0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
34 visualizzazioni15 pagine
A summary restates the author's main point, purpose, intent and supporting details in your own words. It's not enough to merely copy out parts of the original. State the main point first. Emphasize the main stages of though. State the article's conclusion. Summarizing such texts requires adequate understanding of the experimental method and discussions.
A summary restates the author's main point, purpose, intent and supporting details in your own words. It's not enough to merely copy out parts of the original. State the main point first. Emphasize the main stages of though. State the article's conclusion. Summarizing such texts requires adequate understanding of the experimental method and discussions.
A summary restates the author's main point, purpose, intent and supporting details in your own words. It's not enough to merely copy out parts of the original. State the main point first. Emphasize the main stages of though. State the article's conclusion. Summarizing such texts requires adequate understanding of the experimental method and discussions.
The goal of writing a summary of an article, a single chapter or a whole book is to offer as accurately as possible the full sense of the original, but in a more condensed form. A summary restates the author's main point, purpose, intent and supporting details in your own words. A summary or prcis is a shorter version of a longer piece of writing. The summary captures all the most important parts of the original, but expresses them in a [much] shorter space Summarizing exercises are usually set to test your understanding of the original, and your ability to re-state its main purpose Summarizing is also a useful skill when gathering information or doing research. The summary should be expressed as far as possible in your own words. Its not enough to merely copy out parts of the original. State the main point first. Emphasize the main stages of though. State the articles conclusion. Summarize rather than give a table of contents Summarizing such texts requires adequate understanding of the experimental method and discussions. In such articles usually the report follows the order: Purpose of the experiment, What method was used, What results were found, What the author concludes by looking at the results of the study.
Method: Subjects: 75 young male regular tea drinkers Experimental design: Ss divided into 2 groups monitored for 2 weeks Experimental group: given caffeinated tea mixture Control group: placebo drink Task: both groups given challenging tasks: Subjected to one of 3 stressful situations and asked to prepare a verbal response Results: Increased blood pressure, heart rate and subjective stress ratings in both groups 50 mins after the task, cortisol levels dropped by an ave of 47% in tea-drinking group 27% in the fake tea group Blood platelet activation was lower in tea drinkers Tea drinkers: greater degree of relaxation in recovery period Conclusion and discussion: Tea drinkers recover from stress more quickly than those who drink a fake tea substitute Unclear if ingredients in tea responsible Tea drinking not decrease stress levels but brings stress hormone levels back to normal more quickly Important bec. slow recovery after acute stress lead to chronic illnesses e.g. heart disease
Summarizing argumentative or theoretical texts follow the authors main line of reasoning spot his arguments identify the counterarguments he puts forward to refute another argument differentiate between main ideas, and evidence provided to support or refute arguments. decide what is essential information and what is detail. Comprehensive: You have included in your summary all of the authors major ideas, assertions and findings Accurate: in your choice of words and paraphrasing you did not misrepresent the authors ideas Neutral: you tried to be objective and fair and did not include your own evaluation or comments Independent: a person who has not read the source text can understand what you have written
The purpose of a critical analysis essay is to accurately summarize and critique the argument of another article or composition. In summarizing an article, you strive to present the author's ideas in your own words. In critiquing the article, you try to evaluate the author's ideas by determining their validity Write an introduction. In one sentence, paraphrase the thesis of the article or essay you are responding to, including the author's name and title of the article. Then write another sentence or two that states the points you intend to make concerning the article's ideas. This type of introduction will tell the reader what you plan to argue and how the paper will progress. Write a summary of the main ideas presented in the article or essay you are responding to, consolidating the author's points, leaving out small details, and avoiding any repetition in the original source. Remember also to sequence the author's main ideas in a logical order, to use transitions to connect their ideas, and to quote when necessary. Write a critique of the author's points. When you critique a point, first restate it very briefly, then state whether you agree or disagree. Finally, analyze the author's evidence and reasoning to indicate why you agree or disagree with the point. Each of your points should be responding in some way to the points in the essay you are critiquing. You may demonstrate logical fallacies in the author's argument, show inconsistencies in the author's methods, or make practical observations about the author's conclusions Add a conclusion, summing up your overall reaction to the validity of the source, explaining its strengths and weaknesses, and evaluating how well it achieves its purpose. The conclusion should be no more two or three paragraphs.
