RANOP Part4 Solution Findings

RANOP Radio Network Optimization Principles
Solution Findings (optimization)
Soc Classification level

1
Nokia Siemens Networks
Presentation / Author / Date
Objectives
At the end of the this chapter participants will be able to
know the basic interfaces / Network elements and how to

optimize these
know the basics of CS/PS performance optimization
know which tools can be used for optimization

2
Contents of RANOP
Introduction
What is network optimization
What should be taken into account when starting Network
Optimization?
Assessment
Situation at the moment
KPIs and Measurements

Measurement tables + KPIs
Solution findings (optimization) and verification

Maximum gain in limited time
Bottlenecks
Features to be considered
NSN recommended features to be used in optimization
3
Solution finding table of contents

Introduction
Optimization tasks
Performance optimization
Traffic and Capacity optimization
Coverage Optimization
Frequency Optimization
Neighbor Optimization
HO Optimization
(E)GPRS Optimization
Alarms
Implementations (documentation, good case)
Solution verification
Monitoring
Tools to be used

4
More detailed inputs

(if necessary) based
on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution Finding - Introduction
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled

detailed inputs
(ifMore
necessary)
based
on
assessment
on assessment
INPUTS
INPUTS
Project
Project
Starts
Starts
Performance
Performance
Problems
Problems
Solution
Solution
Verification
Verification
Are Criterias
Criterias
Are
Fulfilled
Fulfilled
Implementations
Implementations
No
Yes
Monitoring //
Monitoring
Data collection
collection
Data
Project
Project
report
report
Project
Project
Ends
Ends

5
Assessments &
Assessments
Analysis
Work orders
orders
Work
Analysis
Analysis
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Solutions
Solutions
Priorization
Priorization
Solutions
Solutions
Solution Finding Phase
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Performance Optimization

6

on assessment
INPUTS
Performance Optimization - Introduction
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Typical performance problems which have to

be improved
Indoor coverage
problems
CS / PS Capacity
problems
Downlink coverage problems
Downlink interference problems
Uplink Signaling (access)
problems

7
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Performance optimization - basic CS/PS flows
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Paging
Optimization
SDCCH
Optimization
Accessibility
Accessibility
Signaling
TCH
Optimization
Retainability
Quality
Traffic / TSLs allocation
Data rates
CS Basic Call Flow

PCH
AGCH
RACH
Get
SDCCH
Establish
SDCCH
connection
Get
TCH
Establish
TCH
connection
Call
phase
Release
phase
Requested
TSLs to
Allocate
TBF
Session
Release
phase
PS MO Uplink TBF
Ready
State
Send
RACH

8
Establish
immediate
assignment
Get
PDCH
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Performance optimization will include here:
CS
PS
Accessibility
MM and SM Signaling
Signaling problems
Retainability
TCH Dropped calls
GPRS Attach
PDP Context activatios
RLC/MAC TSL data rate

TBF Failure
Quality
E2E Data Rate
interference
Throughput
Traffic
Traffic handling
Multislot usage
Territory downgrades/upgrades
PS Blocking
Mobility
9
Cell reselection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Performance optimization Accessibility

Signaling
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
CS
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
If problems with RACH, AGCH, PCH capacity

Check if combined signaling is existing. If it is existing, it should be removed
Here is combined sdcch in TSL0
Should be
TSL0 = BCCH
TSL1= SDCCH
Check if TRXSIG is big enough, default value for TRXSIG is 32k.If lots of SMS
traffic + HR is used 64k should be used.
Check if there are any bad interference problems
Bad interference problem can cause lot of repetitions => more blocking
Check CCCH related parameters
Check if location areas are optimized
Sizes
Borders
10
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Performance optimization Retainability

TCH drop
Solution
Verification
CS
Most Common TCH drop reasons can be seen here

Drop Reason
TCH radio fail call
TCH radio fail old
TCH tc fail call
TCH tc fail old
Lapd fail
BTS fail
user act
BCSU reset
cnfg act
Act fail call
Abis fail call
Abis fail old
A if fail call
A if fail old
Counter
c1013
c1014
c1029
c1030
c1046
c1047
c1048
c1049
c1050
c1081
c1084
c1085
c1087
c1088
Description
Transactions ended due to radio failure.
Transactions ended due to old channel failure in HO.
Transaction failures due to transcoder failure.
Transaction failures due to transcoder failure on old channel during HO.
Transaction failures due to Lapd problems.
Transaction failures due to BTS problems.
Transaction failures due to user actions.
Transaction failures due to BCSU reset.
Transaction failures due to radio network
Channel activation failures during call.
Abis failures during call.
Abis failures on old channel during TCH HO.
A if failures during call.
A if failures on old channel during TCH HO.
In RANOP we are concentrating on radio reasons

11
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Performance optimization Retainability

TCH drop
Solution
Verification
CS
TCH DROP Distribution
Excersise
What can be typical reason for TCH radio drops?
12
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Performance optimization Quality

RX Quality Level Distribution
Rx Quality x Rx Level
Solution
Verification
CS
NOTE! Same level quality

distribution for both UL and DL
HW Problem:
Bad Quality
Good Quality
for all Rx Levels

Coverage Problem:
Bad quality and
Low Rx Level
HW Problem
All samples below 100dBm
CL10 <-100dBm
High Rv Level
Interference Problem:
Bad quality and
High Rx Level
NWD report 204 model

13
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Performance optimization RX Quality - Level CS

Here are some RX quality level distribution examples
Here are some examples how different kind of problems can be found
Like Normal distribution
CL10
CL15
CL20
CL30
CL40
CL63
Q0
10645
47043
56204
200863
12785
4583
CL10
CL15
CL20
CL30
CL40
CL63
Q0
5323
23522
28102
67544
6393
2292
CL10
CL15
CL20
CL30
CL40
CL63
Q0
200863
16543
2654
4543
5114
24
Q1
8516
37634
44963
160690
10228
1123
Q2
6813
30108
35971
128552
8182
583
Q3
5450
24086
28776
102842
6546
452
HW Problem, TRX/combiner etc is broken

Q4
4360
9865
6574
17654
456
261
Q5
3488
7543
10324
9876
112
76
Q6
2791
5643
345
145
24
26
Q7
2232
2345
65
28
23
2
CL10
CL15
CL20
CL30
CL40
CL63
Q0
5323
11761
14051
33772
3196
1146
HW problem, Q4 amount of samples is strange
Q1
4258
18817
22482
54035
5114
562
Q2
3406
15054
17985
43228
4091
292
Q3
2725
12043
14388
34582
3273
226
Q4
2180
18765
36542
150073
9876
6756
Q5
1744
3772
5162
4938
56
38
Q1
4258
9409
11241
27017
2557
281
Q2
3406
7527
8993
21614
2046
146
Q3
2725
6022
7194
17291
1636
113
Q4
2180
9383
18271
75037
4938
3378
Q5
1744
1886
2581
2469
28
19
Q6
4563
65432
65438
18765
3659
100
Q7
9765
7675
63562
14523
2648
174
Q4
2180
13234
2123
3634
4091
2275
Q5
1744
10588
1699
2908
3273
1187
Q6
1395
8470
1359
2326
2618
876
Q7
1116
6776
1087
1861
4532
654
Interference problem
Q6
1395
2822
173
73
12
13
Q7
1116
1173
33
14
12
1
Q6
7865
1173
33
14
12
0
Q7
6543
234
65
28
23
0
CL10
CL15
CL20
CL30
CL40
CL63
Q0
5323
23522
28102
67544
6393
9987
Q1
4258
13234
2123
3634
4091
7543
Q2
3406
10588
1699
2908
3273
4323
Q3
2725
8470
1359
2326
2618
3454
HW Problem, TRX/combiner etc is broken
Q1
160690
13234
2123
3634
4091
54
Q2
128552
10588
1699
2908
3273
8
Q3
102842
8470
1359
2326
2618
87
Q4
17654
6776
1087
1861
2095
7
Q5
9876
2822
173
73
12
0
1.
Lots of Q4 samples. Distribution is not OK HW problem. Site reset will help
2.
Lots of bad signal level samples. TRX/Combiner is broken. If no HW problem

Site is totally in wrong place, site is like transferring traffic to another cell ( cause
level HO). Typically a HW problem
3.
Lots of Q6 and Q7 samples. Distribution is not OK, no Q5 samples HW

problems. Site reset or broken TRX
4.
Typical normal interference problem., lots of q4q7 samples in good signal level

14
Performance optimization Interference, UL CS

-100dBm
-95dBm
-90dBm
-80dBm
-70dBm
-47dBm
q0
10645
47043
56204
200863
1234
24
q1
8516
37634
44963
160690
987
19
q2
6813
30108
35971
128552
790
15
q3
5450
24086
28776
102842
632
12
q4
4360
9865
16574
17654
505
10
q5
3488
7543
5676
3653
404
8
q6
2791
5643
845
145
323
6
q7
2232
2345
65
28
259
5
-100dBm
-95dBm
-90dBm
-80dBm
-70dBm
-47dBm
q0
10645
47043
56204
200863
1234
24
q1
8516
37634
44963
160690
987
19
q2
6813
30108
35971
128552
790
15
q3
5450
24086
28776
102842
632
12
q4
4360
9865
16574
17654
505
10
q5
3488
7543
5676
3653
404
8
q6
2791
5643
845
145
323
6
q7
2232
2345
65
28
259
5
Bad interference problems. By POC

parameter interference can be
decreased, how power is adjusted
etc. Also optimum MS power feature
improves UL interference, no full
power is sent after HO.
-100dBm
-95dBm
-90dBm
-80dBm
-70dBm
-47dBm
q0
10645
47043
56204
200863
1234
24
q1
8516
37634
44963
160690
987
19
q2
6813
30108
35971
128552
790
15
q3
5450
24086
28776
102842
632
12
q4
4360
9865
16574
17654
505
10
q5
3488
7543
5676
3653
404
8
q6
2791
5643
845
145
323
6
q7
2232
2345
65
28
259
5
Bad quality sample due to signal

level problems. Diversity should be
checked, also possibilities to use
LNA to improve UL signal level.
Antenna place should be also
checked if there are some obstacles
near the antenna.

15
MS power control can be seen here.

If Power is reduced no bad UL
problems. BSC border is increasing
good level samples

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Performance optimization Interference
Solution
Verification
CS
UL examples
-100dBm
-95dBm
-90dBm
-80dBm
-70dBm
-47dBm
-100dBm
-95dBm
-90dBm
-80dBm
-70dBm
-47dBm
-100dBm
-95dBm
-90dBm
-80dBm
-70dBm
-47dBm
UL_q0
490
8410
38512
219137
509591
244302
UL_q0
70004
80339
106883
246892
254875
23288
UL_q0
251992
123653
62938
27005
2831
751
UL_q1
137
3768
5249
4600
2504
582
UL_q1
5020
392
233
227
155
21
UL_q1
30668
1151
247
51
3
0
UL_q2
368
3225
3066
2453
1812
711
UL_q2
3500
286
318
314
298
27
UL_q2
20552
403
144
65
9
4
UL_q3
605
3023
2323
2311
3050
1363
UL_q3
2564
461
602
860
935
103
UL_q3
18417
692
288
149
28
10
UL_q4
1014
2767
1692
1470
1271
1713
UL_q4
2232
328
199
298
203
109
UL_q4
18156
519
353
177
87
25
UL_q5
1378
2304
1570
1724
1465
873
UL_q5
1946
250
146
338
135
11
UL_q5
18286
351
129
82
10
1
UL_q6
16983
221
62
40
6
0
UL_q6
1830
1561
1191
1864
1649
671
UL_q6
2190
275
234
395
166
41
UL_q7
12478
72
29
16
0
0
UL_q7
2586
1859
1268
1221
337
87
UL_q7
2579
92
64
60
15
0
DL_q0
27862
89094
142228
222462
44504
5994
Some UL interference in good signal

level. UL power control is not
working properly. Ul power control is
good indicator, if power is adjusted,
there are no big problems in UL
direction
There is no UL interference, or just a

little. MS is adjusting power properly,
there are only little samples in good
UL signal level.
DL_q1
5537
4236
2732
1523
91
49
DL_q2
5529
3853
2550
1355
123
17
DL_q3
6069
3576
2356
1552
151
17
DL_q4
6109
2893
1510
716
81
12
DL_q5
6107
2264
1114
812
101
29
DL_q6
5389
1372
774
1081
191
65
Huge amount of UL bad samples. Cells is not working properly, it is like transferring traffic, UL quality/ UL level HOs are
triggering immediately. These kind of cells must be investigated.

