Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Supervised By: Dr. Samantha Thelijjagoda Senior Lecturer Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology, Sri Lanka
To be Covered
Research Topic Introduction Literature Review Research Method Data Analysis and Findings Conclusions and Recommendations
Introduction
Introduction
Traditional Government system E-Government: access to information, transparency Citizens are proficient with Internet E-Government tries to match the private sector Many governments fail to realize users perceptions and expectations Implemented with cost but low adoption
Research Problem Why are the e-Government services in Sri Lanka less adopted by the citizens?
Research Questions
What are the factors influencing citizens adoption of e-Government services in Sri Lanka?
o Is there any relationship between Performance Expectancy and Behavioural Intention to use e-Government services? o Is there any relationship between Effort Expectancy and Behavioural Intention to use e-Government services? o Is there any relationship between Social Influence and Behavioural Intention to use e-Government services? o Is there any relationship between Behavioural Intention and actual Use Behaviour of use e-Government services? o Is there any relationship between Facilitating Conditions and actual Use Behaviour of use e-Government services?
What is the most suitable technology adoption model that depicts the key factors influencing the citizens adoption of e-Government in Sri Lanka?
Thesis Defence: S. Sabraz Nawaz 7
LITERATURE REVIEW
E-Government in Sri Lanka Launching of Lanka Gate; the implementation step of e-SriLanka, 2002 Benefits for citizens of Sri Lanka One computer out of every ten households Computer Literacy 20.3%
10
18
16 14 Desktop PCs in % 12 10 8 2004 2006/07
6
4 2 0 Western 2004 2006/07 2009 8.4 16.4 19 Central 3.3 6.7 9.7 Southern 2.2 4.9 6.6 Eastern 1.2 3.7 5.8 NorthWestern 3.1 4.8 6.9 NorthCentral 1.4 2.7 6.1 Uva 0.4 2.7 4.6 Sabaragam uwa 2 3.3 7.3
2009
Provinces
11
25
20
15
10
0 Western 2006/2007 2009 23.2 27.7 Central 14.8 18 Southern 15.6 19.8 Eastern 11.4 12.9 Provinces NorthWestern 12.6 16.5 NorthCentral 8.9 14.1 Uva 9.9 14.7 Sabaragamu wa 12.3 19.1
12
UN E-Government Survey
In 2012, out of the top 20 world e-government leaders, three are from Asia; Republic of Korea, Singapore, and Japan Asia as a whole has a higher level of e-government the rest of the world
13
14
Current Status
After 30 years old war, country on development track and greater focus on ICT Roughly 3,222,200 Internet
users
Internet Users in Sri Lanka
3500000 3000000 2500000
3,222,200
No. of Users
1776200
428000
2010
2012
Year
But only 19,028 registered users for srilanka.lk as of 01-03-2013 24221 as of 17-11-2013
1,395,660
Thesis Defence: S. Sabraz Nawaz
500,000
15
1,515,720 Now
Dimensions of E-Government
16
MPCU
CTAMTPB
SCT
DOI
MM
TPB TAM
TRA
UTAUT
17
UTAUT Model
18
Unfilled Gap Published researches on the adoption of e-Government (Oman, Qatar, Kuwait Iran, India,
Taiwan, etc.)
19
RESEARCH METHOD
20
21
Behavioural Intention
Use Behaviour Gender Age Education Level Internet Experience
Research Model
23
Hypotheses
H1: There will be a positively significant relationship between Performance Expectancy and Behavioural Intention to use e-Government services, and this relationship will be moderated by Gender, Age, Education Level, and Internet Experience. H2: There will be a positively significant relationship between Effort Expectancy and Behavioural Intention to use e-Government services, and this relationship will be moderated by Gender, Age, Education Level, and Internet Experience.
H3: There will be a positively significant relationship between Social Influence and Behavioural Intention to use e-Government services, and this relationship will be moderated by Gender and Age.
H4: There will be a positively significant relationship between Behavioural Intention and Use Behaviour of e-Government services. H5: There will be a positively significant relationship between Facilitating Conditions and Use Behaviour of e-Government services, and this relationship will be moderated by Age, Education Level, and Internet Experience.
