Sei sulla pagina 1di 50

Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

Session VII : Busbar Protection


9th Training on Power System Element Protection, & 17th March, 2007 at L&T Manappakam, Chennai.

Dr. G. Pradeep Kumar

Contents
Introduction Frame leakage protection High impedance bus differential Low impedance bus differential Busbar configurations Breaker failure protection
2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories 17th March 2007 2

Introduction
2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories 17th March 2007 3

Busbar Protection
Busbar faults are very rare. Busbar protection not provided always Without busbar protection
No dislocation of system due to accidental operation of busbar protection. Slow fault clearance.

Busbar faults are cleared by remote time delayed protection on circuits feeding the faults:
Time delayed over current or Time delayed distance protection
17th March 2007 4

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

Busbar Faults Are Usually Permanent


CAUSES :
Insulation failures Circuit breaker failures Falling debris Isolators operated outside their ratings Safety earths left connected Current transformer failures

THEREFORE :
Circuit breakers should be tripped and locked out by busbar protection
2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories 17th March 2007 5

Busbar Protection
BUSBAR ZONE F1 F2

WITH BUSBAR PROTECTION


Fast clearance by breakers at the busbars
Where busbars are sectionalised, protection can limit the amount of system disruption for a busbar fault
2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories 17th March 2007 6

Busbar Protection
RELIABILITY
Failure could cause widespread damage to the substation

STABILITY
False tripping can cause widespread interruption of supplies

to customers

DISCRIMINATION
Should trip the minimum number of breakers to clear the

fault

SPEED
To limit damage and possible power system instability

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 7

Methods of Providing Busbar Protection


Frame to Earth (Leakage) Protection Directional Comparison Protection

Differential Protection :

High Impedance
Low Impedance

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 8

Frame Leakage Protection


2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories 17th March 2007 9

Frame Earth Protection Scheme


Can only detect an earth fault

Involves measuring fault current from switchgear frame


to earth

Switchgear insulated by standing on concrete plinth Only one earthing point allowed on switchgear C.T. mounted on single earth conductor used to energise

instantaneous relay
All cable glands must be insulated
17th March 2007 10

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

Current Distribution for External Fault


Outgoing feeder IF = I1 + I2 Switchgear frame Frame-leakage current transformer Switchgear frame bonding bar

Generator

Earth bar

System earthing resistor

I1 + I2
I1 Frame insulation resistance to earth (> 10) I1 I2

Earthing electrode resistance (< 1)

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 11

Frame Leakage Busbar Protection


Simple, economical. Suitable for phase segregated indoor metal-clad

switchgear. Only E/F protection required.


Setting of instantaneous E/F relay (64)
= < 0.3 IF(min)

Disadvantages
Insulation of switchgear frame and between sections. Insulation of cable glands to prevent spurious currents during through faults.

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 12

Frame-Leakage Scheme with Single Insulation Barrier


Insulation Barrier Zone 1 Zone 2

0.2-1 sec.

64 Z1

64 Z2

B1

B2

Trip A

Trip B

Trip C

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 13

Frame Leakage Protection


Check Feature
To differentiate between a genuine busbar fault and a fault in the secondary winding of a c.t. The check feature provides a second line of defence.

The check relays pick up for both internal and external


faults.

Both check and discriminating relays must operate before tripping can occur.

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 14

Frame Leakage Protection


Check Feature
The various methods of obtaining the check feature are,
Neutral check provided by a relay energised from a single c.t. in the power system neutral. Residual check provided by a relay energized from a residually connected c.t. on the busbar incomers. Residual voltage check provided by a voltage relay energized from a broken delta v.t. supply.

Check relays are normally self-reset in order to avoid having to reset the relay after each external fault.

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 15

Single Zone Frame - Earth Protection with Neutral Check


Switchgear frame

Frame-earth fault relay Neutral check relay 64


64 CH

Trip all breakers circuit

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 16

High Impedance Bus Differential


2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories 17th March 2007 17

Circulating Current Differential Scheme

A B C N
87A 87A 87A

Differential relay
2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories 17th March 2007 18

High Impedance Protection


This is a versatile and reliable protection

system applied to many different busbar


configurations. Simple system to apply and extend. High sensitivity for phase and earth faults. Extremely stable for external faults.

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 19

High Impedance Protection


CT requirements:
Equal ratios
Class X

Requires stabilising resistors, RST May require non-linear resistors (Metrosils) If CT requirements are met, scheme performance may be predicted by calculation without heavy current conjunctive tests
2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories 17th March 2007 20

High Impedance Busbar Protection

RST METROSIL 87

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 21

Effective Setting
Since in each zone of protection there are several CTs in parallel with the relay and each other, the combined CT magnetising currents will increase the primary operating current (P.O.C). P.O.C. = CT ratio (IR + INLR + nIM)
where :IR IM n = = = Relay setting current CT magnetising current (one CT at relay setting voltage) Number of paralleled CTs Non linear resistor current at relay setting voltage
17th March 2007 22

INLR =

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

Primary Operating Current (P.O.C)


The value of primary operating current should be around 30% of minimum fault current available.

This ensures sufficient relay current during internal


fault conditions for high speed operation.

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 23

Through Fault Stability


Busbar protection stability limit is based on maximum through fault current.

Generally this value is derived from the rating of the associated switchgear irrespective of existing fault level, since it can be expected that system can grow

up to limit of rating.