16
DL_q7
4119
584
404
343
88
10
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Performance optimization Interference, DL
CS
-100dBm
-95dBm
-90dBm
-80dBm
-70dBm
-47dBm
q0
10645
47043
56204
200863
12785
4583
q1
8516
37634
44963
160690
10228
1123
q2
6813
30108
35971
128552
8182
583
q3
5450
24086
28776
102842
6546
452
q4
4360
9865
16574
17654
456
261
q5
3488
7543
5676
3653
112
76
q6
2791
5643
845
145
24
26
q7
2232
2345
65
28
23
2
Really bad interference problem signal level is really

good (<-70dBm) and usually no better cell available no
HO samples can be seen in the table. Interference is
causing drops.
-100dBm
-95dBm
-90dBm
-80dBm
-70dBm
-47dBm
q0
10645
47043
56204
200863
12785
4583
q1
8516
37634
44963
160690
10228
1123
q2
6813
30108
35971
128552
8182
583
q3
5450
24086
28776
102842
6546
452
q4
4360
9865
16574
17654
456
261
q5
3488
7543
5676
3653
112
76
q6
2791
5643
845
145
24
26
q7
2232
2345
65
28
23
2
Bad interference problem signal level good (<-80dBm)

and sometimes no better cell available. If better cell
available and quality samples are 4 or worse HO (reason
quality or interference, depends on the parameter)
Interference is causing drops.
-100dBm
-95dBm
-90dBm
-80dBm
-70dBm
-47dBm
q0
10645
47043
56204
200863
12785
4583
q1
8516
37634
44963
160690
10228
1123
q2
6813
30108
35971
128552
8182
583
q3
5450
24086
28776
102842
6546
452
q4
4360
9865
16574
17654
456
261
q5
3488
7543
5676
3653
112
76
q6
2791
5643
845
145
24
26
q7
2232
2345
65
28
23
2
-100dBm
-95dBm
-90dBm
-80dBm
-70dBm
-47dBm
q0
10645
47043
56204
200863
12785
4583
q1
8516
37634
44963
160690
10228
1123
q2
6813
30108
35971
128552
8182
583
q3
5450
24086
28776
102842
6546
452
q4
4360
9865
16574
17654
456
261
q5
3488
7543
5676
3653
112
76
q6
2791
5643
845
145
24
26
q7
2232
2345
65
28
23
2

17
Situation is network is working properly If there are quality

4 or worse samples quality HO. Most of the samples are
q4 samples. If lots of q5..q7 samples interference
problem and interference must be analyzed / removed. If
quality HOs but no q5..q7 samples better cell is available
no interference problems. In these signal levels
overlapping exists and if handover reason is no PBGT, it will
be quality HO. By parameter amount of quality HOs can be
adjusted
Bad quality samples due to signal level problems. If PBGT

overlapping is not existing lots of quality HOs + level
HOs (margin are lower than in PBGT).
Not interference problem, more coverage problem.
Check how much samples vs. HOs are

better cells available or not.

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Performance optimization Interference
Solution
Verification
CS
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
DL, examples
-100dBm
-95dBm
-90dBm
-80dBm
-70dBm
-47dBm
DL_q0
12057
44818
98587
225919
88708
15881
DL_q1
2827
4811
7107
7450
1014
84
DL_q2
3108
5041
7400
7731
971
109
DL_q3
3952
5866
8334
8445
998
122
DL_q4
4783
6587
8470
7726
751
104
DL_q5
6200
7223
8781
7441
688
167
DL_q6
7013
7259
7825
5695
689
199
DL_q7
8156
6781
6162
3369
367
184
-100dBm
-95dBm
-90dBm
-80dBm
-70dBm
-47dBm
DL_q0
8006
24951
57559
200602
304206
108047
DL_q1
1636
1636
2171
5771
5464
2134
DL_q2
1681
1627
1884
4686
4310
1908
DL_q3
2197
1767
1651
4130
3796
1623
DL_q4
2379
1037
781
1736
1315
689
DL_q5
2510
431
330
566
350
230
DL_q6
2025
175
161
254
153
129
DL_q7
1290
53
47
97
105
64
-100dBm
-95dBm
-90dBm
-80dBm
-70dBm
-47dBm
DL_q0
7055
20109
34531
107539
177614
58718
DL_q1
1398
1307
1053
875
283
78
DL_q2
1374
1274
745
518
316
91
DL_q3
1906
1161
587
630
663
198
DL_q4
2163
694
273
161
61
54
DL_q5
2003
332
131
98
32
40
DL_q6
1468
211
94
113
29
54
DL_q7
832
84
41
47
9
32

18
There are almost as much samples Q5 and Q7 samples as

Q 4 samples even interference is really bad or there is
no better cell available ( no hos after bad quality samples).
These kind of interference cells should be optimized,
otherwise there are lots of drops etc
There are no as much Q5Q7 samples as Q4 samples

after interference samples Quality HO is done or the
interference situation is not so bad, for example sampling is
Q0,Q2,Q4,Q2,Q5,Q0,Q2,Q3,Q4,Q2 quality HO is not
triggering
There are bad quality samples only due to signal level

problems.
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Performance optimization, Interference
Solution
Verification
CS
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
(internal / external)
Internal Interference
Interference can be seen from stats or can be measured by scanner.
Neighbor cells (DL) or mobiles (UL) are causing interference.
By frequency / network planning interference can be decreased.
External Interference
Interference can be seen from stats or can be measured by scanner.
External radio frequencies are causing interference
Military use
In the border area, interference is coming from other country.
Some external wireless system (for example some wireless industry system)
is causing interference
Increased I level can be also due to external interference

19
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Performance optimization Traffic

Traffic handling
How to balance traffic
between other cells in same
site?
HO parameters
Traffic layers
1800 (dual band)
CBCCH
20
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
cellA
Traffic will be
pushed to neighbor
cells
cellB
Umbrella
Traffic reason HO
DR
CS
Implementations
Blocking in cellA
PBGT
Quality /interference margins
Level margins
HO Features
Solution
Verification
Assessments &
Analysis
cellC
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Performance optimization Traffic

Traffic handling
How to balance traffic
between other sites?
HO parameters
Solution
Verification
CS
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Some blocking in cellA
Traffic will be pushed

To neighbor cells
HO Features
Umbrella
Traffic reason HO
DR
cellB
cellC

21
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
cellA
PBGT
Quality /interference margins
Level margins
Implementations
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Performance optimization PS
Before PS Optimization basic GSM optimization

should be done
1. As high signal level as possible

It means that even the indoor signal level should be high enough to
have MCS9 for getting the highest data rate on RLC/MAC layer.
2. As low interference as possible

The aim of having high C/I is to avoid throughput reduction based
on interference.
3. Enough capacity
Enough BSS hardware capacity (interface and connectivity) is
needed to provide the required capacity for PSW services in time.
Both CSW and PSW traffic management should be harmonized
with the layer structure and long term plans.
22

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Performance optimization GPRS Attach
Solution
Verification
PS
Typical failures outside BSS

User subscription
non-GPRS users and users from other operators with no roaming
agreement
Protocol error
Mainly caused by MS not responding during attach, some possible
reasons:
Radio contact lost
MS out of coverage
Collision of signaling message MS sends Attach Request or Detach
Request when the previous Attach Request is still in process
Typical recommendations:
PS Core settings
Further RF optimization
GPRS detach feature

23
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Performance optimization PDP Context

Activation
Solution
Verification
PS
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Typical failures:
PS Core
Subscribers use incorrect APN during PDP Context Activation
Request
Subscribers/MS keep reattempt with the incorrect APN can badly affect
overall PDP Activation Success Rate
APN of other operators often seen, could because of subscribers using
the same MS with different SIM

24
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Performance optimization TBF Failure
Solution
Verification
PS
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Typical reasons for TBF failures

Radio reasons
Bad coverage
Interference problems
Blocking
TBF Failures
Parameter discrepancies
MCA parameters
POC
GPRS_POC
IFP, TFP
SGSN problems
Establishment
No
Failures
Response
TBF
Attempts
Gb, Gn traces will be needed

25
Flush
CSW
Suspend
Traffic
Normally
Ended
TBFs
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Performance optimization Throughput
Solution
Verification
PS
Radio reasons, throughput / timeslot is bad

Bad coverage
Interference problems
Decreased coding scheme => less throughput even many timeslots used
TSL allocation problems, total throughput is bad

Check territory usage
Check downgrades due to CSW traffic and PSW rejects
Add more dedicated timeslots for data if possible
Check TBF sharing

If lots of TBF/ TSL => check that CDED parameter <>0
Too much sharing => territory not big enough. If possible, add more dedicated timeslots
Transmission problems
EDAP congestion
Gg congestion

26
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Performance optimization Multislot Usage
PS
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Territory downgrade and upgrade

Territory downgrade due to CSW traffic rise (c1179)
CS traffic handling
Territory downgrade due to less PSW traffic(c1181)
Territory optimization, territory is perhaps not big enough
CS Traffic handling
Territory upgrade request rejection beyond default territory
Upgrade request beyond Default territory for additional resources
(c1174), which can be rejected because of:
1. No (E)GPRS capable resource left (No (E)GPRS enable TRX or the maximum (E)GPRS
capacity reached)
2. PCU and EDAP capacity limitation (256 Abis TSL per PCU)
3. High CSW load
0
Default territory
1174
5
1179
1181
1180

27
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Performance optimization PS Blocking
Solution
Verification
PS
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Hard blocking no resources available

More TSLs for data must be available
Check unavailability in the cell
More dedicated timeslots for data
Amount of CS traffic must be reduced (traffic handling with features)
RF optimization => better throughput => less blocking
Sof blocking TSL allocation problems

Check parameters
Territory parameters, CDED, CDEF
Check also also (E)GPRS parameters
Check also timers
Too much delays => more blocking

28
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Performance optimization Cell Reselection PS
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Project
Ends
Typical main causes:

Bad overshooting
Dominance areas are not clear
Too much cell reselections
Link balance problems

UL / DL
Cell reselection parameters are not properly planned

Check C1,C2, NCCR parameters
Check IFP, TFP parameters
BSC / PCU area optimization is not properly done

Delays will be increased if areas are not properly planned
29
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Traffic and Capacity Optimization

30

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems

GSM Architecture
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Project
report
Project
Ends
Traffic and Capacity Optimization levels
Ater, Transcoder (TC), A-interface

BSC level
Site level
TRX level
Timeslot level
TC
Signaling
MSC
A
Ater
Air
interface
BTS
2G
BSC
Abis