Tips in summarizing an essay. Ask yourself, "what is the essay trying to tell me?" The topic of your essay may be about secondhand smoking, global warming or just about any other. You may have to carefully identify the topic of the essay first before you can be able to further elaborate on your summary. Identify the thesis of the essay. The thesis of the essay is the main argument of the article stating something about the topic. For example, if the topic of the essay is "secondhand smoking," the thesis states something about secondhand smoking, something like "secondhand smoking is worse than firsthand smoking" or "the government should look into secondhand smokers as a main concern for legislating health laws related to smoking in public." After identifying the thesis of your essay, you have to look for the main arguments supporting the thesis or main claim of the essay. If the thesis of the essay is "secondhand smoking is worse than firsthand smoking", identify the main arguments in support of and/or against the thesis. You can provide in your essay summary a few examples mentioned in the essay pertaining to the main arguments. However, try to limit the number of your examples to at least one or two as maximum since you are simply summarizing the article. Close your summary with a brief sentence about the essay's conclusion. DO NOT write as to whether the essay is well written or otherwise as it is not required for a summary. It is required, however, if you are doing a review of the essay instead of a summary. DO provide the author's name and the title of the essay at the beginning of your summary. Be direct to the point. Avoid writing down ideas and words that are not relevant to the essay. Keep words relatively simple. Avoid exaggerations. In summarizing an essay, keep in mind that less is more. Tips on how to summarize a research paper. A research paper may have an abstract which basically tells the reader about what to expect from the article. If the research paper contains an abstract, it can serve as your most basic yet most concise summary of the entire research paper. If there is no abstract, go the introduction of the research paper. Identify the purpose and the background of the research. These things will serve as your introduction for your summary. The introductory part of the research paper typically includes the thesis. Go to the literature review and list down the main arguments of the reviewed literature in the research paper, whether they be in support of or against the article you are summarizing. Identify the methodology used and the reason why the author chose that methodology. This usually refers to the methods, calculations or experiments applied to the variables in the research. Write down the data analysis done by the author. This typically includes the method used in the research in getting the needed data from the methodology. Briefly list down the results of the data analysis. Results may include the outcome of the experiment, the end-products or the effects observed at the end of the data analysis. Provide a short summary of the discussion of the results in the research paper. It basically includes the possible suggestions on how to improve the research or on how to conduct future research based on the given research. Reiterate the conclusion made by the author. (Name) (NIM) (Class) Article Review Form Article title: _______________________________________________ Writer: __________________________________________________ Journal/Newspaper: ________________________________________ Date published: ______________ Number of words: ________________ List No.: ______________
What is the main issue of the article? (please refer to Summarizing argumentative or theoretical texts) What is the method used in the article and what is the result? (please refer to Summarizing an experimental report) How did the writer put him or herself in the article? Would you support or contradict the writer? Why? Any personal experience or evidence or thought related to the topic of the article?
Monkey Brain Research: The Case Against: Student Summary Dr Ray Greek, medical director of Europeans For Medical Advancement, in his article titled Monkey Brain Research: The Case Against asserts that there is no need for monkey brain research. Dr Greek states that brain research on monkeys cannot predict side effects on human beings. Many drugs and vaccines that had no side effects on primates may cause serious damage in humans, e.g. an Alzheimers vaccine that was seen completely harmless on primates caused brain inflammation in humans. Another reason why we should not conduct experiments on primates is that human and primate brains are completely different in size, biochemical pathways and genetic expression. Finally, knowledge about human diseases came from autopsies, population research and studies on human tissues. Greek concludes that funding had better be spent on research involving DNA arrays, bioinformatics, human stem cells and not on animal research. Paper: A4, 70gr Font: Times new roman 12 Spacing: 5 pt Line spacing: exactly 15 Lay out: 3 cm for all sides Maximum 800 words (one page) Due time: I. Oct 28 (2 articles) II. Nov 11 (3 articles) III. Nov 25 (3 articles) IV. Dec 9 (2 articles)