Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Disclaimer: The analysis performed in the following pages is to be considered as opinions expressed by the authors only
Executive Summary
Demographers application of CSR method is invalid CSR approach is inappropriate for cyclical situations Historical data reveals enrollment could be recovering soon Multivariable linear regression may be a more useful tool Data requirements persist to complete analysis Data thus far suggest the risk and cost of being wrong are still too high
2
Outline
Critical review of the Grip report and conclusions Review of cyclicality in enrollment Multivariable linear regression Observations and discussion
Outline
Critical review of the Grip report and conclusions Review of cyclicality in enrollment Multivariable linear regression Observations and discussion
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
...which reflects the major limitations of the CS method for this situation, further exacerbated by its flawed application.
C-SR Method: Start with current enrollments, by grade, then advance students one grade for each year of the forecast. Thus, the current years kindergarteners become next years first graders. The current years first graders become next years second graders, and so on. KG Enrollment Prediction: The cohort survival method needs some way to obtain future kindergarten enrollments. The study done for KLSD assumes that the recent trend in kindergarten enrollments will continue.
Ex: If kindergarten enrollment declined by 5% annually during the last five years, kindergarten enrollment is assumed to continue to decline by 5%. Mr. Grip used a variation. Average 3 years of birth data, used a fixed (1.25x) multiplier based on 6 yr BK ratio taken during the recent downturn of the Great Recession.
Does not consider growth in home sales which is the single biggest source of increased enrollment in KLSD (statistical proof later in this document) Fixed births Fixed birth to survival ratio of 1.25: - B-K survival ratios could not be computed for the entire 20 year period b/c KLSD geocoded data was not available. As a result, Dr. Grip notes he could only use 5 and 6 year averages (p 12, Nov 2013 report). This dramatically skews the forecast downward. Misleading error projections. Claims enrollment can be predicted within 1% for 5 years. Implied suggestion that housing growth, macroeconomic conditions etc are all being predicted to BETTER than 1% for 5 years Very few first principles models in the physical sciences come anywhere near this number, leave alone social sciences
Cannot model human behavior accurately (yet)
C-S method not appropriate for cyclical variations irrespective of size of districts Misunderstood our SAC/HU ratio history has been as high as 1.25 (a fact overlooked by Dr G, but on the BOE website)
Above graph shows the kindergarten trend in the State during the two time periods. Note that kindergarten enrollments were declining during the 1997-2002 period, but rose (swiftly and strongly) during the 2003-2007 period. Continuing the trendunderstated future kindergarten 9 enrollments.
Outline
Critical review of the Grip report and conclusions Review of cyclicality in enrollment Multivariable linear regression Observations and discussion
10
11
1500
1000
Elementary
500
0 1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
12
Based on preliminary data, however, a full history suggests we are in a trough that could be on the verge of recovery
KLSD Elementary Enrollment
2500
Elementary Enrollment
2000
1500
1000
0 1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
Year2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
13
2000
500
1. Chappaqua, 2013: surprise Elementary enrollment increase of 39 students this year (58 total across all grades). Attributed to existing home sales 2. KLSD 1998: Surprise increase of 91 students in grades 1-6 from the prior year's K-5, due to home sales. 3. KLSD 1999: Additional 80 students
14
In a separate study to test whether regression analysis was a better method of prediction than the Cohort-Survival Ratio, Webster (1970) found a regression model to be significantly more accurate than the CSR.
Source: R.S. Grip & J. W. Young, Planning and Changing (1999).
15
Outline
Critical review of the Grip report and conclusions Review of cyclicality in enrollment Multivariable linear regression Observations and discussion
16
18
2500
Enrollment vs Housing
2000
400 350
1500
300 250
500
0 1975
1985
1995
2005
2015
19
2500
2000 1500 1000 500 0 2000 2000 1500 Elementary
Actual
Predicted
Projections
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
Limitations: Fits training data very well if data is linear (R2 ~ 0.9), but Need independent variable trends Accuracy improves with data if cyclicality is considered, need more mathematical rigor (and perhaps use polynomial regression or normalization) Independent variables should not be strongly correlated (sufficient to establish housing and birth rates are not highly correlated) 20
Other notes: FYI - Our SAC/HU ratio history has been as high as 1.25 (a fact overlooked by Dr G, but on the BOE website.). Stock ratio, likely higher for new home sales. Any secular concerns need to be addressed with hard data, not hunches or anecdotes
21
B*
1500
350
Elementary Enrollment 300 Enrollment Enrollment Enrollment Grip Projections Houses Sold
A*
1000
500
100 50
0 1970
Capacity footnotes: Bottom Line (A) 1380 = capacity with all 61 standard classrooms Top line (B) 1440 = capacity in event of unlucky surprise: +60 students, across 3 grades and 2 schools need +6 extra classrooms in 2 schools. Note also violates ideal school size of 400 as shown in literature.
22
Historical data show that home sales rose from 200 to 300 in one year and remained on average above 300 for the next 13 years
23
Simple math and The Perfect Storm (You tell me housing, Ill tell you enrollment)
Additional housing comes on line (Falcon Ridge, Oakridge), housing market recovers, we get a surprise increase K, 1st and 2nd graders, we need 3 extra classrooms at 1, 2, or 3 schools. Class sizes rise from 200 to 300 annually enrollment reaches 1450 in 3 yrs (300 275 250 200 200 200) School size rises above 450+
24
Outline
Critical review of the Grip report and conclusions Review of cyclicality in enrollment Multivariable linear regression Observations and discussion
25
26
Other issues
Slippery slope risk: Need to keep our school system attractive to attract future buyers and keep our community vibrant. MBA 101: Successful businesses maintain and invest in their brands. They are sacred. Impact of school size A survey of the literature shows that 400 students is the ideal school size- could it be that all of our elementary schools were designed with this principle deliberately in mind? Tax cap issues to reopen or grow when necessary Execution risk thoughtful redistricting, physical simulation of bus routes still to be done, as well as many other transition plans
27
Recap
Demographers enrollment projections invalid.
Not appropriate for cyclical situations - ignored housing growth as a key predictor
Our district, like our peers, has cyclic enrollments. We are in a trough, and may be recovering soon.
We showed housing is a strong predictor We built a multi-variable regression model. Predicted the past accurately. Needs work.
In the absence of a credible enrollment forecast, there is no case to close a school. At a minimum, we need more time to study and collect data In a broader sense, even after further analysis, it may not be appropriate to recommend closing a school in a period of cyclical recovery: (Not if, but when) Respectfully submit that in faithfully upholding its stewardship of young children and their education, it is not the province of a school administration (or any of us) to be speculating on the future of housing. We are a school system, not a hedge 28 fund.
Appendix
Claire Aldrich Holds a BA in Economics and Political Science from Yale University and a CFA. Claire has worked as a credit analyst on Wall Street for 30 years. Satya Nitta - Holds a Ph. D in Chemical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Master Inventor at IBM T J Watson Research center. 15 years of experience in Nanoelectronics inventing and developing future chip technologies. Recent focus is on applications of Cognitive Computing.
29
Hypothesis:
Parameters: Cost Function: Goal:
30
J(0,1)
1 0
31
Incorrect:
32