0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
6 visualizzazioni20 pagine
Using the X-bar model draw the tree diagram of the following sentence: where did Maria meet Susan after the concert? II. Describe the structural relations between the following sets of nodes in the tree diagram in the previous exercise. For each pair, try to find as many structural relations as possible.
Using the X-bar model draw the tree diagram of the following sentence: where did Maria meet Susan after the concert? II. Describe the structural relations between the following sets of nodes in the tree diagram in the previous exercise. For each pair, try to find as many structural relations as possible.
Using the X-bar model draw the tree diagram of the following sentence: where did Maria meet Susan after the concert? II. Describe the structural relations between the following sets of nodes in the tree diagram in the previous exercise. For each pair, try to find as many structural relations as possible.
I.Using the X-bar model draw the tree diagram of the following sentence: Where did Maria meet Susan after the concert?
II. Describe the structural relations between the following sets of nodes in the tree diagram in the previous exercise. For each pair, try to find as many structural relations as possible. (a) V and NP Susan (b) V and PP after the concert (c) V and NP the concert (d) P and NP the concert (e) I and NP Maria (f) NP Susan and PP after the concert
Temporal Location Patient meet V NP Maria VP I IP D-structure CP V V V where AdvP P NP the concert P after Agent I did Susan NP PP [+Past tense +Abstract agr. +EPP] C C [+interr] Temporal Location Patient meet V NP Maria VP I IP C C CP V V V P NP the concert P after Agent I did Susan NP PP [+Past tense +Abstract agr. +EPP] where AdvP k
t k
[+interr] Location Patient meet V VP I IP C C CP V V V P NP the concert P after Agent I did Susan NP PP where AdvP k
t k
NP i
Maria t i
Temporal [+interr] [+Past tense +Abstract agr. +EPP] Location Patient meet V VP I IP S-structure C C CP V V V P NP the concert P after Agent I Susan NP PP
did j
t j
NP i
Maria t i
where AdvP k
t k Temporal [+interr] [+Past tense +Abstract agr. +EPP] Acc. Patient meet V VP I IP Structural relations C C CP V V V P NP the concert P after I Susan NP PP
did j
t j
NP i
Maria t i
where AdvP k
t k
V and NP Susan no dominance V precedes NP Susan V c-commands NP NP c-commands V mutual c-command V m-commands NP NP m-commands V mutual m-command V governs NP Susan [+interr] [+Past tense +Abstract agr. +EPP] meet V VP I IP Structural relations C C CP V V V P NP the concert P after I Susan NP PP
did j
t j
NP i
Maria t i
where AdvP k
t k
V and PP after the concert no dominance V precedes PP V does not c-command PP PP c-commands V V m-commands PP PP m-commands V mutual m-command V governs PP PP [+interr] [+Past tense +Abstract agr. +EPP] meet V VP I IP Structural relations C C CP V V V P NP the concert P after I Susan NP PP
did j
t j
NP i
Maria t i
where AdvP k
t k
V and NP the concert no dominance V precedes NP the concert V does not c-command NP NP does not c-command V V m-commands NP NP does not m-command V V does not govern NP the concert [+interr] [+Past tense +Abstract agr. +EPP] Acc. meet V VP I IP Structural relations C C CP V V V P NP the concert P after I Susan NP PP
did j
t j
NP i
Maria t i
where AdvP k
t k
P and NP the concert no dominance P precedes NP the concert P c-commands NP NP c-commands P mutual c-command P m-commands NP NP m-commands P mutual m-command P governs NP the concert Temporal [+interr] [+Past tense +Abstract agr. +EPP] Nom. meet V VP I IP Structural relations C C CP V V V P NP the concert P after I Susan NP PP
did j
t j
NP i
Maria t i
where AdvP k
t k
I and NP Maria no dominance NP Maria precedes I I does not c-command NP NP c-commands I I m-commands NP NP m-commands I mutual m-command I governs NP Maria [+interr] [+Past tense +Abstract agr. +EPP] NP meet V VP I IP Structural relations C C CP V V V P NP the concert P after I Susan PP
did j
t j
NP i
Maria t i
where AdvP k
t k
NP Susan and PP after the concert no dominance NP precedes PP NP does not c-command PP PP c-commands NP NP m-commands PP PP m-commands NP mutual m-command no government PP [+interr] [+Past tense +Abstract agr. +EPP] I.Using the X-bar model draw the tree diagram of the following sentence: George expects Peter to sell his bicycle by the end of the month.