24
25
Performance Expectancy Perceived Usefulness Extrinsic Motivation Job fit Relative Advantage Outcome Expectations
26
Method
Method: Quantitative Study Setting
o Nature: Explanatory o Type of Investigation: Correlational o Extent of Researcher Interference: Field Study (minimal interference) o Setting: Non-Contrived (natural environment) o Time Horizon: Cross-Sectional o Unit of Analysis: Individuals
27
28
29
30
Demographics' Dashboard
Gender
Female 55% Male 45% 51-60 41-50 31-40 26-30 20-25 Below 20 40 278 5 11 73
Age
12
Internet Experience
More than 09 Years 06-09 Years 03-06 Years 01-03 Years Below 01 Year 36 93 115 84 91
Graduates 18%
31
Demographics' Dashboard
Internet Usage Frequency
Less than once a month Once a month Two or Three times a month Once a week Two or Three times a week Daily 9 20 Good 55 Fair 194 Poor 20 93 186 16
Internet Proficiency
Excellent
Very Good 36 84
125
E-Government Usage
Yes 11% No 89%
32
Response by District
63
Galle
Gampaha 3 Hambantota Jaffna Kaluthara Kandy Kegalle Kilinochchi Kuranegala 10 District
21 14
Mannar 00 00
Demographics' Dashboard
Mullaitivu
6 14 22 2 22 Matale Matara Monaragala Nuwara Eliya Polannaruwa Puttalam Ratnapura Trincomalee 3 Vavunia
Frequency
10 9 11 8 6 18 9 22
33
Reliability
>= 0.90 Excellent Reliability 0.70 0.90 High Reliability 0.50 0.70 High Moderate Reliability < = 0.50 Low Reliability Hinton et al. (2004)
Scale Performance Expectancy Effort Expectancy Social Influence Facilitating Conditions Behavioural Intention N of Items 7 6 2 7 2 Cronbachs Alpha 0.697 0.647 0.776 0.777 0.707 Type High Moderate Reliability High Moderate Reliability High Reliability High Reliability High Reliability
34
Factor Analysis
419 responses were taken Factor analysis, a data reduction method Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with the Varimax rotation method Since all constructs already been validated in many contexts individually, factor analysis for each construct individually
35
PE
EE SI FC BI
0.759
0.775 0.651 0.749 0.500
77.136%
68.617% 83.045% 70.171% 79.717%
2
2 1 2 1
Most of the items under each construct earned Communalities above 0.5; which means those items contribute to the variable significantly
36
37
(Cohen, 1988)
Thesis Defence: S. Sabraz Nawaz
38
Model 1
R .863a
75% of the variance in BI can be R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the accounted for by the R Square Square Estimate of PE Change knowledge
.745 .744 .536 .745
Change Statistics Sig. F F Change 713.548 df1 1 df2 244 Change .000
a. Predictors: (Constant), PE Table 4.27: Performance Expectancy and Behavioural Intention: ANOVAa Model 1 Regression Residual Total Sum of Squares 205.294 70.201 275.495 df 1 244 245 Good model; < .001 chance of Type I error Mean Square 205.294 .288 F 713.548 Sig. .000b
a. Dependent Variable: BI, b. Predictors: (Constant), PE Table 4.28: Performance Expectancy and Behavioural Intention: Coefficients Unstandardized Coefficients Model 1 (Constant) PE
Thesis Defence: S. Sabraz Nawaz
t 1.712
B .059 1.295
.863
26.712
a. Dependent Variable: BI
PE and BI:
BI = 0.059 + 1.295 PE
Moderated by Gender
BI = 0.299 + 1.22 PE - 0.154 Gender
Moderated by Age
BI = 0.238 + 1.16 PE - 0.0687 Age
Moderated by Education
BI = - 0.476 + 0.638 PE + 0.128 Education + 0.124 PExEducation
40
Moderate Correlation
41
Model
R Square
Square
23% of the variance in BI can be R Square Std. Error of the accounted for by the Estimate knowledge of EEChange
.94850738 .234
Change Statistics
Change
.484a
.234
.232
106.514
348
.000
a. Predictors: (Constant), EE Table 4.31: Effort Expectancy and Behavioural Intention: Model ANOVAa df
Regression
Residual Total
95.827
313.084 408.911
1
348 349
95.827
.900
106.514
.000b
a. Dependent Variable: BI b. Predictors: (Constant), EE Table 4.32: Effort Expectancy and Behavioural Intention: Coefficients
p > 0.05
Standardized Coefficients Beta -.800 .484 10.321 .424 .000
42
Unstandardized Coefficients
Model 1 (Constant) EE a. Dependent Variable: BI
Thesis Defence: S. Sabraz Nawaz
Sig.