31
BCSU
Gb
SGSN

on assessment
INPUTS

Introduction
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Ater, TC, A
Capacity and pools
BSC
BSC Type, BSC load, Gb links
BCSU, capacity
EDAP/PCU Type, Load
Site
Antennas, BTS HW/SW BTS configuration, Dual band, CBCCH, SDCCH
traffic etc
TRX
Where capacity will be needed
Timeslot
FR/HR, AMR FR/HR, territory, CMAX, SDCCH traffic
Signaling
CCCH, TRXSIG, SS7 links
32
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Ater, TC, A
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Abis
interfaces
Ater Interface
All traffic from BSC must be transferred to
transcoders. Number of E1s in Ater / Asub
interface is depending on:
TCH Traffic from all abis IFs
CCS7 traffics
O&M links
Utilization rate
1 PCM timeslot in Ater/Asub interface:

64Kbit/s
1 PCM timeslot in Abis interface :
FR= 16 kbit/s
HR = 8 kbit/s
=> 4 or 8 PCM timeslots in abis = 1 PCM
timeslot in Ater
33
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Ater, TC, A
Project
Ends
Required transcoding (TC) capacity is

derived from
Total number of required Ater Channels.
Number of Ater channels is based on total
Erlangs in BSC and blocking in A-interface
Configuration options for TCSM3i for
standalone installations can be seen below
TCSM3i units (capacity step) ETSI channels ANSI channels
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
34
960
1920
2880
3840
4800
5760
6720
7680
8640
9600
10560
11520
760
1520
2280
3040
3800
4560
5320
6080
6840
7600
8360
9120
ET 16
ET 16
(16 E1
PCMs)-1
BSC
(16 E1
PCMs)
several
BSCs
3
5
8
10
13
15
18
20
23
25
28
30
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
33
36
TR3E
8
16
24
32
40
48
56
64
72
80
88
96
Note. In some solution

Transcoder can be
implemented to Media
Gateway MGW
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Ater, TC, A
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
A Interface
Number of required A- Interface PCMs is derived from total number of
required Ater Channels. 4:1 multiplexing
1 : 120
For Example
Total Erlangs in BSC = 3920 Erl
Blocking in A-interface =0.1%
ErlangB table(3920,0.1QoS )
4042 Ater Channels
Ater Interface PCMs

A interface PCMs(1:4)
35
ETSI Channels
960
1920
2880
3840
4800
5760
6720
7680
8640
9600
10560
11520
4:1
Ater interface PCMs

8
16
24
32
40
48
56
64
72
80
88
96
A interface PCMs (4:1)
= 4042(ETSI) / 120 = 34
= 34*4 = 136
32
64
96
128
160
192
224
256
288
320
352
384
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

BSC
Solution
Verification
# TRX
#BTS
#BCF
#BSCU
#SS7L
#LAPD
# (logical) PCU
# abis 16k channels
#E1/T1 lines
Erlangs
BSC2i
BSC3i 660
512
512
248
6
16
992
16
4096
144
3040
660
660
504
6
16
1236
24
6144
256
3920
BSC3i 1000/2000
1 cab
2 cab
1000
2000
1000
2000
1000
2000
5
10
16
16
2240
4480
50
100
12800
25600
384
800
5940
11880
How Erlangs are calculated?

This depends on used traffic profile
Different traffic profile => different
results
Example, How to calculate BH call attempts
= (Total_Erl x 3600s) / mean_holding_time(s)
36
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Example of BSC capacity evolution

Static limits
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
BSC3i 3000
3000
3000
3000
6
16
5760
30
30720
800
17820
Traffic Profile example

Mean holding time
Mobile originated calls (MO)
Mobile terminated calls (MT)
Handovers per call
Location updated per call
IMSI detach per call
Paging response
SMS (req(subs/1 hour)
Terminated SMS 80%
QoS
120s
70%
30%
1.5
2
0.1
63%
1
80%
2%
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems

BSC - Example of Utilization
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
BSC Utilization
TRX Usage
TCH Usage
Actual TRX utilization
Actual TCH Utilization
If utilization values
are too high
=> BCS Capacity
optimization will be
needed
Utilization analysis can be used for long term BSC optimization

Capacity management vs. configuration optimization
37
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

BSC - EDAP / PCU / Gb
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
EDAP capacity can be optimized based on KPI values
DL / UL MCS selection limited by EDAP (dap_7a, dap_8c)

DL / UL MCS selection limited by PCU (dap_9, dap_10)
Peak DL EDAP usage (c76004)
Peak UL EDAP usage (c76005)
Territory upgrade rejection due to lack of PCU capacity (blck_32)
Not too much capacity nor too less capacity
EDAP / PCU performance can be decreased due to Gb link

size
UL/ DL Gb load: frl_7a/ frl_8a
This should be checked always with EDAP / PCU optimization

38
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
BSC - EDAP / PCU
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Project
report
Project
Ends
EDAP blocking
If EDAP utilization is below 100 => increasing EDAP does not
provide any help => PCU optimization needed
As a rule of thumb the following estimation may be used to
calculate number of E1s.
Nbr of TRX
Amount of E1s
12 TRX GSM / GPRS
1 E1
9 TRX GSM / EGPRS

6 TRX GSM / Heavy EGPRS
18 TRX GSM / GPRS
1.5 E1
15 TRX GSM / EGPRS

24 TRX GSM / GPRS
2 E1
21 TRX GSM / EGPRS


39
Note!
Can be used also T1s
E1:32 channel
T1:24 channel

on assessment
INPUTS

BSC - Gb
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Gb utilization
If values near thresholds, it is recommended to increase Gb link size
OR Implement Gb over IP
Maximum received load % ( DL)

40
Gb bandwidth
[kbps]
Restricting Gb
link utilisation
[%]
128
25
256
61
384
68
512
68
640
70
768
75
896
85
1024
90
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Site - Indoor solution
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Indoor solutions
Before
4 TRX, 20Erl
After
2 TRX, 5Erl
Indoor Site
4TRX, 15Erl
Note! Indoor solution is collecting traffic inside (heavy traffic) office

=> Less frequencies is needed outside the building

41
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Site - Dual Band Network
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Before
GSM 900 layer (4TRX:24Erl (Bad blocking),

GSM 900 layer (2TRX:2Erl)
Actions:
After
GSM 900 layer (2TRX:7Erl (no blocking)
GSM 1800 layer (4TRX:21Erl)
1800 layer was added

From 900 layer traffic to 1800 layer
3 TRX was removed from 900 layers
Total traffic was increased
GSM 900 layer (1TRX:1,5Erl
Note! Dual band layers can be also GSM 900 and WCDMA

42
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Site Traffic layers
Traffic layers
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
3G Layers
2100 Macro
2100 Micro
2100 Indoor
2G Layers
Note! Traffic between layers can be

handled by parameters
43
900 Macro
1800 Macro
900/1800 Micro
900/1800 Indoor
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems

TRX capacity where it is needed
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Site configuration 2+2+2 in all sites

Bad Blocking area
8Erl
5Erl
More capacity is needed
3Erl
9Erl
2Erl
1Erl
4Erl
5Erl
5Erl
6Erl
1Erl
4Erl
1Erl
Extra capacity
4Erl
3Erl
44
2 trx / cell is too much

=> TRX can be transferred
to the cells where these are
more needed
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Timeslot AMR FR/HR
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Half rate (HR) is recommended to use when:

More capacity will be needed but additional TRXs can not be
added
Interference problems, Frequency reuse
HW limitations
Temporary needs for additional capacity

Special events
Due to daily traffic profile, additional capacity will be needed just for
short time
Big cruise is passing by, tens of calls during short time

45
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Timeslot AMR FR/HR
Solution
Verification
select the correct channel rate (FR or HR).

The selection of the channel rate depends on 2 main
factors: load and quality
Codec
Good
Quality
load
AMR FR
AMR FR
packing
unpacking
Bad
Quality

46
AMR HR
AMR HR
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Channel Mode Adaptation is an HO algorithm that aims at
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems

Timeslot FR/HR & PS territory
Solution
Verification
Assessments &
Analysis
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Strategy which timeslots for data and which

for speech?
BFG parameter
Whether the BCCH TRX or other TRXs are preferred in GPRS channel allocation .
FRL parameter
With this parameter the percentage of full rate TCH resources that must be available for
traffic channel allocation is defined.
FRU parameter
With this parameter the percentage of full rate TCH resources that must be available for
traffic channel allocation is defined.
Note! Territory and dual rate in same TRX(HR just

after territory) => not good, should be changed
TRX1
tsl0
tsl1
bcch
sdcch
tsl0
tsl1
TRX2level
Soc Classification
47
tsl2
tsl2
tsl3
tsl3
tsl4
tsl4
tsl5
tsl5
tsl6
tsl6
tsl7
tsl7
How to allocate
CS and PS
channels?
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
AMR and PS interworking, CS TCH Allocation Calculation

CS TCH allocation calculation (CTC)
Defines how the GPRS territory is seen when calculating FR resources.
EGPRS
used/default
MBCCHC
TCHD
TCHD
TCHD
TCHD
TCHD
TCHD
5 CS calls
CTC 0
CTC1
CTC2
Working FR TCH resources 6
% of free FR resources
16.7%
14.3%
28.6%
HR Preferred?
Free FR TCH resources
EGPRS
downgraded
MBCCHC
TCHD
TCHD
TCHD
TCHD
TCHD
TCHD
6 CS calls
CTC Value
0 = Only CSW used RTSLs
are used to calculate
CDEF
resources
1 = CSW and PSW used
RTSLs are used. PSW used
RTSLs are seen as occupied
resource when calculating
Territory
downgrade due to PSW RTSLs
CS traffic
2 = CSW used and PSW
used RTSLs are used. PSW
used RTSLs are seen as idle
resource when calculating
resources
downgrad
ed
FRL = relative amounts of

free FR TCH resources in
proportion to working FR TCH
resources
FRL = 15% in this example
Free FR TCH resources
Working FR TCH resources 7
% of free FR resources
14.3%
14.3%
14.3%
HR Preferred?

48
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Timeslot AMR FR/HR
Solution
Verification
Assessments &
Analysis
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
HR will be allocated when there are few free FR TCHs available.

The purpose is to avoid congestion / blocking
HR => FR when there are again enough free FR TCHs
Thresholds are set by parameters (FRL, FRU)
Free FR TCHs
Upper limit for free FR TCHs
Low er limit for free FR TCHs
Time
No packing of
FR calls

49
Packing of
FR calls
No packing of
FR calls
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

signaling -paging
Solution
Verification
TRXSIG can be dimensioning based on following table:

After implementation paging capacity KPIs and occurrence of
LAPD overload must be checked
TRXSIG
Comments
16k
Can be used if 32k is not possible to use
32k
Default value. Must be used if HR is used or high

SMS
Must traffic
be used if HR is used and high SMS traffic
64 k
Note! If the cell is part of the large location area, high paging
load is expected. Thus small signaling links (16kbps) shall be
avoided.
50
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Paging
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

signaling -sdcch
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Assessments &
Analysis
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Project
report
Project
Ends
Capacity of SDCCH in the cell is depending on the amount of

TRXs in the cell
Capacity of SDCCH in the cell is also depending heavily on
Traffic profile, for example amount of SMSs
Number of TRX in
the cell
1
2
3
4
5
SDCCH Traffic (Erl)

Number of SDCCH in the cell
Erl mErl/subs subs 1 sms/subs/hour 5 sms/subs/hour 10 sms/subs/hour 1 sms/subs/hour 5 sms/subs/hour 10 sms/subs/hour
2.2
25
88
0.4
0.8
1.3
1
1
1
8.2
25
328
1.6
3.1
4.9
1
2
2
14.9
25
596
3.0
5.6
8.9
1
2
3
21
25
840
4.2
7.9
12.6
2
2
3
27
25
1080
5.4
10.2
16.2
2
3
4
SDCCH blocking KPIs should be monitored & avoided

And reason for blocking, SMS, LU, paging etc should be known.
Note! Exceptions are cells that cover ports of entry, such as airports, where
a large number of subscriber location updates are expected
51

on assessment
INPUTS

signaling - sdcch
Assessments &
Analysis
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Increased Dynamic SDCCH

SDCCH resources are used for call
establishment, location updates and

short messages (SMS)
Dynamic SDCCH allocation feature
configures additional SDCCH resources
according to the traffic situation in a cell
When a BTS needs temporarily larger
SDCCH capacity, then idle TCH
resources are configured for the
SDCCH use
When the congestion situation is over
extra SDCCH resources are configured
immediately back to TCH resources
By using Increased Dynamic SDCCH
Capacity, you can use up to 32
SDCCHs per non-BCCH TRX and 24
per BCCH TRX

52
BCCH SDCCH/8 TCH
TCH
TCH
TCH
TCH
TCH
BCCH SDCCH/8SDCCH/8
TCH
TCH
TCH
TCH
TCH
In case of SDCCH congestion, one

free traffic channel can be
changed dynamically to SDCCH/8
When SDCCH/8 is no longer
needed it is changed dynamically
back to TCH
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

signaling SS7
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
SS7 capacity planning depends heavily on traffic profile.

