Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Prof. V.K. Gupta Department of Biochemistry Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra (For Biosym 2013 Murthal)
Introduction
Enzymatic processes are generally preferred over Chemical methods in laboratories and industries mainly because these are: highly specific (no bye products formed) environment friendly mild reaction conditions India imports about 70% of the total enzyme consumption. Major industrial enzymes are protease, - amylase, xylanase, lipase, cellulase, penicillin acylase, laccase, glucose isomerase, tannase, pectinase, phytase, etc. The blooming industrial enzyme market is one of the major revenue generators in the life sciences industry sector
The world market for enzymes is estimated to grow 8% per year to eight billion dollar in 2013. According to Global Industry Analysts Inc., the global market for enzymes is expected to reach 4.3 US billion dollar by the year 2015
Lipases
Lipases (triacylglycerol acylhydrolase; EC 3.1.1.3) comprise a group of hydrolytic enzymes which catalyze reversibly the hydrolysis and synthesis of triacylglycerols at the oil-water interface
Lipases catalyze the hydrolysis of long chain acylglycerol at an oil- water interface are highly diversified in enzymatic properties and substrate specificity can also catalyze esterification, interesterification, and transesterification reactions in non-aqueous media to synthesize a growing range of products of potential industrial interest reactions usually proceed with high chemo-, regio- and/or enantioselectivity, making lipases an important group of biocatalysts
Microbial lipases are commercially significant because of: great variety of catalytic activities available high yields possible ease of genetic manipulation regular supply due to absence of seasonal fluctuations and rapid
Kitchen waste
Dairy waste
Identification of culture
Plated on Nutrient agar medium
Selection of bacteria for producing largest zone of hydrolysis & highest Lipase activity
Electron microscopy
Zone of hydrolysis on TBA
Culture (DVL-2) was identified as Bacillus sp. DVL-2
16 S rDNA sequencing
Consensus Sequence DVL-2 (1406 bp) GAGCAGGACAGAAGGGAGCTTGCTCCCGTGATGTTAGCGGCGGACGGGTGAGTAACACG TGGGTAACCTGCCTGTAAGACTGGGATAACTCCGGGAAACCGGAGCTAATACCGGATAGTTCCTT GAACCGCATGGTTCAAGGATGAAAGACGGTTTCGGCTGTCACTTACAGATGGACCCGCGGCGCAT TAGCTAGTTGGTGGGGTAATGGCTCACCAAGGCGACGATGCGTAGCCGACCTGAGAGGGTGATC GGCCACACTGGGACTGAGACACGGCCCAGACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAGTAGGGAATCTTCCGCA ATGGACGAAAGTCTGACGGAGCAACGCCGCGTGAGTGATGAAGGTTTTCGGATCGTAAAGCTCT GTTGTTAGGGAAGAACAAGTGCGAGAGTAACTGCTCGCACCTTGACGGTACCTAACCAGAAAGC CACGGCTAACTACGTGCCAGCAGCCGCGGTAATACGTAGGTGGCAAGCGTTGTCCGGAATTATTG GGCGTAAAGGGCTCGCAGGCGGTTTCTTAAGTCTGATGTGAAAGCCCCCGGCTCAACCGGGGAGG GTCATTGGAAACTGGGAAACTTGAGTGCAGAAGAGGAGAGTGGAATTCCACGTGTAGCGGTGAA ATGCGTAGAGATGTGGAGGAACACCAGTGGCGAAGGCGACTCTCTGGTCTGTAACTGACGCTGA GGAGCGAAAGCGTGGGGAGCGAACAGGATTAGATACCCTGGTAGTCCACGCCGTAAACGATGAG TGCTAAGTGTTAGGGGGTTTCCGCCCCTTAGTGCTGCAGCTAACGCATTAAGCACTCCGCCTGGG GAGTACGGTCGCAAGACTGAAACTCAAAGGAATTGACGGGGGCCCGCACAAGCGGTGGAGCATG TGGTTTAATTCGAAGCAACGCGAAGAACCTTACCAGGTCTTGACATCCTCTGACAACCCTAGAGA TAGGGCTTTCCCTTCGGGGACAGAGTGACAGGTGGTGCATGGTTGTCGTCAGCTCGTGTCGTGAG ATGTTGGGTTAAGTCCCGCAACGAGCGCAACCCTTGATCTTAGTTGCCAGCATTCAGTTGGGCAC TCTAAGGTGACTGCCGGTGACAAACCGGAGGAAGGTGGGGATGACGTCAAATCATCATGCCCCTT ATGACCTGGGCTACACACGTGCTACAATGGACAGAACAAAGGGCTGCAAGACCGCAAGGTTTAG CCAATCCCATAAATCTGTTCTCAGTTCGGATCGCAGTCTGCAACTCGACTGCGTGAAGCTGGAAT CGCTAGTAATCGCGGATCAGCATGCCGCGGTGAATACGTTCCCGGGCCTTGTACACACCGCCCGT CACACCACGAGAGTTTGCAACACCCGAAGTCGGTGAGGTAACCTATTATGGTAGC.
Lipase assay
Titrimetric method using tributyrin as substrate
Spectrophotometric method using pNitrophenyl palmitate as substrate
Purification
Bacillus sp. DVL-2 cells were grown under
optimized SmF
Cell free extract (CFE) was obtained after sonication of the bacterial cells
The enzyme was purified in two steps : Ammonium sulfate fractionation HIC using Phenyl Sepharose CL-4B.
