Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
David Weston - Clockwork Tony Gramelspacher Anhueuser-Busch Marcel Landry New Brunswick Power William Reilly - IBM
A M E R I C A S
S A P
U S E R S
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
Copyright 2000
WORKITEM
Data
Programs
2000 ASUG Business Workflow Fall Meeting
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
Application Server
Tape
Database
Storage System
SAP System
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
Copyright 2000
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
Copyright 2000
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
Copyright 2000
Customizing in SARA
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
DB Tables (DB15)
Which archiving object(s) for selected DB table(s)?
Copyright 2000
Copyright 2000
General Rules
The system archives all data that belongs to a work item and that is not purely runtime data. Work items should not be archived without an application reference. Therefore, in a production system not only the work items but also the application archiving objects associated with these work items should be archived. The data archived includes log data, workflow manager data, and work items that depend on another work item (for example, the work items in a workflow or the lines of a work queue). The objects in the container of a work item are archived as references only. The same applies to the work item attachments. The attachments themselves are not archived because attachments can be objects outside R/3, such as Microsoft Word files. Archiving is not currently supported for such data. When the archived work items are deleted, the attachments (not archived) are also deleted. You can only archive work items that have one of the following statuses: Completed Logically deleted (cancelled)
2000 ASUG Business Workflow Fall Meeting
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
SAPNet Notes
49545 - Deleting unnecessary work items 67366 - Deletion of work items is incomplete 76431 - Measures for optimizing the upgrade runtime 4.x 117191 - Work item log is not deleted from archiving 126678 - Archiving or deleting work items type C 133943 - Update termination when deleting a work item 145291 - Performance of deletion from archive file 149367 - IDoc: Link and archiving 153205 - Direct deletion of type C work items 159065 - Data selection for work item archiving 180683 - Work items in Subworkflows are not deleted 182204 - Short dump when archiving work items See also the standard upgrade notes in application area BC-UPG-RDM
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
Copyright 2000
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
Copyright 2000
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
Copyright 2000
Copyright 2000
Copyright 2000
Copyright 2000
Copyright 2000
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
Environment at NB Power
Electric Utility: 300,000 customers. 1997 - SAP R/3 Rel 4.0B FI/CO/MM/SD (No Workflow). 1999 - IS-U/CCS 1.2 Add-on module + workflows. OS / DB: Windows NT / Microsoft SQL Server Users: 900+ Majority of workflows originate from IS-U/CCS module. Average volume: 2000 new workflows / day. First archiving exercise almost one year after go live.
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
Issues Encountered
Workflow and container tables growing at rapid pace. WF Table monitoring (swuf) showing yellow lights on most tables. Neglect - Always saw archiving as something to do later No policy in place for WIs - had to fast track our approach. Ownership of WF data not well defined. Archiving misunderstood by client - actually purging. Client concerned about impact on WIS. Large volume of stale workitems in place as a result of initial data creation. Had used WI deletion program to manage size of WF inbox Ooops!
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
Preparation / Testing
Applied OSS notes to improve archiving performance. Educated client on WI log data and its usage - not impacted. No business documents removed as result of WI archiving. Enabled security for object Workitem only. Confirmed that WIS in not impacted by archiving - tested in DEV environment. Agreed on data retention period of 8 weeks from completion date. (client uses WF logs for investigation of WF errors) Volume tested on QA system (Prod Copy) - measured performance. Ensured that enough space was available for creation and storage of archive files.
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
Archiving being done manually bi-monthly. Have report to change status of stale WI to cancelled Will allow archiving to pick up old items.. Setting-up batch job for archiving on weekly basis - small volumes. Planning the removal of Type C workitems. Developing strategy for archiving of IDOCS.
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000
Thanks !
O c t o b e r 2 5 2 7 , 2 0 0 0
Copyright 2000