Typical traffic profile + bytes needed can be seen below
Traffic in BSC 3920 Erl 3920 (Example)
Configuration 2+2+2 (per cell 2 signaling channels, 1 dedicated for data )
Reference model of call traffic
Mean holding
120s
time originated
Mobile
70%
calls
Mobile
30%
terminated
Handovers calls
per
1.5
call
Location
updated
2
per call
IMSI
detach per
0.1
call
SMS (req(subs/1
1
hour)
TOTAL _ Erl subscribers * 25mErl
BusyHourCallAttempts
TOTAL _ Erl * 3600s

MeanHoldingTime
BusyHourCallAttempts
3920Erl * 3600s
117600
120s

53
Procedure
MOT
MTC
HO
LU
Security
SMS
Bytes
290
267
145
160
120
218
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems

signaling SS7
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Total throughput must be calculated based on traffic profile (see previous

slide)
Procedure
Bytes
Mobile Originated Call

Mobile Terminated
Call
Handover
(MSC)
Location Update
Security
SMS
Total
# in Busy Hour
290
267
145
160
120
218
82320
35280
176400
235200
117600
117600
Kbps
53
21
57
83
31
57
302
Total SS7 Capacity: 302 kbps

If SS7 utilization is 20%
302 kbps / (0.2 * 64kbps)
24 64kbps SS7 links are needed
Note!
1 E1 = 31 x 64kbps (total 32, 31 can be used for this purpose)
1 T1 = 24 x 64kbps
54
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

55

on assessment
INPUTS
Solution finding coverage optimization
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
20 km away from site

Signal level -95dBm?
Are both cases critical ones?
Are both cases coverage problem
20km
cases?
Bad coverage what does it mean?
20km

56
SiteA
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Solution
Verification
Assessments &
Analysis
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Project
report
Project
Ends
Signal level quality distribution

12478 samples
signal level < -100dBm
Quality 7
=> UL coverage problem?
251992 samples
signal level < -100dBm
Quality 0
=> UL coverage problem?
Exercise
How we should here optimize coverage?
Any problems?
UL_q4
18156
519
353
177
87
25
SIGNAL LEVEL
QUALITY
UL_q5
18286
351
129
82
10
1
UL
UL_q6
16983
221
62
40
6
0
DL

57
-100dBm
-95dBm
-90dBm
-80dBm
-70dBm
-47dBm
UL_q0
251992
123653
62938
27005
2831
751
UL_q1
30668
1151
247
51
3
0
UL_q2
20552
403
144
65
9
4
UL_q3
18417
692
288
149
28
10
UL_q4
18156
519
353
177
87
25
UL_q5
18286
351
129
82
10
1
UL_q6
16983
221
62
40
6
0
UL_q7
12478
72
29
16
0
0
DL_q0
27862
89094
142228
222462
44504
5994
UL_q7
12478
-100dBm
72
-95dBm
29
-90dBm
16
-80dBm
0
-70dBm
0
-47dBm
DL_q0
UL_q0
251992
27862
123653
89094
142228
62938
222462
27005
44504
2831
5994
751
DL_q1
UL_q1
30668
5537
4236
1151
2732
247
1523
51
91
3
49
0
DL_q2
UL_q2
20552
5529
3853
403
2550
144
1355
65
123
9
17
4
DL_q3
UL_q3
18417
6069
3576
692
2356
288
1552
149
151
28
17
10
DL_q4
UL_q4
18156
6109
2893
519
1510
353
716
177
81
87
12
25
DL_q5
UL_q5
18286
6107
2264
351
1114
129
812
82
101
10
29
1
DL_q6
UL_q6
16983
5389
1372
221
774
62
1081
40
191
6
65
0
DL_q7
UL_q7
12478
4119
584
72
404
29
343
16
88
0
10
0
DL_q0
27862
89094
142228
222462
44504
5994

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Project
report
Project
Ends
Signal level <-90-95dBm is many times level threshold

Typical values for ul/dl level HO (UL, -95dBm, DL, -90dBm)
UL / DL coverage should be always analyzed separately
Here, lots of bad UL signal level samples => UL coverage should be
improved
UL_q4
18156
519
353
177
87
25
SIGNAL LEVEL
QUALITY
UL_q5
18286
351
129
82
10
1
UL
UL_q6
16983
221
62
40
6
0
DL
-100dBm
-95dBm
-90dBm
-80dBm
-70dBm
-47dBm
UL_q0
251992
123653
62938
27005
2831
751
UL_q1
30668
1151
247
51
3
0
UL_q2
20552
403
144
65
9
4
UL_q3
18417
692
288
149
28
10
UL_q4
18156
519
353
177
87
25
UL_q5
18286
351
129
82
10
1
UL_q6
16983
221
62
40
6
0
UL_q7
12478
72
29
16
0
0
DL_q0
27862
89094
142228
222462
44504
5994
DL
5
4
2
1
UL_q7
12478
-100dBm
72
-95dBm
29
-90dBm
16
-80dBm
0
-70dBm
0
-47dBm
DL_q0
UL_q0
251992
27862
123653
89094
142228
62938
222462
27005
44504
2831
5994
751
DL_q1
UL_q1
30668
5537
4236
1151
2732
247
1523
51
91
3
49
0
DL_q2
UL_q2
20552
5529
3853
403
2550
144
1355
65
123
9
17
4
DL_q3
UL_q3
18417
6069
3576
692
2356
288
1552
149
151
28
17
10
DL_q4
UL_q4
18156
6109
2893
519
1510
353
716
177
81
87
12
25
DL_q5
UL_q5
18286
6107
2264
351
1114
129
812
82
101
10
29
1
DL_q6
UL_q6
16983
5389
1372
221
774
62
1081
40
191
6
65
0
DL_q7
UL_q7
12478
4119
584
72
404
29
343
16
88
0
10
0
DL_q0
27862
89094
142228
222462
44504
5994
DL
5
4
2
1

58

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Solutions to improve coverage

Antenna changes
Tilting
Adding antenna with bigger gain
New cell / site

Costly
DL /UL amplifiers
DL, boosters
UL, Mast head amplifier (MHA)
Diversity
UL
2100MHz
900MHz
Reducing losses
Combiner types
Feeder types
2100MHz
900MHz
Better site / antenna place

59
900MHz
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

indoor coverage
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Many networks have insufficient indoor coverage due to high building

penetration loss. This includes subways, under ground facilities and
tunnels.
Outdoor coverage is normally ok in urban and city area. Interference is
more an issue for outdoor users.
Micro cell and Indoor cell are good solution to improve indoor coverage
and network quality.
Antenna location is main factor for successful indoor coverage planning
Indoor BTS
Indoor Panel
Antenna
Optical Fiber
Remote Unit
60
Master Unit
RF Cable
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

indoor coverage
Other features can be also used for coverage
optimization
Extended cell
Smart radio concept
Antenna hopping

61
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Examples of wrong parameter set
impact on network operation/performance call setup,

qual, bands
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
1. No calls happening in a cell

Cell Barred
Non existent (LAC, Cell ID) in MSC
DMAX = 0
2. Very few calls happening in a cell

RxLevAccesMin
Wrong MNC, MCC, LAC declaration
3. Very low traffic in a cell

msTxPwrMax = 0, bsTxPwrMax = 30
4. Bad quality in UL after rehoming

5. Few traffic in 1800 layer of a dual band 900/1800 network

62
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Example 1a
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
No calls happening in a cell:

The cell has been barred
Handover
Call Setup

63
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Example 1b
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends

CI different between MSC and BSC or non existent (LAC, Cell
ID) in MSC

64
MSC does not find (LAC,

CI) in its database
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Example 1c
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends

MsMaxDistanceInCallSetup (DMAX) = 0
Despite the coverage
of the cell, no calls
will be established!
DMAX = 0

65
Call Setup
RxLevel = -70
dBm
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Example 2a
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Very few calls happening in a cell:

RxLevAccesMin
Mapping
OSS
database
BSS
MML
Lowest range
-110 dBm
-109 dBm
...
...
62
-48 dBm
63
-47 dBm
Highest range
Cell coverage
RxLevAccessMin = -47 dBm

66
Be careful when setting

parameter through xml or dat
file! OSS database unit
should be used to specify
parameter value!
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Example 2b
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Very few calls happening in a cell:

Wrong MNC, MCC, LAC declaration in network - MNC: 01
1 !!! (In OSS correct value)
Note! Be careful when

setting parameter through
xml or dat file! OSS database
unit should be used to
specify parameter value!

67
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Example 3
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Very low traffic in a cell:

msTxPwrMax = 0, bsTxPwrMax = 30
Parameter
bsTxPwrMax
bsTxPwrMin
minMsTxPower
msTxPwrMax
Value_______
0 30 dB
0 30 dB
0 36 dBm
0 36 dBm
Attenuation Values (dB)

BTS Max Power = BTS Power (bsTxPwrMax = 0 dB)
BTS Min Power = BTS Power (bsTxPwrMin = 30 dB)
Power Values (dBm)

MS Max Power = (msTxPwrMax = 33 dB)
MS Min Power = (minMsTxPower = 13 dB)

68
Implementations
Default value
0 dB
30 dB
0 dB
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Example 4
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Bad quality in UL after rehoming:

DiversityUsed parameter not set to yes anymore
After rehoming
RDIV parameter
was set to default
value (No) and UL
quality was
affected.
RDIV = Y
Uplink Diversity
improves quality of
signal received.