II. Describe the structural relations between the following sets of nodes in the tree diagram in the previous exercise. For each pair, try to find as many structural relations as possible. (a) V expect and NP Peter (b) I -s and NP George (c) N end and PP of the month (d) V sell and NP the end of the month (e) V sell and NP his bicycle (f) NP his bicycle and PP by the end of the month
Further practice Consider the example below. How do the underlined NPs acquire case? NP case (Nom, Acc, Gen) structural inherent under government assigned by ... (finite I, transV, P) expression of theta-role... ECM? If so, explain why. NP Ann-- structural Nominative assigned by finite I -s under gov. NP John-- structural Accusative assigned by transitive V want under gov. ECM: NP John is the specifier of the non-finite (infinitival) IP. But the non-finite I is a weak governor and fails to assign structural Nom. to its subject. Also, the maximal projection of the weak governor, the non-finite IP, is not barrier to outside government. Therefore V want governs and assigns str. Acc to the subject of the infinitival clause NP John. 1. Ann wants John to drive her friends car. Consider the example below. How do the NPs acquire case? NP case (Nom, Acc, Gen) structural inherent under government assigned by ... (finite I, V, P) expression of theta-role... ECM? If so, explain why. 1. Ann wants John to drive her friends car. NP her friends car-- structural Acc. assigned by transitive V drive under government. NP her friends-- inherent Gen. expression of the theta-role Possessor. 2.Marys grandmother did send Julian an invitation to her party. NP Marys grandmother-- structural Nom. assigned by finite I did under gov. NP Marys-- inherent Gen. expression of the theta-role Possessor. NP Julian-- structural Acc. assigned by ditransitive V send under gov. NP an invitation to her party-- inherent Acc. expression of the theta-role Theme. NP her party-- structural Acc. assigned by P to under government. Consider the example below. How do the NPs acquire case? 3. The presentation of the mayors proposal impressed the people in the audience. NP the presentation of the mayors proposal-- structural Nom. assigned by finite I -ed under gov. NP the mayors proposal-- inherent Acc. expression of the theta-role Theme. NP the mayors-- inherent Gen. expression of the theta-role Possessor. NP the people in the audience-- structural Acc. assigned by transitive V impress under gov. NP the audience-- structural Acc. assigned by P in under gov. Consider the example below. How do the NPs acquire case? 4. The teacher was eager for her students to read the Deans speech. Consider the example below. How do the NPs acquire case? NP the teacher-- structural Nom. assigned by finite I was under gov. NP her students-- structural Acc. assigned by prepositional complementizer for under gov. ECM: NP her students is the specifier of the non-finite (infinitival) IP. But the non-finite I is a weak governor and fails to assign structural Nom. to its subject. Also, the maximal projection of the weak governor, the non-finite IP, is not barrier to outside government. The closest outside governor is A eager, but adjectives are not case-assigners in English. Therefore, preposition for is inserted in the available lower CP system under the complementizer node to govern and assign str. Acc to the subject of the infinitival clause NP the students. NP the Deans speech-- structural Acc. assigned by transitive V read under gov. NP the Deans-- inherent Gen. expression of the theta-role Possessor. Consider the example below. How do the NP acquire case? 5. For John to have behaved so is unbelievable. NP John-- structural Acc. assigned by prepositional complementizer for under gov. ECM: NP John is the specifier of the non-finite (infinitival) IP. But the non-finite I is a weak governor and fails to assign structural Nom. to its subject. Also, the maximal projection of the weak governor, the non-finite IP, is not barrier to outside government. Preposition for is inserted in the available lower CP system under the complementizer node to govern and assign str. Acc to the subject of the infinitival clause NP John. Consider the examples below. How do the NPs acquire case? 6. Maria is fond of her husbands family.
7. George expects Peter to sell his bicycle by the end of the month.
8. For an ex-president to support his wife in the election would be surprising. Further practice