B -.041 .741
EE and BI
BI = 0.741 EE
Moderated by Gender
BI = 0.666 + 0.477 EE - 0.451 Gender
Moderated by Age
BI = 0.478 + 0.432 EE - 0.204 Age
43
44
Model 1
R .605a
R Square .366
37% of the variance in BI can be Adjusted R Std. Error of R Square accounted for by the Square knowledge the Estimate of SI Change
.364 .83284403 .366
Change Statistics Sig. F F Change 220.371 df1 1 df2 382 Change .000
a. Predictors: (Constant), SI Table 4.35: Social Influence and Behavioural Intention: ANOVAa Model 1 Regression Residual Total Sum of Squares 152.856 264.966 417.822 df 1 382 383 Good model; < .001 chance of Type I error Mean Square 152.856 .694 F 220.371 Sig. .000b
a. Dependent Variable: BI, b. Predictors: (Constant), SI Table 4.36: Social Influence and Behavioural Intention: Coefficients Standardized Unstandardized Coefficients Model 1 (Constant) SI
Thesis Defence: S. Sabraz Nawaz
p > 0.05
Coefficients Beta
Sig.
B .006 .632
.884 .000
45
a. Dependent Variable: BI
SI and BI
BI = 0.632 SI
Moderated by Gender
BI = 0.513 + 0.492 SI - 0.322 Gender
Moderated by Age
BI = 0.471 + 0.611 SI - 0.182 Age
46
Table 4.38: Model Summary: BI and UB Step 1 -2 Log likelihood 153.273a Cox & Snell R Square .293 Nagelkerke R Square .574
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 8 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001. Table 4.39: Hosmer and Lemeshow Test: BI and UB Step 1 Chi-square .965 df 5 Sig. .965
Table 4.40: Classification Table: BI and UB Predicted eGovUse Observed Step 1 eGovUse No No 341 Yes 30 Percentage Correct 91.9
Yes
Overall Percentage a. The cut value is .500 Thesis Defence: S. Sabraz Nawaz
41
85.4
91.2
91.2% of the categories are predicted by the model so more than 91% of the outcome are correctly predicted
47
48
Model is insignificant
49
Response to Hypotheses
No. Research Hypotheses There will be a positively significant relationship between Performance Expectancy Results
H1:
and Behavioural Intention to use e-Government services, and this relationship will
be moderated by Gender, Age, Education Level, and Internet Experience. There will be a positively significant relationship between Effort Expectancy and
Supported
H2:
Behavioural Intention to use e-Government services, and this relationship will be moderated by Gender, Age, Education Level, and Internet Experience. There will be a positively significant relationship between Social Influence and
Supported
H3:
Behavioural Intention to use e-Government services, and this relationship will be moderated by Gender and Age. There will be a positively significant relationship between Behavioural Intention
Supported
H4:
Supported
H5:
and Use Behaviour of e-Government services, and this relationship will be moderated by Age, Education Level, and Internet Experience.
Not Supported
50
51
52
Significance
Generalizability
Consistent with UTAUT AlAwadhi and Morris (2008) in Kuwat Al-Shafi and Weerakkody (2010) in Qatar Ahmad et al (2012) in Pakistan Nawaz and Thelijjagoda (2013) in Sri Lanka. Consistent with UTAUT AlAwadhi and Morris (2008) in Kuwat Al-Shafi and Weerakkody (2010) in Qatar Ahmad et al. (2012) in Pakistan Nawaz and Thelijjagoda (2013) in Sri Lanka Consistent with UTAUT AlAwadhi and Morris (2008) in Kuwat Al-Shafi and Weerakkody (2010) in Qatar Ahmad et al. (2012) in Pakistan Nawaz and Thelijjagoda (2013) in Sri Lanka
Yes
Effort Expectancy
Yes
Social Influence
Yes
Facilitating Conditions
No
Not in agreement with UTAUT and AlAwadhi and Morris (2008) in Kuwat But in agreement with Al-Shafi and Weerakkody (2010) in Qatar & Ahmad et al. (2012) in Pakistan
Behavioural Intention
Yes
Consistent with UTAUT AlAwadhi and Morris (2008) in Kuwat Al-Shafi and Weerakkody (2010) in Qatar Ahmad et al. (2012) in Pakistan Nawaz and Thelijjagoda (2013) in Sri Lanka
53
Thesis Defence: S. Sabraz Nawaz Gender, Age, Education Level and Internet Experience have moderating effects on the relationship between DVs and IVs
54
What is the most suitable technology adoption model that depicts the key factors influencing the citizens adoption of e-Government in Sri Lanka?
Thesis Defence: S. Sabraz Nawaz
55
56
Recommendations
Government should diffuse (promote) this innovation Awareness for millions of government servants and also make some services (such as salary and pension details) available at the Portal User-friendly, transparent & valuable services made available Awareness at O/L and A/Ls Awareness at HE institutions DoEs results to be published via Gov. Portal at least for 5 years Nenasalas extended & upgraded to improve IT skills
Research Limitation
Time Adoption-side only No sampling frame All computer literate citizens could not be included Less email address available, social network sites blocked, etc.
58
59
60
62