69
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Example 5
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Few traffic in 1800 layer of a dual band 900/1800 network:

Idle Mode: C2 parameters not set properly (temporaryOffset,
penaltyTime)
Idle / dedicated mode parameters should be according to
strategy
BCCH
BCCH
slow moving mobile

1800: micro-Layer
70
fast moving mobile

900: macro-layer
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

71

on assessment
INPUTS
Solution finding frequency optimization
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
GSM network is based on good frequency planning

Bad frequency planning is causing high interference levels
Lots of drop calls
CS/PS quality is bad
Features are not working properly
Maybe new sites are built due to bad interference problems
Lots of customer complaints
Finally less customers
=> Frequency plan should be properly done

72
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Basic Theory
How to analyze my frequency plan
Frequency reuse distance
Frequency allocation reuse
Frequency load
Effective frequency load

73
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Theory, Effective reuse
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Since the frequency band is always limited, the frequencies have to be

reused in the network.
As the reuse distance becomes smaller, there are more frequencies
available for each cell, so more capacity can be provided.
The effective reuse is essentially the same as the conventional
frequency reuse distance.
Reff
N freqsTOT
N TRXave
where:
Reff = effective reuse
NfreqsTOT = total number of used frequencies
NTRXave = average number of TRXs in a cell
Note! The smaller the effective reuse, the higher the capacity in terms of
the number of TCHs provided by one frequency in the network.
74
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Theory, Frequency Allocation Reuse RF Hopping only
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Frequency allocation reuse indicates how closely the frequencies

are actually reused in a network.
FAR
N freqsTOT
N freqs/ MA
where:
FAR = frequency allocation reuse
NfreqsTOT = total number of used frequencies
Nfreqs/MA = average number of frequencies in MA-lists
It indicates the severity of a worst case C/I in the cell border.

If the network doesnt utilize fractional loading, the frequency allocation
reuse is the same as the effective reuse.

75
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Theory, Frequency load
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Assessments &
Analysis
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
The C/I is low when frequency collisions occur.

In order to guarantee an adequate quality, the collision probability has to be made low.
The collision probability depends on the load of the hopping frequencies called a
frequency load.
The frequency load describes the probability that a frequency channel is used for
transmission at one cell at one time.
The frequency load is a product of two other loads:
hard blocking load (the average busy hour TCH occupancy in most of the cases)
fractional load
L freq LHW L frac

where:
Lfreq = frequency load
LHW = the busy hour average hard blocking load (see next slides)
Lfrac = fractional load (see next slides)
76
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Theory, Hard blocking load
The hard blocking load is calculated as
LHW
ThopTCH
N hopTCH
where:
LHW = hard blocking load
ThopTCH = average number of used TCHs in the busy hour
NhopTCH = total number of TCHs in the hopping TRXs

77
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Theory, Fractional load
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Fractional load means that the cell has been allocated more frequencies
than TRXs. This is only possible for RF hopping TRXs.
The fractional load is very useful when the number of TRXs is low. By
utilizing fractional load, it is possible to provide enough frequencies to hop
over (to get FH gain) to even a cell with just one hopping TRX.
L frac
N TRX
N freqs / cell
where:
Lfrac = fractional load
NTRX = number of TRXs in a cell
Nfreqs/cell = number of frequencies allocated to a cell (MA-list length)
78
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Theory, Frequency Load,HW and fractional load
75 %
TRX-1
BCCH
f1
TRX-2
f2, f3, f4, f5, f6
TRX-3
f3, f4, f5, f6, f2
TRX-4
f4, f5, f6, f2, f3

79
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
HW load is 75%
Fractional load FL is
3 TRX / 5 F = 0.6 = 60%
Frequency load is
HWL * FL = 45%
25 %
Active slots
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Empty slots
(E)GPRS is on the BCCH

layer in this case
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Theory, Effective Frequency Load
Coverage limited network has low EFL
Interference limited network has high EFL
It is calculated by the equation mentioned below:

80
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

81
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Project
Ends
584 re-used
close together
Heavy re-use
of 582
Solution
Verification
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Visual BCCH Plan Inspection
584 re-used
close together
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
BCCH Carrier Utilisation
Project
Ends
Channel distribution
60
Occurrences
50
40
30
20
Carriers also used

in MA List

82
584
583
582
581
580
579
578
577
576
575
574
573
571
570
522
521
520
519
518
517
516
515
514
513
572
10
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

BSIC Utilization
BSIC allocation distribution
As can be seen from the
figure, amount of BSIC
combinations are not
spread smoothly
BSIC planning is not
properly done => risks to
double BCCH+BSIC
combinations is increased
Note! Good radio network is based on properly

done BSIC + BCCH Planning
83
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Same color =
same frequency
Signal level is good,

but quality is bad
=> Frequency plan is
not properly done

84
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Different frequency planning methods
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Exercise
How these planning methods differs from each other?
Based on Prediction tools
Planning Tools with propagation models
Based on Interference matrix

Optimizer
Mapinfo
Visualization
Any other methods?

85
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Frequency Hopping
Network capacity and performance is
typically limited by co-channel
interference, multipath fading, delay
spread and noise
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Interference
Interference Diversity
F1
F3
F1
F1
Frequency Hopping benefits are based

on:
Interference Diversity
where interference is averaged over
multiple frequencies
Frequency Diversity
which reduces the needed fading
margins
average
F2
F2 F3
F2 F
3
MS_1
Signal
Level
MS_2
MS_3
Frequency Diversity
F1
F2
Interference averaging and reduced

immunity to signal fading gives the
possibility to reduce the C/I margins and
tighten the frequency reuse schemes
F3
MS Location
Distance
Bursts sent on frequency F2 may be degraded or lost, but the initial signal is
still be reconstructed from the bursts on frequencies F1 and F3.

86
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
TRX 1
7 Timeslot
f1
BC
CH
TRX 2
f2
TRX 3
f3
TRX 4
f4
HSN1
Timeslot 0 hops over TRXs 2-4 only
BCCH does not hop
HSN2
Timeslots 1-7 hop over all TRXs
RF Hopping
0
TRX 1
Timeslot
BC
CH
f1 no hopping
TRX 2
f2,f3..fn hopping according

mobile allocation list
One hopping sequence
number only
TRX 3
TRX 4
87
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Project
Ends
Baseband Hopping
1 2
Solution
Verification
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Frequency Hopping
0
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

DFCA (Dynamic frequency & channel allocation)
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Random FH
TRX 1
BCCH
TRX 2
Random FH
over a fixed
frequency
list
TRX 3
TRX 4
DFCA
TRX 1
TRX 2
TRX 3
TRX 4

88
Loose interference control
Relies on random spreading of the

interference
BCCH
Cyclic FH
over
individually
selected
frequency lists
and MAIOs
for each
connection
C/I > C/I target
Accurate interference control (C/I estimations)
Each connection is assigned with the most suitable

radio channel (MA list, MAIO, TSL)
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Frequency optimization Consistency check

Cells with co-channel and adj-channel frequencies
Cell A
Co-channel frequencies: HO is not possible in case of co-BCCH

89
Monitoring /
Data collection
Analysis
-6dB -9dB
FREQ=9,10,11
If Co / Adj-channel frequencies are existing, these must be removed
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Work orders
Project
Ends
Cell B
Adj-channel frequencies: Ho is possible but might fail due to

interference.
Implementations
Project
report
B
FREQ=10
Solution
Verification
Assessments &
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Check BCCH-BSIC and BCCH reuse distance

Small distances may be
dangerous!
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Project
Ends
FREQ = 234
BSIC = 42
FREQ = 234
FREQ = 234
BSIC = 42
Reuse 4/12
90
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems

Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Other Checks
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Neighbors with co-channel frequencies

Neighbors with adj-channel frequencies
Neighbors of a same cell with co-BSIC, co-BCCH
Neighbors from other Vendor
Frequencies / co-BSICs near the country border ( if available)

91
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
impact on network operation/performance frequencies
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
1. Drop call rate increase after new frequency plan

implementation
Double BA List activated
2. Impossibility to unlock some BTS after a RF-frequency

hopping implementation
3. Impossibility to unlock some BTS after a frequency retune
NON-EDGE TRX, with GTRX = Y

TRX, with GTRX = Y, not attached to any EDAP pool

92
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Example 1
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Project
report
Project
Ends
Drop call rate increase after new frequency plan implementation:

In the meantime, measurementBcchAllocation has been changed to
idle and MA list defined with old BCCH frequency band
OLD MA List
BCCH
TCH
TCH
BCCH
TCH
OLD FREQUENCY PLAN
NEW FREQUENCY PLAN
These BCCH frequencies will not be measured by old MA List

These TCH frequencies will be wrongly measured

93

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Example 2
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Not possible to unlock some BTS after a RF-frequency

hopping implementation:
After frequency hopping retune, some BCCH frequency

equal to TRX frequency of non-BCCH TRXs
After changing TRX frequency, verify BSIC and TSC
(Training Sequence Code) is changed accordingly.

94
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Example 3a
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Impossibility to unlock some BTS after a frequency retune:

NON-EDGE TRX, with GTRX = Y, in a cell with EGENA set
to yes
SEG
EGENA = Y
BTS
(E)GPRS territory
GTRX = Y
GTRX = Y

95
SEG
EDGE TRX(s)
NONEDGE
TRX(s)
EGENA = Y
BTS
(E)GPRS territory
EDGE TRX(s)
GTRX = Y
GTRX = N
NONEDGE
TRX(s)
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Example 3b
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Impossibility to unlock some BTS after a frequency retune:

TRX, with GTRX = Y, not attached to any EDAP pool in a cell
with EGENA set to yes
SEG
EGENA = Y
1
BTS
(E)GPRS territory
EDGE TRX(s)
GTRX = Y
GTRX = N
NONEDGE
TRX(s)
Add TRX-1 to EDAP

pool

96
EDAP pool
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

97

on assessment
INPUTS
Solution finding neighbor optimization
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Keep the neighbor list in order.

Note! If lots of overshooting => dominance areas are not clear => neighbor
list are getting bigger.
Bad overshooting should be avoided
Missing neighbors the worst situation
Use the Handover Adjacency Statistics to identify and remove

neighbors
Bad overshooting cells can cause problems
ISHO optimization
Avoid:
neighbor definitions that are co-BCCH and co-BSIC or Adj-BCCH and
co-BSIC that can lead to wrong neighbor reporting
One-way neighbors

98
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
GREEN = source
RED
=neighbor cell
BLUE = no neighbor
As can be seen, neighbors are not

fully optimized.
There are missing neighbors and
on the other hand, some far away
cells are neighbors
99
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
GREEN = source
RED
=neighbor cell
BLUE = no neighbor

100
In this area there might be big

problems due to unoptimized
neighbors
Overshooting cells => added

to neighbor list.
Neighbor planning is more
difficult to do, if lots of
overshooting cells
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Challenges
Sites by the sea
Dominance areas are reaching
far away => neighbor cells can
be far away
SEA
Indoor solutions
Signal levels from outdoor cells
near windows can be high
High buildings
Lots of cells can be heart near
the window
3G cells
Limited amount of neighbors
101
Only few neighbor cells

=> in the sea there will
be problems
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Neighbor optimization based on statistics

HO attempts, blocking and fails can be analyzed as source or
target cells
Neighbor removing can be done based on stats
In case Number of HO
Attempts is very low to a
certain cell, consider
removing this cell from
Adjacency list.

