Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Trade
Trade is always political Robert Kuttner Friedman transformation of the production process associated with globalization Use of sophisticated technology and communication systems Mass production of industrial goods Shift of the production process from assembly lines to the use of computers Fragmentation of production process which led to specialization and outsourcing
International Trade
a process that occurs when goods and services national boundaries in exchange for money or the goods and services of another nation Binds countries together thus generating economic, political and social interdependence but it can also create tension and conflict among different states Growth of international Trade
Reflection of increased demand for goods and services that do not exist or cannot be produced locally Reflects the growing globalization of production
Economic Liberals
the rational thing for states to do is to agree on a common set rules and regulations that will maximize the gains from trade Law of Comparative Advantage
Opportunity cost Free trade increases efficiency
Mercantilists
Trade is an instrument to increase a nations wealth and power Challenges the assumption that comparative advantage benefits all parties engaged in trade States can create comparative advantages in the production of goods and services by adopting strategic trade policies In democratic nations it is the states duty to protect society and businesses from the negative effects of trade NO guarantee that even when states advocate free trade they will adopt any form protectionism for their goods and services Rational thing for states to do is to be prepared to act in their own interest by protecting themselves
Structuralists
Trade helps imperialist industrialized nations subjugate the of people in developing regions of the world Patterns of international trade are determined by an international division of labor between core, semi-peripheral, and peripheral states Integration global markets and free trade policies are extensions of the economic motives imperialist powers during the 19th and 20th centuries
Post-WWII
Trade largely reflected the interests of the dominant states, especially Great Britain. Despite the economic liberal ideas prevailed, Protectionism was obligatory. Trade Rules were enforced
Eg. In 1860s, US forcing Japan to open its door to US trade. In 1934, USA supported and officially supported free trade policy, until then routinely protecting most of its traded items.
In 1940s, Breton Woods conference in New Hampshire established the capitalist worlds political economy. Protectionist trade policies had been on the rise as the major powers raced to stimulate industrial growth. International Trade Organizations establishment was promoted by the US. (To oversee new liberal trade rules that would gradually reduce tariffs, subsidies, and other protectionist measures, offsetting domestic protectionist and mercantilist tendencies.)
Keep in mind, GATT was not a set of rules that could be enforced by the organization but depended on the members to fulfil multilateral trade obligations with one another.
1960s & 1970s, pace at which the Western industrialized economies had grown after war began to slow appreciably 1973, OPEC oil crisis began and soon resulted in economic recession in many of the Western industrialized nations. Throughout this period, International trade continue to grow but not at the rate at which it had earlier. Many nations reduced their tariff barriers and devised new and more sophisticated ways of protecting their exports and otherwise limiting imports.
1973-1979, Tokyo round of the GATT got underway, the level of tariffs on industrial products had decreased to an average of 9%. It tries to deal with the nontariff barriers (NTBs) that many believed that shifting world trade. 1980s, trade accounted for increasingly higher percentages of GDP in the industrialized countries. Trade policy continued to be a serious source of tension and disagreement among the industrialized nations, reflecting their increasing dependence on trade to help generate and maintain economic growth.
JAPAN (1970) Benefited from the liberal international trade system while erecting domestic trade and other protectionist policies Its exported-led growth trade strategy began to bear fruit. Its Ministry of International Trade and Industry helped pick corporate winners that it and other government officials felt would prosper in the international economy from assistance.
Strategic trade policies became synonymous with the state efforts to stimulate exports or block foreign access to domestic markets and included the use of threats, promises, and other bargaining techniques in order to alter the trading regime in ways that improve the market position and increase the profits of national corporations.
Free Trade was slowly replaced as the central principle by the notion of Fair Trade or Level playing Field, where as sought to enact policies to counteract as much but not more than those of their trading partners. Under conditions of increasing protectionism but also in an effort to benefit more from trade, it was US during Reagan administration that first sought to reassert the liberal vision of free trade. Thus was born Uruguay round of the GATT.
Doha lite- a water down compromise that do not require states to give up too much out of fear that not reaching an agreement will undermine the WTO as an institution. With the US as a national hegemon who failed to give compromise in trade barriers, expert now have doubts in the capabilities of the WTO in its pursuance of its economic liberal objectives
For economic liberals: trade also served as an ideological justification for the globalization campaign
Economic liberals continue to support the objectives of the Doha trade round, especially trade policies that include and ensure the success of developing countries
Structuralist and Mercantilist reactions to economic liberal trade NGOs and Economic Liberals criticize WTO
Race to the bottom
TNC move out of the country and search a country with cheap labor and few regulations.
After the first Persian Gulf War- use of sanctions has lost popularity as a foreign policy tool There is more to the use of sanctions than simply using trade to punish or reward a state. Trade remains a tool many states use to help discipline or send a distinct message to another state.