Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Origins of the World Trade Center and the World's Tallest Buildings
The origins of the World Trade Center extend back to 1946, when the New
York Legislature created the World Trade Corporation with a view to
creating a trade center in Manhattan.
The architectural firm Emery Roth & Sons handled production work.
The site MASTER PLAN from 1963, though detailed, was modified in some
respects prior to implementation. In particular, the final configuration of the
low-rise buildings WTC 4, 5, and 6 was different than shown in the
MASTER PLAN.
The Twin Towers were the tallest buildings in the world when they
were completed in 1972.
The design, created by architect Minoru Yamaski, was innovative in
several ways, including its elevator system, and its structural
system.
These innovations would be widely adopted in later skyscrapers.
Elevator System
A conventional elevator system would have taken up half the space of the
lower floors.
The express elevators took people to "sky lobbies" on the 44th and 78th
floors, where they could board local elevators.
Structural System
1 and 2 World Trade Center used the so-called tube within a tube
architecture, in which closely-spaced external columns form the building's
perimeter walls, and a dense bundle of columns forms its core.
Tall buildings have to resist primarily two kinds of forces: lateral loading
(horizontal force) due mainly to the wind, and gravity loading (downward
force) due to the building's weight.
The tube within a tube design uses a specially reinforced perimeter wall to
resist all lateral loading and some of the gravity loading, and a heavily
reinforced central core to resist the bulk of the gravity loading.
The floors and hat truss completed the structure, spanning the ring of space
between the perimeter wall and the core, and transmitting lateral forces
between those structures.
Structural System
The tube within a tube
architecture was relatively new
at the time the Twin Towers
were built, but has since been
widely employed in the design
of new skyscrapers. In fact
most of the world's tallest
buildings use it, including:
The Sears Tower (1450 ft)
The World Trade Center
Towers (1350 ft)
The Standard Oil of Indiana
Building (1125 ft)
The John Hancock Center
(1105 ft)
Construction
The owners initially had difficulty finding tenants to fill the enormous towers,
which had over 8 million square feet of floor space.
Most of the North Tower was still unoccupied when a serious fire broke out in
February of 1975.
Construction
The 110-story
Twin Towers,
rising 1,368
and 1,362 feet,
remained the
world's tallest
and largest
buildings until
they were
surpassed by
the Sears
Tower in 1974.
Facts
Architect
Location
Date
Building Type
Construction
Climate
Context
Style
Notes
Minoru Yamasaki
New York
1966 to 1977. Demolished by terrorist
attack on September 11, 2001
skyscraper, commercial office tower
System steel frame, glass, concrete
slabs on steel truss joists
temperate
urban
Modern
Yamasaki and Associates, with Emery
Roth and Sons. 110 stories tall.
building
first occupied
floors
elevators
number
area, ft^2
passenger
freight
North Tower
1970
110
45,000-50,000
97
South Tower
1970
110
45,000-50,000
97
Building 4
1977
84,000
12
Building 5
1972
108,000
Building 6
1975
80,400
Building 7
1985?
47 no information available
Foyer of WTC
Reports on the number of core columns vary from 44 to 47. The exact
arrangement of the columns is not known due to the secrecy of detailed
engineering drawings of the towers. It is clear from photographs, such as
the one on the right, that the core columns were abundantly cross-braced.
For the dimensions, see FEMA report, "World Trade Center Building
Performance Study," undated. In addition, the outside of each tower was
covered by a frame of 14-inch-wide steel columns; the centers of the steel
columns were 40 inches apart.
These exterior walls bore most of the weight of the building. The interior
core of the buildings was a hollow steel shaft, in which elevators and
stairwells were grouped. Ibid.
Yamasaki and engineers John Skilling and Les Robertson worked closely,
and the relationship between the towers design and structure is clear.
Faced with the difficulties of building to unprecedented heights, the
engineers employed an innovative structural model: a rigid "hollow tube" of
closely spaced steel columns with floor trusses extending across to a
central core.
The columns, finished with a silver-colored aluminum alloy, were 18 3/4"
wide and set only 22" apart, making the towers appear from afar to have no
windows at all.
Also unique to the engineering design were its core and elevator system.
The twin towers were the first supertall buildings designed without any
masonry.
Worried that the intense air pressure created by the buildings high speed
elevators might buckle conventional shafts, engineers designed a solution
using a drywall system fixed to the reinforced steel core. For the elevators,
to serve 110 stories with a traditional configuration would have required half
the area of the lower stories be used for shaftways. Otis Elevators
developed an express and local system, whereby passengers would
change at "sky lobbies" on the 44th and 78th floors, halving the number of
shaftways.