102
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Neighbor Planning Consistency check
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Non symmetrical adjacencies
Project
Ends
Find all non symmetrical adjacencies :

cell B is neighbour of Cell A
cell A is not neighbour of Cell B
Cell A
Cell B
If there are non symmetrical adjacencies, these must be

changed to symmetrical adjacencies
103
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Neighbor Planning Consistency check
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Neighbours with co-channel and adj-channel frequencies

or co-BSIC, co-BCCH
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Cell B
f=10
f=10, BSIC=2,2
Cell A
f=24
Cell C
f=10, BSIC=2,2
Neighbours with co-BSIC, co-BCCH:

Might generate ghost-access and
HO drop calls.
High sdcch abis failure and high
handover failure could be indicators
for this case.
104

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
f=24
f=9,10,11
Neighbours with co-channel or

adjacent channel frequencies:
Will cause interference between
neighbour cells
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Different methods
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Exercise
How these planning methods differs from each other?
1.Add maximum nbr of neighbors and after 2 weeks remove
extra neighbors based on HO statistic
2.First only nearest (dominance area) and if problems, add
more neighbors
In neighbor optimization following selection methods can be
used
Based on Optimizer
Based on Map
Based on OSS Statistics

105
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Neighbor planning Consistency check

Other Checks
Check cells in MSC vs cells in BSC

Check external adjacencies in MSC
Non symmetrical adjacencies
3G neighbors

106
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Handover Optimization

107

on assessment
INPUTS
Solution finding HO optimization
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
HO Strategies Traffic handling (900-1800 layers)
PBGT, quality, level
1800
layer
Umbrella
Traffic Reason
IUO
PBGT, quality, level
900
layer

108
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Optimizing HOs, Reduce unnecessary HOs

DL Level HO typically (-94dB)
old
Quality HO 3dB
HO Level margin 2dB
=> if Cell1 -98dBm => Cell2 >-96dBm => HO
=> might be HO fail if for example some imbalance
new HO level margin => 24dBm (=disabled in this case)

Quality HO 3dB (HO is done only if quality problems)
No HO, AMR is used => no drops and quality is OK
PBGT is still working. Value can be decreased if problems)
Unnecessary HO is
prevented in this area
-100dBm
Cell1
Cell2
route
-100dBm

109
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Optimizing HOs, HO parameters

Umbrella ( AUCL parameter)
AMR FR/HR
Packing, unpacking parameters
Interference / quality HO
If interference level -75dB => interference problems in good signal level
Rest are quality HOs => bad quality can be also due decreased signal
level.
This difference is good to know
Level / PBGT
If margin is same as PBGT, the only difference is level, See example in
previous slide where Level HO disabled.
It is useful to know if overlapping in good signal level and bad signal level
Can be noticed if overshooting
If no Level HOs => real coverage problems without overlapping
110
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
AMR + Power Control & HO control co-ordination in UL
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Project
report
Project
Ends
Quality
(BER)
(PxNx:6/16)
UURF
Packing of the call
Power down quality

(PxNx:4/6)
IHRF
No action
(PxNx: 2/3)
LURF
Power up quality
IHRH
(PxNx: 4/6)
(PxNx:1/1)
(PxNx:1/1)
RxLevel
Power down
level

111
UUR (POC) -70
(AMR) Qual HO
HYS -6dB
Handover
trigger
-110dBm
LUR (POC) -95
Handover trigger
Power up
level
LUR (HOC) -95
QURF
(PxNx: 1/1)
Unpacking the call
-47dBm

on assessment
INPUTS
HO Optimization Consistency check
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Synchronized handover
Project
Ends
Non-synchronized Handover
MS sends access bursts (HO_ACCESS) (with varying TA) until
it receives PHYSICAL_INFO
Synchronized Handover
MS sends a few access bursts (HO_ACCESS) and then starts
transmission with previous TA
Non-synchronised handover leads to a longer communication
interruption than synchronised handover (200ms vs. 100ms)
Synchronized HO should be activated between sectors of the same site.
If activated on inter-site adjacencies the handover can fail
Non- Synchronized HO
Synchronized HO
Site A
112
Site B
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS

Different methods
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Exercise 1
In which case the network is working better? (theoretical)
All handovers are quality handovers
All handovers are level handovers
Exercise 2
How these differs from each other?
Quality HO vs. Interference HO
PBGT vs. Level HO
Traffic handling : decreased power 2 dB vs. decreased HO
margin 2dB

113
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
HO planning Consistency check

Other Checks
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Check cells in MSC vs cells in BSC

Check external adjacencies in MSC
Neighbors with co-channel frequencies
Neighbors with adj-channel frequencies
Check site with same MA List in different sectors and different
HSN
Check site with same MA List in different sectors and MAIO
collision

114
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems

impact on network operation/performance Handover
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
1. No handover from a cell towards all its neighbours
PLMN permitted = No
2. High Handover failures after implementation of new adjacency plan
SYNC = YES
3. No handover happening from an interfered cell
hoMarginQual set to 0
4. 100% of handover failures in an adjacency relation
Co-BSIC co-BCCH declarati
5. High number of handovers
hoThresholdsLevUL = hoThresholdsLevDL
6. Handover not happening when DL signal level of neighbour much

greater than serving cell
POC DL activated

115
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Example 1
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
No handover from a cell towards all its neighbours:

PLMN permitted not set properly. MML Default value is the NCC of the
BTS. So HOs will not happen towards neighbours with different NCC.
No Measurement reports of
Cell B are sent to BSC. So no
HOs occur from Cell A to Cell
B
Plmn permitted 0 = No
.
Plmn permitted 3 = Yes
Cell A
NCC 3
Cell B
NCC 4
Set Plmn permitted 4 =

Yes
PLMN permitted parameter consists actually of 8 parameters (0 7) related to

the NCC part of the BSICs of neighbour cells. MS only reports measurements of
cells with NCC permitted (plmn permitted = YES).

116
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Example 2
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Project
report
Project
Ends
High Handover failures after implementation of new adjacency plan

All adjacencies have been implemented with synchronised
parameter set to yes. HOs between cells of different sites will
probably fail.
Synchronized Handover
MS
NETWORK
ACTIVE CALL
HANDO CMD
HANDO ACC
PHYS INFO
Old Channel, Old Cell
Set SYNC = YES

only between
sectors of the
same site.
SYNC = NO
New Channel, New Cell
HANDO COM
ACTIVE CALL

117
Recommendation is to have Sync HO within BTSs in the

same BCF and Non Sync HO between BTSs in different
BCFs.
SYNC = YES

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Example 3
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
No handover happening from an interfered cell

hoMarginQual set to 0
A
Ho Margin Qual = -4
PBGT margin = 6dB
B
Ho Margin Qual = 0
(MML Default)
In an interfered cell, despite high signal strength, quality is not good. So HO

Margin Qual should permit HO to a cell that despite its lower signal strength,
may have a better quality.
118
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Example 4
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
100% of handover failures in an adjacency relation

Co-BCCH declaration (Co-BSIC)
Cell A

119
Cell B
FREQ=10
FREQ=10
BSIC = 33
BSIC = 33
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Example 5
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
High number of handovers. hoThresholdsLevUL =

hoThresholdsLevDL
Quality
hoThresholdsLevUL
, high thresholds will
anticipate HOs:
-95 -> -100
Level Ho
No Action Needed
hoThresholdsLevDL
:
Interference Ho
HoThresholdInterferenceUL/DL
HoThresholdLevUL

120
HoThresholdLevDL
HoThresholdLevUL/
DL
-50
-52
-54
-56
-58
-60
-62
-64
-66
-68
-70
-72
-74
-76
-78
-80
-82
-84
-86
-88
-90
-92
-94
-96
-98
-100
-102
-104
-106
-108
7
-110
-95 -> -90
Quality Ho
dBm
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Example 6
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Handover not happening when DL signal level of neighbour

much greater than serving cell
Power control DL activated
A
Power Control
-6dB
B
-3dB

121
-9dB
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

122

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Objectives
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
After PS optimization module learning

You know the impact of GSM performance on (E)GPRS
performance
You know the main assessment activities
You know how the signaling, throughput and mobility can be
optimized

123
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
GSM Network as the physical layer of (E)GPRS
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
The optimal GSM network from PSW services point of view has:
1. As high signal level as possible
It means that even the indoor signal level should be high enough to have MCS9 for
getting the highest data rate on RLC/MAC layer.
2. As low interference as possible
The aim of having high C/I is to avoid throughput reduction based on interference.
3. Enough capacity
Enough BSS hardware capacity (interface and connectivity) is needed to provide the
required capacity for PSW services in time. Both CSW and PSW traffic management
should be harmonized with the layer structure and long term plans.
4. As few cell re-selection as possible
The dominant cell coverage is important to avoid unnecessary cell-reselections in

mobility. The prudent PCU allocation can help to reduce the inter PCU cell
reselections.
Dominant cell structure can help to maximize the signal level and reduce the
interference, too.
5. Features
All the features should be used which can improve the PSW service coverage,
capacity and quality in general.
6. The GSM network is the physical layer of (E)GPRS, so the optimization

of GSM network can improve the performance of (E)GPRS, too.
124
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Assessments &
Analysis
(E)GPRS Optimization TSL data rate optimization

Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Timeslot optimization is based on basic optimization

Interference optimization
Coverage optimization
RLC/MAC Data Rate (FTP Download on 2 TSLs)
100
80
kbps
Data rate is heavily

depending on network
quality
Better quality
Better throughput
Less blocking
120
No Interference
C/I 25 dB
60
C/I 20 dB
C/I 15 dB
40
20
0
-65
-70
-75
-80
-85
-90
Signal level (dBm)

125
-95
-100
-105
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Network Element and Configuration Assessment
HLR
BSS
BTS
GPRS territory
PCU variant &

dimensioning
BTS HW
considerations
(TRX & BB-card)
PCU strategy in
mixed
configuration
BTS SW (EPCR)
QoS profile
TC
HLR/
AC/
EIR
TCSM
BSS SW and
features
MSC/VLR
GPRS settings
SGSN
Unit capacity
(PAPU etc.)
BSS Gb Flow
control
MS/Client
parameters
Gs
GPRS/EDGE
capability and
release
IP/MPLS/IPoATM backbone
Multislot support
GGSN
RF
BTS
BSC
Abis
Gb
2G
SGSN
Gn
Gi
Application
Applicatio
Servers
n Servers
(co located
RF interface
Coverage
C/I
Capacity
Traffic volume
Mobility
Gb interface
Abis interface
EDAP size /
dimensioning
# of E1/T1s
GPRS/EDGE
traffic
126
Bearer size
IP v.s. FR
Dimensioning
Server
load
settings (Linux/Win)

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
(E)GPRS Optimization - Introduction
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
(E)GPRS Network Optimization
Signaling capacity & resource allocation improvement

Data Rate
Connectivity Capacity (MS-SGSN)
Multiplexing and multislot usage maximization
Mobility improvement

127
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
(E)GPRS Optimization - Signaling Capacity &

Resource Allocation improvement
Signaling
PCH, AGCH, RACH and SDCCH (NMOII)
Resource Allocation
Cell (re)-selection
BTS selection
Scheduling

128
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
(E)GPRS Optimization - RF Signaling

Paging Measurements (NMO I)
Traffic Volume
cs_paging_msg_sent (c3058) (CS pagings from Gb)

ps_paging_msg_sent (c3057) (PS pagings from Gb)
Congestion (CS + PS)
max_paging_gb_buf (003050)
Paging success ratio on CS
PAC_PAG_REQ_FOR_CS_PAG (c72083) / (cs_paging_msg_sent) (c3000)
Success ratio of Paging on Gs interface (2G SGSN)

sum(DL_MESSAGES_DISCARDED_IN_GS(11000))
Sgsn_961a = ----------------------------------------------------------------------- * 100
sum(CS_PAGING_MSGS + DL_TOM_MSGS)
Solution for reducing PCH rejection and load
Usage of combined structure, modifying MFR and PER parameters

LA/RA re-planning
Cell splitting

129
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems

AGCH Measurements
Immediate Assignment
Traffic Volume (with Rejection)
imm_assgn_sent (c3001) - Imm Assign)
imm_assgn_rej (c3002) - Imm Assign Rejected
packet_immed_ass_msg (c72084) - P-Imm Assign
packet_immed_ass_rej_msg (c72087) - P-Imm Assign

Congestion
blck_21b =
packet_immed_ass_nack_msg
------------------------------------------------------------------------packet_immed_ass_nack_msg + packet_immed_ass_ack_msg
Solution for reducing AGCH rejection and load