Most of activity was recovered in 30-70 % fraction and was loaded Phenyl Sepharose CL-4B column
Elution profile of Bacillus sp. DVL-2 lipase through Phenyl sepharose CL-4B column
Determination of MW by SDS-PAGE
(a)
(b) (c) (d) (e)
(f)
(g)
Temperature optima
Temperature optima : 30 C
Enz was pre-incubating at different temperatures for 2 h and then lipase activity was determined DVL-2 lipase was most stable at 30-37 C retaining nearly 100 % of activity even after 2 h of incubation .
pH optima
Maximum lipase activity was observed over a broad pH range (6.0 to 10.0) with a slightly higher activity at pH 8.0. So its pH optimum was considered as 8.0.
To find out pH optima lipase assay was carried out at different assay pH
pH stability
The pH stability of the purified enzyme was investigated by pre-incubating it with buffers of varying pH (3.0-12.0) for different time intervals (30-240 min) Residual enzyme activity was calculated with respect to that of the control in which buffer was replaced by distilled water. The lipase purified from Bacillus sp. DVL-2 showed stability over a wide pH range (6.0-10.0).
The DVL-2 lipase was found to be 100% stable in xylene, methanol, ethanol, toluene, hexane and DMSO after 12 h of incubation showing residual activity of 112, 104,101, 114, 99.2 and 101 % respectively as compared to control. In xylene and toluene, the enhanced lipase activity might be due to their activating effect. After 24 h of incubation, relative activity of the lipase in xylene, toluene, and DMSO was >90 %, in methanol (88.2 %), ethanol (82.1 %) and hexane (72.3 %). The DVL-2 lipase retained >70% of lipase activity in DMSO, toluene, and xylene even after 36 h of incubation. The DVL-2 lipase was found most stable in DMSO followed by toluene, xylene methanol and ethanol.
Anionic detergents such as deoxycholic acid, sodium deoxycholate, cholic acid and lithocholic acid were found to stimulate the lipase activity by 23%, 20%, 17% and 7% respectively whereas sodium taurocholate and SDS inhibited the lipase activity by 12% and 38% respectively. Among the non-ionic detergents, Brij 52 had a slight stimulatory effect (5%) whereas Brij 96 and Brij 58 inhibited the lipase activity by 12% and 17% respectively.
120 107 98 99
123
117 99 105 83 89 88
62
To determine the storage stability of the purified lipase, the enzyme was stored at 4 C and samples were collected at 15 days intervals for determination of lipase activity. Residual enzyme activity (%) was calculated by taking lipase activity of 0 time as 100 %.
0
0 15 30 Days 45 60
TLC showing esterification of oleic acid and ethanol using DVL-2 lipase
Ethyl oleate
Oleic acid
S: substrate (oleic acid) D: Reaction with enzyme C: Cospot (S+D), E+D (Enzyme + reaction) E+S (Enzyme + Substrate)
28
1H
5.38-5.30 (m, 2H), 4.11 (q, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.28 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.05-2.00 (m, 3H), 1.62-1.56 (m, 6H), 1.30-1.24 (m, 20H), 0.89 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H).
29
Ethyl - Palmitate
Palmitic acid
R C
TLC showing esterification of Palmitic acid where S: substrate; R: Reaction with enzyme S: Substrate; R: Reaction mixture; C: Co-spot DVL-2; C: Cospot
30
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) 4.12 (q, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.28 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.67-1.58 (m, 2H), 1.30-1.24 (m, 27H), 0.88 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H). GC-MS
31
GC-MS of Ethyl-palmitate
32
Ethyl stearate
Substrate
S
33
Ethyl stearate
CDCl3): 4.12 (q, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.28 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.62-1.58 (m, 2H), 1.28-1.24 (m, 31H), 0.89 (t, J1H-NMR of ethyl stearate 1H NMR (Fig. 4.5.9) confirmed the formation of ethyl-stearate is interpreted as: 1H NMR (500 MHz, =7.1 Hz, 3H).
34
TLC showing esterification of lauric acid and ethanol using DVL-2 lipase
1H-NMR
of ethyl laurate
1H
1H
NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 4.12 (q, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.28 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.62-1.58 (m, 2H), 1.281.24 (m, 31H), 0.89 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H).
36
Purified DVL-2 lipase was immobilized on glutaraldehyde activated aluminum oxide pellets Immobilization parameters statistically optimized using RSM number of pellets enzyme dose glutaraldehyde concentration and coupling time
Response surface plots showing cumulative effect of two variables on the immobilization of lipase while keeping other variables at 0 level Variables: A =number of beads; B =glutaraldehyde concentration; C =enzyme dose ; D = incubation period (a) interaction between factors A and B; (b) factors C and A; (c) factors C and B; (d) factors D and B ; (e) Perturbation graph showing the effect of variables on immobilization yield
The immobilized lipase showed better stability than free enzyme in organic solvents
The immobilized lipase was found to be 100% stable in xylene, ethanol, methanol, toluene and hexane after 12 h of incubation. The stability in these solvents though declined after 24 h incubation as compared to 12 h yet the relative activity was greater than 90 %, except methanol (80 %)
Esterification of oleic acid and ethanol in hexane to produce ethyl oleate by the free (solid circle) and immobilized lipase (hollow circle)