Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Analysis:
1. Fishbone Diagram
2. Cause and Effect Matrix
1
Learning Objectives
Fishbone Diagram
A PROBLEM WHICH
HAS OCCURED
A POTENTIAL
FUTURE PROBLEM
(FMEA)
CAUSE
EFFECT
CAUSE
Events/conditions
that would lead to
the problem
EFFECT
Symptoms that
would result
from the problem
CAUSE
EFFECT
Events/conditions
that led to
the problem
Symptoms that
provide evidence
of the problem
AD
AP
TIV
Lim
E
i
E
t
pro FFE s th
e
b le
C
m o T of
a
rd
evi
atio
n
E
TIV
EC
the
RR
tes
CO
a
n
SE
mi
Eli CAU blem
ro
ap
of
ACTION
Fishbone
Diagram
C/N/X
Methods
C
C
N
C
C
C
Machinery
Problem/
Desired
Improvement
Manpower
Dr Kaoru Ishikawa
Quality
control statistician
Professor in University of Tokyo
One of the pioneers of Japans quality
revolution in the 1940s
Played major role in growth of QC circles
Best known for formalizing use of
Cause-and-Effect Diagram
Won the Deming Prize and Shewhart
Medal
ASQ established the Ishikawa Medal to
recognize the human side of quality
7
To visual
10
Materials
Man
List specific
causes in
each category
Surface Flaws
Environment
Methods
Machines
Problem (effect)
at the head of
the fish
3. Continue
asking: Why is
this happening?
until you no
longer get useful
information.
Micrometers
Materials
Calibration Method
Calibration Interval
Precision
Accuracy
Personnel
Alloys
Lubricants
Supervisors
Suppliers
Microscopes
2. Repeat this
procedure with each
specific cause to
produce sub-causes.
Shifts
Training
Operators
Inspectors
Surface Flaws
Speed
Brake
Machine feedrate
Machine rpm
Lathes
Brand of bit
Condensation
Moisture%
Environment
Engager
Bits
Angle
Methods
Sockets
Machines
Size of bit
13
14
Received
complaint/reject
from customer, inhouse or supplier.
QA personnel verify
the defects.
Issue CAR to
production.
Purge in-house
stock
Should also
update Fishbone
diagram
15
Generate
report for
management
review
Follow up on
CAR
-receive CAR
reply from
production
- reply to
customer
Tasks
Task Owner
Target
Completion Date
Specific Training
needed for Task
Owner/ Date
Core Team
Member In
Charge
Internal Verified
Date
Group Phase
End Date
James
10-Dec-01
Fishbone Diagram
-15 Oct 2001
Nick
15-Dec-01
31-Dec-01
Harry
10-Dec-01
Fishbone Diagram
- 15 Oct 2001
Nick
15-Dec-01
31-Dec-01
Group 1 Tools
1
SPC
Integrate Fishbone
Diagram in the SPC
procedure/system
SCAR
Integrate Fishbone
Diagram in the SCAR
procedure/system
17
18
Lower Spec
Lower Spec
Target
Target
Upper Spec
Upper Spec
19
0
R e q u ire m e n t
R e q u ire m e n t
R e q u ire m e n t
R e q u ire m e n t
14
14
R e q u ire m e n t
R e q u ire m e n t
13
13
R e q u ire m e n t
R e q u ire m e n t
12
12
R e q u ire m e n t
R e q u ire m e n t
11
11
R e q u ire m e n t
R e q u ire m e n t
10
10
R e q u ire m e n t
R e q u ire m e n t
9
9
R e q u ire m e n t
R e q u ire m e n t
8
8
R e q u ire m e n t
R e q u ire m e n t
7
7
R e q u ire m e n t
R e q u ire m e n t
6
6
R e q u ire m e n t
R e q u ire m e n t
5
5
R e q u ire m e n t
R e q u ire m e n t
4
4
R e q u ire m e n t
R e q u ire m e n t
3
3
2
2
R e q u ire m e n t
R e q u ire m e n t
1
1
R e q u ire m e n t
R e q u ire m e n t
Rating of
Rating of
Importance to
Importance to
Customer
Customer
Total
Total
15
15
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
Total
Total
Results
20
21
10
10
Cleanliness
Color
Homogeneity
Consistency
Digets Time
Temperature
Solids
Process Inputs
Viscosity
Rating of
Importance to
Customer
Gel Time
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
10
C o n s is te n c y
D ig e ts Tim e
Tem p e ra tu re
S o lid s
H o m o g e n e ity
C o lo r
Process Inputs
C le a n lin e s s
Input
Variables
V is c o s ity
Rating of
Importance to
Customer
G e l Tim e
Scales
Accuracy
Preheating
DICY TK
DMF Load
Accuracy
DMF
Cleanliness
DMF Raw
Materials
DICY Load
Accuracy
DICY Envir.