Usage of combined structure, modifying AG and CALC parameters
Immediate Assignment messages are shared between PCH and AGCH
PBCCH implementation (in case of high (E)GPRS signaling traffic)

130
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems

RACH Measurements
Traffic Volume
PACKET_CH_REQ (c072082) (PSW)
CH_REQ_MSG_REC (c003004) (CSW)
Load
RACH_4 = 100 * avg(ave_rach_busy(C3014)/res_acc_denom3(c3015))
avg(ave_rach_slot(c3006)/res_acc_denom1(c3007))
Repetitions of PS channel requests (load and quality)

RACH_9 = UL_TBF_WITH_RETRY_BIT_SET (c072020) / PACKET_CH_REQ (c072082)
Solution for reducing RACH rejection and load

Usage of combined structure, modifying RET parameter
PBCCH implementation (in case of high (E)GPRS signaling traffic)
Reducing high UL interference (and DL interference if the repetition is too high)
131
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems

SDCCH Measurements (NMO II with LA Update)
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Project
Ends
Traffic Volume
SDCCH seizure attempts (c1000)
Average available SDCCH (ava_45a)
Congestion
Blocking on SDCCH, before FCS (blck_5)
Time congestion on SDCCH (cngt_2)
Solution for reducing SDCCH load

Increase of Periodic RA update timer (PRAU) / MS Reachable timer (MSRT)
Drawback: more PAPU capacity is needed and more paging will be generated, if the MS is out of service
More SDCCH TSL allocation and/or Dynamic SDCCH feature usage

Combined RAU (NMO-I with Gs for (E)GPRS)
(Resume feature decreases the amount of RAUs)
LA and border re-planning

132
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
(E)GPRS Optimization - Resource Allocation

Introduction
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Project
report
Project
Ends
RLC/MAC
Basic Allocation related Topics
PSW Activation
Territory settings
Channel pref.
Cell-(re)selection
C1, C2
C31/C32
NCCR
Provide enough capacity to PSW

traffic in general (find balance
between CSW and PSW)
Allocate the traffic to the most

appropriate resource
BTS Selection
MultiBCF and CBCCH
PCU algorithm
Separate GPRS and EGPRS

and share the resources
User
Channel Scheduling
Priority based QoS

133
Service and user prioritization

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
GPRS Territory
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Circuit Switched traffic has priority outside dedicated territory

GPRS dedicated time slots (% of total cell capacity) can be defined. Only
(E)GPRS can use, no CSW
Dedicated TSL is subset of Default TSL
Territories consists of consecutive timeslots
GPRS can be set to favour the BCCH Transceiver -> minimum interference
Extra GPRS capacity
Default GPRS capacity threshold
TRX 1
BCCH
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TRX 2
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Free time slots in Circuit

Switched territory
Territory upgrade in interval of
Territory Upgrade Guard Time

134
Default GPRS
Capacity (%)
Territory downgrade
forced by the Circuit
Switched traffic
Dedicated
GPRS
Capacity (%)
Circuit
Switched
Territory
Circuit /
Packet
Switched
Territory
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
(E)GPRS
Cell (re) -Optimization

selection
Cell (re) - Selection

135
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
BTS Selection and TSL Allocation
BTS selection and TSL allocation is
Segment
Initial BTS Selection
Reallocation of TBFs among the BTS
1. BTS Load reallocation
2. Uplink Rx level reallocation
3. Downlink Rx level
reallocation
4. Downlink RX level received
first time reallocation

136
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Resource Allocation - Priority based QoS
Solution
Verification
Assessments &
Analysis
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
TBF1 with SSS=6

TBF2 with SSS=1
127 12
7
Latest Service Time = Current Time + Scheduling Step Size
12
12
12
12
11
12
10
13
12
18
13
10 11 (time)
12
9
18
14
18
15
18 18
16
17
Latest service time
52 TDMA frames = 240 ms= 12 blocks

137
The
scheduling is
done based
on latest
service time,
one TBF at a
time is served
by the RTSL
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
(E)GPRS - Throughput optimization
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Connectivity Capacity (MS-SGSN)

TSL data rate improvement and multislot usage maximization
(BSS)
E2E data rate (applications)

138
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Connectivity Planning Maximized Capacity
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
The connectivity optimization for maximum capacity is based

on the proper set of CDEF and DAP size.
To provide enough capacity for territory upgrade the 75 %
utilization in the connectivity limits is recommended by NSN
PCU Connectivity capacity limits can be seen below
Outputs
Abis channles (radio TSLs)
EDAP pools
BTS (cell, segment)
TRXs
*PCU & PCU-S handle 128 radio TSLs only with S11.5
*PBCCH is not implemented

139
Max limit*
256
16
64
128
Utilization
75%
75%
75%
75%
Limit
192
12
48
96
unit
TSLs
pcs
pcs
pcs
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Connectivity in different PCUs
PCU variant
PCU
PCU-S
BSCE, BSC2,
BSCi, BSC2i
PCU-T
BSCE, BSC2,
BSCi, BSC2i
PCU2-U
BSCE, BSC2,
BSCi, BSC2i
PCU-B
BSC3i
PCU2-D
BSC3i

140
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
BSS11
BTS
64
64
TRX
Radio TSLs
Abis 16 kbps channels
Gb 64 kbps channels
BTS
128
256
256
31
64
128
128
256
31
64
TRX
Radio TSLs
Gb 64 kbps channels
BTS
TRX
Radio TSLs
Gb 64 kbps channels
BTS
TRX
Radio TSLs
Gb 64 kbps channels
BTS
TRX
Radio TSLs
Gb 64 kbps channels
BTS
TRX
Radio TSLs
Gb 64 kbps channels
128
256
256
31
64
128
256
256
31
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2 x 64
2 x 128
2 x 256
2 x 256
2 x 31
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
128
128
256
31
64
128
256
256
31
128
256
256
256
31
2 x 64
2 x 128
2 x 256
2 x 256
2 x 31
2 x 128
2 x 256
2 x 256
2 x 256
2 x 31
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
BSS11.5
ownwards
BSC Type
BSCE, BSC2,
BSCi, BSC2i
Solution
Verification
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Connectivity Planning Cells / PCU
Solution
Verification
Assessments &
Analysis
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Work orders
Solutions
Priorization
Analysis
Solutions
Project
report
Project
Ends
The following configuration types were

defined:
The following table shows the number

of EGPRS cell / PCU calculations for
the different configuration types.
EGPRS BSS Configuration
Portfolio (ETSI)
extra small
(XS)
Extra small
Small
Medium
Large
Extra large
Data monster
small
(S)
lowest cost
per EGPRS
cell: maximize low cost: high
EGPRS cells
EGPRS cells per
per PCU
PCU ratio
Use case
Parameters
CDEF
DAP
medium
(M)
(CDEF1 RTSL, DAP 3 TSL)

(CDEF 2 RTSL, DAP 4 TSL)
large
(L)
High data volume

Basic EGPRS site EGPRS site
extra large
(XL)
Extra high data

volume site
data monster
monster
Data
(DM)
(DM)
Data hot spot

site)
Data hot spot site
1
3
2
4
4
6
4
8
4
11
4
16
# of cells / PCU with utilization

cells per DAP
#DAPs per PCU
#EGPRS cells per PCU
PCU Abis ch utilization
average cells per DAP
#DAPs per PCU
cells per DAP
#DAPs per PCU
2
16
32
88%
2.5
15
37
85%
3
15
45
88%
2
11
22
86%
2.5
10
25
82%
3
10
30
86%
2
7
14
88%
2.5
6
15
80%
3
6
18
84%
2
5
10
78%
2.5
5
12
81%
3
5
15
86%
2
4
8
81%
2.5
4
10
84%
3
4
12
88%
2
3
6
84%
2.5
3
7
86%
3
3
9
89%
Performance figures (kbps) (n+n+n)

single user peak RLC/MAC (#RTSL in DL)
cell peak RLC/MAC (gross)
186
354
237
325
237
597
237
748
237
829

141
notes fo applying
area for low

EGPRS traffic,
no
Presentation
/ Author / Date
performance
commitments
areas for low+

EGPRS traffic,
support 4 RTSL
MS FTP max
throughput
237
373
areas for medium
EGPRS traffic,
supports 4 & 5
RTSL MS
FTP/HTTP max
throughput
Hot spot site

areas for high
EGPRS traffic
areas for extra

hot spot site for
For EGPRS
high EGPRS traffic EGPRS

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
(E)GPRS Optimization - KPIs
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
DL MCS selection limited by EDAP (dap_7a)

Similar formula for DL (dap_8c)
Target values:
Good: < 75 min/GByte
Bad: > 150 min/GByte
DL_TBFS_WITH_INADEQ_EDAP_RES (c076008)
c76008 includes lack of PCU resources (c76020
DL_MCS_LIMITED_BY_PCU ) as one reason.
If c76008 is updated but peak EDAP usage is less than 100%, reason
is that c76008 has been updated because of lacking PCU resources,

142
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
(E)GPRS Optimization - KPIs
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
DL MCS selection limited by PCU (dap_9)

Similar formula for UL ( dap_10)
Target values:
Good: < 15 min/GByte
Bad: > 30 min/GByte

143
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
(E)GPRS Optimization - Multiplexing
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Channel Allocation Algorithm tends to separate EDGE TBFs and GPRS

TBFs on different RTSL to avoid multiplexing, if only one PS Territory exists
in the cell or there is high load.
UL GPRS USF on DL EGPRS TBF
TSL sharing - GPRS/EGPRS TBFs multiplexing on a TSL
The algorithm checks the need for re-allocation every
TBF_LOAD_GUARD_THRSHLD, in order to separate sessions.
The max amount of TBFs per TSL can be limited:
Parameter Name
Abbreviation
Description
Maximum Number of DL TBF
MNDL
maximum number of TBFs that a radio time slot can

have in average, in a GPRS territory, in the dow nlink
direction.
1..9, default:9
Maximum Number of UL TBF
MNUL
maximum number of TBFs that a radio time slot can

have in average, in a GPRS territory, in the uplink
direction.
1..7, default:7

144
Range and Default
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Multiplexing Measurements (KPIs)
Amount of TBFs / TSL
Uplink TBFs pr timeslot tbf_37d
Downlink TBFs pr timeslot tbf_38d
GPRS TBF multiplexed with EGPRS TBF
8PSK coding scheme downgrade due to GPRS multiplexing rlc_61
DL EDGE TBFs in GPRS territory tbf_60
UL EDGE TBFs in GPRS territory tbf_59
Ratio of DL GPRS TBFs in EDGE territory tbf_58a
Ratio of UL GPRS TBFs in EDGE territory tbf_57a

145
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
(E)GPRS Optimization - Multislot usage

Territory Downgrade and Upgrade
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
The territory downgrade heavily depends on the size of dedicated and

default territory.
Territory downgrade due to CSW traffic rise
Territory downgrade due to less PSW traffic
Downgrade request below Default territory because of rising CSW (c1179)
Downgrade request back to the Default territory when there is no need for
additional channels anymore (c1181)
Territory upgrade request rejection beyond default territory
Upgrade request beyond Default territory for additional resources (c1174),

which can be rejected because of:
1.
2.
3.
No (E)GPRS capable resource left (No (E)GPRS enable TRX or the maximum (E)GPRS capacity reached)
PCU and EDAP capacity limitation (256 Abis TSL per PCU)
High CSW load
Default territory
1174
5
1179
1181
1180

