11ME001 ARIVAZHAGAN .S Guided by Dr. ASHOK VARDHANAN
PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION Particle Swarm Optimization was first introduced by Dr. Russell C. Eberhart and Dr.James Kennedy in 1995. It uses a number of agents (particles) that constitute a swarm moving around in the search space looking for the best solution. Each particle is treated as a point in a N-dimensional space which adjusts its flying according to its own flying experience as well as the flying experience of other particles.
PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION Each particle keeps track of its coordinates in the solution space which are associated with the best solution (fitness) that has achieved so far by that particle. This value is called personal best , pbest. Another best value that is tracked by the PSO is the best value obtained so far by any particle in the neighborhood of that particle. This value is called gbest. The basic concept of PSO lies in accelerating each particle toward its pbest and the gbest locations
INTRODUCTION Surface roughness is one of the most important parameters to determine the quality of a product. Surface roughness consists of the fine irregularities of the surface texture, including feed marks generated by the machining process. Several factors will influence the final surface roughness in a CNC reaming operation such as controllable factors (spindle speed, feed rate and depth of cut) and uncontrollable factors (tool geometry and material properties of both tool and work piece). MACHINING PARAMETERS 1. Depth of Cut 2. Cutting Speed 3. Feed Rate 4. Number of flutes 5. Helix angel 6. Number of passes 7. Rake angel
PROPERTIES Work piece properties: 1. Hardness 2. thickness 3. Diameter Cutting Tool properties: 1. Tool Material 2. Tool Shape 3. Run out Errors OUTPUT PARAMETERS 1.Surface roughness (Other output parameters) 2. Material removal rate 3. Tool life 4. Productivity 5. Quality 6.Machining time 7. Machining cost EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE 1. Planning for the experiment 2. Collection of data by conducting experiments as per plan 3. Establishment of prediction model for the selected output measure 4. Optimization of the predictive model for better results
LITERATURE REVIEW Effects of machining parameters when reaming aluminium silicon (SAE-322) alloy
This paper evaluate dimension stability and surface roughness of reamed holes K10 cemented carbide welded blade reamers on aluminium-silicon alloy Parameters such as depth of cut, cutting speed, feed rate, helix angle , number number of blades, margin size are individually varied. RESULT 1. Reaming of aluminium-silicon alloy at lower depth of cut gave best result in accuracy, surface finish, roundness, and cylindricity.
2. Best dimensional stability, surface finish can be achieved at lower cutting speed.
3. Accuracy of hole diameter can be achieved by increasing feed rate. 4. Reamers with a 0 helix angle produced holes with poor surface finish and better accuracy.
5. Reamers with more blades produced better hole diameter accuracy, surface finish and roundness with poor cylindricity.
6. Machining with reamers with a small margin gave excellent results in hole diameter accuracy, surface roughness, cylindricity. Application of GA to optimize cutting conditions for minimizing surface roughness in end milling machining process To observe the optimal effect of the radial rake angle of the tool, combined with speed and feed rate which influence surface roughness
End milling of titanium alloy is taken GA is used to find the optimal solution of the cutting conditions for giving minimum value of surface roughness. 24 experimental trials were executed
Three different types of cutting tools 1. Uncoated 2. TiA1N coated 3. SNTR coated By varying feed, cutting speed and rake angle Ra value is noted for the given varying parameters Three equations are formed then by using GA these equations are solved. Then optimal value is determined. (Azlan Mohd Zain) Ra=0.138 GA compare the result with (Mohruni ,2008) Ra=0.277 RSM tech Optimization of cutting conditions in end milling process with the approach of particle swarm optimization With the help of regression modeling equation developed by Zain, Haron and Shariff (2010) is used in this paper. Depth of cut is added as an another input parameter Then it is solved by PSO technique and find Ra=3.2 microns Reaming process in AA piston Work piece material EN1A Tool Sandvik Number of flutes 6 Helix angle - 0 Depth of cut =0.315mm Feed= 0.15mm/rev Cutting speed=32m/min