963mm
14.0%
3.
0.651mm
41.8%
4.
0.579mm
48.3%
taken as 5.
29
Disp. in mm
30
25
Without S.w.
20
15
10
5
0
0
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
No. of storey
30
SR.NO.
DESCRIPTION
MAX.
DISPLACEMENT
% REDUCTION
IN
DISPLACEMENT
1.
37.70mm
2.
32.10mm
14.8%
3.
17.70mm
53.05%
4.
17.50mm
53.58%
Diagonal and Zig-zag shear wall patterns may reduce more than 50%
of top lateral displacements.
31
Drift in mm
0.6
0.5
Without S.W.
0.4
0.3
With Diag.S.W.
0.2
0.1
0
0
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
No. of storey
32
SR.NO.
DESCRIPTION
MAX.
INTERSTOREY
DRIFT
% REDUCTION
IN INTERSTOREY
DRIFT
1.
0.735mm
2.
0.607mm
17.41%
3.
0.420mm
42.85%
4.
0.377mm
48.70%
34
Recording station
Duration
(sec)
PGD
(m)
PGV
(m/sec)
PGA
(g )
El Centro Array
#5
39.420
(1971/0.02)
0.765
0.98
0.37
Newhall
60.000
(3000/0.02)
0.381
1.19
0.72
Lucerne
Valley
49.284
(12321/0.004)
2.300
1.36
0.71
Rinaldi
14.950
(2990/0.005)
0.391
1.75
0.89
Sylmar
60.000
(3000/0.02)
0.311
1.22
0.73
35
Disp. in mm
250
200
Without S.W.
150
Peri. S.W.
100
Diag.S.W.
Zig-zag S.W.
50
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
No. of storey
36
SR.NO.
DESCRIPTION
MAX.
DISPLACEMENT
% REDUCTION
IN
DISPLACEMENT
280mm
268.10mm
4.25%
1.
2.
3.
90.0mm
67.53%
4.
91.9mm
67.17%
.
37
38
Disp. in mm
200
150
Without S.W.
Peri. S.W.
100
Diag. S.W.
50
Zig-zag S.W.
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
No. of storey
39
% REDUCTION
IN
DISPLACEMENT
SR.NO.
DESCRIPTION
MAX.
DISPLACEMENT
1.
233.3mm
2.
232.7mm
4.25%
3.
112.4mm
51.8%
4.
110.7mm
52.55%
.
40
Drift in mm
8
7
6
Without S.W.
Peri S.W.
4
3
Diag. S.W.
Zig-zag S.W.
1
0
1
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
No. of storey
41
SR.NO.
DESCRIPTION
MAX.
INTERSTOREY
DRIFT
% REDUCTION
IN INTERSTOREY
DRIFT
1.
8.904mm
2.
6.59mm
25.98%
3.
3.027mm
66.0%
4.
3.067mm
65.55%
More than 50% of drift can be reduced with diagonal and zig-zag
shear wall.
42
Drift in mm
5
4
Without S.W.
Peri. S.W.
Diag. S.W.
Zig-zag S.W.
1
0
0
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
No. of storey
43
SR.NO.
DESCRIPTION
MAX.
INTERSTOREY
DRIFT
% REDUCTION
IN INTERSTOREY
DRIFT
1.
5.0mm
2.
4.59mm
8.0%
3.
3.093mm
38.14%
4.
3.053mm
39.0%
CONCLUSION
The lateral displacement of frame with conventional shear wall is
The interstorey drift of frame with diagonal and zig-zag shear wall
Hence, diagonal and zig-zag shear wall patterns gives better result
45
with patterns of shear wall for finding out lateral loads shared
by frames and shear wall.
46
REFERENCES
2000.
Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures,(Fifth
Revision),IS 1893:2002, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete to IS 456: 1978, Special
Publication SP: 16, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
Fintel Mark, Hand book of Concrete Engineering , Second Edition.
Paulay, T., Pristley M.J.N., seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete
and Masonry Buildings
Penelis George G. and Kay Andreas J., Earthquake Resistant
Concrete Structures, Publication- E and FN Spon , London, UK.
Plain and Reinforced Concrete code of Practice (Forth Revision),
Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 456: 2000
47
Rai, S.K., Prasad J. and Ahuja, A.K., (2006), Reducing Drift and
Taranath
49
50