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 24

Check Feature
Provided by duplication of primary protection using second set

of CTs on all circuits other than bus section and coupler units.
Check system forms one zone only, covering whole of busbar systems and not discriminating between faults on various sections.

Zone A

87A

87A

Zone B

Check zone
87A

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 25

CT Wiring Supervision
Open circuit connections between CTs and relay circuit result in unbalance currents which may operate the protection. Supervision is applied by a voltage relay across

differential relay circuit.


Supervision relay is time delayed, gives alarm and also shorts out bus wires to protect differential relay circuit. Typical effective setting is 25 primary amps or 10% of lowest circuit rating, whichever is greater.
2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories 17th March 2007 26

CT Wiring Supervision
I1
CT1 V
Supervision relay

RST

I2 R ZM2 ZM3 ZM4

I3

I4

RR I1

Voltage measured by supervision relay V 1 (R || ZM2 || ZM3 || ZM4 ) If supervision relay setting VSP Out - of - balance current tooperate the supervision relay V V V V SP SP SP SP R ZM2 ZM3 ZM3
2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories 17th March 2007 27

Differential Relay Circuit


A B C N

Zone bus wires

95X 95X 95X

Bus wire short contacts


95

Supervision relay

Non-linear resistors

v
87

v
87

v
87

Stabilizing resistors

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 28

Current Transformer Wiring


Lead burdens between various sets of CTs must be kept

low. Usually bus wires are run in closed ring between


breaker control panels. Typical route is : CTs to marshalling kiosk Marshalling kiosk to isolator auxiliaries Loop between marshalling kiosks Normal conductor size is 2.5mm2
17th March 2007 29

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

Low Impedance Bus Differential


2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories 17th March 2007 30

Low Impedance Busbar Protection


Biased differential characteristics provides stability for through fault. Modular scheme design allows relays to relate to each circuit and function of the protection. Optic inter module communication in numerical relays High sensitivity for phase and earth faults. Protection for each phase can be relatively independent. Earlier schemes were less stable than high impedance schemes. Modern schemes incorporate saturation detectors and are extremely stable.
2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories 17th March 2007 31

Low Impedance Busbar Protection


Current transformers can be :
of different ratio
of relatively small output shared with other protections

Current transformer secondary circuits are not


switched.

CT burden reduced in distributed architecture Continuous supervision of CT circuits and constant monitoring of vital circuits are included.

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 32

Modular Low Impedance Relay Single Bus Protection


Z1 F1 F2 Z2

BS

F3

F4

FM 1

FM 2

BSM

FM 3

FM 4

Z1 ZCK

Z2 ZCK

Z1

ZCK

Z2
17th March 2007 33

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

Modular Low Impedance Relay Double Bus Protection


Z1 Z3 BS Z2 Z4

BC1

F1

F2

F3

F4

BC2

BCM 1
Z1 Z3 ZCK

FM 1

FM 2

BSM

FM 3

FM 4

BCM 2
Z2 Z4 ZCK

Z1

Z3

ZCK

Z2

Z4

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 34

Bus Arrangements
2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories 17th March 2007 35

Effect of C.T. Location on Busbar Protection Performance

Circuit protection

Interlocked over current relay Circuit protection Busbar protection Circuit protection Busbar protection

Busbar protection

Interlocked over current relay All C.T.s on line side of circuit breaker All C.T.s on Busbar side of circuit breaker

Overlapping C.T.s

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 36

Typical Double Busbar Arrangement


60MW Generators 75MVA 132/13.8kV Transformers

132kV

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 37

Zones of Protection for Double Bus Station


Zone G BS Zone H

BC

BC

Zone J

Typical Feeder Circuits


2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories 17th March 2007 38

Isolator Auxiliary Switches


R M A B C D

In order to maintain stability on switching, auxiliary switches should : 1) Close before the isolator
a b c d

closes 2) Open after the isolator opens

r Bus wires

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 39

Tripping Circuits
One trip relay is required for each feeder breaker

Two trip relays for each bus section or bus coupler


breakers.

The trip relays have to be lock-out type (hand reset) Both main and check relays must be energized for the tripping relays to trip all breakers associated with that zone.

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 40

Double Busbar with Transfer Facilities


Main

Reserve / Transfer

By-pass Isolator

By-pass Isolator

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 41

Triple Busbar
Main

Reserve Transfer CB Transfer CB

Transfer

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 42

1 Breaker Scheme
Bus 1

Bus 2
2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories 17th March 2007 43

1 Breaker Bus Protection


87

87

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 44

Mesh Busbar
F1 F3

T1

T3

T4

T2

F4
2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

F2
17th March 2007 45

Mesh Busbar Protection


87 R1

F1

F3

87 R3

T1

T3

T4

T2

87 R4

87 R2

F4
2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

F2
17th March 2007 46

Breaker Failure Protection


2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories 17th March 2007 47

Breaker Fail Protection


Detects failure of a circuit breaker to interrupt the fault current even after the protection relay issues a trip command Where breaker fail protection is applied to a system, back tripping of associated breakers is required in the event of a breaker failure. Often, breaker fail protection is arranged in conjunction with busbar protection tripping circuits to initiate tripping

of breakers on a busbar zone associated with the failed


breaker.
2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories 17th March 2007 48

Breaker Fail Protection


+
Enable PR Trip

Inst. O/C

Td

Breaker Failure Trip Initiation

2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories

17th March 2007 49

Thank you
2007 Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories 17th March 2007 50

Potrebbero piacerti anche