The 208-foot wide facade is, in effect, a prefabricated steel lattice, with
columns on 39-inch centers acting as wind bracing to resist all overturning
forces; the central core takes only the gravity loads of the building.
A very light, economical structure results by keeping the wind bracing in the
most efficient place, the outside surface of the building, thus not transferring
the forces through the floor membrane to the core, as in most curtain-wall
structures.
Office spaces will have no interior columns. In the upper floors there is as
much as 40,000 square feet of office space per floor.
Columns
Like the perimeter columns -- and like steel columns in all tall buildings -the thickness of the steel in the core columns tapered from bottom to top.
Near the bottoms of the towers the steel was four inches thick, whereas
near the tops it may have been as little as 1/4th inch thick.
The top figure in the illustration to the right is a cross-section of one of the
smaller core columns from about half-way up a tower, where the steel was
about two inches thick.
The bottom figure shows the base of one of the larger core columns, where
the steel was five inches thick.
The bases of the columns also had slabs of steel running through their
centers, making them almost solid.
Columns
The top illustration indicates what may have been typical dimensions and thickness of
the smaller core columns, about half-way up the tower. The outermost rows of core
columns were apparently considerably larger, measuring 54 inches wide
Columns
Column Arrangement
Cross-Bracing
Construction photographs show that the core columns were
connected to each other at each floor by large square girders and Ibeams about two feet deep.
The debris photograph below shows what appears to be one of the
smaller core columns surrounded by perpendicular I-beams
approximately three feet deep.
In addition, the tops of core structures were further connected by the
sloping beams of the hat truss structures.
This photograph from Ground Zero is apparently of one of the smaller core
columns connected to a set of I-beams.
This image from the documentary Up From Zero shows the base of a core column,
whose dimensions, minus the four flanges, are apparently 52 by 22 inches, with
walls at least 5 inches thick.
The Floors
The Structural System of the Twin Towers
The floors of the Twin Towers completed the structural system
whose main elements were the core structures and the perimeter
walls.
The floor diaphragms were annular structures that spanned the
distance between the core structures and the perimeter walls,
providing large expanses of uninterrupted floor space.
The cores had their own flooring systems, which were structurally
independent of the surrounding floor diaphragms.
The Floors
The Floors
This illustration from FEMA's report shows a section of the flooring system. The main
double trusses, of which two are pictured, are perpeducular to the view plane.
The towers' perimeter walls comprised dense grids of vertical steel columns
and horizontal spandrel plates.
The fact that these structures were on the exterior of the Towers made them
particularly efficient at carrying lateral loads. Richard Roth, speaking on
behlf of the architectural firm that designed the Towers, described each of
the perimeter walls as essentially "a steel beam 209' deep.
As the diagram and photograph illustrate, the perimeter wall structures were
assembled from pre-fabricated units consisting of 3 column sections and 3
spandrel plate sections welded together.
There were 59 perimeter columns on each face of the towers, and one
column on each corner bevel, making a total of 240 perimeter columns in
each tower.
Like the core columns, the thickness of the perimeter columns tapered from
the bottom to the top of the towers.
The illustrated cross-sections represent columns near the top, and near the
mid-section of the towers.
The authors attribute each tower's collapse to three separate but related
"loading events."
The first event was a Boeing aircraft hitting the building, cutting through the
exterior structure and creating a fireball that immediately consumed some of
the estimated 10,000 gallons (38 kiloliters) of jet fuel.
The highrises' structural systems were sufficiently redundant, however, that
this major damage by itself did not cause the collapse.
According to the report, "most of the load supported by the failed columns is
believed to have transferred to adjacent perimeter columns through
Vierendeel behavior of the exterior wall frame."
The second event was the continuing fire, fed both by the remaining jet fuel
and the office contents of furniture and paper.
This fire heated and weakened the structural systems, adding stress to the
damaged structure.
Meanwhile, the sprinklers were not operating as designed. "Even if these
systems had not been compromised by the impacts," says the report, "they
would likely have been ineffective... the initial flash fires of jet fuel would
have opened so many sprinkler heads that the systems would have quickly
depressurized and been unable to effectively deliver water to the large area
of fire involvement."
While the ways the two towers fell were slightly different, the basic cause is
similar for both - a large number of columns were destroyed on impact, and
the remaining structure was gradually weakened by the heat of the fire.
Not much significance should be taken from the fact that one tower fell in 45
minutes and the other in 90 minutes.
The gigantic dynamic impact forces caused by the huge mass of the falling
structure landing on the floors below is very much greater than the static
load they were designed to resist.
Surpassing Facts
#THANKS