Factors
DICY Raw
Materials
DICY Mixer
Speecd
10
11
12
13
14
15
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
Avoid
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
S olids
Tem perature
D igets Tim e
C ons is tenc y
10
H om ogeneity
Scales
Accuracy
Preheating
DICY TK
DMF Load
Accuracy
DMF
Cleanliness
DMF Raw
Materials
DICY Load
Accuracy
DICY Envir.
Factors
DICY Raw
Materials
DICY Mixer
Speecd
10
C olor
C leanlines s
Process Inputs
V is c os ity
Xs
G el Tim e
Rating of
Importance to
Customer
348
66
255
102
66
282
247
242
126
25
Ys
Total
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
S olids
Tem perature
D igets Tim e
C ons is tenc y
10
H om ogeneity
10
C olor
Scales
Accuracy
Preheating
DICY TK
DMF Load
Accuracy
DMF
Cleanliness
DMF Raw
Materials
DICY Load
Accuracy
DICY Envir.
Factors
DICY Raw
Materials
DICY Mixer
Speecd
C leanlines s
V is c os ity
Process Inputs
G el Tim e
Rating of
Importance to
Customer
348
66
255
247
242
126
26
Total
So??
102
66
282
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Solids
Temperature
Digets Time
10
Consistency
10
Homogeneity
Scales
Accuracy
Preheating
DICY TK
DMF Load
Accuracy
DMF
Cleanliness
DMF Raw
Materials
DICY Load
Accuracy
DICY Envir.
Factors
DICY Raw
Materials
DICY Mixer
Speecd
Color
Process Inputs
Cleanliness
s
t
u
tp
Viscosity
Rating of
Importance to
Customer
Gel Time
321
65
255
105
74
269
247
242
125
Total
In
p
%R&R or P/T
Ratio
Upper
Spec
Limit
Target
Lower
Spec
Limit
Operational Excellence
Control Plan
FMEA
Cp
Cpk
Sample
Size
Date
Product:
Key Contact:
Phone:
Process
Actions
Gel Time
Viscosity
Cleanliness
Color
Homogeneity
Consistency
Digets Time
Temperature
Solids
DICY
Process/Product
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
(FMEA)
Capability Summary
Customer Requirement
(Output Variable)
ut
Process or
Product Name:
Prepared by:
Responsible:
Process
Step/Part
Number
Spin Draw
Process
S
E
V
Potential Causes
Dirty Spinneret
O
C
C
8
Filament motion
Current Controls
Visual Detection of Wraps and
broken Filaments
D
E
T
R
P
N
144
Visual Sight-glass
Core Team:
Date (Rev):
Process Step
Input
Output
Process
Specification (LSL,
USL, Target)
Cpk /Date
Measurement
Technique
%R&R
P/T
Sample
Size
Sample
Frequency
Control
Method
Reaction Plan
DMF
Load DMF
DMF Load
Accuracy
DMF
Load DMF
DMF
Cleanliness
DICY
Load DICY
DICY Envir.
Factors
DICY
Load DICY
DICY Load
Accuracy
DICY
Load DICY
DICY Raw
Materials
DICY
Load DICY
DICY Mixer
Speecd
DMF
Load DMF
DMF Raw
Materials
DICY
Date (Orig):
Polymer defects
80
144
Fuzzball Light
27
Received
complaint/reject
from customer, inhouse or supplier.
QA personnel verify
the defects.
Issue CAR to
production.
