Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
0.400%
0.350%
0.300%
0.250%
0.200%
1985-86 1987-88 1989-90 1991-92 1993-94 1995-96 1997-98 1999-00 2001-02 2003-04 2005-06
Sponsored projects
Federal
Business
Foundations
Hospitals
National labs
Auxiliary enterprises
Three potential budget scenarios
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
2001-2 2002-3 2003-4 2004-5 2005-6 2006-7 2007-8 2008-9 2009-10 2010-11
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
2001-2 2002-3 2003-4 2004-5 2005-6 2006-7 2007-8 2008-9 2009-10 2010-11
5.1%
3.9% 6.4% 4.3%
4.6%
4.4%
8.7%
11.1%
45.7%
16.7% 60.9%
28.1%
State Funds Fees & NRT ICR Endowment Private Other State Funds Fees & NRT ICR Endowment Private Other
“Futures Report” Findings
1. The Compact will not allow UC’s state funding to
recover to “2001 Pathway,” but locks in decline
2. The gap between returning to the 2001 Pathway and
the 07-08 budget request is $1.1 billion
3. A return to traditional UC quality (1990 Pathway)
would require over $2 billion in additional funding
Private fundraising?
Need to raise $25 billion in three years, on top of current $7
billion endowment, with no decrease in state funding
Fee increases?
If state funding maintained but not increased, need to raise
fees to $15,000-18,000 per year by 2010
Answer: Only huge fee increases could make up for lagging state
funding
UC at the Crossroads 2007
1. Extended Compact: fees up ~8% per year, no
recovery to 2001 Pathway
2. 2001 Pathway: attainable, but at current level
of state funding this requires raising fees to
$15-18,000 in three years and large
continuing increases thereafter
3. 1990 Pathway: would restore full-quality core
operations, but remains way over the horizon
Senate Conclusions 2007
1. UC’s quality depends on getting back to 2001
Pathway