146
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Free TSL Size (after CS Upgrade and Downgrade)
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
When a downgrade or upgrade procedure is requested

following parameters can reduce or increase the border
between CSW and PSW territories:
TSL number after CS downgrade

TRX number
free TSL for CS downgrade (%)

(CSD)
70
95
99
1
0
2
1
3
1
4
1
5
2
TSL number after CS upgrade

TRX number
free TSL for CS upgrade (sec)

(CSU)

147
1
4
7
10
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Multislot Usage Measurements (KPIs)
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Actual Territory
ava_44
Peak PS territory (c2063)
Recommendation: Ava_44 and c2063 can be compared with the CDEF
settings. If too big difference, then CDEF should perhaps be changed, or more
capacity should be added to the cell.
Multislot Blocking
UL / DL multislot allocation blocking hard (tbf_15a, tbf_16a)
DL multislot blocking soft (blck_33a)
Recommendation: Too much multislot blocking shows that the territory is perhaps not
enough.
And it is also interesting to see how many timeslots which are requested (helpful in
determining the size of the default territories)
Requested timeslots for GPRS TBFs c72039-c72149, c72040-c72150, c72041c72151, c72042-c72152
Requested timeslots for EDGE TBFs c72149, c72150, c72151, c72152
148
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
(E)GPRS Optimization - Mobility Optimization
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
The aim of mobility optimization is to reduce the cell outage time during cell
re-selection.
Cell outage can be reduced by
Providing enough signaling capacity for cell re-selection (the RACH, PCH,
AGCH and SDCCH channel are not limiting the signaling flow)
Rebalancing BCFs among PCUs properly (the important neighbors are
allocated to the same PCU)
Reallocating LA/RA borders properly
Enabling Network Assisted Cell Change (NACC) feature

149
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Outage Definition Used in Measurements
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Three delays can be

calculated from logs:
GERAN
MS
Cell outage:
In one-phase access: the time
between the last EGPRS Packet

Downlink Ack/Nack message and
the first Packet Uplink Ack/Nack.
In two-phase access: the time
between the last EGPRS Packet
Downlink Ack/Nack message and
the first Packet Uplink
Assignment.
Data outage:
Application outage:
the time between the last and the
first successfully received FTPpacket.
Outage
EGPRS Packet Downlink Ack/Nack

Routing Area Update Request
Data
Outage
Packet Uplink
Assignment
Routing Area Update Accept
Routing Area Update Complete
the time between the last and the

first EGPRS Packet Downlink
Ack/Nack message.

150
Last IP packets Application
EGPRS Packet Downlink Ack/Nack

First IP packets
Cell
Outage
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Network Assisted Cell Change (NACC)
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
NACC is in Rel 4 of 3GPP GERAN , mandatory for R4 mobiles. Nokias

S11.5 implementation is based on Rel4.
Both, autonomous and network controlled cell reselections are supported.
Support is for intra-BSC cell changes (Support of inter-BSC NACC
specification is available in Rel 5)
NACC support is for MSs in RR Packet Transfer Mode only
NACC shortens the cell reselection in two ways:
Sending neighbour cell system information on PACCH to MS in

packet transfer mode while it is camped on the serving cell
By supporting PACKET SI STATUS procedure in a target cell

151
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
CS Traffic vs. PS Traffic
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
CS and PS peak values at the

same time (BSC level data)
Bad for PS timeslot allocation
Lots of downgrading
Exercise
How to optimize PS performance on area level?

152
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Alarms

153

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Alarms - Introduction
Solution
Verification
Assessments &
Analysis
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Alarm analysis is the 1st thing to be done in worst cell

troubleshooting! No use optimizing parameters if you have a
HW problem!
Bad performance of a cell may be caused by faulty equipment.
Check that there are no performance-affecting alarms in the cell monitored and
also in neighbour cells!
Alarms are usually transferred to the NetAct database.
Monitoring can be done through MML Commands, Nokia NetAct Top Level User
Interface
Note! Constant monitoring is needed in order to avoid critical alarms in

any network element.

154
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Alarms Groups
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Alarm n u mb er in :
Notices
( NO T ICE )
Distu rb an ce
F ailu re
p rin tou ts
p rin tou ts
( DIS T UR)
( AL ARM S )
switching equipment 0799
10001799
O&M equipment
800 - 899
18001899
900 - 999
19001999
transmission
equipment
diagnosis report
number
base station/
transmission
equipment alarms
Diag n osis
rep orts
( DIAG N)
Base
station
alarms
Nu mb ers
T ran smission reserved f or
eq u ip men t
p ossib le
alarms
extern al
alarms
20002799
30003799
28002899
38003899
29002999
39003999
40004799
48004899
49004999
37003999
70007999
80008999
power equipment
50005499
external equipment
55005999

155
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Alarms Printout Fields
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Alarm Number
BCF number, BTS number, TRX number, Alarm Object, Unit, Date, Time, Alarm
Number
Urgency level
Note:
* Low Priority
** Med Priority
Printout type
*** High Priority
ALARM fault situation

CANCEL fault terminated
DISTUR disturbance
NOTICE notice
Event type
COMM communication failure
QUAL quality of service
PROCES processing failure
EQUIPM equipment failure
ENVIR environmental failure
156
The urgency level is

output in all alarm
printouts except notices
(NOTICE).
The urgency levels of

terminated alarms are
indicated by dots (.)
instead of asterisks (*).
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Alarms - Alarms in MML
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Alarms in BSC Level:

ZAHO: PRINT ALARMS CURRENTLY ON
ZAHP: PRINT ALARM HISTORY
Alarms in BTS Level:

ZEOL: LIST ALARMS CURRENTLY ON
ZEOH: LIST ALARM HISTORY
Verify if BCF, SEG, BTS,

TRX and RTSL are
LOCKED or UNLOCKED;
WO (working), BL- USR
(blocked by user) or
Restarting.
BCF, SEG or BTS configuration and status

ZEEI: OUTPUT RADIO NETWORK CONFIGURATION
TRX and RTSL configuration and status

ZERO: OUTPUT TRANSCEIVER PARAMETERS

157
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Alarms - Alarms in MML
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
HW Tests:
ZUBK: HANDLE ABIS LOOP TEST
(Parameters: BTS, TRX, RTSL, Fixed or Dynamic Abis connection and
Abis TSL and Sub-TSL, looping time)
ZUBS: START TRANSCEIVER TEST

(Parameters: BTS, TRX, RTSL, test mode, RTSL,test selection, diversity
path selection,test connection, RF test signal attenuation,BTS RX
level,STM antenna attenuation,BS TX power attenuation, loop duration)

158
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Alarms - Examples
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
2993: BTS AND TC UNSYNCHRONIZATION CLEAR CALLS ON

ABIS INTERFACE
Transcoder and transmission alarm. Abis test is needed.
7045: TRX/FU DATA TRANSFER ERROR BETWEEN FU AND CU16

Base Station alarm. Observed when TCH failure rate is very high. A possible
solution can be to change the TRX.
Example of a BTS alarm printout:

159
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Alarms - Top Level User interface
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
The Top-level User Interface contains graphical views of the network, in

which network elements are represented hierarchically with symbols
One of the main functions of the Top-level User Interface in network
monitoring is to show the alarm situation in all managed objects

160
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Implementation / Documentation

161

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Implementation / Documentation
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Project
report
Project
Ends
Optimization process is an iterative process, so there is no need to create

troublesome final report after every circle. Main items must be still written
down after every circle.
All the activities/ findings should be listed

What should be done and when
recommendation for the changes to be done" and "working orders".
All improvements should be shown

Implementation time should be shown
with improvements
Network Report
Tasks And
Results

162
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Solution Verification

163

on assessment
INPUTS
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution Verification
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
The purpose is to check was solution succeed

Is the trend positive or negative after aimplementations
Check that collected data is valid
EGPRS RLC Throughput kbit/s/TSL
BSC KRASNODAR
60
Parameter changes
were done 20.11
50
Throughput after
changes was improved
30
20
DL
10
UL
11
.
10
.1
1.
12
.1
1.
14
.1
1.
16
.1
1.
18
.1
1.
20
.1
1.
22
.1
1.
24
.1
1.
26
.1
1.
28
.1
1.
30
.1
1.
2.
12
.
4.
12
.
11
.
8.
11
.
4.
2.
31
.1
29
.1
27
.1
25
.1
23
.1
21
.1

164
6.
11
.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0
19
.1
kbit/s
40
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Monitoring

165

on assessment
INPUTS
Monitoring Introduction
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
The basic idea to monitor network is to see how the

optimization project is ongoing and how the network is
performing
KPI monitoring
Testing & post processing
Alarm monitoring
Schedule monitoring
Investments checking
Resource monitoring

166
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Monitoring Reporting Suite
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Before Reporting Suite

can be started,
connection to NetAct
must be done
Reporting Suite can be
used for KPI monitoring

167
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions

on assessment
INPUTS
Monitoring Reporting Suite
Project
Starts
Performance
Problems
Solution
Verification
Implementations
Are Criterias
Fulfilled
Monitoring /
Data collection
Project
report
Project
Ends
Different KPI group can

be seen here
Example of final KPI report

168
Assessments &
Analysis
Work orders
Analysis
Solutions
Priorization
Solutions
Tools to be used

169
Tools to be used
Example of tools to be used in Solution finding

Statistics
(Reporting Suite,
Metrica etc.)
Traffic and Capacity optimization
HO Optimization

170
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Planning tools
(NetAct Planner,
Asset etc)
x
x
x
x
x
Configuration tools
(Plan Editor, RAC tools,
etc)
Optimizer
Drive test tools (Nemo

Outdoor. TEMS, Actix
etc)
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x

RANOP Part4 Solution Findings

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

RANOP Part4 Solution Findings

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

RANOP Radio Network Optimization Principles

Solution Findings (optimization)

Soc Classification level

Presentation / Author / Date

know the basic interfaces / Network elements and how to

Soc Classification level

Presentation / Author / Date

KPIs and Measurements

Solution findings (optimization) and verification

Presentation / Author / Date

Solution finding table of contents

Soc Classification level

Presentation / Author / Date

More detailed inputs

Solution Finding - Introduction

More detailed inputs

Soc Classification level

Presentation / Author / Date

Solution Finding Phase

Soc Classification level

Presentation / Author / Date

More detailed inputs

Performance Optimization - Introduction

Typical performance problems which have to

Soc Classification level

Presentation / Author / Date

More detailed inputs

Performance optimization - basic CS/PS flows

CS Basic Call Flow

Soc Classification level

Presentation / Author / Date

More detailed inputs

Performance optimization will include here:

RLC/MAC TSL data rate

E2E Data Rate

More detailed inputs

Performance optimization Accessibility

If problems with RACH, AGCH, PCH capacity

Presentation / Author / Date

More detailed inputs

Performance optimization Retainability

Most Common TCH drop reasons can be seen here

In RANOP we are concentrating on radio reasons

Soc Classification level

Presentation / Author / Date

More detailed inputs

Performance optimization Retainability

TCH DROP Distribution

Presentation / Author / Date

More detailed inputs

Performance optimization Quality

NOTE! Same level quality

for all Rx Levels

Soc Classification level

Presentation / Author / Date

Performance optimization RX Quality - Level CS

HW Problem, TRX/combiner etc is broken

HW problem, Q4 amount of samples is strange

HW Problem, TRX/combiner etc is broken

Lots of Q4 samples. Distribution is not OK HW problem. Site reset will help

Lots of bad signal level samples. TRX/Combiner is broken. If no HW problem

Lots of Q6 and Q7 samples. Distribution is not OK, no Q5 samples HW

Soc Classification level

Presentation / Author / Date