Purge in-house
stock
28
Generate
report for
management
review
Follow up on
CAR
-receive CAR
reply from
production
- reply to
customer
29
Tasks
Task Owner
Target
Completion Date
Specific Training
needed for Task
Owner/ Date
Core Team
Member In
Charge
Internal Verified
Date
Group Phase
End Date
Dick
10-Dec-01
Fishbone Diagram
-15 Oct 2001
Cause & Effect
Matrix
-15 Oct 2001
Nick
15-Dec-01
31-Dec-01
Mary
10-Dec-01
Fishbone Diagram
-15 Oct 2001
Cause & Effect
Matrix
-15 Oct 2001
Nick
15-Dec-01
31-Dec-01
Group 1 Tools
1
SPC
Integrate Cause and
Effect Matrix in the
SPC procedure/ system
SCAR
Integrate Cause and
Effect Matrix in the
SCAR procedure/
system
30
End of Topic
Any question?
31
Product/Manufacturing Example
M e a s u re m e n t
M a c h in e
S e t tlin g o f S lu r r y
P a r tic le s ( C )
S lu r r y F lo w R a t e ( C )
R a (C )
L in e D e n s ity ( C )
T e x tu re
T e m p e r a tu re (C )
M a te r ia l
P ro g ra m u s e d (N )
S k e w (N )
P U P a d (C )
S o n ic p o w e r ( C )
T e x tu re
T e m p e ra tu re (C )
C a lib r a tio n ( N )
S lu r r y T y p e ( C )
S u b s tra te (C )
T a p e T y p e (C )
S u rfa c ta n t T y p e (C )
P U P a d (C )
NLA
M e th o d
S e t t l i n g o f P a r t ic le s ( C )
S lu r r y S tir r in g P r o c e d u r e s ( C )
P ro g ra m u s e d (N )
S p e e d A d ju s t m e n t ( C )
U lt r a s o n i c o n / o f f ( C )
S o a k T im e ( C )
S ta g g in g T im e ( N )
T r a n s f e r T im e ( C )
T e x tu r e T e m p e r a tu r e ( C )
C o n c e n tr a t io n o f C h e m ic a ( C )
T a p e S p e e d (C )
S l u r r y F lo w R a t e ( C )
T e x tu r e P re s s u r e (C )
M an
32
S lu r r y S t ir r in g P r o c e d u r e ( C )
S o a k T im e ( C )
S t a g g i n g T im e ( N )
T r a n s fe r T im e ( C )
C o m p lia n c e to P r o c e d u r e s ( C )
Transactional Example
Estimated Ship Date Change - CAUSE & EFFECT / FISHBONE
MDC
PRACTICES
SCHEDULE
CHANGES
ORDER
CANCELLATION
- Firm
- Planned
MDC
CAPACITY
- B.O.. Consol.
- SC late
WCSC
PRACTICES
- Receiving
- Picking
- PC delays
- Off shift support
- Unrealistic
Del. Req
Dates
- Customer Order
Priority Changes
Estimated
Ship Date
Changes
- Bad IT days
- Table Maint.
IN
TRANSIT
TIMES
- Availability
Overrides
- No Stocks
INVENTORY
ACCURACY
APPOINTMENT
CUSTOMER
- Waiting for
Delivery Appt.
PLANNED
SHIP DATE
ALGORITHM
- Late PT print
- Late EDI data
LDSS
33
- No Delivery Constraints
After initial PSD
- Back Ord. Release Logic
- Cust Priority vs. availability
-Future orders at AP
ESD
ALGORITHM
ANOMALIES
Brainstorming
?
?
?
?
?
A technique to
generate a large
number of ideas or
possibilities in a
relatively short time
frame.
Experts
Semi experts
Implementers
Analysts
Operators
Discussion Rules
Suspend judgement
Strive for quantity
Generate wild ideas
Build on the ideas of others
Leaders rules for Brainstorming
Be enthusiastic
Capture all the ideas
Make sure you have a good skills mix
Push for quantity
Strictly enforce the rules
Keep intensity high
Get participation from everybody
35
Root Cause
How do we know when we have reached
ROOT CAUSE ?
Root Cause is the lowest cause in a chain of cause and
effect at which we have some capability to cause the
break
Its within our capability to unilaterally control, or to influence,
changes to the cause
SPHERE OF INFLUENCE
(Influence or persuasion only)
SPAN OF CONTROL
(Full authority)
OUTSIDE, UNCONTROLLED
ENVIRONMENT
37